:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:衡量行動電話基地臺設置之外部成本:假設市場評估法之應用
書刊名:亞太經濟管理評論
作者:林幸君 引用關係林億明 引用關係
出版日期:2009
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁1-16
主題關鍵詞:假設市場評估法雙界二分選擇模型基地臺外部成本願付價值Contingent valuation methodDoubled-bound dichotomous choice modelBase stationExternal costWillingness to pay
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:101
  • 點閱點閱:87
本文旨在衡量行動電話基地台設置之外部成本。由於此外部成本無法直接觀察,因此應用假設市場評估法,加以推估。作者設計問卷,並以面訪的方式在嘉義市隨機抽樣,直接詢問受訪者將住家及工作地點附近的行動電話基地台遷移之願付價值;在實證估計上,本文採用雙界二分選擇模型,研究結果顯示:每人因行動電話基地台設置之外部性產生之受害程度,若以金錢衡量約為每年新台幣2,932元;另外,每人之受害程度亦隨著個人之年齡、教育程度、風險認知及運動習慣之不同而有顯著差異。
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the external cost of cellular base stations by the contingent valuation method. We randomly sample 501 residents in Chiayi city in Taiwan and survey the willingness-to-pay of removing nearby cellular base stations by a face-to-face interview. A double-bound dichotomous choice model is employed in our study. Our results show that on average the WTP of removing cellular base stations for each person is about NT$ 2932. Moreover, the degree of suffering from the base station also depends on the level of education, frequencies of using a cellular phone, risk perception, and habit of exercise of individuals.
期刊論文
1.蔡宗秀(20040900)。鄰避情結之衝突協商。亞太經濟管理評論,8(1),67-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Buzby, J. C.、Skees, J. R.、Ready, R. C.(1995)。Contingent Valuation in Food Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Pesticide Reside Risk Reduction。Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,27,613-625。  new window
3.Jan, M.、Fu, T.、Liao, D.(2006)。Willingness to Pay for HACCP on Seafood in Taiwan。Agriculture Economics and Management,10,33-46。  new window
4.Jan, M.、Fu, T.、Huang, C.(2005)。Willingness to Pay for Low-Lung-Cancer Risk Cigarettes in Taiwan。Health Economics,14,55-67。  new window
5.Shaw, D.、Chien, Y.、Lin, Y.(1999)。Alternative Approach to Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data: Evaluating Water Quality of a River System in Taipei。Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,2,97-112。  new window
6.Tang C.、Liu, J.、Chang, C.、Chang, W.(2007)。Willingness to Pay for Drug Abuse Treatment: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study in Taiwan。Health Policy,82,251-262。  new window
7.詹滿色、傅祖壇(20070600)。臺灣漁產品HACCP安全認證的價值評估--雙界二分假設市場評估法之應用。農業經濟叢刊,12(2),163-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.傅祖壇、劉錦添、簡錦漢、賴文龍(20010300)。健康風險認知與香菸消費行為--臺灣的實證研究。經濟論文,29(1),91-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭代基(19960700)。汙染性設施之設置與民眾信心之建立。臺灣經濟預測與政策,27(1),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.傅祖壇、葉寶文(20050300)。應用CVM在健康效益之評估--高血壓疾病預防之願付價值。經濟論文叢刊,33(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉錦添、陳宜廷(19960900)。罹病減輕的願付金額估計--臺灣都會區與石化專業區的比較。經濟論文,24(3),397-431。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.傅祖壇、周濟(19950900)。乘坐高速鐵路之支付意願及時間價值--假設評估法之應用。經濟論文叢刊,23(3),259-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Hanemann, W. M.、Loomis, J.、Kanninen, B.(1991)。Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73(4),1255-1263。  new window
14.Shin, S. Y.、Kleibenstein, J.、Hayes, D.、Shogren, J.(1992)。Consumer willingness to pay for safer food products。Journal of Food Safety,13(1),51-59。  new window
15.劉錦添(19900900)。淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估--封閉式假設市場評估法之應用。經濟論文,18(2),99-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭代基、錢玉蘭、蔡麗雪(19980100)。淡水河系水質與景觀改善效益之評估。經濟研究.臺北大學經濟學系,35(1),29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Johannesson, M.、Jönsson, B.、Borgquist, L.(1991)。Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy-results of a swedish pilot study。Journal of Health Economics,10,461-474。  new window
18.Johannesson, M.、Johansson, P. O.、Kriström, B.、Gerdtham, U. G.(1993)。Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy: further results。Journal of Health Economics,12,95-108。  new window
19.Johannesson, M.、Johansson, P. O.、Kriström, B.、Borgquist, L.、Jönsson, B.(1993)。Willingness to pay for lipid lowering: a health production function approach。Applied Economics,25,1023-1031。  new window
會議論文
1.劉錦添(1993)。核能風險與反核的願付代價45-65。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳珮瑛、吳巽庚(2002)。二元選擇條件評估模型於環境資源效益分析之整合與比較。國立暨南大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳宗霖、鄭博仁、郭志文(2001)。行動電話及基地台電磁波對人體健康之影響程度評估及其防範措施相關研究報告與文獻資料。  延伸查詢new window
2.Liu, J.、Tsou, M.、Hammitt, J.(2005)。Willingness to Pay for Weight-Control Treatment。  new window
學位論文
1.陳惠宜(2005)。鄰避現象之研究--以行動基地台抗爭為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊東鋒(2004)。行動電話基地台抗爭處理模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.馮全忠(2007)。中華電信行動電話基地台鄰避效應之研究--以馬祖南竿鄉馬祖村為例(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.小山壽、葉政秀(2000)。恐怖的電磁波。台北:世茂出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bateman, I.、Willis, K.(1995)。Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Carlo, G.、Schram, M.(2001)。Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age: An Insider's Alarming Discoveries about Cancer and Genetic Damage。Carroll & Graf Publishers。  new window
4.Mitchell, R.、Carson, R.(1989)。Surveys to Value Public Goods。Washington, D.C.:Resources for the Future。  new window
5.Hanley, Nick、Spash, Clive L.(1993)。Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment。Edward Elgar。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wu, P. I.、Hsieh, W. H.(1996)。Demand for environmental quality: Comparing models for contingent policy referendum experiments。The economics of pollution control in the Asia Pacific。Edward Elgar Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE