臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣同性戀家庭權立法的政治心理學分析
書刊名：臺灣宗教研究
作者：郭承天
作者(外文)：Kuo, Cheng-tian
出版日期：2015
卷期：14:2
頁次：頁3-30
主題關鍵詞：臺灣；同性戀；宗教；家庭權；政治心理學；Taiwan；Gay/lesbian；Religion；Family rights；Political-psychology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:102
  • 點閱點閱:132
對於臺灣的保守宗教團體而言，從 2012年開始，同志團體積極推動同性戀家庭權的三個立法草案（「婚姻平權法」、「伴侶制度」、「家屬制度」），強烈衝擊了傳統婚姻制度。面臨「毀家廢婚」的危機，臺灣的宗教團體也出現前所未有的大團結，強力地在立法院阻擋這三個草案進入實質的討論。到了 2015年底，有關同性戀家庭權的所有草案，都已經實質上被封殺。取而代之的，是朝著雙方多數可接受的雙軌制「同性伴侶法」的草案而前進。 本文使用政治心理學的「團體關係理論」（ intergroup theory）以及它常用的「描述方法」（ narrative），分析同志團體為何能在兩年之內，突然聚集龐大的政治力量，幾乎在立法院闖關通過同性戀婚姻的相關草案；而宗教團體為何又能在短時間內，有效組成一個跨宗教的聯盟，阻擋這些草案；且在雙方激烈衝突中，出現一個學者社群，推動「同性伴侶法」的構想，成為雙方多數可接受的折衷辦法。因此，未來一兩年，臺灣很有可能成為亞洲第一個通過同性戀家庭權立法的國家。
Beginning in 2012, Taiwan’s gay/lesbian groups actively pushed forward three bills for same-sex family rights, the “Equal Rights Marriage” (hunyin pingquan 婚姻平權 ) bill, the “Civil Partnership”（banlü zhidu伴 侶制度 ) bill, and the “Household Institution” (jiashu zhidu 家屬制度 ) bill, all of which, according to Taiwan’s conservative religious groups, violently attacked traditional marriage institutions. Facing the “destroy the family, and discard marriage” (huijia feihun 毀家廢婚 ) crisis, Taiwanese religious groups appeared in unprecedented unification to fiercely resist the three bills in the legislative house and entered into a discussion of their substance. Towards the end of 2015, the bills regarding same-sex family rights had in essence already been killed. What replaced them was a dual-track system, the “Same-Sex Partnership” (tongxing banlü 同性伴侶 ) bill, acceptable to the majority on both sides. This paper applies the political-psychology theory of intergroup relations and its often employed methodology of narrative to analyze the following: why, inside two years, the gay/lesbian groups could suddenly mobilize massive political power and nearly force through bills related to same-sex marriage in the legislative house; why religious groups, in a short period of time, could also effectively form a trans-religious coalition to stonewall these bills; and how, in the midst of sharp conflict between the two sides, there emerged an academic community to push forward a proposition for same-sex marriage legislation that became a means of compromise acceptable to the majority on both sides. As a consequence, in the next two years, Taiwan will likely become the first Asian country to pass legislation on same-sex family rights.
期刊論文
1.陸詩薇(20140100)。平等奔流，不容隔離：婚姻平權三大常見法律疑義解析。全國律師，18(1)，4-12。  延伸查詢new window
2.許耀明(20061200)。「家」的解構與重構：從法國、德國、比利時與歐盟層次新近法制談「異性婚姻」外之其他共同生活關係。東海大學法學研究，25，75-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭承天(20101200)。臺灣宗教與政治保守主義。臺灣宗教研究，9(2)，5-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.傅美惠(20040700)。論美國同性戀與平等保護--兼論我國同性戀人權保障之發展。國立中正大學法學集刊，16，1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.郭承天(20141200)。平衡基督信仰與同性戀權益。臺灣宗教研究，13(2)，41-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Halperin, Eran、Canetti-Nisim, Daphna、Hirsch-Hoefler, Sivan(2009)。The Central Role of Group-Based Hatred as an Emotional Antecedent of Political Intolerance: Evidence from Israel。Political Psychology，30(1)，93-123。  new window
7.Hewstone, Miles(2009)。Living Apart, Living Together? The Role of Intergroup Contact in Social Integration。Proceedings of the British Academy，162，243-300。  new window
8.Kedmey, Dan(20140715)。CDC Survey Finds 1.6% of Adults Identify as Gay。TIME。  new window
9.錢玉芬(20110600)。從同性戀到前同性戀--基督徒前同性戀者生命改變歷程的解釋現象學分析。生命教育研究，3(1)，111-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Huddy, Leonie(2001)。From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory。Political Psychology，22(1)，127-156。  new window
11.戴瑀如(20040400)。論德國同性伴侶法。月旦法學，107，145-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.許耀明(20081200)。歐盟關於結婚權與組成家庭權之保護：從歐洲人權法院與歐洲法院相關案例談起。歐美研究，38(4)，637-669。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.簡至潔(20121200)。從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」--朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動。臺灣人權學刊，1(3)，187-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳靜慧(20100100)。同性生活伴侶之平等權問題--以歐洲法院、德國聯邦憲法法院及德國聯邦行政法院之判決為中心。東吳法律學報，21(3)，161-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李震山(20040700)。憲法意義下之「家庭權」。國立中正大學法學集刊，16，61-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Snow, David A.、Rochford, Edmund Burke Jr.、Worden, Steven K. Jr.、Benford, Robert D.(1986)。Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation。American Sociological Review，51(4)，464-481。  new window
研究報告
1.立法院司法及法制委員會(2012)。「立法院第8屆第2會期司法及法制委員會舉行『同性婚姻合法化及伴侶權益法制化』公聽會」會議紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.宋泉盛、莊雅棠(2002)。故事神學。台南：人光出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bar-Tal, Daniel(2000)。Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological Analysis。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Armstrong, Elizabeth A.(2002)。Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950-1994。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Etzioni, Amitai(1997)。The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society。New York：Basic Books。  new window
5.Gamson, W. A.(1990)。The Strategy of Social Protest。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
6.Fisher, Ronald J.、Bartoli, Andrea(2005)。Paving the Way: Contributions of Interactive Conflict Resolution to Peacemaking。New York：Lexington Books。  new window
7.Allport, Gordon Willard(1979)。The nature of prejudice。Garden City, New York：Doubleday Anchor Books。  new window
8.(201401)。月旦法學。  延伸查詢new window
9.校園書房出版社(2013)。校園雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
10.華人基督徒義顯社(200809)。義顯之聲。  延伸查詢new window
11.新使者雜誌社(200406)。新使者。  延伸查詢new window
12.臺灣基督徒學會(2006)。獨者。  延伸查詢new window
13.護家盟(2013)。愛護健康家庭，打造幸福臺灣。臺北：真理堂。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bar-Tal, Daniel(2013)。Intractable Conflicts。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Citrin, Jack、Sears, David O.(2014)。American Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Hardin, Russell(1982)。Collective Action。NY：RFF Press。  new window
17.Howie, Gillian(2010)。Between Feminism and Materialism: A Question of Method。NY：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
18.Kinder, Donald R.、Kam, Cindy D.(2010)。Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Kurzban, Robert(2011)。Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
20.Luhmann, Nicklas、Ziegert, Kalus A.(2004)。Law as A Social System。Oxford University Press。  new window
21.Newberg, Andrew、Waldman, Mark Robert(2009)。How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist。New York：Ballantine Books。  new window
22.Pearce, Lynne(2004)。The Rhetorics of Feminism: Readings in Contemporary Cultural Theory and the Popular Press。NY：Routledge。  new window
23.Rimmerman, Craig A.、Wilcox, Clyde(2007)。The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
24.Stark, Rodney(2007)。The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success。New York：Random House。  new window
25.Stevens, Hugh(2011)。The Cambridge Companion to Gay and Lesbian Writing。NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
26.Tinkcom, Matthew(2002)。Working Like A Homosexual: Camp, Capital, Cinema。Durham, NC：Duke University Press。  new window
27.Zaslow, Emilie(2009)。Feminism, Inc.: Coming of Age in Girl Power Media Culture。NY：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
28.戴瑀如(2012)。德國、法國及加拿大同性伴侶制度。臺北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
29.Olson, Mancur(1977)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
30.Woods, Gregory(1998)。A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
31.Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan：Addison-Wesley。  new window
32.McAdam, Doug(1982)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。University of Chicago Press。  new window
33.Laumann, Edward O.、Knoke, David(1987)。The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
34.Rawls, John(1996)。Political Liberalism。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
其他
1.(20140219)。靈恩派牧師：神佛是邪靈，http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140219000406-260102。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20150125)。2015國是論壇，回應關鍵時刻。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20140317)。同志團體街吻，幸家盟喊一夫一妻。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20150412)。同志聚教堂前吃早餐，盼多元溝通。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20150627)。同性婚聲浪再起，法務部暫不考慮。  延伸查詢new window
6.(20141226)。同運霸凌再添一例。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20150727)。法務部版伴侶法矮化同志？同運不接受，護家盟反對，http://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/34894。  延伸查詢new window
8.(20150428)。政黨扯宗教？。  延伸查詢new window
9.(20131208)。家庭幸福、守護臺灣，30萬人讚上凱道。  延伸查詢new window
10.(20141006)。彩虹圍城，爭取同性婚姻合法。  延伸查詢new window
11.(20130926)。揮舞彩虹旗，同志向教會嗆聲。  延伸查詢new window
12.(20130109)。離譜教材，要小學生做「口交膜」。  延伸查詢new window
13.(20140827)。會議紀錄（法務部同性伴侶法制化意見交流座談會（第4場））。  延伸查詢new window
14.(20150920)。國度復興報。  延伸查詢new window
15.(20150927)。國度復興報。  延伸查詢new window
16.法務部(20141223)。書面意見全文。  延伸查詢new window
17.許玉秀(20140521)。模擬憲法法庭函。  延伸查詢new window
18.曾恕敏(2012)。同志神學物語(2012伴侶盟讀書會《同志神學講義》)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Sapiro, Virginia(1998)。Feminist Studies and Political Science: And Vice Versa。Feminism and Politics。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Carroll, Susan J.、Zerilli, Linda M. G.(1993)。Feminist Challenges to Political Science。Political Science: The State of the Discipline。Washington, DC：American Political Science Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：334（臺灣：331，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67329068
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上