:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從兒童畫中分析國小學童性別角色之認同
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:葉郁菁 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Yu-ching
出版日期:2001
卷期:14
頁次:頁259-292
主題關鍵詞:性別認同性別刻板印象性別差異城鄉差異兒童畫Gender identityGensder stereotypesChildren's drawings
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:106
  • 點閱點閱:36
     兒童的性別角色認同,除了存在生理遺傳的基本差異,還包括後天環境的學習與影響。本研究主要探討國小學童的性別角色認同,分析兒童眼中的自己、兒童認為的父母形象、兒童畫中出現的家庭活動。 研究者選取臺南縣市國民小學各一所,以二、四、六年級學童為對象,請他們以「我的家庭」為題做畫。研究者分析了219位城市與鄉村地區學童的兒童畫。得到以下主要結論: 一、樣式化期與幫群期兒童對性別認同具有階段性發展: 1. 對家庭活動的描繪,隨年齡增長逐漸減少全家共同參與的活動。 2. 對男女性別認同由強調服裝(裙子或褲子)與頭髮長短等外表特徵到強調男性化或女性化態度的差異。 3. 低年級兒童對父母親形象仍保持傳統觀念並具有強烈的性別刻板印象,但中高年級學童對父母的形象則較多樣化。 二、學童的性別角色認同的性別差異較過去的研究結果更為複雜 1. 女童所畫的家庭活動以室內、居家為主,男童所畫的家庭活動以戶外為主,反映了女性化行為與男性化行為的特質。 2. 女童反而比男童更常描繪母親從事家務工作,可能與社會化過程中女性較易接受社會規範有關。 3. 兒童畫中的女性玩玩具槍、玩電腦,但是具有女性化特徵的遊戲卻只有女性從事。而且高年級的女童描繪的女性多半從事家務工作。 三、城鄉差異反應了兒童接觸的性別價值不同、提供的角色模範(role model)不同。 1. 都市地區兒童所畫的家庭活動多半以室內較多,但鄉村地區的兒童所畫的家庭活動則較有變化。 2. 都市地區學童所觀察到的性別角色模範是父母親分擔家務工作,因此出現爸爸煮飯、媽媽睡覺等與傳統性別角色不同的作品;但是在鄉村地區則男女的性別分工明顯,女性多半為家務工作的服務者。
     The aim of this study was to explore the gender identity of primary school pupils by analysing their drawings. The researcher explored how children drew themselves, their parents, and the family activities they involved with. Two hundred and nineteen pupils' drawings along with articles describing content were collected. The pupils were Year 2, 4, and 6 (age 8, 10, and 12). These drawings were analysed according to the styles of family activities, their family members, the images of their parents, pupils themselves, and other family members including brothers and sisters and grandparents. The researcher concluded that the pupils' gender identities followed the periodic development. Pupils' drawings showed that the senior pupils less participated in family activities because they may identity with their peer groups instead of their parents. Besides, the symbolization of gender developed from an emphasis of appearance, such as dressing and length of hair, to the weight of the masculine and feminine characters. Both Year 2 and Year 6 pupils identified with the traditional male and female roles, whereas the Year 4 pupils had a variety of descriptions of different gender images. The previous researchers argued that girls could be more critical about their traditional roles. The finding of this research, on the contrary, suggested that girls tended to accept their traditional gender model easily than the boys. It could because that the girls tended to accept traditional gender values embodied in socialisation. Another finding could be generated from this research that gender boundaries tended to be more influential on the boys than the girls. Although both girls and boys drew themselves playing guns or computers, only girls participated the feminine activities such as playing dolls, or caring babies at home. This research provided a beginning for the similar researches, and furthermore, to localize the related theories, no matter examining existing models or constructing a domestic one.
期刊論文
1.卓紋君、陳瑤惠(19991100)。兒童的家庭動力畫(KFD)與其親子關係及社會行為之研究。嘉義師院學報,13,1-23。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂燕卿(19960300)。兒童繪畫發展之認識與實際。美育,69,11-26。  延伸查詢new window
3.范瓊方(19980600)。藝術教育與藝術治療的比較。美育,96,25-34。  延伸查詢new window
4.林玉山(19930400)。葛德納兒童繪畫發展研究與認知發展之探討。國教月刊,39(7/8),60-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳麗卒(19981100)。Children's Drawings of a House: Concept Formation and Socio-Culture-Environmental Contextualization。嘉義師院學報,12,269-287。  new window
6.陳慶福(19870600)。幫群期兒童畫特徵之探討。國教世紀,22(6),61-64+。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉郁菁(19940800)。英國小學兒童性別認同差異之個案研究。初等教育學報,7,311-334。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Cahill, B. J.、Theilheimer. R.(1999)。Helping kids (and teachers) not to hate。The Education Digest,65(4),50-56。  new window
9.Cohen, O.、Ronen, T.(1999)。Young children's adjustment to their parents' divorce as reflected in their drawings。Journal of Divorce and Remarriage,30(1-2),47-70。  new window
10.Henshaw, A.(1992)。Skipping's for girls: children's perceptions of gender roles and gender preferences。Educational Research,34(3),229-235。  new window
11.Lev-Wiesel, R.、Al-Krenawi, A.(2000)。Perception of family among Bedouin-Arab children of polygamous families as reflected in their family drawings。American Journal of Art Therapy,38(4),98-109。  new window
12.Taylor, M. T.、Mardle, G. D.(1986)。Pupils' attitude towards gender roles。Educational Research,28(3),202-209。  new window
13.Tuman, D. M.(1999)。Gender styles as form and content: An examination of gender stereotypes in the subject preference of children's drawing。Studies in Art Education,41(1),40-51。  new window
14.李靜芳(19921200)。兒童繪畫的探討。現代美術,45,60-63。  延伸查詢new window
15.范瓊方(19950600)。藝術治療在幼兒教育上的運用。國教月刊,41(9/10),32-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳瓊花(19971100)。再從兒童繪畫表現,探討地區性的差異與特質--臺北市與金門縣小學五年級的學童如何畫「我未來的家庭」。美育,89,37-48。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉焜輝(19940600)。藝術治療。諮商與輔導,102,26-31。  延伸查詢new window
18.賴念華(19960800)。簡介藝術治療及其特色。中等教育,47(4),24-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Yeh, Yu-ching(1993)。Gender Differences in a Junior School: A Case Study(碩士論文)。University of York。  new window
圖書
1.Cohen, L.、Manion, L.(1989)。Research methods in education。Routledge。  new window
2.Golombok, S.、Fivush, R.(1994)。Gender development。N.Y.。  new window
3.Burgess, R. G.(1984)。In the field: An introduction to field research。London:Routledge。  new window
4.劉秀娟(1998)。兩性關係與教育。台北市:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Smith, Charles A.、呂翠夏(1998)。兒童的社會發展--策略與活動。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃慧真(1998)。兒童發展。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
7.Best, J.(1994)。Troubling Children: Studies of Children and Social Problems。New York:Aldine De Gruyter。  new window
8.Delamont, S.(1980)。The Sociology of Women。London:George Allen and Unwin。  new window
9.Delamont, Sara(1990)。Sex Roles and the School。London:Routeldge。  new window
10.Duncan, W. A.(1989)。Engendering School Learning。Stockholm:Institute of International Education, University of Stockholm。  new window
11.Goodenough, F.(1926)。Measuring of Intelligence by Drawing。New York:World Book Company。  new window
12.Pearson, J. C.(1985)。Gender and Communication。Dubuque:Wm. C. Brown Publishers。  new window
13.Simon, R. M.(1997)。Symbolic Images in Art As Therapy。London:Routledge。  new window
14.范瓊方(19960000)。幼兒繪畫心理分析與輔導:家庭動力繪畫的探討。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Erwin, P.、黃牧仁(1999)。兒童到青少年期的友誼發展。臺北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
16.Rosal, Marcia L.、陸雅青(1997)。兒童藝術治療。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.Askew, S.、Ross, C.(1988)。Boys Don't Cry。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
18.Deem, Rosemary(1978)。Women and schooling。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
19.陸雅青(20000000)。藝術治療團體實務研究:以破碎家庭兒童為例。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陸雅青(1993)。藝術治療:繪畫詮釋--從美術進入孩子的心靈世界。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gardner, H.、Davis, J.(1992)。The cognitive revolution: Consequences for the understanding and education of the child as artist。The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Lowe, K.(1998)。Gendermaps。Gender in early childhood。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
3.葉郁菁(2001)。第四章 嬰幼兒期。人類發展。台北:永大。  延伸查詢new window
4.Arnot, M.(1984)。How shall we educate our sons?。Coeducation Reconsidered。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
5.Fuller, M.(1984)。Dimensions of gender in a school: reinventing the wheel?。The Research Process in Educational Settings。London:Falmer。  new window
6.White, M.(1998)。'The pink's run out!' The place of artmaking in young children's construction of the gendered self。Gender in Early Childhood。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE