臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中小學「細胞概念類比測驗」的發展與效化
書刊名：國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類
作者：盧秀琴
作者(外文)：Lu, Chow-chin
出版日期：2005
卷期：18:1
頁次：頁87-116
主題關鍵詞：細胞概念類比測驗；圖形類比；模型類比；敘事性類比和複雜性類比；The analogism tests of cell concepts；Graph analogy；Model analogy；Narrating analogy and complex analogy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:25
本研究根據中小學生物科細胞相關課程的教材，配合大台北地區中小學學生的另有概念分析，進行中小學細胞相關課程的類比教學，蒐集學生反應的資料，做為編製「細胞概念類比測驗，簡稱ATCC」的依據；本工具目的在偵測學生學習細胞相關課程時，是否會因為類比教學而獲得細胞相關概念，而存在的另有概念是否起源於不理解類比關係而無法產生概念遷移。ATCC 分為國小卷、國中卷和高中卷，包含四個分量：圖形類比、模型類比、敘事性類比和複雜性類比等。本研究建立ATCC 的表面效度、內容效度和構念效度，使類比試題內容可以反映中小學細胞相關課程的內涵，答案選項可以反映學生是否產生另有概念；ATCC 的主要構念可抽出四個因素，總共可以解釋的變異量有51.24%（國小卷）、51.55% （國中卷）和48.05% （高中卷）。 本研究以大台北地區的國小五年級、國中一年級和高中二年級學生為對象，發展並效化ATCC，得到內部均質性信度分別達0.6653（國小卷）、0.7021（國中卷）和0.7451（高中卷），顯示ATCC 已建立內部均質性信度。本研究利用試題的項目分析，得到試題的平均難度為0.563 （國小卷），0.654（國中卷）和0.641 （高中卷）；鑑別度指數之平均值為0.500（國小卷），0.434（國中卷）和0.425（高中卷）。最後，根據難度和鑑別度，將不適合的題幹陳述與答案選項做最後的修正。
Based on the statements of cell-related curriculum and the analysis of alternative conception of the elementary and middle schools students and according to the elementary and middle schools cell-related curriculum analogy teaching and students’ reported data, this research is intended to devise the so-called “Analogism Tests of Cell Concepts” (ATCC). The purpose of the instrument is to testify whether the students could obtain more cell-related concepts through analogy teaching, whether the students’ alternative conception resulted from their failure in understanding the analogy relation so that they did not have concepts migration. The contents of ATCC were divided into three parts: the elementary school test papers, the junior high school test papers, and the senior high school test papers. ATCC contains four components: graph analogy, model analogy, narrating analogy, and complex analogy. This research has established superficial validity, content validity, and construct validity. ATCC is able to allow the contents of test questions to reflect the cell-related curriculum in elementary and middle schools. The test items also can reflect how students form their alternative conception. Four components were extracted from ATCC, and they explained 51.24% (elementary school test papers), 51.55% (junior high school test papers) and 48.05% (senior high school test papers) of the variation. This research took grade 5, grade 7 and grade 11 students as subjects in Taipei areas. The results showed that the internal consistency reliability of ATCC were 0.6653 (elementary school test papers), 0.7021 (junior high school test papers) and 0.7451 (senior high school test papers). The research found that the reliability and validities of ATCC were satisfactory. The factor analysis revealed that the Difficulty Index for ATCC were 0.392~0.735 (elementary school test papers), 0.433~0.875 (junior high school test papers), and 0.387~0.896 (senior high school test papers); the Discrimination Index for ATCC were 0.314~0.686 (elementary school test papers), 0.174~0.693 (junior high school test papers), and 0.151~0.698 (senior high school test papers). Finally, inappropriate test questions or test items were revised according to the results of difficulties and resolutions of ATCC.
期刊論文
1.Brown, D. E.、Clement, J.(1989)。Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction。Instructional Science，18，237-261。  new window
2.高淑芬、邱美虹(19980300)。類比的檢索與對應。科學教育學刊，6(1)，63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.涂金堂(20010600)。類比推理之探究。初等教育學報，14，293-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bean, T. W.、Singer, H.、Cowen, S.(1990)。Learning concepts from biology text through pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide。Journal of Educational Research，83(4)，233-237。  new window
5.Dagher, Z. R.(1995)。Analysis of use by science teachers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，32(3)，259-270。  new window
6.Falkenhainer, B.、Forbus, K. D.、Gentner, D.(1989)。The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and example。Artificial Intelligence，41，1-63。  new window
7.Gentner, D.、Toupin, C.(1986)。Systematicity and surface similitive in the development of analogy。Cognitive Science，10，277-300。  new window
8.Gilbert, J. K.、Boulter, C.、Rutherjord, M.(1998)。Models in explanations, Part I: Horses for courses。International Journal of Science Education，20，187-203。  new window
9.Goswami, U. f.、Brown, A. L.(1990)。Melting chocolate and melting snowman: Analogical reasoning and causal relation。Cognition，35，69-95。  new window
10.Guttman, L.(1954)。Some necessary conditions forcommon-factor analysis。Psychometrika，19，149-161。  new window
11.Holyoak, K. L.、Koh, K.(1987)。Surface and structural simility in analogical transfer。Memory & Cognition，15(4)，332-340。  new window
12.Odom, A. L.、Barrow, L. H.(1995)。Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，32(1)，45-61。  new window
13.盧秀琴(20030300)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報，16(1)，127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.盧秀琴(20040300)。不同教學策略影響中小學學生學習顯微鏡相關課程之探究。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類，17(1)，147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Goswami, U.(1991)。Analogical reasoning: What develop? A review of research and theory。Child Development，62，1-22。  new window
16.Pearsall, N. R.、Skipper, J. E. J.、Mintzes, J. J.(1997)。Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in Biology。Science Education，81(2)，193-215。  new window
17.盧秀琴(20030900)。臺灣北部地區中小學學生的顯微鏡操作技能與相關概念之發展。國立臺北師範學院學報，16(2)，161-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.蕭碧茹、洪振方(20010600)。類比教學策略及應用模式。中學教育學報，8，239-271。  延伸查詢new window
19.Brown, D. E.(1992)。Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: factors influencing conceptual change。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，29(1)，17-34。  new window
20.Keane, Mark T.、Ledgeway, Tim、Duff, Stuart(1994)。Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models。Cognitive Science，18(3)，387-438。  new window
21.Gentner, D.(1983)。Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy。Cognitive Science，7(2)，155-170。  new window
22.Duit, R.(1991)。On therole of analogies and metaphors in learning science。Science Education，75(6)，649-672。  new window
23.Novick, L. K.、Holyoak, K. J.(1991)。Mathematical problem solving by analogy。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition，17(3)，398-415。  new window
24.Brown, A. L.、Kane, M. J.、Long, C.(1989)。Analogical transfer in young children: Analogies as tools for communication and exposition。Applied Cognitive Psychology，3(4)，275-293。  new window
25.邱美虹(19931100)。類比與科學概念的學習。教育研究資訊，1(6)，79-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.盧秀琴(20051200)。探討教科書與中小學學生學習細胞相關概念的關係。科學教育學刊，13(4)，367-386。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Cattell, Raymond B.(1966)。The scree test for the number of factors。Multivariate Behavioral Research，1(2)，245-276。  new window
會議論文
1.盧秀琴、童禕珊(2003)。台北市高中生的擴散與滲透作用概念認知之研究。92學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會。國立台南師院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Good, R.、Trowbridge, I.、Demastes, S.、Wandersee, I.、Hafner, M.、Cummins, C.(1994)。Proceeding of the 1992 Evolution Education Research Conference。the 1992 Evolution Education Research Conference。Baton Rouge：Louisiana State University。  new window
3.盧秀琴(2003)。不同學生表徵影響國中學生學習顯微鏡相關課程之探究。92學年度國立臺北師院教育學術論文發表會。國立台北師院。231-250。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Campbell, N, A.、Reece, J. B.(2003)。Biology concepts & connections。Benjamin。  new window
單篇論文
1.Zeitoun, H. H.(1983)。Teaching scientific analogies: a proposed model(ED 230423)。  new window
2.Thiele, R. B.，Treaguest, D. F.(1991)。Using analogies in secondary chemistry teaching(ED 239236)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Glynn, S. M.(1989)。Analogical reasoning and problem solving in science textbooks。Handbook of creativity。New York, NY：Plenum。  new window
2.Stepans, J. I.(1991)。Developmental in students' understanding of physics concepts, The psychology of learning science。The psychology of learning science。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence ErIbaum Associates, Publishers。  new window
3.Vosniadou, S.(1989)。Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective。Similarity and analogical reasoning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Gentner, D.(1989)。The mechanisms of analogical learning。Similarity and analogical reasoning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：431（臺灣：426，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67993446
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上