:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國加州同性伴侶法制之發展:以2003年「家庭伴侶權利與責任法」為論述重心
書刊名:東海大學法學研究
作者:江崇源
作者(外文):Jiang, Chung-yuan
出版日期:2008
卷期:29
頁次:頁87-131
主題關鍵詞:同性伴侶家庭伴侶家庭伴侶登記家庭伴侶法加州家庭伴侶法Same-sex couplesDomestic partnersDomestic partnership registrationDomestic partnership lawsCalifornia's domestic partnership laws
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:62
同性伴侶以同居方式經營其共同生活,早已事實存在於我國社會,但主要規制身分與家庭關係之民法親屬及繼承篇,對其並無具體規範。然自法律的社會規制功能與同性伴侶的平等保護,如何建構一不減損傳統婚姻關係所欲確保之社會價值,且亦能兼顧同性伴侶權益保障之法規範架構,乃為現今家事法上之重要課題。針對此一事實存在於現今社會之同性伴侶共同生活關係,美國許多州早已採取立法手段就其間之權利義務關係,進行調整與規制,其中又以加州的法制發展起源最早且規範最為完整。因此,本研究希冀藉由整理與分析美國加州有關規範同性伴侶關係之家庭伴侶法(主要以2003年之「家庭伴侶權利與責任法」(Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act)為研究重心),以期可做為我國將來針對此議題,進行相關法制建構或為司法審判時之參考。
In order to offer a remedy for same-sex couples who are legally ineligible to marry, California Legislature in recent years (1999-2003) has enacted statewide domestic partnership legislations under which registered same-sex couples can enjoy all of the rights and responsibilities afforded to married couples under state law. Although the development of California domestic partnership legislations has not fulfilled complete equality for same-sex couples, it represents a significant civil rights progress for same-sex couples and reflects the social reality.However, the legal regulations of the relationship of same-sex couples are so underdeveloped in Taiwan. In considering principles of equivalence and the reciprocity of rights and obligations of human beings, it shows that the need to look beyond limitations of traditional family and to fashion a new legal regime protecting caring and committed same-sex couples from the severe economic and social consequences of abandonment, separation, the death of loved one, and other life crises. Therefore, this research, through the analysis and discussion of the existing legal approach California has already taken to regulate same-sex couples, with particular attention to Domestic Partnership Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003, hopes to provide a useful direction for Taiwan Legislature to establish a more effective legal framework to cope with the relationship of same-sex couples in the near future.
期刊論文
1.Sloane, Craig A.(1997)。A Rose by Any Other Name: Marriage and the Danish Registered Partnership Act。Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law,5,189-215。  new window
2.傅美惠(20040700)。論美國同性戀與平等保護--兼論我國同性戀人權保障之發展。國立中正大學法學集刊,16,1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Seckelman, Joseph D.(2008)。Nature and Scope of Community Property System。Merten's Law of Federal Income Taxation,3。  new window
4.Stafford, Holly M.(2006)。The Case for Same-sex Marriage in California from a Social and Economic Perspective。Whittier Journal of Child & Family Advocacy,6,217-217。  new window
5.Zielinski, Debbie(1999)。Domestic Partnerships Benefits: Why Not Offer Them to Same-sex Partners and Unmarried Opposite Sex Partners?。J. L. & HEALTH,13,281-281。  new window
6.Docan, Carol A.、Sperling, Richard F.(2007)。California's Domestic Partnership Law: Incremental Progress or Dramatic Social Change?。William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law,14,153-171。  new window
7.Monagas, Enrique A.(2006)。California's Assembly Bill 205, the Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003: Is Domestic Partner Legislation Compromising the Campaign for Marriage Equality?。Hastings Women's Law Journal,17,39-39。  new window
8.Oliver, Brooke(1993)。Contracting for Cohabitation: Adopting the California Statutory Marital Contract to Life Partnership Agreements between Lesbian, Gay or Unmarried Heterosexual Couples。GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV.,23,899-899。  new window
9.Mak, Kitty(2001)。California's New Domestic Partnership Registration Act May Aid Same-sex Partners in Providing a Legal Basis for Their Life Relationships。AUG L. A. LAW.,24,35-35。  new window
10.Carrillo-Heian, M. R.(2000)。Domestic Partnership in California: Is It a Step toward Marriage?。McGeorge Law Review,31,475-475。  new window
11.Gavin, Meghan M.(2004)。The Domestic Partners Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003: California Extend Significant Protections to Registered Domestic Partners and Their Families。McGeorge Law Review,35,482-482。  new window
12.Callan, Megan E.(2003)。The More, the Not Marry-Er: In Search of a Policy behind Eligibility for California Domestic Partnerships。San Diego Law Review,40,427-427。  new window
13.Eblin, Robert L.(1990)。Domestic Partnership Recognition in the Workplace: Equitable Employee Benefits for Gay Couples (and Others)。Ohio State Law Journal,51,1067-1067。  new window
14.Blumberg, Grace Ganz(2004)。Legal Recognition of Same-sex Conjugal Relationships: The 2003 California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act in Comparative Civil Rights and Family Law Perspective。UCLA Law Review,51,1555-1618。  new window
15.Matsumura, Kaiponanea T.(2006)。Reaching Backward While Looking Forward: The Retroactive Effect California's Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act。UCLA Law Review,54,185-185。  new window
16.Cleary, Erin(2008)。New Jersey Domestic Partnership Act in the Aftermath of Lewis v. Harris: Should New Jersey Expand the Act to Include All Unmarried Cohabitants?。Rutgers Law Review,60。  new window
17.Willey, Charles W.(2008)。Effect in Montana of Community-source Property Acquired in Another State (and It Implicat on a Montana Marriage Dissolution, Estate Planning, Property Transfers and Probate)。MONT. L. REV.,69,313-313。  new window
18.Briffault, Richard(1990)。Our Localism: Part I - The Structure of Local Government Law。Columbia Law Review,90,1-1。  new window
19.Cornish, Blake M.(1992)。A More Perfect Union: A Legal and Social Analysis of Domestic Partnership Ordinances。Columbia Law Review,92,1164-1164。  new window
20.Turk, Karen R.(2007)。Always a Bridesmaid? Unveiling California's Domestic Partner Laws, Including Their Impact on Real Property。Miller & Starr Real Estate Newsalert,17(3),1-1。  new window
21.Katz, Sanford N.(1999)。Emerging Models for Alternatives to Marriage。Family Law Quarterly,33(3),663-663。  new window
22.Deam, Ryan M.(2008)。Creating the Perfect Case: The Constitutionality of Retroactive Application of the Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act of 2003。Pepperdine Law Review,35(3),733-786。  new window
23.Duncan, William C.(2001)。Domestic Partnership Laws in the United States: A Review and Critique。Brigham Young University Law Review,961-961。  new window
圖書
1.張宏誠(2002)。同性戀者權利平等保障的憲法基礎。台北:學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林菊枝(19850000)。美國婚姻法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.紀欣(2002)。美國家事法。美國家事法。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Clark, Homer H.(2002)。The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States。The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States。0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE