臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：多元識讀與動畫敘事課程在國語文領域統整中的應用--一個國語文領域統整課程發展之經驗分享
書刊名：師大學報. 人文與社會科學類
作者：徐靜嫻
作者(外文)：Hsu, Ching-hsien
出版日期：2006
卷期：51:1/2
頁次：頁55-77
主題關鍵詞：合作探究；多元識讀；敘事課程；國語文領域統整課程；Collaborative inquiry；Multi-literacy；Narrative curriculum；Curriculum integration for Chinese language courses
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:33
本研究乃研究者與一個九人國小教師團隊，透過合作探究方式共同研發課程的歷程與結果。筆者有感當下諸多國語文領域的統整，缺乏對國語文領域本質與內涵之深究，導致國語文在統整課程中被稀釋化的現象。筆者透過教師團隊研習的方式，引導教師重新反省與建構對此面向的理解，並根植於相關理論發展出一個國語文領域統整的課程。研究結果顯示，以多元識讀的方式將動畫敘事課程運用至國小低年級國語文領域統整課程，在建立孩子對閱讀理解與策略應用、多元識讀能力之提升、以及生命經驗之分享上都有其積極的意義。另一方面，九人教師團隊亦肯定並建議，未來關於師資培育專家教授與現場教師專業成長團隊的互動上，合作探究模式是一個可以採行的方向。
The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze, by means of collaborative inquiry, the results of a Chinese language curriculum development project. More specifically, the researchers were concerned with the possibility of using animated narratives and other multi-media applications in designing an integrated Chinese Language curriculum. Our research shows that the use of a narrative curriculum produces positive results in reading comprehension, the use of reading strategies, the improvement of multi-literacy skills, and the ability to share life experiences in Chinese. In addition, collaborative inquiry as a mode of interaction is highly recommended for cooperative efforts involving college experts and classroom practitioners in the future.
期刊論文
1.徐靜嫻(20050600)。「國語文領域統整問題疑、議」再議。新竹師院學報，20，109-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kress, G.(2000)。A curriculum for the future。Cambridge Journal of Education，30(1)，133-145。  new window
3.Duncum, P.(2004)。Visual culture isn't just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality and meaning。Studies in Art Education，45(3)，252-264。  new window
4.Cazden, Courtney、Cope, Bill、Fairclough, Norman、Gee, Jim(1996)。A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures。Harvard Educational Review，66(1)，60-92。  new window
5.Suhor, C.(1984)。Towards a semiotics-based curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Studies，16(3)，247-257。  new window
6.Pataray-Ching, J.、Roberson, M.(2002)。Misconoceptions about a curriculum-as-inquiry framework。Language arts，79(6)，498-505。  new window
7.Leland, C. H.、Harste, J. C.(1994)。Multiple Ways of Knowing: Curriculum in a New Key。Language Arts，71(5)，337-345。  new window
8.Cochran-Smith, M.、Lytle, S. L.(1999)。Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teaching learning in communities。Review or Research in Education，24(8)，249-305。  new window
9.Siegel, M.(1995)。More than words: the generative power of transmediation for learning。Canadian Journal of Education，20(4)，455-475。  new window
10.Short, K.、Kauffman, G.、Kahn, L.(2000)。I just need to draw: Responding to literature across multiple sign systems。The Reading Teacher，54(2)，160-171。  new window
11.Short, K.、Bruke, D.(1996)。Examining our beliefs and practices through inquiry。Language Arts，73(2)，97-104。  new window
12.Short, K. G.(1999)。The search for "balance" in a literature-rich curriculum。Theory and Practice，38(3)，130-137。  new window
13.Short, K. G.(1997)。Inquiring into inquiry。Learning，25(6)，56-57。  new window
14.Anstey, M.(2002)。'It's not all black and white': Postmodern picture books and new literacies。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy，45(6)，444-457。  new window
15.趙鏡中(20010700)。國語文統整教學的「統整」在哪裡？。教育研究，87，85-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.徐世瑜(2001)。輔導國小教師從事行動研究之歷程探討。課程與教學季刊，4(3)，89-102。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kellner, D.(1998)。Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogy in a Multicultural Society。Education Theory，48(1)，103-123。  new window
18.Hiebert, J.、Gallimore, R.、Stigler, J. W.(2002)。A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?。Educational Researcher，31(5)，3-15。  new window
會議論文
1.劉旭東(2004)。對教師「去理論化」現象的思考。第六屆「兩岸三地課程理論研討會：課程改革的再概念化」，國立台北師範學院舉辦 。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.國家教育研究院籌備處(2000)。語文教育的新趨勢：國語課程實驗教學研討會論文集。語文教育的新趨勢：國語課程實驗教學研討會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Weinbaum, A.、Allen, D.、Blyth, T.、Simon, K.、Seidel, S.、Rubin, C.(2002)。Teaching as inquiry: Asking hard questions to improve practice and student achievement。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
2.Mezirow, J.(2001)。Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Halliday, M. A. K.(1975)。Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language。Edward Arnold。  new window
4.Carini, P.(2001)。Starting strong: A different look at children, schools, and standards。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
5.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程：語文（國語文）學習領域研習手冊暨教學示例。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lauritzen, C.、Jaeger, M.(1997)。Integrating learning through story: The narrative curriculum。New York：Delmar Publishers。  new window
7.Bray, J. N.、Lee, J.、Smith, L. L.、Yorks, L.(2000)。Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and meaning making。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
8.Beane, James A.(1997)。Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education。Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
9.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY：Random House。  new window
10.Connelly, F. M.、Clandinin, D. J.(1988)。Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experiences。Teachers College Columbia University。  new window
11.Buckingham, D.(1993)。Children talking television: The making of television literacy。London：The Falmer Press。  new window
12.Goodlad, J. I.(1984)。A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
13.Short, K. G.、Harste, J. C.、Burke, C. L.(1996)。Creating classrooms for authors and Inquirers。Portsmouth, NH：Heinemann。  new window
其他
1.國家教育研究院籌備處。九年一貫課程與教學示例全集，http:www.near.edu.tw/announce/9teach-1/2.htm/， 2004/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Greene, M.(1990)。Education in the humanities: Toward a breaking of the boundaries。Artistic intelligence: Implications for education。New York：Teacher College Press。  new window
2.Berghoff, B.(1993)。Moving toward aesthetic literacy in the first grade。Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice。Chicago：National Reading Conference。  new window
3.Eisner, E. W.(1990)。Implications of artistic intelligences for education。Artistic intelligences-implications for education。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
4.Gardner, H.(1990)。Multiple intelligences: Implications for art and creativity。Artistic intelligences: Implications for education。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1040（臺灣：1038，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67909480
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上