:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同族群對於高爾夫推桿外觀偏好之研究
書刊名:國立臺北教育大學學報. 人文藝術類
作者:陳淳迪 引用關係潘武宏
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-diPan, Wu-hong
出版日期:2006
卷期:19:2
頁次:頁95-132
主題關鍵詞:產品設計高爾夫推桿多向度分析Product designGolf putterMDS
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:30
在一般以功能為導向的運動器材消費上,高爾夫運動的推桿有較多外形上的變化可供消費者選擇。本研究嘗試探討當消費者在無法觸及這些球桿的情形下,是如何評斷這些商品?不同的消費者對於不同造形屬性的球桿的看法有何差異?這些問題不只關乎目前盛行的消費性電子商務,對於球桿的設計師也極其重要。 本研究選出具外觀差異的10 支推桿作為受測樣本,以多向度分析(multidimensional scaling analysis, MDS),探討不同分類族群之消費者,在瞄準、擊球面、表面處理、平衡、心理、造形這六個在推桿上的外觀特徵屬性上之偏好程度與其差異性。 研究結果顯示各分類族群彼此之間對於產品外觀屬性的感受與認知程度不同。消費者在推桿的選購上,並非僅與外觀特徵因素有關而已,尚包含外觀所衍生的象徵意義與產品社會性價值等考量。
Instead of the benefits from material innovation and human factor performance, golf putters are designed with significant consideration in their appearance. This study focuses on the consumers’ preference to the appearance of golf putter, with a view to exploring the interrelation between the consumers’ attributions and the features of appearance of golf putter. The results are expected to establish a framework for the design strategy of golf putters. The appearance of golf putters is represented in terms of six features: aim, face, surface, balance, psychology, and shape. Ten samples of putters are selected and then reviewed on the basis of the six characteristics by 127 consumers whose attributions are representive including the gender, the experience in playing golf, the age, and the background in design. The variety in preference is then analyzed by multi-dimensional scaling analysis. Results of MDS showing the preference distribution allow us to find difference preference determinants amongst the groups with different attributions. In other words, the consumers with different attributions present different ways in determining their preference. Finally, even given putters with a strong image in functionality, the results indicate that symbolic meaning plays an important role in determining the purchase willing.
期刊論文
1.劉育東(1995)。Some Phenomena of Seeing Shapes in Design。Design Studies,16(3),367-385。  new window
2.莊明振、陳俊智(2004)。產品形態特徵與構成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究--以水壺的設計為例。設計學報,9(3),43-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bloch, Peter H.(1995)。Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response。Journal of Marketing,59(3),16-29。  new window
4.Roy, R.、Riedel, J. C.(1997)。Design and Innovation in Successful Product Competition。Technovation,17(10),537-548。  new window
5.Crilly, Nathan、Moultrie, James、Clarkson, P. John(2004)。Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design。Design Studies,25(6),547-577。  new window
6.陳俊智(20011200)。以坐椅設計為例探討中西設計風格的認知與判斷。設計學報,6(2),79-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Miller, George A.(1956)。The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information。The Psychological Review,63(2),81-97。  new window
8.林榮泰、翁註重(1997)。醫院用標誌符號的認知研究。工業工程學刊,14(4),363-376。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.莊明振、馬永川(2001)。以為電子產品為例探討產品意象與造形呈現對應關係。設計學報,6(1),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.簡思寧(2004)。德國6國iF設計獎執行長總裁拜訪臺灣創意設計中心。設計雜誌,117,72-74。  延伸查詢new window
11.Chang, W. C.、Van, Y. T.(2003)。Researching design trends for the redesign of product form。Design Studies,24(2),173-180。  new window
12.Lin, R.、林君昱、Wong, Jean(1996)。An application of multidimensional scaling in product semantics。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,18,193-204。  new window
13.Sauerhaft, R.(2004)。Putter test 2004。Golf Magazine,47(11),121-140。  new window
學位論文
1.謝政峰(2002)。產品造形屬性特徵對使用者感官意象的影響—以行動電話為例(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋伊可(2002)。消費者對產品外觀價值感認知差異之研究--以行動電話為例(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.賈靜嫻(2002)。利用標竿管理創造競爭優勢研究--以鉅明股份有限公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張永杰(2002)。市場區隔研究在新產品開發上之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張建成(2000)。使用者對產品造形意象認知的影響因素研究(博士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
6.張嘉玲(2004)。消費者對產品創新認知之相關研究,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
7.許瑜真(2002)。消費性電子產品實體介面色彩與標示之研究,雲林。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳奕廣(2000)。多向度評量法改良及應用之研究,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.魏雅萍(2000)。設計師與一般消費者對造形認知差異研究,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Norman, Donald A.(1988)。The Design of Everyday Things。New York。  new window
2.Ulrich, K. T.、Eppinger, S. D.(2000)。Product design and development。New York:Irwin McGraw-Hill。  new window
3.Hawkins, D. I.、Best, R. J.、Coney, K. A.(2003)。Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy。McGraw-Hill College。  new window
4.Schiffman, L. G.、Kanuk, L. L.(2004)。Consumer behavior。Upper Saddle River, NJ:New Jersey:Pearson Education International:Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Maslow, Abraham H.(1954)。Motivation and Personality。Harper & Row。  new window
6.Baxter, M.(1995)。Product design, practical methods for the ststematic development of new products。Product design, practical methods for the ststematic development of new products。London, UK。  new window
7.Esslinger, H.、Sweet, F.(1999)。Frog: Forms follows emotion。London:Thames & Hudson。  new window
8.Lewalski, Z. M.(1988)。Product esthetics: An interpretation for designers。Product esthetics: An interpretation for designers。Carson City, NV。  new window
9.Maurer, C.、Overbeeke, C. J.、Smets, G.(1992)。The semantics of street furniture。Objects and images and images, studies in design and advertising。Helsinki。  new window
10.Pagano, R. R.(1998)。Understanding statistics in the behavioral science。Understanding statistics in the behavioral science。Belmont, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE