:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:韓非子法治思想述評
書刊名:文與哲
作者:湯智君 引用關係
作者(外文):Tang, Chih-chun
出版日期:2004
卷期:5
頁次:頁115-154
主題關鍵詞:韓非子反智論Han-Fei-tzLawShuIntentionPowerAnti-intellectualism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:131
  • 點閱點閱:236
韓非子是先秦時代最為晚出,也是思想最為獨特的哲學家,他是融合各家思想而集其大成卻又影響深遠的一位法家人物。韓非師承儒家荀子,由於時代的鉅變、國家的處境,使得他拋棄儒家之禮治轉而倡「法治」。韓非所說的「法」具有客觀性、標準性等特性,他融合法、術、勢,建構一有系統的法治理論。就法理學的範疇而言,韓非子的法治思想是卓越的,他在政治領域的貢獻是被肯定的。韓非子的法治思想,植基於現實功利的人性觀、君國至上的國家觀,以及反對傳統的歷史觀上,在當時社會文化大轉型之際,固提供了有效的治國方法,然而由於過度偏激而產生流弊。又由於韓非強調國君需融合術、勢的運用,再加上無法釐清立法權誰屬的情況下,「法治」遂淪為政治治理的工具。更且因為韓非子任用法術之士,強調「以法為教,以吏為師」,強勢執行法治,乃有集權愚民棄賢反智的傾向。韓非子的法治思想,在「法」的觀念上可謂獨具洞識力。然而,他的法治理論的應用,卻使得我國走向君主專制政體數千年,影響可謂既深且深,因此,歷來學者對韓非子毀譽參半。凡此,都值得我們去闡述探討。
Han-Fei-tz was the last and unique philosopher in the Pre-Chin era. He was a Faist of profound influence, who synthesized and epitomized the earlier rule-by-law thoughts of Faist, Confucian, daoist, Mohist and Minist. He modeled himself after Confucian and Hsun-tz. Due to the changes of the times and the difficult situations of nation, he discarded rule-by-courtesy of Confucian. As a result, he advocated rule-by-law. The Law, proposed by Han-Fei, showed the character of objectivity as well as standardization. He synthesized the law, intention and power. A systematic rule-by-law theory was constructed. In the field of jurisprudence, it was outstanding. The contribution to the field of politics was affirmative. It was based on the conceptions of realistic-profit human nature, monarchism and anti-traditional history. It supplied an effective method of governing a country on that time of great changes, while the malpractice was produced in virtue of extremes. He stressed that the monarch needed to synthesize the application of the law, intention and power. And, the legislative power was not clarified. As a consequence, the Law became a tool of politics. Because he adopted the Faist and emphasized “Educated by Law, Teachings of Officer”, there was the tendency of power-centralization, keeping the people in ignorance, discarding persons of virtue and anti-intellectualism. The Law thought of Han-Fei-tz was penetrating. The application of his theory to our monarchism was continuous for thousands of year. Therefore, it got both praise and censure. The study on the Law thoughts of Han-Fei-tz was indeed discussed in detail.
期刊論文
1.康韻梅(19910500)。韓非形名觀念之探析。中國文學研究,5,109-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡仁厚(19961000)。韓非子論「法」與「術」--「定法篇」之思想解析。東海哲學研究集刊,3,57-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳秀英(19911100)。韓非政治思想之評價。逢甲中文學報,111-126。  延伸查詢new window
4.周富美(19980500)。韓非思想與墨家的關係。臺大中文學報,10,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳拱(1988)。論韓非之心態。書目季刊,22(3),20-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.魏義霞(1997)。殊途而同歸:墨子與韓非子哲學的比較研究。齊魯學刊,45。  延伸查詢new window
7.許洪順(2002)。韓非子的吏治思想及其現代意義。四川師範學院學報,5,68。  延伸查詢new window
8.王健(2001)。法家事功思想初探─以《商君書》、《韓非子》為中心。史學月刊,2001(6),54。  延伸查詢new window
9.高柏園(1993)。韓非哲學的根本問題及其理論根基。漢學研究,11(2),66。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.馮國超(2000)。人性論、君子小人與治國之道--論《韓非子》的內在邏輯。哲學研究,2000(5),40-47。  延伸查詢new window
11.戴黍(1998)。“法”、“勢”、“術”--略論韓非子的法治思想。中山大學學報論叢,1998(5),149-152。  延伸查詢new window
12.林儒(2001)。從法律的功能論韓非的法治教育。哲學與文化,28(2),186。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡英文(1985)。刑的傳統與韓非的法。東海學報,26,79。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.周富美(1993)。論《韓非子》「以刑去刑」說。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫詒讓(1986)。定本墨子閒詁。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳璵(197711)。新譯尚書讀本。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
3.高柏園(1990)。人性管理的終結者。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.張素貞(1993)。韓非子思想體系。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳秀英(1979)。韓非子研議。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭公權(1984)。中國政治思想史。中國政治思想史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉向(1965)。戰國策。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.張純、王曉波(1984)。韓非思想的歷史研究。聯經出版事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.段玉裁(1979)。說文解字注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.邵增樺(1995)。韓非子今註今譯。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡元培(1991)。中國倫理學史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.王先謙(1981)。荀子集解。世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.王邦雄(1993)。韓非子的哲學。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐復觀(1988)。中國人性論史:先秦篇。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.顧炎武、黃汝成(1984)。日知錄集釋。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳啟天(1970)。中國法家概論。臺北:中華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.胡適(1986)。中國古代哲學史。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
18.唐君毅(1986)。中國哲學原論‧原道篇。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡英文(1986)。韓非的法治思想及其歷史意義。臺北:文史哲。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.余英時(1990)。歷史與思想。聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.牟宗三(1986)。中國哲學十九講:中國哲學之簡述及其所涵蘊之問題。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.勞思光(1984)。新編中國哲學史。三民。  延伸查詢new window
23.姚蒸民(1999)。韓非子通論。東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.朱守亮(1992)。韓非子釋評。五南。  延伸查詢new window
25.梁啟超(1984)。先秦政治思想史。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.蕭公權(1979)。商子與韓子。中國上古史論文選集(上冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.謝雲飛(1996)。韓非子析論。韓非子析論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.張素貞(1989)。韓非子實用哲學。韓非子實用哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
29.沈剛伯(1979)。從古代禮、刑的運用探討法家的來歷。中國上古史論文選集(下冊)。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.徐漢昌(1984)。韓非子的法學與文學。韓非子的法學與文學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(西漢)司馬遷(1981)。新校本史記三家注并附編,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(漢)劉安(1984)。淮南子,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)王先慎(1981)。韓非子集解,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(周)商鞅(1965)。商君書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE