:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:司法保護少年與工作者之依附關係及其行為控制之相關性研究
書刊名:青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者:賴碧怡
作者(外文):Lai, Pi-yi
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁103-131
主題關鍵詞:犯罪少年司法保護依附關係行為控制Juvenile delinquentJurisdictional protectionAttachment relationshipControlling behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:87
國內在處理偏差或犯罪之非行少年是以少年事件處理法第42 條為基礎,然 而,過去較多關注在犯罪因子與制度層面上的修正,唯有對以少年為主體的影響 與改變缺少重視。基於少年之特殊性與保護之立場,將焦點擺放在社會情境之下 對少年身心發展與對個人的行為產生的影響;因此,本文以「依附關係與行為控 制」為主題,針對執行非行少年司法保護處分服務之組織單位中,以目前正在接 受保護管束(N=72)及安置輔導(N=49)的少年為研究對象,採用自編問卷進 行問卷調查,以中部地區台中和南投2 個地方法院,以及3 間安置機構進行調查, 發出200 份問卷,回收194 份,扣除無效問卷,有效問卷為121 份,有效回收率 60.5%。 經過資料分析與整理,本研究得到幾項結論:(一)受保護處分少年的基本 資料、生活狀況與目前處遇情形有差異;(二)處遇執行狀況在少年的行為控制 上具有相關性;(三)少年與工作者間的依附關係以安全支持型居多,逃避抗拒 最少,而安全支持依附關係對行為控制的影響最顯著,呈現正相關。最後,對於 研究限制與後續建議均分別加以說明,期待司法犯罪矯治、社會工作等專業領域 的處遇,能夠持續對於非行少年的關注與服務。
Jurisdictional treatment for juvenile delinquents in Taiwan is based on the 42nd clause of the Law Governing the Disposition of Juvenile Cases. In the pass, we all paid most attention not just to modifying the law but taking an interest in the criminal facts. However, people are less concerned apart from the adolescents’ individual experience also the behavioral change during the treatment period. This study aimed to research on the attachment relationship and the controlling behavior by distributing self-compiled questionnaires to the juvenile delinquents including both of probation in Taichung and Nantou juvenile courts (N=72), as well as residential community treatment (N=49) . Totally 200 cases including 79 invalid cases were got in interview. In order to analyze data from investigation, the social science statistic software SPSS for window version 12.0 was used as analysis tool. To sum up, due to the data analysis and the collected information there are several points of the findings and conclusions as below: (1)The background, living conditions and recently situations after receiving the treatment of the juvenile delinquents are different from each other. (2) There have several significant relationships between the juvenile delinquents basic data and behavior controlling. (3) The safe attachment relationship which affects behavior controlling much more is in the majority, and just a small minority of the juvenile delinquents are resistant. Finally, a few of suggestions from researcher were stated at the end of study. Besides, the conclusion of this research will be provided to government and relevant organizations for reference.
期刊論文
1.曾華源(20070400)。少年觀護工作的社會福利屬性與困境。犯罪與刑事司法研究,8,133-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李自強(20050100)。社會工作在刑事司法體系內的角色與貢獻。警學叢刊,35(4)=158,195-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ainsworth, M. D. S.(1989)。Attachments beyond infancy。American Psychologist,44(4),709-716。  new window
4.Brennan, K. A.、Shaver, P. R.(1995)。Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning。Personality & social psychology Bulletin,21(3),267-283。  new window
5.Hazan, Cindy、Shaver, Phillip R.(1994)。Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships。Psychological Inquiry,5(1),1-22。  new window
6.徐錦鋒(2001)。我國觀護制度的新紀元。月旦法學雜誌,74,51-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳振盛(2006)。受刑人矯正處遇機制的探討。警學叢刊,36 (4),239-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黎文德(2001)。少年保護事件之協商審理與處遇。月旦法學雜誌,74,69-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gendreau, P., Little, T. & Goggin, C.(1996)。A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism。what works! Criminology,575-607。  new window
10.Cooper, M. L., Shaver, P. R.& Collins, N. L.(1998)。Attachment styles。emotion regulation,74(5),1380-1397。  new window
11.Abrams, L. S.(2006)。Listening to juvenile offenders。can residential treament prevent recidivism,23(1),61-85。  new window
12.Mandisa, T.(2007)。Home and family circumstances of young offenders: an examination of social workers views。British journal of community justice。  new window
13.Bandura, A.(1997)。Self-efficacy。the exercise of control。  new window
14.Knight, V.、Kemshall, H.、Dominey, J.(2007)。Gathering offender perceptions of probation programmes: potential, piffalls and limits。British journal of community justice,15(1),65-77。  new window
研究報告
1.曾華源、胡中宜、陳玫伶、白倩如(2006)。法院裁定少年轉向安置機構輔導服務之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許文雄(2003)。少年矯正學校矯治處遇評估之研究--以明陽中學為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林羿坊(2001)。少年保護管束經驗之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪櫻瑜(1998)。內在運作模式對日常互動的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林群期。少年犯罪與少年司法制度之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.卓雅苹(2003)。非行兒少安置輔導處遇中社會工作者之服務經驗研究。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Taylor, Shelley E.、Peplau, Letitia Anne、Sears, David O.、張滿玲(1999)。社會心理學。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.許春金(2000)。犯罪學。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bowlby, J.(1982)。Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment。New York:Basic Books。  new window
4.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
5.黃維憲、曾華源、王慧君(2001)。社會個案工作。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.李錦松(2004)。安置輔導制度之檢討與展望。中華民國觀護協會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Rooney, R. H.(1992)。Strategies for work with involuntary client。NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE