:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:休閒運動阻礙量表競爭模式策略與複核效化評鑑之研究
書刊名:運動休閒管理學報
作者:張良漢 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Liang-han
出版日期:2007
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:休閒運動阻礙量表探索性因素分析驗證性因素分析競爭模式複核效化Recreational sport constraint scaleExploratory factor analysisConfirmatory factor analysisCompeting modelCross-validation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:75
目的:本研究旨在透過一系列嚴謹的分析程序,建構適用於大學生對休閒運動阻礙之衡量工具。方法:研究樣本包含臺灣地區北、中、南、東之大學生,採叢集抽樣共收集有效問卷1515份,本研究以休閒運動阻礙量表作為研究的工具,利用SPSS統計軟體將其隨機分成三組樣本,每組各505名樣本,進行各項分析。第一組樣本經探索性因素分析後共獲得四個因素,分別命名為「個體阻礙」、「經驗阻礙」、「社會阻礙」、「機會阻礙」。此外,將所得因素成份透過第二組樣本進行驗證性因素分析,進行各種競爭模式的考驗。結果:二階單一因素模式為休閒運動阻礙量表的最佳模式,且觀察變項及潛在變項皆具有良好的信度與效度。結論:經第三組樣本複核效化評鑑後發現,休閒運動阻礙量表二階單一因素模式具有穩定性及預測力,後續研究者可參酌本量表進行相關實證研究。
Purpose: This research was to construct a scale as a measurement of recreational sport constraint for college students. Methods: Cluster sampling was used to collect the research samples of college students from northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan with 1515 valid questionnaires received in total. Data were randomly divided using SPSS into three groups with 505 samples each for further analysis. Four factors named “individual constraint”, “experiential constraint”, “social constraint”, and “opportunity constraint” were extracted through EFA with the first sample group. Furthermore, CFA was used to examine the various competing models with the second sample group. Results: The results showed that second order model was the optimal model for the recreational sport constraint scale with good reliability, convergent validity and discriminate validity in both observed and latent variables. Conclusions: The cross-validation with the third sample group revealed that the second order model of recreational sport constraint scale was constant and predictable. The scale could be used for relative empirical studies for future researchers.
期刊論文
1.Crawford, D. W.、Godbey, G. C.(1987)。Reconceptualizng barriers to family leisure。Leisure Sciences,9,119-127。  new window
2.謝智謀、賴家馨(20050600)。休閒阻礙量表之編製--以臺北市大學生為例。公民訓育學報,16,1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jackson, E. L.(1991)。Leisure constraints/constrained leisure: special issue introduction。Journal of Leisure Research,23(4),279-285。  new window
4.Jackson, E. L.(1993)。Recognizing patterns of leisure constraints: Results from alternative analyses。Journal of Leisure Research,25(2),129-149。  new window
5.沈易利(19990100)。臺灣省民休閒運動參與動機與阻礙因素之研究。國立臺灣體育學院學報,4(下),319-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張良漢、許志賢(20020100)。休閒運動阻礙量表編製與信效度分析研究。國立臺灣體育學院學報,10,157-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.(1994)。Self-esteem, gender, and socioeconomic status: Their relation to perceptions of constraint on leisure among adolescents。Journal of Leisure Research,26,99-118。  new window
8.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.、Von Eye, A.(1993)。Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test。Leisure Sciences,15(2),99-113。  new window
9.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423。  new window
10.Crawford, Duane W.、Jackson, Edgar L.、Godbey, Geoffrey C.(1991)。A hierarchical model of leisure constraints。Leisure Sciences,13(4),309-320。  new window
11.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,10(4),622-647。  new window
學位論文
1.孫孟君(1998)。身心障礙青少年休閒自由、休閒偏好及休閒阻礙之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳信安(2000)。休閒參與的知覺自由與阻礙之研究--以台北縣淡水鎮國小六年級學童為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳藝文(2000)。休閒阻礙量表之建構--以北部大學生為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃立賢(1996)。專科學生休閒興趣相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張玉鈴(1998)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙與其休閒無聊感及自我統合之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.張少熙(1994)。青少年自我概念與休閒活動傾向及其阻礙因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。臺北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.張良漢(2002)。休閒覺知自由、休閒無聊感及休閒利益之相關研究---以國立聯合技術學院學生為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chubb, M.、Chubb, H. R.(1981)。One Third of Our Time?: An Introduction to Recreation Behavior and Resources。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
4.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.(1998)。Multivariate data analysis。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
5.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1993)。LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language。Scientific Software International。  new window
9.黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式--理論與應用。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kline, Rex B.(1998)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。Guilford Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hancock, G. R.、Mueller, R. O.(2001)。Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems.。Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Joreskog。IL:SSI。  new window
2.Hu, L. T.、Bentler, P. M.(1995)。Evaluating model fit。Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications。Sage。  new window
3.Jöreskog, K. G.(1993)。Testing structural equation models。Testing structural equation models。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE