臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國聯邦最高法院與就業歧視問題-
作者：焦興鎧
書刊名：勞工法與勞工權利之保障：美國勞工法論文集(一)
頁次：329-388
出版日期：1995
出版項：臺北:月旦
主題關鍵詞：美國；聯邦最高法院；就業歧視
學門：法律學
資料類型：專書論文
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(10)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
期刊論文
1.Befort(1991)。BFOQ Revisited: Johnson Controls Halts the Expansion of the Defense to Intentional Sex Discrimination。OHIO ST. L. J.，52，5+29-43。  new window
2.Sullivan、Nowlin(1991)。Gender-Based Fetal Protection Policies: Impermissible Sex Discrimination。Lab. L. J.，42，387。  new window
3.Gwartney、Long(1977)。The Relative Earnings of Blacks and Other Minorities。Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev.，31，336+340-341+343。  new window
4.Modjeska(1985)。The Supreme Court and the Ideal of Equal Employment Opportunity。Mercer L. Rev.，36，794+797-802。  new window
5.Jones(1985)。Some Relflections on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 at Twenty。Mercer L. Rev.，36，813-815。  new window
6.Leonard(1984)。The Impact of Affirmative Active on Employment。J. Lab. Econ.，2，439+447。  new window
7.Carliner(1976)。Returns to Education for Blacks, Anglos, and Five Spanish Groups。J. Hum. Res.，11，172+179。  new window
8.Hogler、Cleveland(1990)。Wards Cove and the Theory of disparate Impact: From Bad Law to Worse Policy。Lab. L. J.，41，138。  new window
9.Gould(1990)。The Supreme Court and Employment Discrimination Law in 1989: Judicial Retreat and Congressional Response。Tulane L. Rev.，64，1485。  new window
10.Bryan(1990)。Shifting the Burdens in Disparate Impact Cases: Wards Cove Packing v. Atonio。Lab. Law.，6，233。  new window
11.Allen、Robinson、Vaught(1990)。Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio: Implications for Disparate Impact。Lab. L. J.，41，102。  new window
12.Bernstein(19850610)。Putting Mandatory Retirement Out to Pasture。Business Week，104-105。  new window
13.Kilberg(1989)。On Government and the Private Sector: A Look at the Wards Cove Decision and the AT&T Collective Bargaining Agreement。Empl. Rel. L. J.，15，171。  new window
14.Lansing、Podhajsky(1990)。The Conservative Shift in U.S. Supreme Court Labor Law Decisions。Lab. L. J.，41，67+69-72。  new window
15.Myers、Rasnie(1990)。Did Wards Cove Packing Overrule Griggs? A Contrary View。Lab. L. J.，41，370。  new window
16.Players(1979)。Is Griggs Dead: Reflecting (Fearfully) on Wards Cove Packing Co., v. Atonio。Flor. St. U. L. Rev.，17，1。  new window
17.Rossein(1989)。Validation of Subjective Criteria in Selecting Employees After Watson and Wards Cove。N. Y. U. Ann. Conf. Lab.，42，17。  new window
18.Modjeska(1989)。Employment Discrimination and the Reconstruction of Runyon。Ky. L. J.，78，277。  new window
19.Maltz(1989)。Legislative Inaction and the Patterson Case。Mich. L. Rev.，87，858。  new window
20.Kaozorowski(1989)。The Enforcement Provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866: A Legislative History in Light of Runyon v. McCrary。Yale L. J.，98，565。  new window
21.Shaw、Moore、Brasswell(1990)。Wards Cove Packing Co., Inc. v. Atonio。Lab. L. J.，41，183。  new window
22.Shanor、Marcosson(1990)。Battleground for a Divided Court。Lab. Law.，6，145+150-161。  new window
23.Wymen、Sudberg(1990)。The Patterson Decision: a Mixed Blessing for Employee?。Empl. Rel. L. J.，16，5。  new window
24.Sullivan(1989)。Historical Reconstruction, Reconstruction History, and the Proper Scope of Section 1981。Yale L. J.，98，541。  new window
25.Scanlan(1990)。Patterson v. McLean and Affirmative Action。Lab. L. J.，41，131。  new window
26.Player(1990)。What Hath Patterson Wrought: A Study in the Failure to Understand the Employment Contract。Lab. Law.，6，183。  new window
27.Pavchinski(1989)。Whether to Override Statutory Based Civil Rights Precedent: Whose Needs Should Prevail?。Flor. L. Rev.，41，369。  new window
28.Cava(1990)。Taking Judicial Notice of Sexual Stereotyping。Ark. L. Rev.，43，27。  new window
29.Brooks(1980)。The Structure of Individual Disparate Treatment Litigation after Hopkins。Lab. Law.，6，215。  new window
30.Brooks(1990)。Employment Discrimination-the Supreme Court Liberates Title VII/Mixed-Motive Case from the Procrustean Bed of the McDennel Douglas-Burdine Pretext Model。Wake Forest L. Rev.，25，345。  new window
31.Belton(1990)。Causation and Burden-Shifting Doctrines in Employment Discrimination Law Revisited: Some Thoughts on Hopkins and Wards Cove。Tulane L. Rev.，64，1359。  new window
32.Murphy(1989)。Supreme Court Review。Lab. Law.，5，679+685。  new window
33.Swan(1990)。Subjective Hiring and promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse。J. Coll. & U. L.，16，553。  new window
34.Radtford(1990)。Sex Stereotyping and the Promotion of Women to Position of Power。Hastings L. J.，41，471。  new window
35.Pilate(1989)。A Mixed Outcome for Title VII Mixed-Motive Plaintiffs。U. Kans. L. Rev.，38，107。  new window
36.Evans(1990)。Balancing Employers' Prerogatives: Allocation of Burden of Proof in a Title VII Mixed-Motive Case。Sw. L. J.，43，1149。  new window
37.Cohen(1989)。Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: Mixed Motive Discrimination Cases, the Shifting Burden of Proof and Sexual Stereotyping。Lab. L. J.，40，723。  new window
38.Weber(1990)。Beyond Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: A New Approach to Mixed Motive Discrimination。N. Carl. L. Rev.，68，495。  new window
39.Blumrosen(1989)。The 1989 Supreme Court Rulings Concerning Employment Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Minefield for Employers and a Gold Mine for Their Lawyers。Empl. Rel. L. J.，15，175。  new window
40.Strickler(1990)。Martin v. Wilks。Tulane L. Rev.，64，1557。  new window
41.Comisky(1990)。The Seniority System Exception After Lorance。Lab. Law.，6，421。  new window
42.Sternlight(1989)。The Supreme Court's Denial of Reasonable Attorney's Fees to Prevailing Civil Rights Plaintiffs。Rev. L. & Soc. Chan.，17，535。  new window
43.Greene(1990)。Race in the 21st Century: Equality Through Law?。Tulane L. Rev.，64，1515。  new window
44.Johnson(1989)。Recent Legal Implication for Minority Set Aside Programs and Public Contractors。Lab. L. J.，40，775。  new window
45.(1989)。Affirmative Action: Consensus on the Equal Protection Standard and the Evidentiary Requirement of Past Discrimination。Memphis St. U. L. Rev.，19，491。  new window
46.Spirack(1989)。Constitutional Law--Fourteenth Amendment-Supreme Court Adopts Strict Scrutiny Standard to Review the Constitutionality of Affirmative Action Measures (Case Note)。Seton H. L. Rev.，20，205。  new window
47.(1990)。Section (F)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: No Justification for Cost Justification? Public Employees Retirement System v. Betts。Ind. L. Rev.，24，161。  new window
48.(1991)。Exploring a Second Level of Parity: Suggestions for Developing an Analytical Framework for Forum Selection in Employment Discrimination Litigation。Vand. L. Rev.，44，641。  new window
49.Ross(1992)。New Civil Rights Act: Law Reverses Several Recent High Court Decisions。Amer. B. Ass'n J.，1992(Jan.)，85。  new window
50.Cherian(1991)。Transnational Reach of U.S. Civil Rights Laws: What's Left After Aramco?。Lab. L. J.，42，596。  new window
51.Prentice(1990)。The Muddled State of Title VII's Application Abroad。Lab. L. J.，41，633。  new window
52.Turley(1990)。Transnational Discrimination and the Economics of Extraterritorial Regulation。Bos. U. L. Rev.，70，339。  new window
53.Ray、Brown(1990)。Federal Legislative Update, January-March, 1990。Lab. Lawy.，6，489。  new window
54.Biskupic(19900210)。A Bipartisan Hill Coalition Unveils Rights Measure。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，392。  new window
55.Biskupic(19900421)。Bush Caught in Contradiction Over Job-Bias Remedies。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，1191。  new window
56.Hook(19900712)。Dole Outburst Shows Frustration Over More Than Civil Rights Bill。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，2314。  new window
57.Biskupic(19900714)。Deal on Civil Rights Measure Stymied by Quota Issue。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，2225。  new window
58.Biskupic(19900630)。Senate Ready to Begin Debate on Omnibrs Civil Rights Bill。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，2070。  new window
59.Biskupic(19900512)。Big Civil Rights Bill Advances, Faces Another House Panel。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，1482。  new window
60.Biskupic(19900407)。Rights Bill Advances in Senate As Panel Ignores Veto Threat。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，1077-1078。  new window
61.Biskupic(19910209)。New Struggle Over Civil Rights Brings Shift in Strategy。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，366。  new window
62.The Defeat of the Civil Rights Act of 1990: Wading Through the Rhetoric in Search of Compromise。VANDERBILT L. REV.，44，595+597。  new window
63.Biskupic(19910601)。Civil Rights Milestones。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，1444。  new window
64.(19900721)。Senate Votes 158 and 161。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，2358-2359。  new window
65.Biskupic(19900721)。Partisan Rancor Marks Vote on Civil Rights Measure。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，48，2312。  new window
66.(19910727)。From Abortion to Public Lands Are Potential Veto Targets。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，2042。  new window
67.Biskupic(19910608)。Bill Passes House, not Muster; Next Chance Is in Senate。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，1498。  new window
68.Rigby(19911026)。Benchmarks。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，3216。  new window
69.Biskupic、Kuntz(19911026)。Rights Bill Rises From the Ashes of Senate's Thomas Fight。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，3124。  new window
70.Biskupic(19911102)。Senate Passes Sweeping Measure to Overturn Court Rulings。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，3200。  new window
71.Getman(1990)。The Changing Role of Courts and the Potential Role of Unions in Overcoming Employment Discrimination。TULANE L. Rev.，64，1477。  new window
72.Biskupic(19911123)。Bush Signs Anti-Job Bias Bill Amid Furor Over Preferences。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，3463。  new window
73.(19911109)。House Vote No. 386。Cong. Q. W. Rept.，49，3338。  new window
74.Oaxaca, Ronald(1973)。Male-female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets。International Economic Review，14(3)，693-709。  new window
圖書
1.Kaufman(1989)。The Economics of Labor Markets and Labor Relations。  new window
2.Flanagan、Smith、Emreberge(1984)。Labor Economics and Labor Relations。  new window
3.Gould, W.(1986)。A Primer on American Labor Law。  new window
其他
1.Rankin(19900708)。Firms See Rights Bill as Outdated。  new window
圖書論文
1.Purcell(1977)。Management and Affirmative Action in the Late Seventies。Equal Rights and Industrial Relations。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：952（臺灣：935，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67432554
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上