:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從東帝汶獨立運動探討美國的干預主義--一個霸權穩定論的觀點
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:宋學文 引用關係黃子哲
作者(外文):Soong, Hseik-wenHuang, Tzu-che
出版日期:2002
卷期:41:3
頁次:頁83-107
主題關鍵詞:東帝汶美國干預主義美國自由霸權霸權穩定論East timorUS interventionismAmerica's liberal hegemonyHegemonic stability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:92
     自從一九七五年印尼兼併東帝汶後,東帝汶獨立運動就不曾間斷,印尼為了壓制東帝汶的分離主義,於是在東帝汶施行高壓的軍事統治,印尼侵犯東帝汶人權的情形亦時有所聞。但在冷戰的大環境下,當時對東帝汶議題具有影響力的美國相當重視反共的印尼政府及其重要的戰略地理價值,因而並不技持具有左派色彩的東帝汶獨立運動。冷戰結束後,不但意識型態不再主導美國的外交政策,而且美國在際體系之權力結構中已逐漸挾其超強(superpower)的地位採行「美國自由霸權」(America's Liberal Hegemony)的地位採行「美國自由霸權之外交政策下,美國以人道之名遂行對外干預逐漸增加,進一步強化了其自由干預主義(interventionism)的傾向。對於美國在東帝汶的干預行動以及最後東帝汶終於走向獨立之路,本文作者認為此一議題反映了美國在外交上之干預政策,其中包括干預政策之正當性、干預修件之分析、干預策略之運用等。針對這些干預政策,本文不但從實務面去分析美國對東帝汶之干預政策,更從霸權穩定論(美國自由霸權)提出美國干預主義之理論依據。最後,透過美國在東帝汶之干預及其理論分析,我們認為,新的美國自由霸權下的干預主義並不同於冷戰時期由權力平衡觀念所衍生的霸權穩定論,也有異於自由主義對人道干預之理想色彩,而是結合了傳統霸權理論與自由民主之價值而形成之一種新的干預主義。
     The independence campaign of East Timor has gone through ceaseless suppression by the Indonesian government since 1975. Due to considerations of strategic cooperation with Indonesia against communism, the United States did not adopt any humanitarian intervention policy in East Timor during the cold War ear. The change of international system in the post cold War ere has, however, encouraged the United States to adopt more humanitarian intervention in her foreign policy. The most recent is US deep intervention in East Timor's independence movement and the success of the island's independence. By analyzing of the indepence campaing in East Timor, we conclude that US interventionism is, indeed, based on hegemonic stability theory. However, America's liberal hegemony in the past Cold War esa must be distinguished from traditional hegemony. Uulike its counterpart's assertion of military power, the new form of America's liberal hegemony situates its intervention policy between human rights and balance of power consideration. By exploiting multilateralism, US interventionism will continue to maneuver between human rights liberalism and realistic national interests.
期刊論文
1.Nixon, R.(1967)。Asia After Viet Nam。Foreign Affairs,46(1),111-125。  new window
2.Gunberg, Isabele(1990)。Exploring the Myth of Hegemonic Stability。International Organization,44(4),431-477。  new window
3.Ruggie, John Gerard(1992)。Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution。International Organization,46(3),561-598。  new window
4.邱坤玄(20000700)。霸權穩定論與冷戰後中(共)美權力關係。東亞季刊,31(3),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1998)。Power and interdependence in the information age。Foreign Affairs,77(5),81-94。  new window
6.李瓊莉(19990200)。經濟安全概念在亞太地區的發展。問題與研究,38(2),39-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉復國(19990200)。綜合性安全與國家安全--亞太安全概念適用性之檢討。問題與研究,38(2),21-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Huntington, Samuel P.(1993)。Why International Primacy Matters。International Security,17(4),68-83。  new window
9.丁永康(19990600)。冷戰後美國的大戰略:建立單極霸權體系之挑戰。美歐季刊,13(2)=134,161-180。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊永明(19970900)。美國亞太安全戰略之理論分析。美歐季刊,12(3)=131,35-71+a6。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋興洲(19970300)。國際合作理論與亞太區域經濟。問題與研究,36(3),27-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.(1994)。Timor's Opportunity。The Economist。  new window
13.Falk, R.(2000)。The East Timor Ordeal: International Law and it's Limits。Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars,32(1/ 2)。  new window
14.(1999)。狄力的火海埋葬總統?。亞洲週刊。  延伸查詢new window
15.(1999)。Scorched Earth。Far Eastern Economic Review。  new window
16.陳鴻瑜(1998)。東帝汶事件的回顧及前途展望。歷史月刊,129,42-49。  延伸查詢new window
17.Ikenberry, J. G.(1999)。America's Liberal Hegemony。Current History,98,23-28。  new window
18.Keohane, R. O.(1990)。Multilateralism。International Journal,45,731-764。  new window
19.Cable, V.(1995)。What is International Economic Security?。International Affairs,71(2),305-324。  new window
20.Merry, R. W.(1999)。Bill Clinton and the Triumph of Wilsonism。The International Economy,13(4),20-27。  new window
21.Huntley, W.、Hayes, P.(2000)。East Timor and Asia Security。Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars,32(1/ 2)。  new window
22.嚴震生(1994)。後冷戰時期美國外交決策的考量因素。美歐月刊,9(12),109-120。  延伸查詢new window
23.(1999)。The Lessons of Timor。Far Eastern Economic Review。  new window
24.(1999)。Ballot Power。Time。  new window
會議論文
1.Clinton, B.(1993)。The APEC Role in Creating Jobs, Opportunities, and Security。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Hass, Richard N.(1999)。Intervention: The Use of American Military Force in the Post-Cold War World。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
2.Kindlebrg, Charles P.(1973)。The World in Depression, 1929-1939。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
3.Wallerstein, Immanuel(1974)。The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century。New York:Academic Press。  new window
4.Gurr, Ted Robert、Harff, Barbara(1994)。Ethnic Conflict in World Politics。Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press。  new window
5.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1990)。Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power。Basic Book。  new window
6.Gilpin, Robert、Gilpin, Jean M.(1987)。The Political Economy of International Relations。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1993)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
8.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Budiardjo, C.、Liong, L. S.(1984)。The War Against East Timor。The War Against East Timor。London, UK。  new window
10.Scheiner, C.(2000)。The United States: From Complicity to Ambiguity。The East Timor Question: The Struggle for Independence from Indonesia。New York, NY。  new window
11.Taylor, J. G.(1999)。East Timor: The Price of Freedom。New York, NY:Zed Books。  new window
12.McCloskey, S.(2000)。Introduction: East Timor From European to Third World Colonialism。The East Timor Question: The Struggle for Independence from Indonesia。New York, NY。  new window
13.O'Shaughnessy, H.(2000)。Reporting East Timor: Western Media Coverage of the Conflict。The East Timor Question: The Struggle for Independence from Indonesia。New York, NY。  new window
14.Jolliffe, J.(1978)。East Timor: Nationalism and Colonialism。East Timor: Nationalism and Colonialism。St. Lucia, Queensland。  new window
15.Liefer, Michael(1983)。Indonesia's Foreign Policy。George Allen & Unwin。  new window
16.(1997)。East Timor and International Community: Basic Documents。East Timor and International Community: Basic Documents。N. Y.。  new window
17.林添貴、Brzezinski, Zbigniew(1999)。大棋盤:全球戰略大思考。臺北:立緒文化。  延伸查詢new window
18.Hainsworth, P.(2000)。Conclusion: East Timor After Suharto - A New Horizon。The East Timor Question: The Struggle for Independence from Indonesia。New York, NY。  new window
19.Brooks, L. F.、Kanter, A.(1994)。Introduction。U. S. Intervention Policy for the Post-Cold War World。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kerr, Pauline、Mack, Andrew、Evans, Paul(1995)。The Evolving Security Discourse in the Asia-Pacific。Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
2.Keohane, Robert O.(1980)。The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967-1977。Change in the International System。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE