:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣產業之空間群聚型態
作者:林珍瑩 引用關係
作者(外文):Tzen-Ying (Jenny) Ling
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:建築及都市計畫研究所
指導教授:陳錦賜
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:產業空間群聚產業專業化專業化係數吉尼係數台灣Industry specializationGini Coefficient of SpecializationIndustry Spatial ClusteringCoefficient of SpecializationTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:63
產業發展是都市發展的重要動能,所以產業發展的良窳影響都市發展興衰甚大。而產業發展的類型在文明發展的影響下,產生不同的都市發展型態。如農業文明發展時期產生農業化現象,而產生農業發展都市;初期工業文明發展時期產生工業化與都市化現象,而創造工業都市與產業都市。中期工業文明發展時期產生資訊化的現象,而創造資訊都市。後工業文明發展時期產業全球化、地方化與網絡化,創造國際都市、生態都市與網絡都市。由歷史觀察之,都市發展型態在產業活動發展的需求下,不斷形成都市產業活動與產業空間聚集的現象,而此現象又影響都市空間結構型態發展;目前台灣產業發展已相對緩慢,總體經濟由高度成長轉為中度成長後,都市之產業面臨產業及人口變遷之抉擇。在這經濟發展過程中,由於已發展成為一種都市經濟及空間聚集的型態,都市的經濟與空間結構變遷更為顯著;各別產業會因其價值創造活動的特性,而對土地資源有不同程度上的需求。
1980年代起,台灣之產業體發展受全球產業分工衝擊甚大,就人口與產業的角度來看,本現象產生不同產業部門空間分佈之變遷與關係之變化;各個都會區域出現明顯的產業空間集中化(群聚)及專業化之現象,但若在北台都會區域內,則發現空間的集中與蔓延,明顯可觀察到台灣企業集中至北部都會區之現象。區域的核心產業聚集為區域發展與規劃的重要關鍵,對於區域內產業之空間聚集的影響,應做詳細的研究。本研究有鑑於此,以「產業專業化」(Industry Specialization)及「產業空間聚集」(Industry Clustering theory)理論,針對產業專業化為目標,產業空間群聚為標的,以台灣地區二十二縣市為對象,提出研究目的進行研究。本研究目的進行實證,除針對界定研究範圍於台灣區域內,慎選研究方法,以利研究能有效推展外,更以文獻回顧論證研究目的可實證性,進而建立論證架構,以利後續研究之需。本研究以台灣地區城鄉產業發展現況進行驗證與實證,並使用吉尼係數 (Gini Coefficient of Specialization)、專業化係數(Specialization Coefficient)及群落分析(Cluster Analysis)法來進行驗證,以了解各都會區產業空間分布及事業化變遷現象,進而提出研究產業專業化對各個區域之產業空間群聚型態之變化之見證。
本研究實證研究目的,論文內容分為五章,第一章緒論由產業專業化之研究背景、問題分析後引發研究目的,再進行研究方法與研究範圍界定;第二章為產業結構變遷之文獻回顧,檢討產業聚集與空間結構調整,以其相關評估方法作為研究參考之背景,提出台灣各地區近期之產業空間去及形態變遷及專業化影響現象與回顧,建立其產業結構於空間分佈變遷評估理論基礎及研究方法理論架構,並構成第三章對於台灣城鄉之現況評析與回顧,至第四章之實證分析,證鑑第二章的方法理論之成立及現況評析;先行分析與敘述工商普查1986、1991、1996 2001及2006之就業人口,廠家數及總生產額普查結果,以台灣都會區產業人口歷年所佔用比例之變動,藉以吉尼係數及專業化係數分析台灣地區城鄉產業專業化現象;本文再以群落分析剖析台灣都會系統產業專業化之產業群聚型態變遷與區別,並將各區域以專業化程度分類,分析台灣都會區產業空間分佈及專業化之變遷,評析都市產業專業化對於台灣地區產業空間群聚型態之變化與比較差異影響。第五章據上開研究分析成果,對於台灣地區中產業空間群聚變遷現象提出結論與建議。
從實證結果檢視本文之假設與目的,三項假設均得到證實,可提供相關學術研究時之參考。亦即:產業聚集與都市發展成正比,台灣產業專業化對於較大之區域產生集中的現象,對於較小之區域產生分散之現象;台灣西部走廊已產生產業空間網絡群聚”點狀”型態之現象並邁進超大核心區發展型態。檢視本文是否達成研究目的,從實證分析的結果來看,產業專業化系數之分析方法確實可運用在探討區域產業專業化與區域發展之關係,人口和經濟活動集中至佔有優勢之地區,功能進行調整,走向專業化(Specialization)。本研究發現在台灣地區產業結構變遷過程中,服務業已成為目前第一大產業,也說明台灣地區已經進入服務化經濟時代(Service Economy)。都市產業的分工趨向專業化,顯示初期專業化程度較相似點狀型態之專業化結果,近期則以超大核心區發展。本文並發現台灣產業專業化以就業人口與總生產額之結果可佐證其發展型態:台灣西部走廊已形成完整之都會網絡(urban network),結合其交通及都市設施,加速形成類似歐洲”產業帶”走廊之特徵;影響關係對應之相關區域位置與都市發展產生超大核心區現象(extended core)。基於本研究結果顯示,台灣都市表現為大範圍的聚集與小範圍的擴散;城市人口及經濟活動均集中到原來就佔有優勢之地區,大都市的經濟回動和人口向外擴散,形成擴展都市區並逐漸走向專業化(Specialization)。廠家數分析之結果顯示因台灣產業發展型態皆以中小企業為主,相較之下、以廠家數進行分析之結果影響是較不顯著。
本研究實證台灣城鄉在產業專業化已以超大核心區發展之影響發展,顯示我國之都市計劃需調整其規劃思維,跳脫目前以地理位置區分北中南東進行規劃之模式。本研究建議將產業專業化後之人口變動、其產業結構與發展,配合區域既有的資源及都市發展政策,做為預測各區域發展模式,既可達成提升區域產業競爭力提升,亦可供政府提昇區域產業的競爭力,帶動區域整體的發展參考之用。為本研究僅探討產業專業化對於台灣城鄉之關係,政治或社會影響因子應另行以其他研究方法進行探討。國土空間宜有整體規劃,包含中央主管機關參與地方政府區域發展計畫規劃過程須重新省思。總體評估台灣城鄉發展應考量各項因子,並後續研究台灣都市產業結構與其空間分佈變遷及競爭力探討之相關議題時,因本文係以吉尼係數及群落分析法實證,但僅限於產業結構變遷,無法全面顯現對於整體空間結構之直接影響,未來可再加入空間評估法進行空間實證,配合思考區域地方產業如何配合地區發展,深入瞭解各都市的產業特性、廠商規模等經濟特性。配合區域產業發展之比較競爭平優勢,整合區域既有的資源,加深對經濟發展成果的瞭解,亦可藉此提供作為政府研判採取結構調整及都市發展政策的方式與必要性參考。
This dissertation analyzed spatial clustering pattern associated with geographical distribution of the industry in Taiwan 22 urban areas as the sectoral change has faced restructure and population migration. Three key issues associated with the industry spatial clustering pattern were addressed in the study. The first study utilized Gini Coefficient of Specialization and examined the degree of dissimilarity in the urban system that, when taken collectively, the employment structures of each urban area with the national urban employment structure. The second study examined industry specialization and convergence employing The Specialization Coefficient and a regression model testing the convergence pattern. Finally, the spatial clustering pattern of the Taiwan industry was analyzed using location quotient quarterlies, mean result to determine the absolute concentration and relative concentration industry clustering pattern in Taiwan; the cluster analysis examined the grouping of similar regions according to their employment structure.
The first study confirmed the hypothesis of industry convergence for the employment structure in Taiwan, indicating that industry are positively concentrated and dispersed across the sectors. Tertiary industry exhibits a positive concentration across the urban areas. Structure change, policy driven development and provision of skilled labor force were found to have the most significant impact on the geographical concentration of industries. Results from regional models indicate that industry in the western corridor prefer to concentrate geographically in the northern area with easy access to transportation link and offer of urban amenities. Conversely, industry that is located in the east which provides necessary services to the urban areas.
Industry specialization and convergence was confirmed in the second study. Proximity to more advantageous urban cores was found to have the most significant relation on the location of tertiary industry. Results indicated that Jacobs’ externality and Marshall Spillover are present in the tertiary industry, resulting in their spatial clustering. Manufacturing industry seemingly is evenly distributed across the urban areas in Taiwan, while certain decrease in witnessed in the primary cores in the northern region. The use of employment data exhibit rise in 10 areas while the total production data exhibits rise in 17 areas; firms numbers shows rise in only 4 areas, reflecting the primary nature of Taiwan industry comprises of small and medium scale firms, therefore the result does not reflect the convergence as directly and firmly.
The extended core pattern in the northern region coupled with the sub cores in the central and southern region was indicated in the third study. Conversely, results indicate that the Taipei city and the extended core areas exhibit higher employment and growth. The cluster analysis further indicates that the urban areas in Taiwan can be grouped in 5 categories according to the employment structure and productivity. The top regions of Taiwan correspond to the western corridor regions highly specialized in the services or to the most productive regions.
This dissertation commences with the introduction and objectives, as followed by investigation methods and definition. Chapter 1 includes the introduction, with research methodology, purpose and study area. Chapter 2 provides the basis for literature review, tracing the progress of industry specialization distribution, exploring diverse analysis and assessment theories, with an overview on the founding of the theoretic structure and methodology framework; Chapter 3 is an overview of the Taiwan urban cities and industry spatial clustering development and change, and chapter 4 is the empirical study for methods detailed in chapter 2. Built on the above empirical outcome, the final chapter will formulate the conclusions and further research recommendations.
The empirical result concludes that Taiwan witnessed a shift toward the tertiary industry after the 1980s accompanied with a steady decline in manufacturing employment. The specialization sorts out a divergent urban development pattern thru the employment convergence. The service sector has become the dominant industry in the Taiwan region, as the northern region formed an extended core spatial pattern.
From the three hypothesis stated in the thesis, three have been confirmed and can be applied for academic references. These confirmations are as follows: industry specialization does affect the development of the urban areas in Taiwan; the main metropolitan areas in the western corridor have greater advantages to be further specialized as they attract more firms to concentrate in those areas. The clustering pattern reflects this phenomenon; the productivity and employment concentration is directly proportional to the specialization coefficient, forming multiple cores and slowly converging toward the northern region. At the national level, the largest urban centers are the most attractive regions for the economic growth linked to the globalization of investments and the development of new technologies (Jacob’s externalities), as time accumulates, an extended core has formed in the northern region and small and medium size areas are threatened by isolation from main accessibility nodes and lower rates of development, such as Miaoli County and Taitung County.
The urban cores in the western side of Taiwan have formed a corridor similar to the pattern observed in other industrialized regions and slowly concentrating in the northern region. This phenomenon challenges the current urban planning methodology since the formation of the clustering pattern is divergent from the geographical division that the authorities have taken to formulate the national development policies. Due to its diversified structure, this study proposes that regional differences should be taken account when planning policies are considered for the Taiwan area; such policy may help the most in bringing about a less unbalanced growth in Taiwan. This empirical analysis renders the current urban planning strategy in Taiwan obsolete. The spatial clustering requires diversified structure and the public authorities should also investigate preconditions for new economic activities and should re-take the economic and institutional context as a starting reference point to allow “new combinations” that would combine the area’s particularities within the structural change trend as the emergence of knowledge-based services economy.
Further analysis should include direct spatial analysis method as the Gini Coefficient of Specialization cross-examines the shift within the sectoral composition. Specialization coefficient and Cluster analysis only shows that convergent and divergent pattern of industry agglomeration but does not reflect directly the geography discrepancy of the clustering effect. This study may work in conjunction with regional planning, by recommending applicable economic advantage within the sectoral mix and spatial consideration, enterprise mix and size, by considering regional resources allocation and future economic development.
REFERENCE
1.Acs, z.j. & Audretsch, d.b. (1991). Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.Afuah. Allen (1998). Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation and profits, New York: Oxford University Press.
3.Agnew, J., 1987. Place and Politics. , Allen Unwin, London.
4.Aiginger, K., (2001). Speed of change and growth of manufacturing, in Peneder, M., et. Al, Structural change and economic growth, WIFO Vienna, pp. 53-86.
5.Akundi, K. (2003). Cluster-based Economic Development, Part 1: A Survey of State Initiatives. Texas Economic Development, Business and Industry Data Center, www.bidc.state.tx.us.
6.Allen, p. m. (1997A). Cities and Regions as Evolutionary, Complex Systems. Geographical Systems 4, 103-130.
7.Allen, p. m. (1997B). Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems. Models of Complexity. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
8.Amsden A H. (1985). "The state and Taiwan's economic development." in P B Evans et al., eds. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
9.Anselin, L., Varga, A. & Acs, Z. (1997). Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42, 422-448.
10.Arrow, Kenneth, J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”. Rev. Econ. Studies, 29:155-73.
11.Audretsch, D. B. (1998). Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 18-29.
12.Audretsch, D. B. & Fritsch, M. (1999). The Industry Component of Regional New Firm Formation Processes. Review of Industrial Organization 15, 239-252.
13.Bahl R.W. et.al, (1971). Industrial diversity in urban areas: alternative measures and intermetroplitan comparison. Economic Geography, Vol. 4, pp 414-425.
14.Baumol WJ (1967). Macro-economics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review 57: 415-426.
15.Barro, R. and X. Sala-I-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
16.Bell D. (1974). The coming of post-industrial society, Basic Books, New York.
17.Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-economic Notion. In: (Pyke, F., Becattini, G. and Sengenberger, W., Eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, pp. 37-51. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
18.Berger, S and Lester, Richar K. (eds). (2005). Global Taiwan-Building Competitive Srenghts in a New International Economy, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
19.Beyers, W. B. and Lindahl, D. (1996) “Explaining the Demand for Producer Services: is Cost Driven Externalization the Major Factor?” Papers of the Regional Science Association.75: 351-374
20.Bell D (1974). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Heinemann, London.
21.Boschma RA, Lambooy JG (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9: 411-429
22.Bingham et al. (1995). Industrial composition of edge cities and downtowns, Economic Development Quarterly, 9, 259-272
23.Bishop, K.C. and C.E. Simpson (1972). ‘Components of Change Analysis: Problems of Alternative Approaches to Industrial Structure’, Regional Studies, 6(1): 59-68.
24.Binswanger, H. P. (1978). The Microeconomic of Induced Technical Change,M.A.,U.S. John Hopkins University Press.
25.Blind, K. & Grupp, H. (1999). Interdependencies between the Science and Technology Infrastructure and Innovation Activities in German Regions: Empirical Findings and Policy Consequences. Research Policy 28, 451-468.
26.Boland, Lawrence A. (1979). ‘A Critique of Friedman’s Critics’, Journal of Economic Literature,17: 503-522.
27.Boyer, R. (1990). The Regulation School: A critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.Brenner, T. (2000). The Evolution of Localised Industrial Clusters: Identifying the Processes of Self-organisation. Papers on Economics & Evolution #0011, Max-Planck-Institute Jena.
29.Brenner, T. & Fornahl, D. (2001). Theoretische Erkenntnisse zur Entstehung und Erzeugung `innovativer Regionen´. mimeo, Max-Planck-Institute Jena.
30.Brenner, T. & Weigelt, N. (2001). The Evolution of Industrial Clusters - Simulating Spatial Dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems 3, (forthcomming). CAMAGNI, R. P. (1995). The Concept of Innovative Milieu and Its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions. Papers in Regional Science 74, 317-340.
31.Brenner, Thomas, (2001). Simulating the Evolution of Localised Industrial Clusters - An Identification of the Basic Mechanisms, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 4, no. 3, , To cite articles published in the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social imulation, please reference the above information and include paragraph numbers if necessary , Received: 13-Oct-00. Accepted: 29-May-01. Published: 30-Jun-01.
32.Bryson, J. R. and Daniels, P. W. (1998). “Business Link, Strong Ties and the Walls of Silence”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 16: 265-280.
33.Buck, T.W. (1970). ‘Shift and Share Analysis — A Guide to Regional Policy? ’, Regional Studies, 4(6): 445-450.
34.Camagni, R. P. & Diappi, L. (1991). A Supply-oriented Urban Dynamics Model with Innovation and Synergy Effects. In: (Boyce, D. E., Nijkamp, P. and Shefer, D. ,Eds.) Regional Science, pp. 339-357. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35.Caniėls, M. (1999). Regional Growth Differentials. Maastricht: Dissertation.
36.Caniėls, M. C. J. AND Verspagen, B. (1999). Spatial Distance in a Technology Gap Model. Working Paper 99.10, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.
37.Casler, S. D. (1989). “A theoretical context for shift share analysis”, Regional Studies, Vol. 23, NO. 1, pp. 43-48
38.Census Data (1986, 1991, 1996, 2001, 2006). DGBAS: www.dgbas.gov.tw
39.CEPD (Council for Economic Planning and Development), (1979). The comprehensive development plan for Taiwan area. Taipei, Urban and Housing Development Department,
40.Chang L S. (1985). "Regional disparity and regional development policies in Taiwan." in T S Yu and P K C Liu eds., Urban growth and economic development in the pacific region. Taipei, Academia Sinica
41.Chang S J. (1991). "Urban experiences of environmental protection and development in Taiwan." a paper presented in urban and regional development in China: a prospect of 21 century. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University 2-6 December (in Chinese).
42.Chang, C S. (1993). Taipei: CEPD. Taiwan Statistical Date Book.
43.Chou T L. (1997). "Global economic development and the institutional transformation of spatial planning and land land development: The cases of Taiwan and Britain." Thinking and Saying 35(3): 139-189. (in Chinese) CoAD (Council of Agricultural Development) 1995. Agricultural land release program. Taipei: CoAD.
44.Chen, KW, Lin,SS, (2002). “Measuring with Producer Services on Spatial Distribution in Taiwan Cities”, Local Development and Management Conference, Taiwan.
45.Chenery, H.B., Taylor, L. (1968). “Development patterns among countries over time, Rev. Econ. Stat., 50, 391-416.
46.Champion, A.G.(1997). Demographic Trends of small and medium-sized towns in non-metroregions. Conference on new challenges in regional policies, OECD, Group on Urban affairs.
47.Ching, C.H., (2003). Taipei’s Economic Restructuring and the Constraints of Developing World City Functions, Journal of Geographical Science, (34), pp 19-39.
48.Clark, J and K. Guy (1998). Innovation and competitiveness: a review, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (3), 360-395.
49.Coffey, W. J. and Bailly, A. S. (1991). “Producer Services and Flexible Production: An Exploratory Analysis” Growth and Change, 22: 95-117.
50.Coffey, W. J. and Polese, M. (1989). “Producer Services and Regional Development: a Policy-oriented Perspective” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 67: 13-27.
51.Cooke P (1995). Introduction. In: Cooke P (ed) The rise of the rustbelt. UCL Press, London
52.Coulombe, S., (1999). Economic Growth and Provincial Disparity-A new View of an Old Canadian Problem”, Commentary No. 122 (March). Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute. www.cdhowe.org
53.Coulombe, S. et.al., (1999). Economic growth and regional income disparity in Canada and the Northern United States, Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de politiques 25: 155-178.
54.Crowley, R.W., (1978). Labour force growth and specialization in Canadian cities, in Bourne L.S. and Simmons J.W. (Eds), System of Cities, ppl. 207-219. Oxford University Press, New York.
55.Dalum, B. (1995). Local and Global Linkages: The Radio communications Cluster in Northern Denmark. mimeo, Aalborg University.
56.Dalum, B., Laursen, K. & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: De-specialisation and stickiness.., International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3): 423-443.
57.Davies, J., (1991). Letter from Tyneside, in the semiperiphery of the semicore. Review 14 3, pp. 437–449.
58.Dei Ottati, G. (1994). Cooperation and Competition in the Industrial District as an Organisation Model. European Planning Studies 2, 463-483.
59.Delamaide D (1994). The new superregions of Europe. Dutton, New York Dinteren JHJ van, Meuwissen JAM (1994) Business services in the core-area of the European Union. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 85: 366-370.
60.Dharmapatni, Ida Ayu Indira and Tommy Firman. (1995). Problems and challenges of megaurban regions in Indonesia: the case of Jabotabek and the Bandung.
61.Dicken, P. (1992). The Internationalization of Economic Activity. Paul Chapman, London.
62.Duan, CP. (1999). Postwar Economy of Taiwan, Taipei, Ren Jian Publication Ltd.
63.Drucker Peter, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and principles, New York: Harper & Row Publisher, Inc.
64.Dunning, J. H. (1989). Multinational Enterprises and the Growth of Services: Some Conceptual and Theoretical Issue, Service Industries Journal. 9(1): 5-39.
65.Duranton, Gilles and Diego Puga (2000). Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where, and When Does it Matter?, Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, p.533-555.
66.Eaton, Jonathan (2003). Cities and Growth-Theory and Evidence from France and Japan, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.27, p. 443-47.
67.Ellison, G. AND Glaeser, E. L. (1994). Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. Working Paper No. 4840, National Bureau of Economic Research.
68.Enderwick, P. (1987). “The Strategy and Structure of Service-sector Multinationals: Implications for Potential Host Regions” Regional Studies. 21(3): 215-223.
69.Faludi, A (2004). The European Spatial Development Perspective and North-west Europe: Application and the Future. European Planning Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, April 2004.
70.Feinstein Ch (1999). Structural change in the developed countries during the twentieth century. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15: 35-55.
71.Fitzsimmons, James D. and Michael R. Ratcliffe. (2002). Reflections on the review of the metropolitan area standards in the United States, 1990-2000. Paper presented at conference on New Forms of Urbanization: Conceptualizing and Measuring Human Settlement in the Twenty-first Century, organized by IUSSP Working Group on Urbanization, Bellagio.
72.Fothergill, Stephen and Graham Gudgin (1979). ‘In Defence of Shift-Share’, Urban Studies, 16(3): 309-319.
73.Fourastié J (1949). Le grand espoir du XXe siècle: Progrès technique, progress économique, progrès social. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
74.Fourastié J (1951). Machinisme et bien-être. Édition de Minuit, Paris Heidenreich M (1998) The changing system of European cities and regions. European.
75.Francois, Joseph. (1990). “Producer Services, Scale and the Division of Labor,” Oxford Economic Paper, 42: 715-729
76.Francois, Joseph. (1990). “Trade in Producer Services and Returns due to Specialization under Monopolistic Competition,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 23(2): 109-124.
77.Fritsch, M., Broskamp, A. & Schwirten, C. (1996). Innovationen in der sächsischen Industrie - Erste empirische Ergebnisse. Freiberg Working Papers 96/13, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg.
78.Friedman, Milton (1953). ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.Friedmann, John (1986). "The World City Hypothesis," Development and Change 17:69-83.
80.Gazel, Ricardo C. and R. Keith Schwer (1998). ‘Growth of International Exports Among the States: Can a Modified Shift-Share Analysis Explain It’, International Regional Science Review, 21(2): 185-204.
81.Gilbert, A. (1993). “Third world cities: the changing national settlement system: Urban Studies 30 (4-5), 721-740.
82.Gilbert A. (1996). “The Latin American mega-city: an introduction. The Mega-City in Latin America, ed A. Gilbert, United Nations University Press.
83.Goe, W. R. (1990). “Producer Services, Trade and the Social Division of Labour.” Regional Studies. 24(4): 327-342.
84.Gold, T. B. (1986). State and Society in the Taiwan miracle. New York: Sharpe. Hall, P. 1992. Urban and Regional Planning. London: Routledge.
85.Gratton C., (1979). Industrial diversification in new towns, Urban Studies, Vo 16, pp. 157-164.
86.Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A. (1992). “Growth in Cities” Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1126-1152.
87.Harberger, A. C., (1998). “A vision of the growth process, Am. Econ Rev. 88(1), 1-32.
88.Hall S. G., Robertson D and Wickens M. R., (1992). Measuring Convergence of the EC economies, Man. School Econ. & Soc. Studies 60, pp. 99-111.
89.Hanna, S.P., (1995). Finding a place in the world economy: core-periphery relations. In: the nation-state and the underdevelopment of Garrett County Political Geography 14, pp. 451–472 5.
90.Hanson, N. (1990). “Do Producer Services Induce Regional Economic Development?” Journal of Regional Science, 30(4): 465-476.
91.Harris, R.I.D., Lau, E., (1998). Verdoorn’s Law and increasing returns to scale in the UK, working paper series.
92.Harrington, J. W., Macpherson, A. D. and Lombard, J.R. (1991).“Interregional Trade in Producer Services: Review and Synthesis” Growth and Change, 22: 75-94.
93.Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanisation of Capital. Baltimore: Pag Bros. (1989a). The Urban Experience. London: Blackwell. (1989b). The Condition of Postmodernity. London: Blackwell. (1989c). "From managerialism to entrepreneurialism." Geografiska Annaler 71B: 3-17.
94.Henderson, V. (1997). “Externalities and Industrial Development” Journal of Urban Economy, 42: 449-470.
95.Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A. and Turner, M. (1995). “Industrial Development in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy, 103(5): 1067-1090.
96.Henderson, J. V. (1999). ‘How urban concentration affects economic growth’ Policy. Research working paper 2326, World Bank.
97.Henderson, J. V. (1999a). ‘Marshall’s Scale Economies,’ NBER Working Paper No. 7358.
98.Henderson, J. V. (1999b). ‘Notes on the Costs of Urban Primacy’ mimeo (10-24-99), Brown University.
99.Hospers GJ (2001). New combinations: Have policymakers learned from past mistakes? New Economy 8: 139-143.
100.Hospers GJ (2002). Beyond the Blue Banana? Structural Change in europe’s Geo-Economy, 42nd European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Germany
101.vom Hofe, R. and Chen, K. (2006). Whether or not Industrial Cluster: Conclusions or Confusions. The Industrial Geographer 4: 2-28.
102.Hoover, E. M. (1937). Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
103.Hospers, GJ, (2002). Beyond the Blue Banana? Structural Change in Euope’s Geo-Economy, 42nd European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Dortmund, Germany.
104.Hsia C J. (1991). "A hypothesis of urban praxis: The local government and society in urban-regional process of Taiwan." Journal of Building and Planning 6: 31-41. (in Chinese).
105.Hugo, Graeme. (1996). Urbanization in Indonesia: city and countryside linked. Pp. 133-183 in J. Gugler (ed.), The Urban Transformation in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106.Iain Deas and Benito Giordano,(2001). Conceptualizing and measuring urban competitiveness in major English cities:An exploratory approach, Environment and Planning A 2001, volume 33, pages 1411-1429.
107.Institutional Crisis and Restructuring in Taiwan's Planning Paradigm by Tsu-Lung CHOU Graduate Institute of Urban Planning National Chung-Hsing University, Taipei, Taiwan.
108.Jacobs J (1969). The economy of cities. Random House, New York.
109.Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities, New York: Vintage.
110.Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 79, 577-598.
111.Jonard, N. and Yildizoglu, M. (1998). Technological Diversity in an Evolutionary Industry Model with Localized Learning and Network Externalities. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 9, 35-53.
112.Katouzian, M. A., (1970). “The Development of the Service Sector: A New Approach,” Oxford Economic Papers, 22: 362-383.
113.King, Anthony D. (1990). Global Cities: Post Imperialism and the Internationalization of London. London and New York: Routledge.
114.Krugman, P. (1991A). Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
115.Krugman, P. (1991B). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483-499.
116.Krugman PR (1991). Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
117.Krugman, P, (1996). Urban concentration:The role of increasing returns and transport costs, International Regional Science Review, 19, pp.5-48.
118.Kunzmann, K.R., Wegener, M. (1991). The pattern of urbanisation in Western Europe 1960-1990. Institut für Raumplanung, Universitat Dortmund.
119.Lambooy JG (1994). Structure and transformation: Regional capitals. In: Kooij P, Pellenbarg P (eds) Regional capitals: Past, present, prospects. Van Gorcum, Assen.
120.Lanaspa Luis et al, (2003). The Evolution of Spanish Urban Structure during the Twentieth Century, Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 567-580.
121.Lawson, C (1997). Territorial Clustering and High-Technology Innovation: From Industrial Districts to Innovative Milieux. Working Paper No. 54, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
122.Leng, T. (1994). Parliamentary Reports of Administration Yeung in 1994. Taipei: Administration.
123.Lever, W.F., (1991). Deindustrialization and the reality of the post-industrial city, Urban Studies, Vo 28, pp. 983-1000.
124.Lin C T. (1989). "Building a sound statute framework for urban planning." in The Preceedings of Urban Planning Conference. edited by Taiwan Urban Planning Association. Taipei: Taiwan Urban Planning Association.
125.Lipietz A. (1987). Mirages and miracles. London: Verso.
126.Ling, T. Y. (2008). et al, Structural Evolution of Taiwan Urban Centers-A Case of Employment Structural Concentration, the Journal of Comparative Asian Development, Vol. 8, no. 1, 2008.
127.Liu, K.C. et at, (2001). Urban Development in Taiwan: Retrospect and Prospect, Population Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 1-25.
128.Liu, JQ. (2004). Taiwan’s Economy: The Success and Problem of a typical newly industrialized economy, Taipei: Ren Jian Publication Ltd.
129.Lo, F.-C. and Y.-M. Yeung, eds. (1996). Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
130.Lucas, R. E. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development” Journal of Monetary Economy. 22:3-42.
131.Maddison, A., (1987). Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist economies: techniques of quantitative assessment. J. Econ. Literature, 24, pp. 649-698.
132.Maillat, D. (1998). From the Industrial District to the Innovative Milieu: Contribution to an Analysis of Territorialised Productive Organisations. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 64, 111-129.
133.Maillat, D. and Lecoq, B. (1992). New Technologies and Transformation of Regional Structures in Europe: The Role of the Milieu. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 4, 1-20.
134.Marelli E., (2000). Convergence and asymmetries in the dynamics of employment: the case of the European regions, Jahrbuch fur Regional wissenschaft/rev. reg., Vol 20, pp. 173-200.ar
135.Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts. Economic Geography 72, 293-313.
136.Marshall J. U., (1981). Industrial diversification in the Canandian urban system, Canandian Geopgraphy, Vok, 25, pp. 316-332.
137.Martin Ron, (1999). The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 65-91.
138.Marelli, Enrico, (2004). Employment Structures and regional specialization in the EU, Economic Systems, Vol. 28, pp. 35-59.
139.Markusen, A. (1994). Studying regions by studying firms, Professional Geographer, 46(4):477-490.
140.Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72(3):293-313.
141.McGee, Terence G. (1991). The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel and T.G. McGee (eds), The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
142.McGee, Terence G. (1995). Metrofitting the emerging mega-urban regions of ASEAN: an overview. In Terence G. McGee and Ira Robinson (eds), The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia, Policy Challenges and Responses. Vancouver: UBC Press.
143.Michalak, W.Z. and Fairbairn, K. J. (1993). “The Producer Service Complex of Edmonton: The Role and Organization of Producer Service Firms in a Peripheral City” Environment and Planning A, 25: 761-777.
144.Montobbio, F., (2000). An evolutionary mode of industrial growth and structural change. CRIC Discussion paper, University of Manchester, p 34.
145.Moucque D (2000). A survey of socio-economic disparities between the regions of the EU. EIB Papers 5: 13-24
146.Myrdal G (1957). Economic development and underdeveloped regions. Duckworth, London.
147.National Program of economic rehabilitation: An action plan of promoting private investment. Taipei: CEPD. (in Chinese). (1995). Taiwan statistical date book. Taipei, CEPD, R.O.C. (1996).
148.Nelson RR (ed) (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford Univerity Press, Oxford
149.Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, London
150.North DC (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
151.O`Conner, K. (1987). “The Location of Services Involved with International Trade” Environmental and Planning A. 19:687-700.
152.O’Donoghue Dan, (2000). Some Evidence for the Convergence of Employment Structures in the British Urban Systems from 1978 to 1991, Regional Studies, Vol. 34.2, pp. 159-167.
153.OECD (2000). The service economy. OECD, Paris.
154.van Oort G. F. (2004). “Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands.” Published by Ashgate Publishing Company, USA.
155.Panchamukhi, V. R. (1990). "UNCTAD in Asia: Issues in the 1990s," IDS Bulletin 21(1): 72-78.
156.Pasinetti LL (1981). Structural change and economic growth: A theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
157.Perry, M. (1990). “The Internationalization of Advertising”. Geofourm. 21(1): 35-50.
158.Perry, M. (1992). “Flexible Production, Externalization and the Interpretation of Business Service Growth”. Service Industry Journal. 12(1): 1-16.
159.Perroux F (1955). Note sur la notion de 'pôle de croissance'. Économie Appliquée 8: 307-320.
160.Perroux F (1961). L'économie au XXe siècle. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
161.Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
162.Pyke, F. and Sengenberger, W., Eds (1992). Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
163.Rabellotti, R. (1997). External Economies and Cooperation in Industrial Districts. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd.
164.Rakodi, C. (1997). The urban challenge in Africa: Growth and management of its large cities, United Nations University Press.
165.RECLUS (1989). Les villes europeénnes: Rapport pour la DATAR. RECLUS, Montpellier.
166.Reinfeld W. (1994a). "Infrastructure and its relation to economic development: the cases of Korea and Taiwan." Industry of free China 82(2): 51-98. (1994b). "Infrastructure and its relation to economic development: the cases of Korea and Taiwan." Industry of free China 82(3): 37-75.
167.Richardson, B.C., (1992). The Caribbean in the Wider World 1492–1992. A Regional Geography. , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
168.Romer, P. M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth” Journal of Political Economic, 94: 1002-37.
169.Romer, P. M. (1990). ”Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economic, 98(5): S71-S101.
170.Rosegrant, S. and Lampe, D. R. (1992). Route 128. Basic Books.
171.Robertson, R. (1991). Social theory, cultural relativity and the problem of globality. In: A. D. King, ed., Culture, Globalization and the World-System. Macmillan, London, and SUNY Department of Art and Art History, Binghampton.
172.Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Change. Sage, London and Newbury Park, Calif.
173.Rodríguez-Pose A (1998). Social conditions and economic performance: The bond between social structure and regional growth in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22: 443-459
174.Romer P (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037
175.Sambidi P.R. and W. Harrison. (2005). “Spatial Dependency of the Geographically Concentrated U.S. Broiler Industry.” Paper Presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island.
176.Saxenian, A.-L. (1994). Regional Advantage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
177.Schulenburg, J.-M. & Wagner, J. (1991). Advertising, Innovation and Market Structure: A Comparison of the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany. In: (Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B., Eds.) Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 160-182. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
178.Schweitzer, F. (1998). Modeling Migration and Economic Agglomeration with Active Brownian Particles. adv. complex systems 1, 11-37.
179.Scott, A. J. (1992). The Role of Large Producers in Industrial Districts: A Case Study of High Technology Systems Houses in Southern California. Regional Studies 26, 265-275.
180.Semple, R. Keith and Alan G. Phipps. (1982). “The Spatial Evolution of Corporate Headquarters within an Urban System.” Urban Geography 3(3):258-279.
181.Semple, R. Keith, Diane J. F. Martz, and Milford B. Green, (1985). “Perspective on Corporate Headquarters Relocation in the United States.” Urban Geography6(4): 370-391.

182.Sengenberger, W. & Pyke, F. (1992). Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration: Research and Policy Issues. In: (Pyke, F. and Sengenberger, W., Eds.) Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
183.Selya, R. M. (1994). “Taiwan as a Service Economy”, Geoforum, 25(3): 305-22.
184.Smith, C.A., (1987). Regional analysis in world system perspective. Review 10 4, pp. 597–648.
185.Smith, Michael Peter and Joe R. Feagin (eds). (1987). The Capitalist City: Global Restructuring and Community Politics. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
186.Syrquin, M., (1988). “Patterns of structural change, in: Chenery, H.B., Srinivason, T.N. (Eds)., Hand book of Development Economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 203-273.
187.The comprehensive development plan for Taiwan area. Taipei, Urban and Housing Development Department, CEPD, R.O.C. (in Chinese). (1997).
188.Todd D, Hsueh Y C. (1990). "New port development and balance regional growth: a Taiwan example." Geoforum 21(4): 421-33.
189.Todd D, Hsueh Y C. (1992). "The industrial complex revisited: petrochemicals in Taiwan."Geoforum 19(1): 29-40
190.Tsai H H. (1985). "Urban growth and the change of spatial structure in Taiwan." in T S Yu and P K C Liu eds., Urban growth and economic development in the pacific region. Taipei, Academia Sinica. (1995). "A new framework of territorial planning and use in Taiwan." Man and Land 133: 24-30. (in Chinese).
191.Tsai, H. H., (1996). “Globalization and the Urban System in Taiwan.” Pp. 179-218 in Emerging world cities in Pacific Asia, edited by Fu-chen Lo and Yue-man Yeung. NY: United Nations University Press.

192.Timmer, Marcel P., Szirmai, Adam, (2000). Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, pp.371-392.
193.Tshetter, J. (1987). “Producer Service Industries: Why are They Growing so Rapidly?” Environment and Planning A, 19: 672-681.
194.Urban Plan in Taiwan (1885-1988). Taipei: National policy research center. (in Chinese).
195.Van Dijk, M. P. (1995). Flexible Specialization, The New Competition and Industrial Districts. Small Business Economics 7, 15-27.
196.Verspagen, B. & Schoenmakers, W. (2000). The Spatial Dimension of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: Evidence from Firm Patenting Data. mimeo, Ecis and Merit.
197.Vernon, R. (1966). "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," Quarterly Journal of Economics 82(2): 190-207.
198.Wade, Robert. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the role of government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
199.Wood, P. A. (1991). “Flexible Accumulation and the Rise of Business Services”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 16: 162-172.
200.Wade R. (1990). Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
201.World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: economic growth and public policy. New York, Oxford University Press.
202.Young, C. S. (1995a). "A critical review of land use regulation in Taiwan." Forecast and Policy of Taiwan's Economy (in Chinese) (1995b). "Constructing a market-led mechanism of land development." United Daily News 7 October. (in Chinese).
203.Yeung. (in Chinese) MoEA (Ministry of Economic affairs) and MoI (Ministry of Interior), (1994). Ordinance of Establishing Industrial-commercial mixed Zone. Taipei: MoEA and MoI. MoI (Ministry of Interior), (1995a). Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book, Republic of China. Taipei: MoI. (1995b). A Handbook of Development Control in Rural Areas. Taipei: MoI.(1996). Draft of National Territorial Development Planning Law. Taipei: MoI.

Chinese:

1.于若蓉、吳惠林、林顯峰,(1988.6) 。產業結構調整政策,中華經濟研究院。
2.王素彎、薛立敏、杜英儀,(1993) 。「生產性服務業與製造業互動關係之研究」,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究。
3.王素彎、薛立敏、杜英儀,(1995) 。「台灣生產性服務業之發展與展望」,財團法人中華經濟研究院。
4.王憶靜,(1996) 。「生產者服務業區位特性之研究-以台北都會區為例」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。
5.中華民國都市計劃學會,(1990) 。都市計畫專業用語之解說及彙編,內政部營建署委託。
6.中華經濟研究院,(1994) 。台商與外商在大陸投資經驗之調查研究:以製造業為例,台北:中華經濟暨研究院。
7.中華經濟研究院,製造業廠商赴大陸投資行為轉變及政府因應政策之研究-以電子資訊業為例,台北:中華經濟暨研究院。
8.石文龍,(2001) 。台灣電子業應加強技術創新力,產經政策動態季刊,4卷3期。
9.汪有遠等,(1991a) 。服務業發展之研究(上),「產業金融」,72:61-81。
10.汪有遠等,(1991b) 。服務業發展之研究(下),「產業金融」,73:12-22。
11.余序江、許志義、陳澤義,(1998) 。科技管理導論:科技預測與規畫, 五南圖書出版公司,民國87年6月。
12.金家禾,(2001) 。全球化與台灣都會區生產服務業之發展 都市與計劃 28 (4): pp 495-518。
13.金家禾,(1999) 。〈邁向世界都市之台北都會去產業結構與空間分佈變遷〉。《都市與計畫》26(2):95-112。
14.金家禾,(1999) 。台北都會區產業結構變遷與產業用地政策之檢討, 台北,玉樹圖書出版社。
15.金家禾,(2001) 。〈全球化與台灣都會區生產者服務業之發展〉。《都市與計畫》 28(4):495-518。
16.金家禾,(2003) 。〈台北產業結構變遷與其世界城市功能發展之限制〉。《國立台灣大學地理學系地理學報》34:19-40。
17.周志龍,(1997) 。〈資本主義全球化過程中的台灣都市及區域發展之結構變遷〉。《中興大學法商學報》33:1-45。
18.周志龍,(2002) 。全球化、台灣國土再結構與制度,詹氏書局。
19.周添城、吳惠林,(1990) 。「產業結構轉變與產業空洞化」,自由中國之工業,第74卷第4期。new window
20.吳惠林,(1985) 。「台灣地區經濟發展過程中產業結構的變動分析」,企銀季刊,第8卷第3期。
21.吳志炎、劉泰英等人,(1988.6) 。「產業發展指標查視體系研究報告」台灣經濟研究院。
22.姜樹翰、黃仁德,(2000) 。高科技產業的發展策略:高科技中心的發展經驗,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,6卷2期。
23.徐千雲,(1998) 。「台北都會區產業空間變遷與都會中心高階服務業(HOS)專業化之研究」,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
24.高長,(2001) 。製造業赴赴大陸投資經營當地化即對台灣經濟之影響,台北,五南。
25.高長,(2002) 。科技產業全球分工與IT產業兩岸分工策略,遠景季刊,3卷2期。
26.夏鑄九,(1987) 。〈一個都市中心的興起─台北市忠孝東路四段的個案研究〉。《當代》15:60-72。
27.夏鑄九,(1995) 。〈全球經濟中的台灣城市與社會〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》20:57-102。
28.陳添枝、顧瑩華,(1999) 。「拓展我國與東南亞經貿關係的策略」,發表於台灣對外經濟發展研討會,台北:台灣大學,11月6日Balassa, B. (1987). "Intra-Industry Specialization: A Cross-Country Analysis," European economic Review, vol.30, pp.27-42.
29.陳冠位,(2002) 。「城市競爭優勢評量系統之研究」,成功大學博士論文。
30.陳博志,(1994) 。「台灣的產業變遷結構」,台灣經濟發展論文集。
31.陳慧瀅,(1997.2) 。"台灣產業結構變遷之探討",經濟情勢暨評論,第二卷第四期。
32.陳麗英,(1995) 。開放兩岸產業分工新局--「分產業分重點區域」執行兩岸經貿交 流,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,1卷2期。
33.張保隆、陳瑋玲,(2003) 。從資源基礎觀點探討兩岸晶圓代工產業之競合策略,ITIS產業論壇,5卷3期。new window
34.許秉翔,(2002.12) 。「E-D模式的應用時機」,公共事務評論,第三卷第二期。
35.童振源,(2001) 。兩岸經濟全球分工與互賴,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,7卷3期。
36.華昌宜,(1998) 。結合「移轉份額」模式與「經濟基礎」模式以分析地區資料之初探,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,9:11-22。
37.黃書偉、鄒克萬,(2001) 。<地區成長管理機制之分析與探討>,《第五屆(2001 年)國土規劃論壇會議》。
38.經濟部技術處,(2007) 。台灣產業發展遠景與策略,台灣。Appendix Existing spatial planning in Taiwan。
39.楊重信,(2001) 。台灣都市製造業動態外部之實證,「2001年中華民國區域科學學會研討會論文集(B)」:323-363。
40.蔡宗羲,(1993.7) 。"我國經濟發展與產業結構的變遷",台灣經濟研究院月刊,4卷6期。
41.劉孟俊,(1994) 。「臺灣與美日產業內貿易決定因素之探討」,經濟專論(152),臺北:中華經濟研究院。
42.蕭峰雄,(1989.12) 。公元2000年我國工業發展之展望及策略,台灣經濟研究院。
43.蕭大立,(1998) 。「服務業與地方發展關係」,國立政治大學地政學研究所碩士論文。
44.邊泰明,(1997) 。「生產性服務業區位與區域發展之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會獎助專題研究計畫:NSC86-2415-H004-00
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE