:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:並聯研發與競爭優勢:臺灣自行車產業的個案研究
書刊名:管理評論
作者:張永佶蔡敦浩 引用關係林文玲陳可杰
作者(外文):Chang, Yung-chiTsai, Stephen D. H.Lin, Wen-lingChen, Ko-chieh
出版日期:2006
卷期:25:4
頁次:頁97-129
主題關鍵詞:自行車中小企業新產品開發模組化設計個案研究BicycleSmall and medium sized enterprisesNew product developmentModular product designCase study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:286
  • 點閱點閱:44
人類消費的最終產品通常是由眾多零件組合而成,所以零件的研發整合問題當有其重要性。雖然Sanchez and Mahoney (1996)曾將以往的零件研發整合方式整理成“傳統型”、“重疊型”、“模組式”三種模式,但可惜都隱涵“系統製造廠商應該主導零件廠服務其顧客”的“串聯型”組織互動關係假設,這對台灣自行車產業以中小企業為研發主體,以OEM為主要國際貿易型態的現實狀況而言,是有直接適用上的問題。經過田野訪談之後,本研究發現,台灣自行車產業新產品研發的組織互動過程是一種“並聯型”的組織互動關係。因為全球自行車產業具有國際介面標準,以及OEM買家的主導力量,所以整個過程不是由台灣成車廠總攬所有研發工作,由台灣成車廠主導所屬零件廠研發創新自行車給OEM買家的“串聯型”互動關係;而是成車廠、零件廠同步跟OEM買家互動,共同協助OEM買家研發新自行車的一種“並聯型新產品開發模式”。在此模式中,台灣成廠與零件廠的角色行為都已產生變化,有別於以往產品系統製造商主導零件廠的角色關係。本文不僅描述此一模式的運作過程與競爭優勢,同時也討論台灣成車廠與零件廠在角色行為變化後的發展策略意涵。
A final product is always composed of many component s so the integration of the development process of related components is very important. Al though Sanchez and Mahoney (1996) had identified three alternative approaches of component development process yet there is a ”vertical-connecting” assumption under these three approaches, which mean ”that the assemblers should lead their component suppliers to serve their customers”. In our research we have found that this assumption may be not right for the bicycle industry in Taiwan which is dominated by many small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). We have found a ”parallel-connecting” relationship in the organizing process of the new product development process of bicycle industry in Taiwan. Because of the international inter face standards in the global bicycle industry and the dominating power of OEM buyers, the organizing process of the new product development process of bicycle industry in Taiwan do not obey the ”vertical-connecting” assumption. Many assemblers and the component suppliers in the bicycle industry in Taiwan get their interaction with foreign OEM buyers simultaneously and offer R&D services to them in a parallel connecting style. We call such a process a「parallel-connecting new product development process」. In this kind of process the role behaviors of assemblers and component suppliers have been transformed remarkably. In addition to the descript ion of the R & D interact ions among the OEM buyers, assemblers and component suppliers, we al so discuss the competitive advantage of such a new product development process to the bicycle industry in Taiwan and the strategic implication of the assembler s and component suppliers in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Brown, S. L.、Eisenhardt, K. M.(1995)。Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings and Future Direction。Academy of Management Review,20(2),343-378。  new window
2.Clark, K. B.(1985)。The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution。Research Policy,14(5),235-251。  new window
3.瞿宛文、李佳靜(19990900)。成長與產業組織:臺灣與南韓自行車業之比較研究。臺灣社會研究,35,47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Nonaka, I.(1990)。Redundant, overlapping organization: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process。California Management Review,32(3),27-38。  new window
5.Lamglois, R. N.、Robertson, P. L.(1992)。Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries。Research Policy,21(4),297-313。  new window
6.Sanchez, R.、Mahoney, Joseph T.(1996)。Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design。Strategic Management Journal,17(S2),63-76。  new window
7.Calantone, Roger J.、Anthony, Benedetto, C.(198809)。An integrative model of new product development process: An empirical validation。Journal of Product Innovation Management,5(3),201- 215。  new window
8.Ulrchi, K. T.(1995)。The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm。Research Policy,24(3),419-440。  new window
9.Morris, Charles R.、Ferguson, Charles H.(1993)。How Architecture Wins Technology Wars。Harvard Business Review,71(2),86-96。  new window
10.Baldwin, Carliss Y.、Clark, Kim B.(1997)。Managing in an age of modularity。Harvard Business Review,75(5),84-93。  new window
11.Chesbrough, H. W.、Teece, D. J.(1996)。When Is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation。Harvard Business Review,74(1),65-73。  new window
12.Kogut, B.、Kulatilaka, N.(1994)。Operating Flexibility, Global Manufacturing, and the Option Value of a Multinational Network。Management Science,40(1),123-139。  new window
13.Orton, J. Douglas、Weick, Karl E.(1990)。Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization。The Academy of Management Review,15(2),203-223。  new window
14.Sanchez, Ron(1995)。Strategic flexibility in product competition。Strategic Management Journal,16(S1),135-159。  new window
15.Cooper, R. G.、Kleinschmidt, E. J.(1993)。Major New Products: What Distinguishes the Winners in the Chemical Industry?。Journal of Product Innovation Management,10(2),90-111。  new window
16.曾成樺、徐聯恩(19980600)。全球企業成長與策略--以巨大捷安特為例。中山管理評論,6(2),461-479。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Takeuchi, H.、Nonaka, I.(1986)。The new product development game。Harvard Business Review,64(1),137-146。  new window
18.Tushman, Michael L.(1977)。Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process。Administrative Science Quarterly,22(4),587-605。  new window
19.謝國雄(19910900)。網絡式生產組織:臺灣外銷工業中的外包制度。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,71,161-181。  延伸查詢new window
20.瞿宛文(19931100)。成長的因素--臺灣自行車產業的研究。臺灣社會研究季刊,15,65-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Henderson, Rebecca M.、Clark, Kim B.(1990)。Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms。Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1),9-30。  new window
22.Egan, M. L.、Mody, A.(1992)。Buyer-seller links in export development。World Development,20(3),321-334。  new window
23.Saren, M. A.(1984)。A Classification and Review of Models of The Intra-firm Innovation Process。R&D Management,14(1),11-24。  new window
24.Allen, T. J.(1966)。Studies of the Problem-solving Process in Engineering Design。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Manufacturing,13(2),72-83。  new window
25.Becker, S. W.、Whisler, T. L.(1967)。The Innovation Organization: A Selective View of Current Theory and Research。The Journal of Business,40(4),462-469。  new window
26.Cooper, R. G.(1979)。The Dimensions of Industrial of Industrial New Product Success and Failure。Journal of Marketing,43(3),93-103。  new window
27.Cooper, R. G.(1983)。The New Product Process: An Empirical Based Classification Scheme。R&D Management,30(1),1-13。  new window
28.Cooper, R. G.(1994)。Perspective: Third-generation New Product Process。The Journal of Product Innovation Management,11(1),3-15。  new window
29.Fleischer, M.(1996)。Implementing Concurrent Engineering。Automotive Production,108(11),14-14。  new window
30.Galvin, P.、Morkel, A.(2001)。The Effect of Product Modularity on Industry Structure: The Case of the World Bicycle Industry。Industry and Innovation,8(1),31-47。  new window
31.Garud, R.、Kumaraswamy, A.(1993)。Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries。Strategic Management Journal,14(5),351-369。  new window
32.Huang, X.、Soutar, G. N.、Brown, N.(2002)。New Product Development Process in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Some Australian Evidence。Journal of Small Business Management,40(1),27-42。  new window
33.Petty, R. D.(1995)。Peddling the Bicycle in 1990s: Mass Marketing Shifts into High Gear。Journal of Macromarketing,15(1),32-46。  new window
34.Simon, H.(1962)。The Architecture of Complexity。Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,106,467-482。  new window
35.Teece, D. J.(1984)。Economic Analysis and Strategic Management。California Management Review,26(3),87-110。  new window
36.Weick, K. E.(1976)。Education Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems。Administrative Science Quarterly,21,1-19。  new window
會議論文
1.高承恕(1994)。臺灣中小企業的社會生活基礎。臺北:中華經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊文螢(1999)。兩岸自行車產業現況與互動專題研究。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉秀美(1994)。臺灣自行車產業品牌化決策之研究(-)。  延伸查詢new window
2.張永佶(2004)。並聯型新產品開發模式:臺灣自行車產業的研發經驗,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.簡百邑(1997)。臺灣自行產業全球價值鏈分析,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chen, S. J.(1999)。Project Task Coordination and Team Organization in Concorrent Engineering,0。  new window
圖書
1.劉水深(1981)。產品規劃與策略運用。臺北市:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Twiss, B.(1992)。Managing Technological Innovation。London:Pitman。  new window
3.Christensen, Clayton M.、Raynor, Michael E.(2003)。The innovator's solution: creating and sustaining successful growth。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
4.Clark, Kim B.、Wheelwright, Steven C.(1993)。Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases。New York, NY:The Free Press。  new window
5.陳介玄(1994)。協力網路與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。台北:聯經圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。  new window
7.Clark, Kim B.、Fujimoto, Takahiro(1991)。Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
8.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
9.Schön, D. A.(1967)。Technology and Change。Technology and Change。沒有紀錄。  new window
10.臺灣區自行車輸出業同業公會2000年名錄。臺灣區自行車輸出業同業公會2000年名錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.2000年中華民國工業發展年鑑。2000年中華民國工業發展年鑑。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kogut, B.、Bowman, E. H.(1995)。Modularity and Permenability as Principles of Design。Redesign the Firm。New York, NY。  new window
13.Kuczmarski, T. D.(1992)。Management New Product: The Power of Innovation。Management New Product: The Power of Innovation。New Jersey。  new window
14.Nishiguchi, T.(1994)。Strategic Industrial Outsourcing: The Japanese Advantage。Strategic Industrial Outsourcing: The Japanese Advantage。Oxford。  new window
15.Sato, Y.(1998)。Large Domestic Market as Paradox: The Background of Japanese Bicycle Industry's Decline。The Bicycle Industries in Taiwan and Japan: A Preliminary Study toward Comparison between Taiwanese and Japanese Industrial Development。Tokyo, Japan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE