:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論墨學思想對《韓非子》之影響
書刊名:長庚人文社會學報
作者:吳聲佑 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Sheng-yu
出版日期:2016
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁339-368
主題關鍵詞:墨學墨子韓非子法儀尚同MohismMoziHan FeiRule of lawEmul
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:333
  • 點閱點閱:36
韓非為戰國時期思想家之殿軍人物,前人多有辯議其學說淵源,除師事荀子外,並綜合前期法家法術勢之思想,又參酌墨、道諸家思想,故於其說可發現儒、道、墨、名諸家交錯重疊之影,因此,則見研究者斷言韓非思想是儒家之直系,亦有直指韓非思想乃道家之末流者。然而,深究其實,韓非學說乃在追求「法治」之前提下,成一家之言,融攝諸子百家思想於一爐。本文專從「法儀」、「尚同」、「墨學評論」三端,考察墨學思想影響《韓非子》情形,尋繹其汲取、轉化自墨家思想之痕跡。
Han Fei was an influential scholar and political philosopher master during Warring States Period. There are many discussions on the origin of his thought. There are also discussions on Han Fei's inheritance. Generally speaking, Han Fei was instructed by Xunzi, and then he synthesized the concepts of the Legalist School-laws, power and tactics. Meanwhile, it is well-believed that his thought was affected by the Mohist School and the Taoist School, bringing his predecessors' ideas together into a coherent ideology. It is commonly accepted that Confucianism, Taoism, Mohism and Logicianism were integrated into the thought of Han Fei. Therefore, some claim that the thought of Han Fei was evolved directly from Confucianism while others argue it was evolved from the decadent Taoism. However, what is true regarding Han Fei should be that his thought was concluded and integrated with other schools of philosophy on the premise of pursuing the innovation of "rule of law." It has developed its own school of philosophy. From the aspect of rule of law, emulation, and commentary on Mohism, the author examines how thought of Han Fei was evolved and transformed from the Mohist School in this article.
期刊論文
1.周富美(19851100)。墨辯與墨學。臺大中文學報,1,187-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.湯智君(20030600)。墨、韓二子思想關係研究。臺大中文學報,18,31-33+35-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡英文(19850600)。刑的傳統與韓非的「法」。東海學報,26,63-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周富美(19970600)。論「韓非子」對墨家的批判。臺大中文學報,9,43-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.湯智君(20110300)。從墨家學派的衰微探論墨與俠的關係。臺北大學中文學報,9,63-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.周富美(19980500)。韓非思想與墨家的關係。臺大中文學報,10,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李玉誠(2014)。韓非子歷史思想研究(博士論文)。山東大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.梁啟超(1923)。墨子學案。上海:商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張永義(2001)。墨子與中國文化。貴州人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.章炳麟(1994)。訄書。遼寧:遼寧人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.康有為(1958)。孔子改制考。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳啟天(1992)。韓非子校釋。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.許慎(1978)。說文解字。北平:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.張素貞(1993)。韓非子思想體系。臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂不韋、高誘(2006)。呂氏春秋。北京:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭傑文(2002)。20世紀墨學研究史。北京:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.梁啟超(1996)。先秦政治思想史。北京:東方出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.司馬遷、裴駰、司馬貞、張守節(1936)。史記。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.班固、顏師古(1930)。漢書。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.胡適(1998)。中國古代哲學史。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.唐君毅(1978)。中國哲學原論--原道篇。香港:新亞研究所:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.墨翟、吳毓江、孫啟治(2006)。墨子校注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.韓非、王先慎、鍾哲(2003)。韓非子集解。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.王讚源(1991)。中國法家哲學。東大。  延伸查詢new window
18.韓非子、陳奇猷(2000)。韓非子新校注。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.章學誠、葉瑛(1985)。文史通義校注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.荀況、楊倞、王先謙、沈嘯寰、王星賢(1988)。荀子集解。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳澧(2008)。東塾讀書記。陳澧集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王光榮(1991)。略論墨子的法律思想。墨子研究論叢。濟南:山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.周樹人(1957)。流氓的變遷。魯迅全集。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾振宇(1991)。墨子「法治」思想探微。墨子研究論叢。濟南:山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE