:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:羅東林區民眾對林業經營的認知與態度
書刊名:地理研究
作者:鐘龍治廖學誠 引用關係陳宛君 引用關係劉瓊蓮陳美惠
作者(外文):Chung, Lung-chihLiaw, Shyue-cherngChen, Wan-jiunLiu, Giong-lianChen, Mei-hui
出版日期:2005
卷期:43
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:民眾參與社區林業環境態度因素分析Public participationCommunity forestryEnvironmental attitudeFactor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:52
  • 點閱點閱:31
民眾參與自然資源經營管理已蔚為國際潮流,臺灣林務局亦於2002年開始推動社區林業計畫,鼓勵民眾參與林業經營,期能兼顧生態保育與社區發展。本研究目的在於瞭解民眾對林業經營的認知與態度,透過深度訪談及問卷調查,比較已申請與未申請社區林業計畫的社區居民對林業經營看法之差異,並分析漢人與原住民對林業經營認知及態度上之不同。結果顯示,社區幹部普遍認為林業經營應優先照顧當地社區福祉,增加經濟收益及提供就業機會最為重要,甚至可以把國有林交給社區管理。社區居民非常認同森林的環境效益,且認為保護森林是件相當急迫的事情,如能讓社區參與將更為恰當。整體而言,有無參與社區林業計畫對社區居民的森林效益認知及環境態度上並無顯著影響,但若以漢人及原住民區分,則社區居民在部份的林業經營環境態度上是有顯著不同,這些差異主要呈現在參與的意願、對傳統知識的認同、森林社區範圍的確認及自然資源的擁有等面向上。最後,經由因素分析可將環境態度問項歸納為四大因素,分別為道德情感、民眾參與、利它觀念及承擔意願等。
It is the international trend that residents participate in the natural resource management. Taiwan Forestry Bureau implemented a new project “Community Forestry” in 2002. The purpose of this new project was to encourage public participation in forestry management in order to ensure ecological conservation and community development. The main aim of this paper was to understand public awareness and attitude for forestry management. Through face-to-face interview and questionnaire survey, we studied the difference of forestry management opinions between community residents applied and non-applied for Community Forestry Project. In addition, we also analyzed the difference of awareness and attitude for forestry management between the Han and aboriginal people. Results showed that almost hardcore members of community association pointed out that forestry management should pay attentions on the community benefits to increasae economic income and to provide employment opportunity. They also suggested letting residents manage national forests directly. The local residents appreciated forest's environmental benefits. They responded that protecting forest was very important, and considered that public participation in foretry management was very suitable. In the conclusion, there wasn't difference of awareness and attitude for forestry management between community residents applied and non-applied for Community Forestry Project. However, there were obvious differences of partial attitudes for forestry management between the Han and aboriginal people. These difference included willingness of public participation, recognition of traditional knowledge, identification of forest community boundary, and possession of natural resources. Finally, these environment attitudes could be classified to four factors through the factor analysis, including moral emotion, public participation, altruistic concept, and responsible willingness.
期刊論文
1.李思屛、林晏州(2001)。遊客對生態旅遊之環境態度與行爲關係之研究--以關渡自然公園爲例。戶外遊憩研究,14(3),15-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.倪進誠(2000)。澎湖群島遊客之空間行為與環境識覺分析。台大地理學報,27,21-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳美惠、管立豪(2002)。社區林業--居民參與保育共生。豐年,52(5),26-30。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭克仲、李建霖、吳秀鳳、張安妮(19980300)。高屏溪流域居民之環境態度與環保行為分析。國立屏東科技大學學報,7(1),31-44。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭欽龍、古曉燕(19990300)。社區林經營與公眾參與。中華林學季刊,32(1)=124,79-89。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cordell, H. K.、Tarrant, M. A.(2002)。Southern forest resource assessment highlights changing demographics€™ values, and attitudes。Journal of Forestry,100(9),28-33。  new window
7.Côté, M.、Bouthilber, L.(2002)。Assessing the effect of public involvement process in forest management in Quebec。Forest Policy and Economic,4,213-225。  new window
8.Elands, B. H. M.、Freerk, W. K.(2001)。Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses。Forest Policy and Economics,3(1/2),5-16。  new window
9.Elands, B. H. M.、O'Leary, T. N.、Boerwinkel, H. W. J.、Wiersum, K. F.(2004)。Forests as a mirror of rural' conditions: local views on the role of forests across Europe。Forest Policy and Economics,6,469-482。  new window
10.Fath, B. D.、Beck, M. B.(2005)。Elucidating public perceptions of environmental behavior: a case study of Lake Lanier。Environmental Modeling & Software,20,485-498。  new window
11.Gauld, R.(2000)。Maintaining centralized control in community-based forestry: policy construction in the Philippines。Development and Change,28(1),1-20。  new window
12.Germain, R. H.、Donald, W. F.、Stehman, S. V.(2001)。Public perception of the USDA Forest Service public participation process。Forest Policy and Economics,3,113-124。  new window
13.Glück, P.(2000)。Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe。Forest Policy and Economics,1(3/4),195-207。  new window
14.Lykke, A. M.(2000)。Local perceptions of vegetation change and priorities for conservation of woody-savanna vegetation in Senegal。Journal of Environmental Management,59,107-120。  new window
15.Noe, E. P.、Snow, R.(1989)。Hispanic culture influence on environmental concern。Journal of Environmental Education,21(2),27-34。  new window
16.Purnomo, H.、Mendoza, G. A.、Prabhu, R.(2005)。Analysis of local perspectives on sustainable forest management: an Indonesian case study。Journal of Environmental management,74,111-126。  new window
17.Roovers, P.、Hermy, M.、Gulinck, H.(2002)。Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanization in central Belgium。Landscape and Urban Planning,59(3),129-145。  new window
18.Still, D.、Fair, B.、Gerhold, H.(1996)。Community forest grants in Pennsylvania: how effective are they?。Journal of Forestry,94(1),26-29。  new window
19.Sumner, G. L.、Heath, W. C.(1998)。A note on the right to experience trees。Journal of Environmental Management,54,127-130。  new window
20.Tahvanainen, L.、Tyrväinen, L.、Ihalainen, M.、Vuorela, N.、Kolehmainen, O.(2001)。Forest management and public perceptions--visual versus verbal information。Landscape and Urban Planning,53,53-70。  new window
21.Trakolis, D.(2001)。Local people's perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park Greece。Journal of Environmental Management,61,227-241。  new window
22.蕭世暉、蕭惠中(2003)。國家公園是什麼?--從馬告國家公園爭議談永續發展政策改革。看守臺灣,5(1),44-49。  延伸查詢new window
23.吳運全、謝智謀(20021000)。生態旅遊遊客環境態度之研究--以綠島為例。旅遊健康學刊,2(1),37-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.靳知勤(19940400)。環境知識、態度與行為之研究。環境教育季刊,21,47-59。  延伸查詢new window
25.簡明旭、蔡長添(2000)。國中學生對垃圾問題的知識、態度與行為之研究。科學教育,11,160-178。  延伸查詢new window
26.Dunlap, Riley E.、Van Liere, Kent D.(1978)。The New Environmental Paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results。The Journal of Environmental Education,9(4),10-19。  new window
27.王天佑、黃芳銘(19990600)。中大學生環境認知、態度與行為調查研究。社會文化學報,8,189-216。  延伸查詢new window
28.Belsky, Jill、Johnson, Nels、Benavides, Victor、Goebel, Martin、Waage, Sissel、Hawkins, Ann(2001)。Global Linkages to Community-based Ecosystem Management in the United States。Journal of Sustainable Forestry,12(3/4),35-63。  new window
29.Enzer, Maia J.、Gray, Gerald J.、Kusel, Jonathan(2001)。Understanding Community-based Forest Ecosystem Management: An Editorial Synthesis。Journal of Sustainable Forestry,12(3/4),1-23。  new window
研究報告
1.羅紹麟、童秋霞、葉美智、黃有傑(2002)。社區居民之認知及態度調查期末報告。台中:國立中興大學森林系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳玟瑾(2001)。台北市華江雁鴨自然公園使用者態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Forestry Bureau(2002)。社區林業--居民參與保育共生計畫補助須知。臺北:林務局。  延伸查詢new window
2.FAO(1978)。Forestry for local community development。Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations。  new window
3.黃安邦(1986)。社會心理學。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖學誠、陳宛君、賴玉芳、鐘龍治(2004)。民眾參與社區林業第一階段後總體效益分析--以羅東林區管理處為例。台北:國立台灣師範大學地理系。  延伸查詢new window
5.Arnold, J. E. M.(1991)。Community forestry: ten years in review, Community Forestry。FAO。  new window
6.Golledge, R. G.、Stimson, R. J.(1987)。Analytical behavioral Geography。New York:Groom Helm。  new window
7.邱皓政(2002)。量化研究統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gifford, R.、蕭秀玲、莊慧秋、黃漢耀(1991)。環境心理學。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
10.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
11.Fishbein, Martin、Ajzen, Icek(1975)。Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE