&action參考文獻
一、中文文獻
(一)專書
王澤鑑，「侵權行為法第一冊─基本理論」：一般侵權行為，自刊，1998年9月。
王澤鑑，民法實例研習叢書第二冊民法總則，自刊，1986年5月。
史尚寬，親屬法論，自刊，1980年。
李震山，人性尊嚴與人權保障學術論文集，元照出版公司，2000年2月。
林山田，刑法各罪論(上冊)，自刊，2004年1月。
林菊枝，親屬法新論，五南圖書出版有限公司，1996年9月。
紀欣，美國家事法，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2002年5月。胡長青，中國民法親屬論，臺灣商務印書館，1986年。
陳棋炎、黃宗樂、郭振恭，民法親屬新論，三民書局，2005年5月修定5版。
陳榮宗、林慶苗，民事訴訟法(下)，三民書局，修訂4版，2005年5月。
鄧學仁，親屬法之變革與展望，月旦法學出版社，1997年6月。藤本十四秋、受島敦美著，九州編輯部譯，簡易胚胎學，九州圖書文物有限公司，1999年8月。
戴炎輝、戴東雄，中國親屬法，三民書局，2001年5月，新修訂二版。
Ian Wilmut, Keith Campbell & Colin Tudge著，陳紹寬及朱佩雯譯，我創造了桃莉─從複製羊談生命再造與基因工程，究竟出版社股份有限公司，2000年8月。
(二)專書論文
施慧玲，論我國兒童人權法制之發展─兼談落實「聯合國兒童權利公約」之社會運動，家庭法律社會學論文集，元照出版有限公司，2004年9月。施慧玲，論國家介入親權行使之法理基礎，家庭法律社會學論文集，元照出版有限公司，2004年9月。陳清秀，憲法上人性尊嚴，現代國家與憲法，李鴻禧教授六秩華誕祝賀論文集，1997年。
陳棋炎，論吾國非婚生子女認領之法律上性質，親屬、繼承法基本問題，三民書局，1980年。張維民，由代孕生殖法草案論代孕者之身體自主權，國立成功大學法律學系碩士論文，2007年 8月。
戴東雄，孩子，你的父母是誰？親屬法論文集，東大圖書股份有限公司，1988年12月。
(三)期刊論文
王海南，人工生殖子女法律地位─兼評「人工生殖法」中涉及身分關係之相關規定，法令月刊，第58卷第8期，2007年8月，頁102-116。王海南，由德國、瑞士、比利時三國關於血緣關係立法看戰後西歐親子法之演進，現代身分法之理論基礎─戴東雄教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集，2007年8月，頁43-74。
牛惠之、雷文玫，生物科技發展脈絡下之胚胎議題─一個法規範穩定思維的觀點，律師雜誌第285期，2003年6月，頁30-46。
朱世霓，英國有關複製人立法及胚胎幹細胞研究爭議發展始末及評析，科技法律透析，2002年3月，頁9-17。
李震山，「複製人」科技發展對既有法律思維與制度之衝擊─以基本權利保障為例，且旦法學雜誌第79期，2001年12月，頁158-171。
李震山，生命權，台灣本土法學雜誌，第22期，2003年10月，頁1-17。
李震山，德國「幹細胞法」之介評，月旦法學雜誌第87期，2002年8月，頁242-249。
李震山，胚胎基因工程之法律涵意─以生命權保障為例，臺大法學論叢第31卷第3期，2002年5月，頁1-16。何建志，法務部「複製人相關問題之研討」會議結論，生物科技與法律研究通訊第1期，1999年1月，頁5-6。
何建志，反反胚胎商品化的一些法律論證，律師雜誌第285期，2003年6月，頁47-61。
沈宜生，英國的憲政改革與最高法院，司法週刊第1468期，2009年11月26日，頁2-3。
吳志正，女性主義法學觀點下之人工生殖相關法議題，月旦法學雜誌第168期，2009年5月，頁139-154。
吳志正，誰來說明？對誰說明？誰來同意？─兼評醫療相關法規，月旦法學雜誌第162期，2008年11月，頁63-85。
林秀雄，婚生推定，台灣本土法學雜誌第66期，2005年1月，頁160-166。
林秀雄，認領無效與認領之否認─最高法院八十七年度台上字第二一 八五號判決評釋，台灣本土法學雜誌第9期，2000年4月，頁76-85。
周志宏，複製人與生物科技之法律規範，月旦法學雜誌第35期，1998年4月，頁46-62。侯英泠，論人工生殖受術夫妻手術同意書之法律效果，成大法學第2期，2004年6月，頁75-119。侯英泠，從「子女最佳利益」原則檢視人工生殖法草案，律師雜誌第318期，2006年3月，頁16-29。
陳英鈐，人類胚胎幹細胞研究的憲法問題，臺北大學法律論叢第56期，2005年6月，頁41-110。陳英鈐，人類胚胎幹細胞研究的法問題─胚胎的基本權利地位，律師雜誌第285期，2003年6月，頁16-29。陳英鈐，人工生殖法的幾個問題，法令月刊，第58卷第8期，2007年8月，頁117-127。陳志忠，胚胎憲法地位之研究─以醫療性複製胚胎為例，東吳法律學報第18卷第3期，2007年4月，頁41-90。陳志忠，生命誠可貴，尊嚴價更高─關於胚胎植入前基因檢測合憲性之辯論，興大法學第1期，2007年5月，頁159-199。陳清雲，論人工生殖子女之親子關係，醫事法學第12卷第1期，2004年6月，頁21-35。陳美伶，人工生殖子女婚生地位之認定，且旦法學雜誌第2期，1995年6月，頁25-36。陳愛娥，憲法對未出生胎兒的保護─作為基本權保護義務的一例來觀察，政大法學評論第58期，1997年12月，頁65-82。莊錦秀，代孕人工生殖法草案之芻議，台灣法學雜誌第103期，2008年2月，頁17-36。
程明修，歐洲「人權暨生物醫藥公約」與人類幹細胞之研製管制，月旦法學雜誌第65期，2000年10月，頁197-205。
張宇樞，複製人之衝擊及相關法律問題初探，法令月刊第53卷第5期，2002年5月，頁23-27。雷文玫，人類胚胎的法律地位：為何人類胚胎不應該是權利主體？人文及社會科學集刊第19卷第1期，2007年3月，頁51-91。雷文玫，解構我國胚胎保護規範體系─發現父母生育自主的地位，臺大法學論叢第33卷第4期，2004年7月，頁1-35。雷文玫，兩對父母親的拔河─從父母子女關係之認定看近來代理孕母合法化爭議，月旦法學雜誌第52期，1999年9月，頁46-59。
鄧學仁，親屬法修正後之親子關係，月旦法學雜誌第146期，2007年7月，頁148-159。
鄧學仁，親子關係之確定，月旦民商法第8期，2005年6月，頁5-17。
簡賢坤，民法親屬編修正後「婚生否認」制度之探討，月旦法學雜誌第161期，2008年10月，頁49-66。
蔡宗珍，人性尊嚴之保障作為憲法基本原則，月旦法學雜誌第45期，1999年2月，頁99-102。
蔡維音，「擬似權利主體」之法律意涵─重新建構人類基因之法律定位，成大法學第2期，2001年12月，頁41-74。蔡墩銘，墮胎與人工流產，月旦法學雜誌，1995年3月，頁55-58。
薛瑞元，「代理孕母」所生子女的身分認定─誰是他的母親？月旦法學雜誌第38期，1998年7月，頁65-76。
戴東雄，民法親屬編修正後法律解釋之基本問題─生父與非婚生子女之血統關係，法學叢刊第39卷第2期，1994年4月，頁29-45。戴瑀如，從德國立法例論我國新人工生殖法對親屬法之衝擊，法令月刊第58卷第8期，2007年8月，頁128-145。羅麗珠、王惠珍，複製人類在歐美之法制規範，資訊法務透析，1998年9月，24-31。二、英文文獻
(一)Books
ABRAMS, DOUGLAS E., NAOMI R. CAHN, CATHERINE J. ROSS & DAVID D. MEYER, CONTEMPORARY FAMILY LAW (Thomson /West, U.S.A. 2006)
BARTON, CHRIS & GILLIAN DOUGLAS, LAW AND PARENTHOOD (Butterworths, London 1995).
BUEREN, GERALDINE VAN, THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (Martinus nijhoff Publishers, Hague/Boston/London 1998).
HOGGETT, BRENDA, PARENTS AND CHILDREN (4th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London 1993).
HARRIS-SHORT, SONIA & JOANNA MILES, FAMILY LAW (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007).
LOWE, NIGEL & GILLIAN DOUGLAS , BROMLEY’S FAMILY LAW (10th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007).
NEWEL, PETER, THE UN CONVENTION AND CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN THE UK (2d ed., National Children’s Bureau 1993).
PRLBERT, REBECCA, CRETNEY’S FAMILY LAW (6th ed., Sweet &Maxwell, London 2006).
(二)Articles
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., Current Development: Negotiating the UN Declaration on Human Cloning, 100 American Journal of International Law 164-179 (January 2006).
Andrews, Lori B., Is there a Right to Clone? Constitutional Challenges to
Bans on Human Cloning, 11 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 643-
681 (summer, 1998).
Armstrong, Edward R., Family Law—Putative Fathers and the Presumption of Legitimacy—Adams and the Forbidden Fruit: Clashes Between the Presumption of Legitimacy and the Rights of Putative fathers in Arkansas, 25 University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review 369 -406(Winter, 2003).
Abel, Kenton, V. Biotechnology and Medical Device: a) State Legislation: 1997 California Legislation Service 688(west)- Human Cloning, 13 Berkley Technology Law Journal 465-481 (1998).
BAINHAM, ANDREW , Parentage, Parenthood and Parental responsibility: Subtle, Elusive Yet Important Distinctions, in ANDREW BAINHAM, SHELLEY DAY SCLATER. & MARTIN RICHARDS (eds) WHAT IS A PARENTS? 25-46(Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 1999)
Bridge, Stuart, Assisted Reproduction and the Legal definition of Parentage, in ANDREW BAINHAM, SHELLEY DAY SCLATER. & MARTIN RICHARDS (eds) WHAT IS A PARENTS? 73-88 (Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 1999)
BAINHAM, ANDREW, Birthrights? The Rights and Obligations Associated with the Birth of a Child, in ANDREW BAINHAM, SHELLEY DAY SCLATER. & MARTIN RICHARDS (eds) WHAT IS A PARENTS? 157-173(Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 1999)
Bridge, Caroline, Adoption law: a balance of interests, in JONATHAN HERRING(ed) FAMILY LAW—ISSUE, DEBATES, POLICY 212-232(Willan Publishing, Callonpton Deron UK 2001).
Brownsword, Roger, Regulating human genetics: new dilemmas for a new millennium, 12(1) Medical Law Review 14-39 (2004).
Brownsword, Roger, Dolly, dignity and the genetics debate, 148 New Law Journal 413-420(March 1998)
Booth, Penny, Family Law without the F-word--- The Implications of Cloning, 154 New Law Journal 374-375( Mar. 12, 2004).
Berg, Jessica, You say Person, I say Property: Does It Really Matter What We Call an Embryo? 4 The American Journal of Bioethics 17-18 (Winter, 2004).
Besson, Samamtha, Enforcing the child''s right to know her origins: contrasting approaches under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Convention on Human Rights, 21(2) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 137-159 (2007)
Baron, Elisha, Columnn: Proposal 2: Michigan Voters End 30-year Ban on the Destruction of Human Embryos for Stem Cell Research, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 155-158 (Spring, 2009).
Case Comment, Cloning (Cell Nuclear Replacement): The Scope of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, 11(1) Medical Law Review135-138 (2003).
Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: International Human Rights: Efforts to Ban Human Cloning, 99 American Journal of International Law 266-266 (January, 2005).
Cameron, Nigel M. de S. & Anna V. Henderson, Symposium: Brave New World at the General Assembly: The United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning, 9 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science &Technology 145 -200(Winter, 2008).
Cannon, Jennifer & Michelle Haas, Recent Development: The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: Did Congress go too Far? 35 Harvard Journal on Legislation 637-645(Summer, 1998).
Cash, Adrienne N. Calhoun, Invasion of the clones: Animal Cloning and the Potential implications on the Future of Human Cloning and cloning Legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Internationally, 82 University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 349-375(Spring, 2005).
Cash, Adrienne N., Attack of the Clones: Legislative Approaches to
Human Cloning in the United States, 2005 Duke Law & Technology
Review 26-38 (2005).
Cook, Rebecca J., International Human Rights Law Concerning Women: case Notes and Comments, 23 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 779-818 (1990).
Chestney, Elizabeth Siberry, The Right to Know One’s Genetic Origin: can, Should, or Must a State That Extends This Right to Adoptees Extend an Analogous Right to Children Conceived With Donor Gametes, 80 Texas Law Review 365-391 (December, 2001).
Coleman, June, Playing God or Playing Scientist: A Constitutional Analysis of State Laws Banning Embryological Procedures,27 Pacific Law Journal 1331- 1399(1996).
Doek, Jaap E. , The Nuclear Family: Who are the Parents? in JOHN EEKELAAR & THANDABANTA NBLAPO (eds), THE CHANGING FAMILY 545-552(Hart Publishing, Oxford 1998).
Dwyer, Deirdre, Beyond autonomy: the role of dignity in “biolaw”, 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 319 -331(2003).
Deech, Baroness Ruth, Playing God: Who Should Regulate Embryo Research? 32 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 321-341 (2007).
Deutsch, Josh, Finders-Speakers: A Bright-Line Rule Awarding Custody to Gestational Mother in Cases of Fertility Clinic Error, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 367-389 (Fall, 2005).
Jocelyn Downie, Jennifer Llewellyn & Francoise Baylis, A Constitutional Defence of the Federal Ban on Human Cloning for Research Purpose, Queen’s Law Journal and Author, 31 Queen’s Law Journal 353-384(Fall, 2005).
Erickson, Theresa M. & Megan T. Erickson, What Happens to Embryos When a Marriage Dissolves? Embryo Disposition and Divorce, 35 Wm . Mitchell L. Rev. 469-488 (2009).
Eibert, Mark D., SYMPOSIUM: SYMPOSIUM TRANSCRIPT: Human Cloning: Myths, Medical Benefits and Constitutional Rights, 53 Hastings Law Journal 1097-1116 (July, 2002).
Foley, Elizabeth Price, The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning, 42 Arizona Law Review 647-730 ( Fall, 2000).
Foley, Elizabeth Price, Human Cloning and the Right to Reproduce, 65
Albany Law Review 625-648 (2002).
Forder, Caroline & Kees Saarloos, The establishment of parenthood: a story of successful convergence? Maastricht faculty of Law Working Paper 2007/1 1-78(2007).
Forsythe, Clarke D., Legal perspectives on Cloning: Human Cloning and the Constitution, 32 Valparaiso University Law Review 469-542 (spring, 1998).
Fair, Lauren M., Shame on U.S.: The Need for Uniform Open Adoption Records legislation in the United States, 48 Santa Clara Law Review 1039 -1067(2008).
Greene, Adam, The World After Dolly: International Regulation of Human Cloning, 33 George Washington International Law Review341-362(2001).
George, Robert P. & Alfonso Gomez-Lobo, The moral Status of the Human Embryo, 48:2 Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 201-210 (spring 2005).
Greenlee, Susan, Dolly''s Legacy to Human Cloning: International Legal Responses and Potential Human Rights Violations, 18 Wisconsin International LawJournal 537-554 (Spring, 2000).
Grubb, Andrew, Case Comment: Regulating Cloned Embryos? 118 Law quarterly Review358-364 (July,2002).
Herring, Jonathan & P-L Chau, Are cloned embryos embryos? The Queen on the application of Quintavalle v the Secretary of State for Health, 14 Child and Family Law Quarterly 315-337 (Sept. 1, 2002).
Hymowitz, Lori J., International Insight: International Restrictions on Human Cloning Research, 3 Journal of Law & Social Challeges 147-160 (spring, 1999).
Halliday, Samantha, A comparative approach to the regulation of human embryo stem cell research in Europe, 12(1) Medical Law Review 40-69 (2004).
Hackett, Tokay T., The Legal Implications of Human Cloning- (Proliferation or Extinction), 24 Thurgood Marshall Law Review 305-326(Spring, 1999).
Hubin, Donald C., Daddy Dillemmas: Untangling the Puzzles of Paternity, 13 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 29-80 (2003).
Herring, Jonathan, Cloning in The House Of Lords, Family law 663-677 (Sept. 1, 2003).
HERRING, JONATHAN, Parents and Children, in JONATHAN HERRING (ed) FAMILY LAW—ISSUE, DEBATES, POLICY 125-168 (Willan Publishing, Callonpton Deron UK 2001).
HERRING, JONATHAN, Introduction, in JONATHAN HERRING (ed) FAMILY LAW—ISSUE, DEBATES, POLICY 1-18(Willan Publishing, Callonpton Deron UK 2001).
Horst Dreier, Does Cloning Violate the Basic Law’s Guarantee of Human Dignity? in SILJA VONEKY & RUDIGER WOLFRUM (eds), HUMAN DIGNITY AND HUMANCLONING 77-85(Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/ Boston, 2004)。
Haas, John, A Catholic View of Cloning, in GLENN MCGEE (ed), THE HUMAN CLONING DEBATE 277-284 (3rd ed.Berkeley Hills Books, Berkeley california).
Ian Karsten, Atypical Familities and the Human Rights Act: The Rights of Unmarried Fathers, Same sex Couples and Transsexuals, 2 European Human Rights Law Review 195-207(1999).
Johnson, Martin, A biomedical perspective on parenthood, in ANDREW BAINHAM, SHELLEY DAY SCLATER. & MARTIN RICHARDS (eds) WHAT IS A PARENTS? 47-71(Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 1999)
Kording, Niccol, Nature v. Nurture: Children Left fatherless and Family-Less When Nature Prevails in Paternity actions, 65 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 811-863(Summer, 2004).
Kahn, Machael I., Clowning Around With Clones: The Moral and Legal
Implications of Human Cloning, 3 Journal of Law &Social Challenges
161-177(Spring, 1999).
Kaplan, Diane S., Immaculate Deception: The Evolving Right of Paternal Renunciation, 27 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 139-151 (Summer, 2006).
Lampert, Allison, An Andy Warhol Society - First Coca-cola, Now Humans: An Examination of Whether a Ban on Human cloning Violates Procreative Liberty, 16 St. John''s Journal of Legal Commentary 245 -265(Winter, 2002).
Lowe, N.V. & Gillian Douglas, Becoming a parent in English law, 108 Law Quarterly Review 414-432 (1992).
Legislative Comment, Reproductive cloning in the UK, 10(3) Medical Law Review 327-329(2002) .
Lewis, Meredith, Age of Human Cloning and the Constitutional Crisis That May Result, 6 Journal of Law & Family Studies 171-180 (2004).
Morgan, Ryan, Embryonic Stem Cells and Consent: Incoherence and Inconsistency in the UK Regulatory Model, 15(3) Medical Law Review279-319(2007).
Morgan, Ryan, Legislative Comment: A tight fit? Deficiencies in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology(Research Purposes) Regulations 2001, 28(3) Statute Law Review199-217(2001).
Moore, Debra L., Comments: Don’t Rush to Judgment on "Dolly": Human Cloning and Its Individual Productive Liberty Implications, 66 UMKC Law Review 425-449 (Winter, 1997).
Mason, J.K., Case Comment: Clones and Cell Nuclear Replacements: A Quintavalle Saga, 7(3) Edinburgh Law Review379-387 (2003).
McBrien, Maureen, Human Cloning: Beyond the Realm of the Constitutional Right to Procreative Liberty, 21 Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal 107-133 (2002-2003).
Michaelides, Sophia, A comparative Overview of the Protection Giving by the Law to the Unborn Child in England and Cyprus, 5(1) Coventry Law Journal 1-10 (2000).
Marks, Dena M., Person v. Potential: Judicial Struggles to Decide Claims Arising from the Death of an Embryo or Fetus and Michigan’s Struggle to Settle the Question, 37 Akron Law Review 41-85(2004).
Masson, Judith, Parenting by Being: Parenting by Doing- In Search of Principles for founding Families, in JR SPENCER & ANJJE DU BOIS-PEDAIN (eds), FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY IN REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE 131-155 ( Hart publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 2006).
Nademleinsky, Marco, The Tensions between legal, Biological and Social Conceptions of parentage national report for Austria, in INGEBORG SCHWENZER (ed), TENSIONS BETWEEN LEGAL, BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIL CONCEPTIONS OF PARENTAGE 27-47(Intersentia, Oxford, 2007).
Nash, Duane, Recommended Response for Human Cloning Patent Applications, 42 The journal of law and technology 279 -312(2002).
Noble-Allgire, Alice M., Switched at the Fertility Clinic: Determining Maternal Rights When a Child is Born from Stolen or Misdelivered Genetic Material, 64 Missouri Law Revies 517-594 (Summer, 1999).
NOTE: Human Cloning and Substantive Due Process, 111 Harvard Law
Review 2348-2365 (June, 1998).
Piciocchi, Cinzia, Bioethics and Law: Between Values and Rules, 12 IND. J. Global Legal Stud 471-482(2005).
Priest, Jacqueline A., Assisted reproduction-developments in England, 37(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 535-550 (1988).
Plomer, Aurora, Beyond the HFE Act 1990:The Regulation of Stem Cell Research in the UK, 10 Medical Law Review 132-164 (Summer, 2002)
Pattinson, Shaun D., Reproductive cloning: can cloning harm the clone? 10(3) Medical Law Revies 295-307 (2002).
Price, Elizabeth C., Does the FDA Have Authority to Regulate Human Cloning? 11 Harvard Journal of Law &Technology 619-641(summer, 1998).
Plomer, Aurora, A Foetal Right to Life? The Case of Vo v France, Human Rights law Review, 5 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 311-338(2005).
Peterson, Shawn E., A comprehensive national policy to stop human cloning: an analysis of the human cloning prohibition act of 2001 with recommendations for federal and state legislatures, 17 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 217 -268(2003).
Penn, Jonathan, A Different kind of Life Esatae: The Laws, Rights, and Liabilities Associated with Donated Embryos, 21 Regent U.L. Rev 207 -228(2008-2009).
Quintero, Maria S., Cloning Californians? Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning and Recent Cloning-Related Legislation, 18 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 417-431 (2002).
Rokosz, Gregory J., Human Cloning: Is the Reach of FDA Authority too Far a Stretch? 30 Steon Hall Law Review 464-515 (2000).
Rup, Valerie S., Human Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Cloning, the Race to Regulate, and the Constitutionality of the Proposed Regulations, 76 University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 1135-1165 (Summer 1999).
Roberts, Dorothy E. , The Genetic Tie, 62 University of Chicago Law Review 209-273 (Winter, 1995).
Rains, Robert E., What the Erie “Surrogate Triplets” can Teach State legislatures about the Need to Enact Article 8 of the Uniform Parentage Act (2000), 56 Cleveland State Law Review 1-35 (2008).
Riaz, Fahd, Legal Update: Genetic Transplantation Cloning and Federal Legislation: Some Constitutional Issues, 7 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 421-430 (2001).
Rae, Scott B., Parental Rights and the Definition of motherhood in Surrogate Motherhood, 3 Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies 219-277 (Spring, 1994).
Robertson, John A., Gay and Lesbian Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology, 55 Case Western Reserve University 323-372( Winter, 2004)
Rothenbacher, Franz, Social Change in Europe and Its Impact on Family Structures, in JOHN EEKELAAR & THANDABANTA NBLAPO (eds), THE CHANGING FAMILY 3-31 (Hart Publishing, Oxford 1998).
Roberts, Melanie, Children by Donation: Do They Have a Claim to Their Genetic Parentage? in JO BRIDGEMAN & DANIEL MONK (eds) , FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON CHILD LAW 47-66(Gavendish Publishing Limited, London 2000)
SCHWENZER, INGEBORG , Tensions between Legal, Biological and Social Conceptions of Parentage, in INGEBORG SCHWENZER (ed), TENSIONS BETWEEN LEGAL, BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIL CONCEPTIONS OF PARENTAGE 1-26 (Intersentia, Oxford, 2007).
Steinbock, Bonnie, Defining parenthood, 13 The International Journal of Children’s Rights 287 -310(2005).
Sevanthinathan, Pratheep, Heavy Regulation of Human Cloning as an Alternative to a Complete Ban, 10 Quinnipiac Health Law Journal 219-249 (2007).
Sunstein, Cass R., Symposium: Conceiving a Code for Creation: The Legal Debate Surrounding Human Cloning: Is There a Constitutional Right to Clone? 53 Hastings Law Journal 987-1005 (July, 2002)
Stepno, Erin M., Review of Selected 1997 California Legislation: Successful Animal Cloning Raises Questions About Human Cloning Possibilities: Science Fiction No Longer, 29 McGeorge Law Review 666 -675(Spring, 1998).
Somekh, Nati, The European Total Ban on Human Cloning: An Analysis og the Council of Europe’s Actions in Prohibiting Human Cloning, 17 Boston University International Law Journal 397-423 (fall, 1999).
Sandel, Michael J., The Ethical Implications of Human Cloning, 48:2 Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 241-247 (spring, 2005).
Symposium: Cloning Californians? Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning, 53 Hastings Law Journal 1143-1202 (July, 2002).
Shanin, Elizabeth L., International Response to Human Cloning, 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 255-261 (Spring, 2002).
Shuster, David J., The Best Interests of the Child Must Be Considered before rebutting the Presumption of Legitimacy, 23 University of Baltimore Law review 661-686 (Spring, 1994).
Shelf, Amy, A Need to know Basis: Record Keeping, Information Access, and the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act, 51 Hastings Law Journal 1047-1072(July, 2000).
Steiner, Eva , The Tensions between the Biological and Social Conceptions of parenthood in English Law, in INGEBORG SCHWENZER (ed), TENSIONS BETWEEN LEGAL, BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIL CONCEPTIONS OF PARENTAGE 159-175 (Intersentia, Oxford, 2007).
Tully, Paul, Dollywood Is Not Just A Theme Park in Tennessee Anymore: Unwarrented Prohibitory Human Cloning Legislation and Policy Guidelines for A Regulatory Approach to Cloning, 31 Marshall Law Review1385-1422( Summer, 1998).
Talbott, Meghan, The Kentucky Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2002 and the Future of Cloning in Kentucky, 42 Brandeis Law Journal 823 -845(Summer, 2004).
Warnock, Baroness Mary, Philosophy and Ethics, in C. Cookson, G. Nowak and D. Thierbach (eds.), GENETIC ENGINEERING: THE NEW CHALLENGE 67-95 (European Patent Office 1993) .
Willgoos, Christine, FDA Regulation: An Answer to the Questions of Human Cloning and Germline Gene Therapy, 27 American Journal of Law & Medicine 101-124 (2001).
Weed, Matthew, Discourse on Embryo Science and Human Cloning in the United States and great Britain, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 802-810(2005).
Wood, Peter & Janita Good, Human reproductive cloning-nipped in the bud, 151 New Law Journal 1760-1776 (Nov.30, 2001).
Wall, L. Lewis & Douglas Brown, Regarding Zygotes as Persons, 49 Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 602-610 (Autumn, 2006).
Wang, Andrea, NOTES & COMMENTS: Regulating Human Cloning Within an Environmental Human Rights Framework, 12 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 165-189 (winter, 2001).
Wickware, Potter, History and Technique of Cloning, in GLENN
MCGEE, THE HUMAN CLONING DEBATE 17-41 (3rd ed.Berkeley
Hills Books, Berkeley california).
Zelony, Adiv, Don’t Throw the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Why a Ban
on Human Cloning Might be a Threat to human rights, 27 Loyola of Los
Angeles International & Comparative Law Review 541-568(summer
2005).
網站資源：
David D. Meyer, Parenthood in a Time of Transition: Tensions Between Legal, Biological, and Social Conceptions of Parenthood. available at http://www2.law.uu.nl/priv/AIDC/PDF%20files/IIA2/IIA2%20-%20USA.pdf (last visited Sept. 3, 2009)
Javitt, Gail H., Kristen Suthers & Kathy Hudson, Cloning: A Policy Analysis, Genetics & Public Policy center (April 2005). available at
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Genetics_and_Public_Policy/GPPC_Cloning_0505.pdf(last visited Dec. 18 ,2009).
Pennings, Guido, The “double track” policy for donor anonymity, 12
Human Reproduction 2839 (1997). Available at
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/12/2839 (last
visited June 27, 2008).
TOBER, TINIA, TOWARDS AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION AGAINST HUMAN PEPRODUCTIVE CLONING.
以英國Warwick大學資料庫查詢available at http://sundoc.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/diss-online/06/06H115/prom.pdf (last visited Sept. 1 ,2009).
Williams, Susan H., Comment: Autonomy and the Public-Private Distinction in Bioethics and Law 483-494 (2004). 以英國Warwick大學MUSE資料庫查詢.
我國2008年行政院版「人類胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究條例草案」Available at http://www.ey.gov.tw/public/Attachment/8731108571.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2009)
BBC新聞available at http://news.bbc.co.uk (last visited Jan. 25, 2010)
2005年3月8日聯合國人類複製宣言(United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning)，解決方案號碼(resolution number)A/RES/59/280. available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/493/06/PDF/N0449306.pdf?OpenElement
(last visited Dec.2, 2009)
聯合國特別委員會制定反對生殖性人類複製條約網站：Available at http://www.un.org/law/cloning/ (last visited Dec. 2, 2009).
聯合國特別委員會專家聽證會之內容及議題：available at http://www.un.org/law/cloning/documents/1st_session/english/Presentation%20schedule..pdf (last visited Dec. 2, 2009).
聯合國大會第57次會議決議之內容第44頁：
General Assembly, Official Records, Fifty-seventh Session Supplement No.49(A/57/49), 44. available at
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/328/45/PDF/N0332845.pdf?OpenElement(last visited Dec. 2, 2009).
聯合國第六委員會向聯合國大會提出之報告。available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/684/94/PDF/N0268494.pdf?OpenElement (last visited Dec. 2, 2009).
哥斯大黎加於聯合國提出有關人類複製之草案：
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/330/84/PDF/N0333084.pdf?OpenElement (last visited Dec. 3, 2009).
聯合國新聞網站available at
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=13576&Cr=cloning&Cr1=&Kw1=human+cloning&Kw2=&Kw3= (last visited Dec. 14, 2006).
or
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=28544&Cr=cloning&Cr1=&Kw1=human+cloning&Kw2=&Kw3= (last visited Dec. 14, 2006).
紐倫堡法典(The Nuremberg Code)
available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/references/nurcode.htm (last visited Feb.18, 2009).
歐洲理事會網站available at http://www.coe.int/NewsSearch/Default.asp?p=nwz&id=156&lmLangue=1 (last visited Dec. 3, 2009)
The President’s Council on Bioethics, Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry. available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/cloningreport/fullreport-print.html. (last visited Mar.10, 2009)
CNN新聞
Available at http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9703/04/clinton.cloning/ (last visited Oct. 24, 2009).
CNN新聞
Available at http://archives.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/11/26/human.cloning/ (last visited Oct. 24, 2009).
The President’s Council on Bioethics, Staff Working Paper-Arguments for Reproductive Cloning.
available at http://www.bioethics.gov/background/workpaper3a.html. (last visited Oct. 4, 2006)
洛斯林機構網站Roslin Institute web site
Available at http://www.roslin.ac.uk/publicInterest/technology.php (last visited Dec.11, 2007).
雅虎網站Available at
http://tw.babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPrimitive_streak&lp=en_zt&.intl=tw&fr=yfp (last visited Mar.10, 2009).
英國國會幹細胞研究報告(The United Kingdom Parliament, Stem Cell Research Report)。Available at http://www.opublications.parliament.uki/pa/Id200102/Idselect/Idstem/183/8305.htm (last visited March 3, 2009)
National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research 8 (Rockville, Maryland , September 1999). Available at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/nbac_stemcell.pdf (last visited May 1, 2009)
National Bioethica Advisory Commission, Cloning Human Beings (Rockvill, Marylamd june 1997).
Available at http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs/cloning1/cloning.pdf (last visited Oct. 24, 2009)
英國醫療專家委員會報告(Stem Cell Research: Medical Progress with Responsibility，又稱Donaldson Report)。available at http://staminali.aduc.it/donaldson_eng.pdf (last visited Mar. 10, 2009).
Warnock報告 (Report of the Committee of the Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Warnock Report)。available at
http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/report_OF_THE_COMMITTEE_OF_INQUIRY_INTO_HUMAN_FERTILISATION_AND_EMBRYOLOGY.PDF (last visited Mar. 11, 2009).
HGAC papers, Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine.
Available at http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/hgac/index.html (last visited April 4, 2009)
人類基因組及人權宣言available at:
http://www.nus.edu.sg/irb/Articles/IBC-Universal%20Declaration%20on
%20the%20Human%20Genome.pdf (last visited May 4, 2009)
歐洲人權及生物醫藥公約Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm (last visited Sept. 19, 2009)
歐洲人權及生物醫藥公約議定書:
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the human being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Clonong Human Beings. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/168.htm (last visited Dec. 3, 2009)
歐洲人權及生物醫藥公約議定書解釋報告(Explanatory Report). Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/168.htm (last visited Dec. 3, 2009)
歐洲人權及生物醫藥公約議定書簽署及批准情形。Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=168&CM=2&DF=03/12/2009&CL=ENG (last visited Dec. 3, 2009)
歐洲人權及生物醫藥公約議定書附保留條款之國家。available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeDeclarations.asp?NT=168&CM=2&DF=03/12/2009&CL=ENG&VL=1 (last visited Dec. 3, 2009)
英國一九九０年人類受精及胚胎法(Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act) Available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1990/Ukpga_19900037_en_1.htm (last visited Dec. 25, 2008).
英國二００八年人類受精及胚胎法available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080022_en_6 (last visited Jan. 22, 2010).
英國二００一年人類生殖性複製法(Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001) Available at
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2001/ukpga_20010023_en_1 or http://www.biotech.bioetica.org/d14.htm (last visited Dec. 25, 2008).
FDA網站letter about human cloning, Available at http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RunningClinicalTrials/ucm150508.htm (last visited Oct. 24, 2009).
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, Available at
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0410_0113_ZS.html (last visited Dec. 5, 2009)
BOWERS v. HARDWICK, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), Available at http://www.sodomylaws.org/bowers/bowers.htm (last visited Jul. 10, 2009)
LAWRENCE ET AL. v. TEXAS 539U.S. 558, Available at http://supreme.justia.com/us/539/558/case.html (last visited Dec. 5, 2009)
Sodomy laws網站 http://www.sodomylaws.org/bowers/bowers.htm (last visited Dec. 5, 2009)
美國國會第一０五會期提出之法案 Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０五會期H.R.923法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.923: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０五會期H.R.3133法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.3133: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０五會期S.368法案，Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:S.368: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０五會期S.1601法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:S.1601: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０六會期提出之法案 Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０六會期H.R.2326法案，Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.R.2326: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０六會期H.R.571法案，Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c106:H.R.571: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 2172號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2172: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 1608號法案Available a http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.1608: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 2608號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2608: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 1260號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.1260: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 1372號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.1372: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期H.R. 1644號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.1644: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期S.1758法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S.1758: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０七會期S.704法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S.704: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０七會期S.790法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S.790: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009)
美國國會第一０九會期H.R. 222號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.222: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期H.R. 1357號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1357: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期H.R. 1822號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1822: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期H.R. 3932號法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.3932: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期S.658法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.658: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期S.876法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.876: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一０九會期S.1520法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.1520: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一一一會期H.R.110法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.110: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
美國國會第一一一會期H.R.1050法案Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1050: (last visited Dec. 4, 2009).
亞利桑那州有關禁止經費使用於人類複製之規定http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/47leg/1r/laws/0180.htm (last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
美國州法聯盟(National Conference of State Legislatures)有關人類複製法律網站http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14284 (last visited Oct. 10, 2009)
加州健康及安全法第24185條至第24187條(Health and Safety Code section24185-24187)。http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=14082512007+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve (last visited Oct. 10, 2009)
我國人工生殖法立法紀錄，Available at http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@8:1804289383:f:NO%3DB02528*%20AND%20NO%3DA2%24%246$$$PD (last visited Feb. 10, 2009).
行政院衛生署二００二年二月十九日公告「胚胎幹細胞研究的倫理規範」Available at http://www.vghks.gov.tw/erli/medethics/%ADF%ADL%B7F%B2%D3%ADM%AC%E3%A8s%AA%BA%AD%DB%B2z%B3W%BDd.htm (last visited July 1st, 2009)
行政院衛生署九十六年八月九日公告「人類胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究倫理政策指引」Available at http://www.nsc.gov.tw/bio/public/Attachment/711111415271.pdf (last visited Jul. 1, 2009)
MEYER v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, 262 U.S. 390 (1923). Available at
http://www.csustan.edu/cj/jjustice/CaseFiles/Meyer-v-Nebraska.pdf (last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535(1942). Available at http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0316_0535_ZO.html (last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
Staley v.Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). Available at
http://www.iowafathers.com/federal_rulings/Stanley%20v.%20Illinois%208212%205014,%20405%20U.S.%20645,%2092%20S.Ct.%201208,%2031%20L.Ed.2d%20551%20(1972).pdf (last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974).
Available at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=414&page=632(last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Available at http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/91-744.ZS.htm l(last visited Dec. 8, 2009)
EISENSTADT v. BAIRD, 405 U.S. 438 (1972). Available at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=405&invol=438 (last visited Dec. 8, 2009).
Cameron v. Board of Education,795 F. Supp. 228 (S.D. Ohio 1991). Available at http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8098993946&homeCsi=140710&A=0.7647543507942456&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=795%20F.%20Supp.%20228&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 8, 2009).
Goodwin v. Turner, 702 F. Supp. 1452 (W.D. Mo. 1988). Available at http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8098993946&homeCsi=140710&A=0.7647543507942456&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=702%20F.%20Supp.%201452&countryCode=USA
IN THE MATTER OF BABY M, A PSEUDONYM FOR AN ACTUAL PERSON, 109 N.J. 396 . Available at http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8098993946&homeCsi=140710&A=0.7647543507942456&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=537%20A.2d%201227&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 8, 2009).
Lindley v. Sullivan, 889 F.2d 124(1989). Available at http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8098993946&homeCsi=140710&A=0.9911074808334605&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=889%20F.2d%20124&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 8, 2009).
Lifchez v. Hartigan,735 F. Supp. 1361 (April 26, 1990). Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8137301448&homeCsi=140710&A=0.6755171146025106&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=735%20F.%20Supp.%201361&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 12, 2009).
Washington V. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702(1997). Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8137324236&homeCsi=156994&A=0.383030058294032&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=521%20U.S.%20702&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 12, 2009).
Margaret S. v. Edwards, 488 F. Supp. 181(E.D. La. 1980). Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8137336794&homeCsi=251300&A=0.5034673827471582&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=488%20F.%20Supp.%20181&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 12, 2009).
Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319(Dec. 6, 1937). Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8212115172&homeCsi=140710&A=0.26168743042834164&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=302%20U.S.%20319&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 12, 2009).
Michael H. v. Gerard, 491 U.S. 110(june 15, 1989). Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T8212115172&homeCsi=140710&A=0.26168743042834164&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=491%20U.S.%20110&countryCode=USA (last visited Dec. 12, 2009).
Vo v France一案Available at http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2004/July/GrandChamberjudgmentVovFrance080704.htm (last visited May 7, 2009)
VO V. FRANCE AND FETAL RIGHTS: THE DECISION NOT TO DECIDE, 18 Harvard Human Rights Journal( Spring 2005).
Available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss18/goldman.shtml (last visited May 5, 2009)
Human Fertilisation and Embryology(Research Purpose) Regulations 2001 Available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2001/uksi_20010188_en.pdf (last visited May 4, 2009).
美國國家委員會(National commission)建議內容Available at http://bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/research_fetus.pdf (last visited April 29,2009)
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects
Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (last visited 30 April, 2009)
密西根州憲法修正案(proposal 2) Available at
http://crcmich.org/election/proposal200802.pdf (last visited Jun. 24, 2009)
密西根州研究報告(Citizens Research Council of Michigan, Proposal 2008-02 Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Report 353, 1(Oct. 2008)
Abailable at http://www.crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2000s/2008/rpt353.pdf (last visited Jun. 24, 2009)
美國各州有關胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究相關規定Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/Health/EmbryonicandFetalResearchLaws/tabid/14413/Default.aspx (last visited June 24th, 2009)
Davis v. Davis一案Available at http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/cloning/davis_v_davis.htm (last visited May 19, 2009).
White Paper on Principles Concerning the Establishment and Legal Consequences of Parenthood. Available at
http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/family_law_and_children''s_rights/Documents/white%20paper.pdf (last visited March 29, 2009).
X,Y and Z v The United Kingdom(ECHR, 1997)一案。Available at
http://www.pfc.org.uk/node/340 (last visited March 28, 2009).
英國公眾資訊局網站Available at
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/about/index.htm) (last visited march 25, 2009).
英國兒童支持法(Child Support Act1991)。Available at
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1991/ukpga_19910048_en_2 (last visited March 28,2009).
歐洲人權法院Odievre v. France一案，Available at
http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/family_law_and_children%27s_rights/documents/CJ-FA%20_2007_%202.pdf 或
http://sim.law.uu.nl/SIM/CaseLaw/hof.nsf/d0cd2c2c444d8d94c12567c2002de990/4ac5d2b818b7635741256ccd004a4516?OpenDocument (last visited 25 March 2009)
Kennedy V. State一案, Available at
http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/mungo/lexseestat.do?bct=A&risb=21_T6108462497&homeCsi=143889&A=0.9087055774960903&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=117%20Ark.%20113,at%20116&countryCode=USA (last visited Mar.23, 2009).
White Paper on Principles Concerning the Establishment and Legal Consequences of Parenthood. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/family_law_and_children''s_rights/Documents/white%20paper.pdf (last visited March 29, 2009).
UPA，Available at http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/archives/ulc/upa/final2002.htm (last visited July 24, 2009)
聯合知識庫網站available at http://interush.tw/news_list_1_detail.php?fname=5270441.xml (last visited Nov. 29, 2009)
判決書
R. (On the Application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2001] EWHC Admin 918.
Available at http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?rltdb=CLID_DB785371444201412&srch=TRUE&db=UK-CASELOC&sv=Split&service=Search&eq=Welcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription&fmqv=s&method=TNC&ifm=NotSet&action=Search&query=%22(2003)+2+A.C.+687%22&mt=WLIGeneralSubscription&fn=_top&origin=Search&vr=2.0&utid=3&sri=53&rlt=CLID_QRYRLT886931444201412&rp=%2fWelcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription%2fdefault.wl&sp=JYRofChina-04&rs=WLIN9.11 (last visited Dec.15, 2009)
R. (On the Application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCA Civ 29.
Available at
http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?rltdb=CLID_DB785371444201412&srch=TRUE&db=UK-CASELOC&sv=Split&service=Search&eq=Welcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription&fmqv=s&method=TNC&ifm=NotSet&action=Search&query=%22(2003)+2+A.C.+687%22&mt=WLIGeneralSubscription&fn=_top&origin=Search&vr=2.0&utid=3&sri=53&rlt=CLID_QRYRLT886931444201412&rp=%2fWelcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription%2fdefault.wl&sp=JYRofChina-04&rs=WLIN9.11
(last visited Dec.15, 2009)
R. (On the Application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health[2003]UKHL13.
Available at http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?rltdb=CLID_DB785371444201412&srch=TRUE&db=UK-CASELOC&sv=Split&service=Search&eq=Welcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription&fmqv=s&method=TNC&ifm=NotSet=Search&query=%22(2003)+2+A.C.+687%22&mt=WLIGeneralSubscription&fn=_top&origin=Search&vr=2.0&utid=3&sri=53&rlt=CLID_QRYRLT886931444201412&rp=%2fWelcome%2fWLIGeneralSubscription%2fdefault.wl&sp=JYRofChina-04&rs=WLIN9.11 (last visited Dec.15, 2009)