:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學史、哲融入生命科學通識教育之學習成效
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:廖麗貞洪振方 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Li-jenHung, Jeng-fung
出版日期:2001
卷期:12
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:科學史科學哲學多元理論競爭生命科學通識教育Scientific history and philosophy of scienceMultiple theses competition dynamic modelLife scienceGeneral education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:24
     本研究主旨在於瞭解融入科學史、哲於生命科學通識課程對學生學習的影響,研究者以融入多元理論競爭的動態模式做為教學理念之背景,藉助科學史豐富的歷史情境與人文內涵來編寫授課教材,並透過小組討論對話,讓學生設想自己是科學家,去體驗多元理論競爭的歷程,藉以探討此課程中,授課教授的「教」與學生的「學」的互動;及學生在此課程中的學習成長與學習感受。 在本研究教學活動中,學生在「生物知識評量」上的前、後測平均得分的差異達顯著水準。透過晤談可發現,學生的科學本質觀點是比較偏向後邏輯實證。由作業評量可發現,學生不管在多元理論競爭的觀念、科學與人文的會通、價值反思上都有明顯增長。 在學生的感受方面,有88%的學生認為能使其學習興趣增加,學生認為「多元化的教材內容」與課後作業可對所學再次思考,上課討論、分組報告更可促進多元思考,影片觀賞則可提升學習效果等。尤其小組討論可以使更多的想法與觀點被提出,解決個人思考向度的有限。有80%以上的學生自認為「有效思考的能力」、「對自然界生命的體驗」有成長,有50%左右的學生自認為「能做適切介斷力的能力」有成長,有近50%的學生自認為「對價值認知的能力」有成長,而這些成長是來自於作業評量與小組討論,及授課教授對教材內容的引導與影片觀賞。
      The purpose of this research is trying to inquiry the effect of students learning in life science general education integrated with history and philosophy of science. The instruction notion is integrated with multiple these competition dynamic model in history of science which is rich in historical situations and humane cultivation. Then let students to assume themselves were scientists to experience multiple these competition dynamic course by discussion small groups. In order to confer the interaction of teacher's teaching and students' learning in this curriculum, to interpret student's progress in this curriculum, and to interpret student's felling in this curriculum. There is a significant effect in pre-and post-biological test. The analysis of the interview transcriptions shows that students' understanding the nature of science is more post-positivism The results of homework assessment shows that students make progess in the aspects of multiple these competition notion, association with science and humane learning, values introspection. 88% of the students express that their interest in learning life science may increase and indicate that diversification of teaching materials and homework allow them for reflecting what they have learned, discuss reports may promote thinking in many ways, and multimedia teaching increase learning outcomes etc. Especially, discuss in small groups can produce much more ideas and solve the problem of limitation in individual thinking, their ability of effective thinking and experience toward natural life become mature, their ability of appropriate decision and awareness of value become mature. Theses growths derive from homework assessments, discuss in small groups, teacher's guidance and multimedia teaching.
期刊論文
1.廖麗貞、洪振方(20000400)。科學史、哲融入大學生命科學通識教育教學模式之初探。高雄師大學報,11,241-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Rogers, P. J.(1982)。Epistemology and History in the Teaching of School Science。European Journal of Science Education,4(1),1-10。  new window
3.Harrington, H.(1994)。Teaching and Knowing。Journal of Teacher Education,45(3),190-198。  new window
4.趙金祁(1993)。科學理念衝擊下科學教育再出發芻議。科學教育(臺灣師大),158,2-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.林陳涌(19960300)。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育學刊,4(1),31-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Berk, L. E.、Winsler, A.(1995)。Scaffolding children''s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education。School Psychology International,19(2),189-191。  new window
7.黃坤錦(1994)。羅索基論通識教育與核心課程。通識教育季刊,1(1),58-59。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳美玉(19971200)。邁向開放的社會--對話教學法的實踐。通識教育,4(4),115-130。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪振方、賴羿蓉(19970900)。教師對以邏輯實證與後邏輯實證主義科學哲學觀建構之電化電池發展史教材的認識與抉擇。科學教育學刊,5(3),347-390。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Oldroyd, D. R.(1977)。Teaching the History of Chemistry in New South Wales Secondary Schools。The Australia Science Teachers Journal,23(2),9-22。  new window
11.徐光台(19950600)。從科學史的觀點來看通識教育中科學教育與人文教育的會通問題。通識教育,2(2),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
12.沈清松(19970800)。論複製人的倫理問題。哲學雜誌,21,232-254。  延伸查詢new window
13.Solomon, J.(1987)。Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science。Studies in Science Education,14(1),63-82。  new window
14.廖麗貞、林寶英、洪振方(20000600)。將達爾文演化論發展史融入大學生命科學通識課程之研究。科學教育學刊,8(2),179-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳美玉(19970300)。理性溝通的教育與社會民主化。通識教育季刊,4(1),51-64。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳嘉麗(1997)。從生活角度學科學:「化學、醫學與社會」之教學經驗。通識教育(清華大學),4(4),97-113。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳嘉麗(1997)。從生活角度學科學:《化學、醫學與社會》之教學經驗。通識教育季刊,4(4),97-113。  延伸查詢new window
18.洪振方、賴羿蓉(1997)。教師對以相異哲學觀建構之電化電池發展史教材的認識與抉擇。科學教育月刊,5(3)。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.廖麗貞、林寶英、洪振方(2000)。達爾文演化論發展史融入大學生命科學通識課程之研究。科學教育學刊,8(2),179-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.洪振方(1998)。從科學史與科學哲學的探討反思學生社群知識的重建與問題。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.趙金祁(1994)。科學與人文平衡研究規劃協調計畫。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙金祁(1994)。科學與人文平衡研究規劃協調計畫。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葉闖(1996)。科學主義批判與技術社會批判。臺北市:淑馨出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Feyerabend, Paul K.(1975)。Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge。Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge。London。  new window
3.Feyerabend, P.(1975)。Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge。Atlantic Highlands, N.J.:Humanities Press。  new window
4.Rogoff, B.(1990)。Apprenticesnip in thinking: Cognitive development in social context。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Mayr, Ernst、涂可欣(1999)。看!這就是生物學。天下。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅麗玉(1996)。科學史與臺灣中等教育之整合-問題與建議。化學教學面面觀。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jones, R.(1989)。The Historiography of Science: Retrospect and Future Challenge。Teaching the History of Science。Chalfont St. Giles, UK/ Oxford, UK。  new window
8.張巨青、吳寅華(1995)。邏輯與歷史,現代科學方法的嬗變。邏輯與歷史,現代科學方法的嬗變。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.張巨青、吳寅華(1995)。邏輯與歷史:現代科學方法的嬗變。邏輯與歷史:現代科學方法的嬗變。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.傅麗玉(1996)。科學史與臺灣中等教育之整合-問題與建議。化學教育面面觀。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jones, R.(1989)。The Historiography of Science: Retrospect and Future Challenge。Teaching the History of Science。Basil Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.(1998)。營養學分不營養,通識教材將翻新,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪振方(1998)。從科學史與科學哲學的探討反思學生社群知識的重建與問題,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE