:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童對「我的敵人」意象之研究
書刊名:嘉南學報
作者:葉郁菁
作者(外文):Yeh, Yu-ching
出版日期:1999
卷期:25
頁次:頁228-238
主題關鍵詞:兒童敵意國小學童學習壓力性別隔離Images on "enemies"Primary school pupilsLearning pressureGender segregation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:12
     本研究主要探討國小三年級學童對「敵人」意象認知的類型與意涵。過去學者認 為課程中傳遞的「反共復國」的敵我意識為潛在課程的一部分,但學者並末提出確切的證據 證實潛在課程如何影響學童的認知。 研究者分析了六十六位學童的作文,並歸納出國小學童認知的「敵人」類型主要有三大 類別:自然界的事物或現象,如蟑螂、鬼;學校內的人事物,如同學、功課:與生活相關的人事 物,如醫生或兄弟姊妹。 國小學童認知的敵人意涵以與他們切身相關的議題為主,多數學童認為粗心或懶惰是他 們最大的敵人,此現象反應了目前國小學童可能面臨的課業壓力。而另一個有趣的現象是, 國小學童將班上不同性別的男女生視為自己的敵人,反應出國小學童間性別的現象仍然存在。 雖然學者認為課程中的反共意識將影響學童對敵人的認知,但是從本研究的分析中,僅 有少數學童提及他們的敵人是日本人,課程中的政治意識型態對學童造成的潛在影響仍值得 進一步探討。其次,學者建議具有敵意的人通常也有厭惡他人或傷害他人的人格特質,但是 從國小學童認知的「敵人」意象分析中,無法證實具有敵意的人必然有傷害他人的傾向,這 可能與國小學童認知的敵人類型有關,本研究中國小學童認知的敵人類型為造成他們壓力、 恐懼或不愉快的事物。第三,雖然國小學童覺察老師對他們學習成果不理想採取各種嚴厲的 方式,但是卻沒有國小學童將老師視為敵人,相反地,他們認為應該聽從老師的話,才能在 課業上有所進步。 最後,研究者建議應在正式課程中融入和平教育的議題,國小教師應理解學童認知的敵 人與學校中衝突可能產生的形式,教導學生如何紓解課業的壓力、並減少與同性或異性同儕 之間的衝突對立。
     The research focused on the primary school children�s images on enemies. The 'anti-China' ideology was considered to be one type of hidden curriculum which may cause impact on children's recognition of 'enemies' However, this research will explore whether the Taiwanese children recognise 'china' as their enemies. Sixty-six pupils' articles titled "My Enemies" were analysed and three main categories were generated: the objects or phenomenon in the nature, such as ghost; people or events in school, such as classmates or homework; people or events related to their personal life, such as doctors or brother-and-sister. Most pupils considered laziness or carelessness is their biggest enemies. It reflected the possible learning pressure the pupils may confront. Besides, primary school pupils also think the classmates of the opposite sex were their enemies. It showed that gender segregation still exists among primary school pupils. Although 'anti-China' ideology was considered to influence pupils' images on enemies, it was not supported in this research. Nevertheless, only few pupils mentioned that Japanese were 'enemies'. Hence, it may need a further study to support similar statements. Puils' images on enemies tended to be someone or somenon they dislike, frighten, or reel unpleasant. However, the pupils would not try to 'destroy' them. Even though pupils recognised that the teachers look many strict ways to promote their grades, no pupils would consider their teachers to be 'enemies'. On the contrary, they thought they should listen to their teachers in order to imiprove their grades. The researcher suggested that peace education should be included into the formal curriculum. Primary school teachers need to recognise pupils' images on enemies and the possible conflict among pupils. They could teach pupils how to release their learning pressure, and try to teach them how to reduce the conflict among pupils.
期刊論文
1.林一真(19931200)。兒童敵意、A型人格和身心適應。中華輔導學報,1,25-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葉郁菁(19940800)。英國小學兒童性別認同差異之個案研究。初等教育學報,7,311-334。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林一真(19930100)。兒童敵意量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊,40,53-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳明隆(19960100)。國小學生學習壓力、學業成就與其社會心理變因關係之研究。教育資料與研究,8,67-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.畢恆達(1998)。讓女生重返運動場。張老師月刊,72-77。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bernat, V.(1993)。Teaching Peace。Young Children,48(3),36-39。  new window
7.Buzzelli, C. A.、File, N.(1989)。Building Trust in Friends。Young Children,44(3),70-75。  new window
8.Carlsson-Paige, N.、Levin, D. E.(1992)。Making Peace in Violent Times; A Constructivist Approach to Conflict Resolution。Young Children,48(1),4-13。  new window
9.Kemple, K. M.(1991)。Preschool Children's Peer Acceptance and Social Interaction。Young Children,46,47-54。  new window
10.Luke, J. L.、Myers, C. M.(1995)。Toward Peace: Using Literature to Aid Conflict Resolution。Childhood Education,71(2),66-69。  new window
會議論文
1.Stomfay-Stitz, A. M.、Hinitz, B. F.(1996)。Integration of Peace Education into Multicultural Education/ Global Education。The Annual conference of the American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: 1996/04/08-12)。New York。  new window
學位論文
1.Yeh, Yu-ching(1996)。From Probationers to Professionals: A Study of First-Year Primary School Teachers in Taiwan(博士論文)。University of York。  new window
圖書
1.黃志成、王淑芬(1995)。幼兒的發展與輔導。台北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Papalia, D. E.、Olds, S. W.、黃慧真(1996)。發展心理學--人類發展。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.Newman, Philip、Newman, Barbara、郭靜晃、吳幸玲(1993)。兒童發展。台北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊瑩(1994)。教育與國家發展--台灣經驗。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
5.Adams, H.(1994)。Peace in the Classroom: Practical Lessons in Living for Elementary-Age Children。Manitoba:Peguis。  new window
6.Burgess, R. G.(1984)。In the Field。London:Routledge。  new window
7.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquire。Sage。  new window
8.Hammersley, M.(1992)。What's Wrong with Ethnography?。Routledge。  new window
9.Lloyd, B.、Duveen, G.(1992)。Gender Identities and Education。London:Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
10.Scott, C. C.(1997)。Managing Diversity-Based Conflicts among Children。Bloomington:Phi Delta Kappa。  new window
11.洪鐮德(1998)。21世紀社會學。台北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Hutchinson, F.(1996)。Building Alternatives to Violence. Are There Needs and Opportunities for Teachers and Teacher Educators To Be Practical Futurists? Peace Education Miniprints No. 85(ED 416130)。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳伯璋(1993)。另一場意識型態的戰爭--國中教育的迷思。意識型態與教育。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐用生(1993)。國民小學價值教學的困境。意識型態與教育。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE