臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以視覺設計文法比較臺澳科學教科書圖像--以七年級生物分類單元為例
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：蓋允萍／鍾昌宏／王國華 引用關係／張惠博／Unsworth, Len
作者(外文)：Ge, Yun-ping／Chung, Chang-hung／Wang, Kuo-hua／Chang, Huey-por
出版日期：2014
卷期：22:2
頁次：頁109-134
主題關鍵詞：生物分類；科學教科書；視覺設計文法；跨國比較；圖像；Biological classification；Science textbook；Grammar of visual design；Cross-country comparison；Image
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1515
  • 點閱點閱:32
社會符號學指出科學教科書的圖像設計無法免除社會文化的影響，本研究旨在探討臺澳教科書中圖像表徵之差異，以視覺設計文法為理論架構（Kress & Van Leeuwen, 2006），從三個後設功能（概念、人際、與語篇）分析圖像所隱含的意義。本研究採內容分析法，取樣臺澳七年級教科書各三個版本，以生物分類單元的圖像作為分析對象。所分析的圖像原有325個圖組，在決定圖像最小單位後，成為990個單位圖像，依照編碼表將每個圖像編碼，分別計量後再進行質與量的比較。結果顯示，在概念後設功能方面，兩國在第一層與第二層的圖像結構分佈類似，第一層主類別皆以概念結構最多，敘述結構極少；第二層次類別多以分析與分類等結構表徵生物特徵與分類的概念。深入第三層對分類次類別的圖像分析後，發現澳版較多採用顯明分類的方式，能彰顯類別的階層關係，臺版多用的隱蔽分類方式則無此功能；在人際後設功能方面，澳版較能運用圖像在動作、參與度、社會距離與權力關係等層面的設計技巧，營造讀者與圖像間較佳的人際關係；語篇後設功能方面，臺澳在版置安排的差異潛藏著社會文化的影響。上述概念、人際、與語篇三個後設功能的分析顯示臺澳科學教科書的圖像的確存在著差異，文末並對教科書圖像編輯與教學提出建議。
Social semiotics proposes that image design is influenced by socio-culture. Drawing on the theoretical framework from grammar of visual design (Kress & Van Leeuwen, 2006), this study compares the images in Taiwanese and Australian high school science textbooks according to three metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. Content analysis is used to analyze the sample units of biological classification, which are shared most consistently across six textbooks: three from Taiwan and the other three from Australia. According to our coding scheme, 325 original image complexes can be analyzed into 990 basic image units. All of them are coded qualitatively and compared quantitatively. The comparison of ideational metafunction indicates that the image structures in the first and second level analysis are similar between countries. The majority of images are represented by conceptual structure. Only a few are represented by narrative structure. Both analytical and classificational structures are the most common subtypes to represent the features of living things and their taxonomy. The difference between countries is not revealed until a further analysis of analytical images. It is found that Australian versions use more representation of overt taxonomy which can explicitly represent hierarchical relationships of classification among concepts. Instead, Taiwanese versions use more representation of covert taxonomy which is short of such function. The comparison of interpersonal metafunction reveals that Australian versions skillfully use the functions of image act, involvement, and social distance to construct a closer relationship between the images and readers. The comparison of textual metafunction unfolds that the difference of image design is influenced by the factors from socio-culture. The results from these three metafunctions all confirm that there are some differences among the images in Taiwanese and Australian science textbooks. The implications for images teaching are discussed. Also, suggestions for publication of science textbooks and further research are made.
期刊論文
1.Moore, D. W.、Readance, J. E.(1984)。A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research。Journal of Educational Research，78(1)，11-17。  new window
2.Daly, A.、Unsworth, L.(2011)。Analysis and comprehension of multimodal texts。Australia Journal of Language and Literacy，34(1)，61-80。  new window
3.Dimopoulos, K.、Koulaidis, V.、Sklaveniti, S.(2003)。Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology。Research in Science Education，33(2)，189-216。  new window
4.diSessa, Andrea A.(2004)。Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction。Cognition and Instruction，22(3)，293-331。  new window
5.Harrison, A. G.(2001)。How do teachers and textbook writers model scientific ideas for students?。Research in Science Education，31(3)，401-435。  new window
6.Han, J.、Roth, W.-M.(2006)。Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro-and microworld。Science Education，90(2)，173-201。  new window
7.Hatzinikita, V.、Dimopoulos, K.、Christidou, V.(2008)。PISA test items and school textbooks related to science: A textual comparison。Science Education，92(4)，664-687。  new window
8.Kahveci, A.(2010)。Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective。International Journal of Science Education，32(11)，1495-1519。  new window
9.Kozma, R.(2003)。The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding。Learning and Instruction，13(2)，205-226。  new window
10.Lemoni, R.、Lefkaditou, A.、Stamou, A. G.、Schizas, D.、Stamou, G. P.(2013)。Views of nature and the human-nature relations: An analysis of the visual syntax of pictures about the environment in Greek primary school textbooks-diachronic considerations。Research in Science Education，43(1)，117-140。  new window
11.Martinec, R.、Salway, A.(2005)。A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media。Visual Communication，4(3)，337-371。  new window
12.Nesbit, J. C.、Adesope, O. O.(2006)。Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A metaanalysis。Review of Educational Research，76(3)，413-448。  new window
13.Roth, W. M.、Bowen, G. M.、McGinn, M. K.(1999)。Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，36(9)，977-1019。  new window
14.Roth, W.-M.、Lawless, D.(2002)。Science, culture, and the emergence of language。Science Education，86(3)，368-385。  new window
15.Sullivan, J. P.(2008)。The use of photographs to portray urban ecosystems in six introductory environmental science textbooks。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，45(9)，1003-1020。  new window
16.Royce, D. T.(1998)。Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text。Japan Association Systemic Functional Linguistics Occasional Papers，1(1)，25-50。  new window
17.Seufert, T.(2003)。Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations。Learning and Instruction，13(2)，227-237。  new window
18.Unsworth, L.(2006)。Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction。English Teaching: Practice and Critique，5(1)，55-76。  new window
19.Hsu, P. L.、Yang, W. G.(2007)。Print and image integration of science texts and reading comprehension: A systemic functional linguistics perspective。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，5(4)，639-659。  new window
20.Ifenthaler, D.(2010)。Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps。Educational Technology Research and Development，58(1)，81-97。  new window
21.Pozzer, L. L.、Roth, W.-M.(2003)。Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，40(10)，1089-1114。  new window
22.Schnotz, W.、Bannert, M.(2003)。Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation。Learning and Instruction，13(2)，141-156。  new window
23.孫曉崗(2009)。佛教藝術與中國繪畫。美與時代，2009(4)，33-36。  延伸查詢new window
24.Pozzer-Ardenghi, L.、Roth, W.-M.(2005)。Making sense of photographs。Science Education，89(2)，219-241。  new window
25.林玉雯、黃台珠、劉嘉茹(20101200)。探討圖形表徵與視知覺學習偏好對生物辨識學習之影響。科學教育學刊，18(6)，521-546。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Cook, M. P.(2006)。Visual representations in science education:The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles。Science Education，90(6)，1073-1091。  new window
27.Wu, H.-K.、Shah, P.(2004)。Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning。Science Education，88(3)，465-492。  new window
28.Spence, D. J.、Yore, L. D.、Williams, R. L.(1999)。The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text。Journal of Elementary Science Education，11(2)，15-30。  new window
29.成露茜、羊憶蓉(19960700)。邁向二十一世紀新新教育--從澳洲「關鍵能力」教育計劃試探臺灣的教改前景。教改通訊，22，14-17。  延伸查詢new window
30.Patrick, M. D.、Carter, G.、Wiebe, E. N.(2005)。Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students' perceptions and interpretations。Journal of Science Education and Technology，14(3)，353-365。  new window
31.盧秀琴(20051200)。探討教科書與中小學學生學習細胞相關概念的關係。科學教育學刊，13(4)，367-386。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.楊榮祥、Fraser,Barry(19981200)。臺灣和西澳科學教室環境的合作研究--研究架構、方法及對臺灣科學教育的啟思。科學教育學刊，6(4)，325-342。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.黃臺珠、Aldridge, Jill M.、Fraser, Barry(19981200)。臺灣和西澳科學教室環境的跨國研究：結合質性與量的研究方法。科學教育學刊，6(4)，343-362。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(1998)。國民教育九年一貫課程規劃專案報告。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pingel, F.(2009)。UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision。United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization & Georg Eckert Institute for Intern。  new window
2.Barthes, Roland、Lavers, Annette、Smith, Colin(1967)。Elements of Semiology。Jonathan Cape。  new window
3.Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood(1978)。Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning。Edward Arnold。  new window
4.Kress, G.、Van Leeuwen, T.(2006)。Reading images: The grammar of visual design。Routledge。  new window
5.Whorf, Benjamin Lee、Carroll, John B.(1956)。Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings。MIT Press。  new window
6.Gagne, Ellen D.、Yekovich, Frank R.、Yekovich, Carol Walker(1993)。The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning。New York, NY：Harper Collins College Publishers。  new window
7.Babbie, E.(2001)。The Practice of Social Research。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
8.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
9.Unsworth, Len(2001)。Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice。Buckingham：Philadelphia：Open University Press。  new window
10.Ausubel, David Paul(1968)。Educational Psychology: a cognitive view。New York：Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。  new window
11.Burr, Vivien(1995)。An Introduction to Social Constructionism。Routledge。  new window
12.Kuhn, Thomas S.、程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥(1994)。科學革命的結構。臺北市：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.王文科、王智弘(2006)。教育研究法。五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心(2007)。TIMSS 2007國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查，http://www.dorise.info/DER/01_timss_2007_html/index.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.Board of Studies in New South Wales(2009)。Science year 7-10 syllabus，http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_sc/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lemke, J. L.(1998)。Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text。Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Levie, W. H.(1987)。Research on pictures: A guide to the literature。The Psychology of Illustration: Basic Research。New York：Springer-Velag。  new window
3.Blystone, R. V.、Dettling, B. C.(1990)。Visual literacy in science textbooks。What research says to the science teacher: The process of knowing。Washington, DC：National Science Teachers Association。  new window
4.Fleming, M. L.(1987)。Designing pictorial/verbal instruction: Some speculative extensions from research to practice。The psychology of Illustration (Vol. 2): instructional issues。New York, NY：Spring-Verlag。  new window
5.Levin, J. R.(1981)。On functions of pictures in prose。Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading。New York：Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：974（臺灣：970，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67859462
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上