:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:墨、韓二子思想關係研究
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:湯智君 引用關係
作者(外文):Tang, Chih-chun
出版日期:2003
卷期:18
頁次:頁31-33+35-84
主題關鍵詞:墨子韓非子法治功利尚同MoutzHan-Fei-tzRuling by lawUtilitarianismEmulation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:68
韓非子是戰國時期最為晚出的思想家,韓非師事儒家苟子,復綜合前期法家法術勢並重的思想,又參酌儒、道、墨、名各家合於法治的理論,而成其一家之言。韓非子的思想,使中國由封建政治進入君主政治的理論得以確立不疑;而秦國更依其理論以結束戰國完成統一。考察韓非子的思想,於各家學派多所擷取。其中墨家墨子立法儀為標準,對韓非以法為客觀標準不無關係;墨子尚同思想,更為韓非運用到絕對君權上;墨子尚功利注重實用的觀念,則被韓非引用為循名責實之術,凡此均可見墨家墨子和法家韓非子思想的淵源關係。然而韓非並非全盤接受墨子思想,或有轉化,或有歧異,二子思想糾結頗多,梳理二子思想同異處,是為本文討論的重點。
Han - Fei - tz was the last philosopher in the Pre - Chin era. He modeled himself after Confucian and Hsun - tz, synthesized the equally importance of law and intention as well as power of influence, earlier thoughts of Faist, and referred the rule - by -law theories of Confu-cian, Daoist, Mohist and Minist. So, his philosophy became a school of thought. As a consequence, Chinese politics became monarchy from feudalism, and Chin ended war and unified the whole country according to it. It adopted many theories. Ruling by law of Moutz's theory had a relationship with its objective law; Emulation of Moutz's theory was applied in its thought of monarchy; Utilitarianism and Pragmatism of Moutz was used in its method of being worthy of the name. From these, one could see the close relationship between Moutz and Han -Fei -tz. However, Han - Fei - tz did not adopt Moutz's theories totally. Some of them were transformed or different. The relationship was complicated. This study was clarified the similarity and difference between Moutz and Han -Fei -tz.
期刊論文
1.周富美(19851100)。墨辯與墨學。臺大中文學報,1,187-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周富美(19980500)。韓非思想與墨家的關係。臺大中文學報,10,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王冬珍。韓非子的政治思想。逢甲學報,24。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳拱(1988)。論韓非之心態。書目季刊,22(3),20-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王克奇(1997)。墨子與孔子、老子、韓非關係論。孔子研究,1997(3),98-99。  延伸查詢new window
6.魏義霞(1997)。殊途而同歸:墨子與韓非子哲學的比較研究。齊魯學刊,45。  延伸查詢new window
7.許洪順(2002)。韓非子的吏治思想及其現代意義。四川師範學院學報,5,68。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡英文(1985)。刑的傳統與韓非的法。東海學報,26,79。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫詒讓(1986)。定本墨子閒詁。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.張素貞(1993)。韓非子思想體系。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.舒大剛(1996)。墨子的智慧。墨子的智慧。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭公權(1984)。中國政治思想史。中國政治思想史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.段玉裁(1979)。說文解字注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.邵增樺(1995)。韓非子今註今譯。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.熊公哲(1988)。荀子今註今譯。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡元培(1991)。中國倫理學史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.梁啓超(198508)。墨子學案。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.王先謙(1981)。荀子集解。世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳奇猷(1981)。韓非子集釋。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.王邦雄(1993)。韓非子的哲學。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.李漁叔(1977)。墨子選注。臺北市:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.胡適(1986)。中國古代哲學史。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
15.趙岐、孫奭(1989)。孟子正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐君毅(1986)。中國哲學原論‧原道篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.王冬珍(1984)。墨學新探。世界。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳問梅(1988)。墨學之省察。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.梁啟超(1984)。先秦政治思想史。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.謝冰瑩、邱燮友、林明波、左松超(1971)。新譯古文觀止。新譯古文觀止。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(西漢)司馬遷(1981)。新校本史記三家注并附編,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE