:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧化廚房功能的重要程度與需求程度之研究
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:陳淑美 引用關係李再長李芃慧于如陵 引用關係盧春林
作者(外文):Chen, Shu-meiLee, Tzai-zangLee, Peng-huiYu, Ju-lingLu, Chun-lin
出版日期:2010
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁243-273
主題關鍵詞:智慧化廚房重要性需求程度Smart kitchenImportanceDemand
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:163
面對全球化挑戰,如何以高科技提升生活品質,已成爲世界先進國家科技政策推動重要的議題。行政院2008年提出以「智慧台灣」主軸下之「優質生活」議題爲焦點,積極運用新科技的智慧化居住空間是重要的議題之一。參考內政部智慧化居住空間發展策略中所揭示的「智慧好生活」,在安全、健康、便利、舒適、節能的五大功能目標之下,由設計團隊研發智慧化廚房功能,本研究針對廚房使用者的需求加以分析與了解,以便將需求分析的結果提供設計師參考。因此,本研究採用立意抽樣法,針對居住於五大都會區與兩大次都會區且家中具備資訊設備(電腦與網路)之「廚房主要使用者」做爲本研究之研究對象,採用敘述統計、重要程度-需求程度二維分析、因素分析和獨立樣本T檢定等方法,分析廚房主要使用者對智慧化廚房功能的需求,以及不同科技接受度和家庭屬性對於智慧化廚房功能需求的差異。研究結果顯示:廚房使用者對於智慧化廚房特定的功能項目有較高的重要性與需求程度的認知;廚房使用者對於智慧型廚房功能需求程度之排序依序爲:災害警示安全、節能、飲食健康、互動便利和舒適;當受訪者的科技接受度愈高時對於各項智慧化功能均有較高之需求,而每天上網四小時以上之受訪者較每天上網時數未滿四小時者有要高之需求。此外,家中有65歲以上老人者對於飲食健康和便利等智慧化廚房的使用需求較高。本探索研究可以開啓並增進設計師或工程師對於智慧化廚房功能需求的了解,作爲研發的參考。
Faced with the challenges of globalization, enhancing the quality of life with high-tech has become an important issue in the policy of technologically advanced countries. Therefore, the Executive Yuan of Taiwan in 2008 initiated the "Smart Taiwan" and "Quality Life" focusing issues, to promote the use of new technologies, including smart living spaces, in response to the challenges of the future needs and to improve people's satisfaction in their lives. Under the targets of safety, energy-saving, health, convenience and comfort, the engineers in our team develop several smart kitchen functions. This study aims to analyze what the users want in a smart kitchen, so that a design centered on the Smart Kitchen can be realized in a quality smart living space. Therefore, this study employed purposive sampling method to conduct the survey. The selected samples were the main users of home kitchen and their houses had to be equipped with the related equipments (such as computer and Internet) in five metropolitan regions and two sub-metropolitan regions. The research analyzes the users' attitude toward the Smart Kitchen's importance and degree of demands. We utilized importance-and-degree of demands analysis to evaluate the demands of the Smart Kitchen's equipments to be the priority for the designer to design the Smart Kitchen. Further, to provide base for market segmentation, we conducted independent sample t-test to explore the variance of different sample users' attitude toward the Smart Kitchen. The results indicated that the main users of the kitchen preferred some functions of smart kitchen, safety and energy-saving were two of the most urgent functions of the Smart Kitchen demanded by the users. Kitchen's functions need to get advanced from basic needs to enjoyed needs. The users of "high technology acceptance" tend to have higher demand toward the five dimensions of kitchen: safety, health, energy-saving, convenience and comfort. Those users who use Internet more than 4 hours a day tend to have higher demand on dimensions. Users have family members aged above 65 tend to have higher demand on dimension of health and convenience. Therefore, the above stated difference may be a critical reference for marketers when making segmentation strategies for special market.
期刊論文
1.劉珠利(20050900)。性別(女性)與資訊化:對社會工作資訊化的啟示。社區發展季刊,111,148-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Moon, J. W.、Kim, Y. G.(2001)。Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context。Information and Management,38(4),217-230。  new window
3.Chu, Raymond K. S.、Choi, Tat(2000)。An Importance-performance Analysis of Hotel Selection Factors in the Hong Kong Hotel Industry: A Comparison of Business and Leisure Travellers。Tourism Management,21(4),363-377。  new window
4.Kozak, Metin、Nield, Kevin(1998)。Importance-performance Analysis and Cultural Perspectives in Romanian Black Sea Resorts。Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research,9(2),99-116。  new window
5.陳明石(20090300)。以使用者觀點探討居家烹飪行為之影響因素。人因工程學刊,10(2),21-31。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Davis, F. D.、Warshaw, P. R.(1992)。Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage。Human Relations,45(7),660-686。  new window
7.丘宏昌、林能白(20010600)。以需求理論為基礎所建立之服務品質分類。管理學報,18(2),231-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Martilla, John A.、James, John C.(1997)。Importance-Performance Analysis。Journal of Marketing,41(1),77-79。  new window
9.Chau, Patrick Y. K.、Hu, Paul J.(2002)。Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study。Journal of Management Information Systems,18(4),191-229。  new window
10.Lederer, Albert L.、Maupin, Donna J.、Sena, Mark P.、Zhuang, Youlong(2000)。The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web。Decision Support Systems,29(3),269-282。  new window
11.Koufaris, Marios(2002)。Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior。Information Systems Research,13(2),205-223。  new window
12.Tonge, Joanna、Moore, Susan A.(2007)。Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study。Tourism Management,28(3),768-776。  new window
13.Venkatesh, Viswanath、Davis, Fred D.(2000)。A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies。Management Science,46(2),186-204。  new window
14.Gefen, David、Karahanna, Elena、Straub, Detmar W.(2003)。Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An integrated Model。Management Information Systems Quarterly,27(1),51-90。  new window
15.Venkatesh, Viswanath、Morris, Michael G.、Davis, Gordon B.、Davis, Fred D.(2003)。User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View。Management Information Systems Quarterly,27(3),425-478。  new window
16.Matzler, Kurt、Bailom, Franz、Hinterhuber, Hans H.、Renzl, Birgit、Pichler, Johann(2004)。The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis。Industrial Marketing Management,33(4),271-277。  new window
17.Oh, Haemoon(2001)。Revisiting importance-performance analysis。Tourism Management,22(6),617-627。  new window
18.Thompson, Ronald L.、Higgins, Christopher A.、Howell, Jane M.(1991)。Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization。MIS Quarterly,15(1),125-143。  new window
19.Chapman, Randall G.(1993)。Brand performance comparatives。The Journal of Product & Brand Management,2(1),42-50。  new window
20.許立群(20071200)。以消費者為基礎探討自有品牌之品牌權益、滿意度與購後行為關係之研究--以臺灣地區前三大量販店為例。中華管理學報,8(4),87-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.林津如(20071200)。父系家庭與女性差異認同:中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。臺灣社會研究季刊,68,1-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Chen, Lei-da、Gillenson, Mark L.、Sherrell, Daniel L.(2002)。Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective。Information & Management,39(8),705-719。  new window
23.許聖倫、夏鑄九、翁註重(2006)。傳統廚房爐灶的空間、性別與權力。浙江學刊,2006(4),205-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Ainin, S.、Hisham, N. H.(2008)。Applying Importance-Performance Analysis to Information Systems: An Exploratory Case Study。Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations,3(2),94-103。  new window
25.Allan K. ,(2006)。Analysis: Home help,。Computing & Control Engineering,,17(6),10-11。  new window
26.Havitz, M. E.、Twynam, G. D.、Delorenzo, J. M..,(1991)。Important- Performance Analysis-as a Staff Evaluation Tool。Journal of Park Recreation Administration,9(1),43-54。  new window
27.Kaufman, G. G..(1972)。Federal Reserve Inability To Control the Money Supply: A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy。Financial Analysts Journal,,(28)5,20-27。  new window
28.Riemenschneider, C. K., Harrison, D. A.,、Mykytyn, P. P. Jr..,(2003)。Understanding IT Adoption Decisions in Small Business。Integrating Current Theories,40(4),269-285。  new window
29.Sanders, E.B.-N.,(1993)。Product Development Research for the 1990’s. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings。Consumer Products,,422-426。  new window
30.Scriven, M.、Roth, J.(1978)。Needs assessment: Concept and practice。New Directions for Program Evaluation,1(1),1-11。  new window
會議論文
1.徐智韋、吳信宏、謝俊逸(2007)。3C 產業服務品質與顧客滿意度之關係研究-以全國電子為例。中華民國品質學會第四十三屆年會暨第十三屆全國品質管理研討會。新竹:新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Keinonen,(1997)。Turkka Expected usability and product preference Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems18-20。  new window
學位論文
1.陳弘岦(2006)。活現的廚房--現代廚房空間實踐與社會意涵的詮釋(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.于勝華(1998)。消費性電子產品操作功能之使用性研究--以數位相機為例(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.許梅鈺(2004)。「 SARS 對台灣消費性電子商務的影響」。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳君儒(2002)。「不同族群對於 PDA 功能需求與選單系統操作績效之研究」。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳彩虹(2003)。「使用者對於手機功能需求與圖像辨識度之研究」。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭雅真(2006)。「基於使用者需求之互動設計研究-以 GameBike 為例」。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李劍光(2001)。專業廚房設施。台北市:品度股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Turner, J. H.(1986)。The Structure of Sociological Theory。Chicago:The Dorsey Press。  new window
3.徐達光(2003)。消費心理學--消費者行為的科學研究。臺北市:東華。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rogers, E. M.(1983)。Diffusion of Innovations。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
5.Maslow, Abraham H.、Frager, Robert、Fadiman, James、McReynolds, C.(1970)。Motivation and Personality。Harper。  new window
6.Maslow, Abraham H.(1954)。Motivation and Personality。Harper & Row。  new window
7.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
8.Huitt, W.,(2007)。Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Educational Psychology Interactive, Valdosta,。Valdosta, GA:。  new window
9.Husen, T.、Postlethwaife, T. N.,(1985)。The International encyclopedia of education., 6,。New York :。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE