:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方政府公共支出效率之研究--以臺北、高雄為例
書刊名:公共事務評論
作者:閻永祺陳佐瑲姜渝生孔憲法 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Yung-chiChen, Tso-changChiang, Yu-shengKung, Shiann-far
出版日期:2008
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁79-109
主題關鍵詞:公共支出時間序列分析高雄市臺北市Public expenditureTime series analysisKaohsiung Taipei
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:122
  • 點閱點閱:57
全球化伴隨著運輸與通訊技術的改良帶來的時空壓縮,模糊了原本完整的地理尺度組織,人口與產業大量集中於都市,促使治理成爲都市發展的重要議題。本文基本立論觀點認爲,都市治理的首要工作便是如何在拮据的財政狀況下加強自身的治理能力,擬定適宜的發展政策,有遠見與效率的使用各項公共支出。因此,本研究嘗試從長期的觀點,利用時間序列模型,搭配各項變數,藉以分析地方政府公共支出對於家戶可支配所得與就業的影響,進而可作爲地方政府治理能力的參考依據。分析結果顯示,台北市的公共支出對於降低失業率、提高所得與所得餘額等變數均有正面的效果;相對,高雄市的公共支出則對降低失業率有正面的效果,對提高所得餘額目前並無顯著效果。另外,亦顯示兩都市之治理效率可能受到產業結構的影響。
The globalization with the time-space compression caused by the improvement of transportation and communication technology has obscured the territorial organization scales (nation, region and local). It caused the centralization of population and industries in cities, and made urban governance become an important issue. The commission of urban governance has evolved into enhancing governance itself under the shortage of finance through making proper policies and investing efficient expenditures. Thus, we applied time series analysis and relevant variables to analyze the interaction among public expenditures, household disposable income and employment rate in the long term, then compared the governance efficiency between two municipal governments. The results revealed that the public expenditures has positive effect on disposable income and employment rate, in Taipei, however it merely has positive effect on employment rate but no effect on disposable income in Kaohsiung. The results also implied that the governance efficiency could be affected by industrial structures.
期刊論文
1.章定煊、劉小蘭、尚瑞國(20021100)。我國各縣市財政支出與經營績效之研究。臺灣土地研究,5,45-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王文誠(20060600)。全球化趨勢下的都會治理:高雄的挑戰。環境與世界,13,35-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.閻永祺、孔憲法(20080300)。區域群聚辨認模式之研究--以南部區域為例。都市與計劃,35(1),49-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.汪銘生、洪東煒(20030400)。都市公共財評量模式CVM與SJT之比較--以高雄市愛河水上巴士為例。管理評論,22(2),131-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.葉嘉楠(20030900)。財劃法修正與地方財政的未來。中國行政評論,12(4),205-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.夏鑄九、劉昭吟(20030900)。全球網絡中的都會區域與城市:北臺都會區域與臺北市的個案。城市與設計學報,15/16,39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.曾梓峰(20010900)。就業希望工程與地方區域發展。亞太經濟管理評論,5(1),23-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.周志龍(20000900)。地方產業經濟流動與區域發展政策。臺灣土地金融季刊,37(3)=145,27-46。  延伸查詢new window
9.Engle, Robert F.、Yoo, Byung Sam(1987)。Forecasting and Testing in Co-Integrated Systems。Journal of Econometrics,35(1),143-159。  new window
10.金家禾(19991200)。邁向世界都市之臺北都會區產業結構與空間分佈變遷。都市與計劃,26(2),95-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.施富士(19910900)。臺灣地方公共支出實證研究。臺灣銀行季刊,42(3),144-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
13.Dickey, David A.、Fuller, Wayne A.(1981)。Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root。Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society,49(4),1057-1072。  new window
14.Johansen, Søren(1988)。Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors。Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,12(2/3),231-254。  new window
15.Johansen, Søren、Juselius, Katarina(1990)。Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration: with Applications to the Demand for Money。Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,52(2),169-210。  new window
16.Sims, Christopher A.(1980)。Macroeconomics and Reality。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,48(1),1-48。  new window
17.Engle, Robert F.、Granger, Clive W. J.(1987)。Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing。Econometrica,55(2),251-276。  new window
18.王振寰(20020900)。東亞「世界城市」的不同路徑:漢城與臺北。臺灣社會研究季刊,47,85-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Dickey, David A.、Fuller, Wayne A.(1979)。Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root。Journal of the American Statistical Association,74(366),427-431。  new window
20.Granger, Clive William John、Newbold, Paul(1974)。Spurious Regressions in Econometrics。Journal of econometrics,2(2),111-120。  new window
圖書
1.Stone, Clarence N.、Sanders, Heywood T.(1987)。The Politics of Urban Development。Lawrence, Kansas:University Press of Kansas。  new window
2.Sassen, Saskia(1991)。The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo。Princeton University Press。  new window
3.Musgrave, Richard A.、Musgrave, Peggy B.(1989)。Public Finance in Theory and Practice。McGraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
4.Hubbard, P.、Hall, T.(1998)。The entrepreneurialism city and the new urban polittics。The Entrepreneurialism City。West Sussex:Wiley & Sons Ltd.。  new window
其他
1.孔憲法、陳麗瑛、閻永祺(2008)。台灣文化產業之經濟帶動效果與空間聚集。  延伸查詢new window
2.李春長(1993)。政府支出規模與經濟成長--台灣的實証分析。  延伸查詢new window
3.李顯峰(2000)。我國公共支出之檢討與改善。  延伸查詢new window
4.林全(1999)。健全中央與地方財政關係,中華經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
5.周志龍(1995)。台灣都市及區域發展結構變遷。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐偉初(1986)。我國國民所得與公共支出:因果關係之實證檢定。  延伸查詢new window
7.施碧瑤(1993)。地方財政與地方發展因果關係之檢測--台灣地區之實證分析。  延伸查詢new window
8.台北市政府都市發展局(2003)。全球化台北:修訂台北市綜合發展計劃,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳智華(2005)。政府消費性支出與經濟成長。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳威傑(1995)。都市財政壓力評估方法之實證研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.行政院經濟建設委員會(2006)。國土空間願景及政策落實執行機制之建立:設置公營開發公司開發公地或都市更新地區公地之可行性及方式:德國魯爾國際建築展的經驗分析,中華民國都市計劃學會。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃麗玲(2003)。一九九○年代台北市都市規劃中的社區參與:全球過程、地方政治與鄰里回應。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張李淑容(2007)。我國財政制度對地方發展影響之研究。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉宜君(2002)。地方政府財務管理問題之研究:公共政策的病理觀點。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.賴宗裕、詹士樑(2000)。公共支出決策與城鄉及區域發展關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝振環(1986)。我國公共投資對經濟成長之影響。  延伸查詢new window
17.韓乾、李靜雯(1997)。地方財政差異與人口遷徙關係之研究,台北:國立政治大學地政系。  延伸查詢new window
18.萬泰宜(2002)。台灣地區地方政府在財政壓力下之因應策略。  延伸查詢new window
19.閻永祺(2004)。產業群聚與區域產業發展關係之研究--以南部區域為例。  延伸查詢new window
20.Bairam, E.(1990)。Government Size and Economic Growth: The African experience, 1960-85。  new window
21.Borja, J. and Castells, M.(1997)。Local and Global: Management of Cities in the Information Age,London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.。  new window
22.Castells, M.(2002)。The Culture of Cities in the Information Age,Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
23.Conte, M. A. and Darrat , A. F.(1988)。Economic Growth and the Expanding public sector: A Reexamination。  new window
24.Crook, C.(2001)。Is government disappearing。  new window
25.Fisher, W. H. and Turnovsky, S. J.(1998)。Public investment, congestion, and private capital accumulation。  new window
26.Granger C. W. J. and Newbold, P.(1974)。ernment Size and Economic Growth in developing countries: A Political-Economy Framework。  new window
27.Gwartney, J.(1998)。Less Government, More Growth。  new window
28.Hassan, A. and Strazicich, M.(2000)。Is Government Size optimal in the gulf countries of the Middle East? An Empirical Investigation。  new window
29.Healy, P.(1995)。Discourse of Integration: Making Frameworks for Democratic Urban Planning。  new window
30.Hirsch, Werner Z.(1978)。The Supply of Urban Public Services,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
31.Jessop, B.(1994)。Post-Fordism and the State,Oxford, U:Blackwell。  new window
32.Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P.(1988)。Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series regression。  new window
33.Sandercock, L.(1998)。Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities,N.J.:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.。  new window
34.Singh, B. and Sahni, B. S.(1984)。Casuality between public expenditure and national income。  new window
35.Todd, A. K.(1999)。Growth, Welfare, and the size of Government。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lefebvre, Henri(1979)。Space: Social Product and Use Value。Critical Sociology: European Perspective。New York:Irvington Press。  new window
2.Prakash, Aseem、Hart, Jeffrey A.(1999)。Globalization and Governance: An Introduction。Globalization and Governance。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE