:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫對國中學生每日攝取五蔬果及相關因素之影響--以彰化縣立鹿鳴國中學生為例
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:黃惠斌劉潔心 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Hui-pinLiu, Chieh-hsing
出版日期:2005
卷期:23
頁次:頁19-38
主題關鍵詞:每日五蔬果全校性教學活動班級性教學活動國中學生5-A-DayClassroom activitiesSchool-wide activitiesJunior high school students
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究主要目的在發展一個「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫,並進一步探討其介入效果。本研究採「前測-後測不等組」實驗設計,以彰化縣立鹿鳴國中一年級各三個班級為實驗組一及實驗組二,以彰化彰立和群國中一年級三個班級為對照組。「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫,分析班級性教學活動及全校性教學活動,實驗組一先接受班級性教學活動,再接受全校性教學活動介入,實組二只接受全校性教學活動介入。研究工具為前後測自填式結構性問卷,問卷回收率達98.11%。最後有效問卷為306份,佔95.92%。研究結果發現「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫實施後,實驗組一的每日五蔬果五個變項對照組都達統計上顯著差異;實驗組二除了每日五蔬果「認知」「自覺障礙」與對照組未達顯二差異其餘變項都和對照組達統計上顯著差異。實驗組一日五蔬果的五個變項前後測都達統計上顯著差異,實驗組二前後測除了「自覺障礙」外,其他四個變項也都達統計顯著差異。若是在控制前測得分下,實驗組一的每日五蔬果「認知」與「自覺障礙」和實驗組二有達顯著差異,「自覺利益」、「社會支持」和「行為」等變項未達顯著差異。根據本研究結果,建議未來在發展每日五蔬果教育計畫課程時,應透過全面性整合的教育方才可增強學生改變的興趣與意願,且對學生每日五蔬果行為亦才能產生顯著提昇的效果。
The purpose of this study is to develop an effective school 5-A-Day education program related to the dietary behavior of junior high school students. Quasi-experimental method is used to explore the effect of the treatments on junior high school students. Treatment activities in the education program are designed to have designed to have two sections as classroom activities and school-wide activities. Subjects were divided into three groups, two as experimental groups, and the other as control group. The first experimental group is treated with both classroom activities and school-wide activities; classroom activities wee held first, and then followed with school-wide activities. The second experimental group is treated with school-wide activities only. The control group is treated without any activities. All the subjects were sampled from two junior high schools located in Chanhwang County. Questionnaire is used as the measurement instrument. Totally 306 out of 319 subjects are valid for statistical analysis. Results reveal the following information: 1.The mean scores of the knowledge, Prons, Cons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the first experimental group are significantly different from those of the control group. 2.The mean scores of the Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in post-test of the second experimental group are significantly different from those of the control group. However, their mean scores of the knowledge and Con about 5-A-Day are not significant. 3.The mean scores of the knowledge and Cons about 5-A-Day in post-test of the two experimental groups are different significantly. But the mean scores of the Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day of the to experimental groups are not significant. According to the findings in the study, it is recommended that the health educator should design a 5-A-Day education program according to the strategies of behavior change, social cognitive theory, health communication theory, social support and other important items. Meanwhile, the education program should contain health concept promotion, school environmental changes and media marketing campaign.
期刊論文
1.鄭惠美(20000500)。學童家長與學童蔬果攝取行為研究。衛生教育學報,13,91-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Center for Disease Control and Prevention(1997)。Guidelines for school health program to promote lifelong healthy eating。Journal of School Health,67(1),9-26。  new window
3.Chen, V. A.、Vontham, E.、Groves, F. D.(1991)。Cancer incidence in south Louisiana: 1983-1986。Cancer in Louisiana,7,1-33。  new window
4.Nicklas, T. A.、Johnson, C. C.、Myers, L.、Farris, R. P.、Cunningham, A.(1998)。Outcomes of a High School Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Gimme 5-A Fresh Nutrition Concept for Students。Journal of School Health,68(6),248-253。  new window
5.Perry, C. L.、Klepp, K. I.、Schultz, J.(1988)。Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Community-wide strategies for youth。Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology,56,358-364。  new window
6.Schlettweingsell, D.(1992)。Nutrition and the quality of life: A measure for the outcome of nutrition intervention。American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,55,1263-1266。  new window
7.Splett, P. L.、Story, M.(1992)。Child nutrition: Objectives for the decade。Journal of the American Dietetic Association,91,665-668。  new window
8.Block, G.、Patterson, B.、Subar, A.(1992)。Fruit, Vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence。Nutrition and Cancer,18(1),1-29。  new window
9.Willer, W.(1990)。Vitamin A and lung Cancer。Nutrition Review,48(5),201-211。  new window
10.Kelder, S. H.、Perry, C. L.、Klepp, K. I.、Lytle, L. L.(1994)。Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors。American Journal of Public Health,84(7),1121-1126。  new window
11.李蘭、陸玓玲、李隆安、黃美維、潘怜燕、鄧肖琳(19950800)。臺灣地區成人的健康行為探討:分佈情形、因素結構和相關因素。中華公共衛生雜誌,14(4),358-368。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院衛生署(1993)。每日飲食指南。臺北:行政院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張玉鳳(2001)。臺北市某國中學生攝取蔬果行為相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.彭汪家康、賴基銘、杭極敏(2001)。蔬菜水果與癌症。蔬果防癌飲食寶典。臺北:財團法人臺灣癌症基金會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE