:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文化差異對創意提袋認知之影響
書刊名:設計學年刊
作者:廖卿枝詹楊彬歐陽競康
作者(外文):Liao, Ching-chihJan, Yang BingAu Yeung, King Hong
出版日期:2016
卷期:4
頁次:頁47-73
主題關鍵詞:文化差異創意提袋認知Cultural gapCreativityShopping bagCognition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:580
  • 點閱點閱:24
在日益全球化的市場中,文化差異所衍伸的問題越來越受到關注。跨國性之品牌與非營利組織常將相關產品或關注性議題,以趣味畫面或強調功能性融入提袋設計,企圖引起注目,以達傳遞訊息之目的。本研究假設不同文化背景下對創意提袋設計之看法與接受度有差異,以具創意設計之提袋為例,利用語意差異法(SD法)結合七階量尺,針對台灣與德國之使用者進行量測。研究結果發現兩群參與者對提袋意象構成與偏好有顯著不同。兩群之提袋意象皆由四個主要因素構成,第一主成份皆為「創新」因素,但台灣的創新成份偏向具趣味創新,德國偏向實用性創新。「喜愛的」綜合評價,台灣參與者之反應受到「優美的」、「互動的」、「實用的」等意象影響;德國參與者受到「實用的」、「巧思的」、「幽默的」等意象影響。「樂於使用的」綜合評價:台灣參與者受到「優美的」、「前衛的」(呈現負值)、「新奇的」、「環保的」等意象之影響,德國則受到「實用的」、「優美的」、「幽默的」意象之影響。顯示在提袋設計中多強調美感、互動、實用與使用不讓人發窘、具驚奇感、環保比較能夠提高台灣使用者喜歡並樂於使用之預測;多注入實用性、巧妙、優美與幽默感的意象則有助於提高德國使用者偏好與樂於使用之預測。
In an increasingly globalized market, issues resulting from cultural differences receive more and more attention. To transmit messages related to products or important issues, and attract attention, multinational brands and nonprofit organizations often incorporate interesting images and emphasize functionality in bag design. This study posits that people with different cultural backgrounds have varying opinions about creative shopping bags. Taking creative shopping bag design as an example, this study uses a seven-point semantic differential to analyze users in Taiwan and Germany. Research results suggest that the two nationalities form different images and preferences toward shopping bags. The images are based on four main factors, the first being “innovation.” However, Taiwanese users are drawn to innovations that are full of fun, while German users prefer practical designs. Results show that Taiwanese users’ overall evaluation of “like” images are affected by those that are “nice,” “interactive,” and “practical.” German users, on the other hand, tend to “like” “practical,” “novel,” and “humorous” images. Moreover, Taiwanese users “enjoy using” shopping bags that are “nice,” “trend-setting” (which shows a negative value), “novel,” and “environmentally friendly.” Germans, however, “enjoy using” bags with designs that are “practical,” “nice,” and “humorous.” The results suggest that Taiwanese users like and enjoy using shopping bags with images that are aesthetical, interactive, practical, surprising and user-friendly in a way that the images do not embarrass users. German users prefer and enjoy using shopping bags with practical, unique and humorous designs.
期刊論文
1.張春暉(2003)。認知思維與英漢成語隱喻互譯。湖南城市學院學報,2003(4),121-123。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lamb, J. M.、Kallal, M. Jo(1992)。A conceptual framework for apparel design。Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,10(2),42-47。  new window
3.馬敏元(20100400)。淺談日本新產品開發之感「心」技術。工業材料,280,160-172。  延伸查詢new window
4.周君瑞、陳國祥(20030900)。感性化產品造形之塑造--以造形特徵為基礎。設計學報,8(2),77-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.莊明振、陳俊智(2004)。產品形態特徵與構成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究--以水壺的設計為例。設計學報,9(3),43-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.de Bont, Cees J. P. M.、Schoormans, Jan P. L.、Wessel, Marianne T. T.(1992)。Consumer Personality and The acceptance of Product Design。Design Studies,13(2),200-208。  new window
7.Budhwar, P. S.、Woldu, H.、Ogbonna, E.(2008)。A Comparative Analysis of Cultural Value Orientations of Indians and Migrant Indians in the USA。International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,8(1),79-105。  new window
8.Buxton, P.(2006)。Design Manual: The Impact of Image。Marketing Magazine。  new window
9.Jellen, H. U.、Urban, K.(1989)。Assessing creative potential worldwide: The first cross cultural application of the test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP)。Gifted Education,6,78-86。  new window
10.Li, Y.、Muthu, S. S.、Hu, J. Y.、Mok, P. Y.、Ding, X.、Wang, L.、Chen, W.(2010)。Eco-Impact of Shopping Bags: Consumer Attitude and Governmental Policies。Journal of Sustainable Development,3(2),71-83。  new window
11.LaTour, M. S.(1990)。Female nudity in print advertising: an analysis of gender differences in arousal and response。Psychology and Marketing,7(1),65-81。  new window
12.Severn, J.、Belch, George E.、Belch, Michael A.(1990)。The effects of sexual and Non-sexual advertising appeals and information level on cognitive processing and communication effectiveness。Journal of Advertising,19(1),14-22。  new window
13.Rodriguez, A.(2013)。Cultural Factors That Impact Brand Personification Strategy Effectiveness。Psychology and Marketing,31(1),70-83。  new window
14.Razzaghi, M.、Ramirez, M. Jr.、Zehner, R.(2009)。Cultural patterns in product design ideas: comparisons between Australian and Iranian student concepts。Design Studies,30(4),438-461。  new window
15.莊雅量、陳玲鈴(20070900)。CAKE:擴充性感性意象調查與分析系統。設計學報,12(3),63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Ahuvia, Aaron C.(2005)。Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers' identity narratives。Journal of Consumer Research,32(1),171-184。  new window
17.Richins, Marsha L.(1997)。Measuring emotions in the consumption experience。Journal of Consumer Research,24(2),127-146。  new window
學位論文
1.謝雯雅(2002)。焦點聯想法於設計創意激發之應用研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, S.、Wheeler, Joe(2002)。Managing the Customer Experience: Turning Customers into Advocates。Financial Times Prentice Hall。  new window
2.Sweet, Fat(1999)。Frog: Form Follows Emotion。London:Thams & Hudson。  new window
3.Friedman, Thomas L.、楊振富、潘勛(2007)。世界是平的。雅言文化出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Norman, Donald A.(1988)。The design of everyday things。New York, NY:Doubleday。  new window
5.De Mooij, Marieke K.(2004)。Consumer behavior and culture: Consequences for global marketing and advertising。Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
6.饒見維(2005)。創造思考訓練:創造思考的心理策略與技巧。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.李天來(2004)。設計 VS 包裝袋。台北:紅蕃薯文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.李天來(1997)。活動海報:包裝袋設計。台北:羲之堂文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.王韻雅(2011)。成語的隱喻藝術。台北市:紅螞蟻圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Norman, Donald A.、王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑(2011)。情感@設計。大眾心理館。  延伸查詢new window
11.Runco, M. A.、邱皓政、丁興祥、林耀南、陳育瑜、林碧芳、王詩婷、賴靜宜、柯怡安、陳佳筠、何潤娥(2007)。創造力--當代理論與議題。新北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Best, K.、李琦、劉櫻、宮力、胡子平、楊彝(2015)。管理設計:創意獲利的關鍵競爭力。台北市:城邦文化事業:麥浩斯。  延伸查詢new window
13.湯曉山(2003)。廣告表現與設計。新竹市:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Sue, W.、Fran, M.、高子梅(2008)。SHOPPING BAG的設計美學。台北市:臉譜:城邦文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.Eliade, M.、Mairet, Philip、Sheed & Ward(1961)。Images and Symbols。New York, NY:Princeton University Press。  new window
16.ICSID(2002)。Facts about ICSID International Council of Societies of Industrial Design。Montréal。  new window
17.ICSID(2001)。ICSID code of professional ethics International Council of Societies of Industrial Design。Helsinki。  new window
18.Hofstede, G.、Hofstede, G. J.、Minkov, M.(2010)。Cultural and Organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival。New York, NY:Mcgraw-Hill Education Ltd.。  new window
19.Press, M.、Cooper, R.(2003)。The Design Experience: The Role of Design and Designers in the 21st Century。Farnham:Ashgate Publishing Limited。  new window
20.Smith, P. B.、Fischer, R.、Vignoles, V.、Bond, M. H.(2013)。Understanding Social Psychology across Cultures. Engaging with others in a changing world。London:SAGE。  new window
21.Woodward, Kathryn、林文琪(2006)。認同與差異。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.Boulding, Kenneth E.(1956)。The image: knowledge in life and society。University of Michigan Press。  new window
23.吳思華(20000000)。策略九說:策略思考的本質。臺北:臉譜。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Hofstede, Geert H.(2001)。Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organisations Across Nations。Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications。  new window
圖書論文
1.Runco, M. A.(1994)。Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity。Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE