:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣照顧分工的重組:兩個女性世代生命歷程的比較
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:劉香蘭古允文
作者(外文):Liu, Hsiang-lanKu, Yeun-wen
出版日期:2015
卷期:36
頁次:頁49-104
主題關鍵詞:照顧世代差異化女性主義生命歷程觀點社會政策Care allowanceRespite servicesFeminismTaiwan1950s1970s
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:691
  • 點閱點閱:299
照顧成為概念在西方發展已久,最早源自女性在家庭的無酬照顧,到當代發展出多元性和制度分化的照顧提供概念,照顧成為市場商品和福利商品,顯示提供照顧的責任與角色已在國家、市場、社區和家庭間重組。雖有相當多與照顧相關的文獻,但缺乏從世代觀點探索女性生命歷程樣態和照顧分工轉型的鑲嵌性。為此,本文以質性研究為典範,依女性主義理論和生命歷程觀點的研究精神,深入訪談1950年代、1970年代兩個世代共17位女性的生命經驗,輔以官方檔案分析為脈絡,建構不同世代的女性生命歷程樣態,探討照顧分工轉型與國家行動產生結構性壓力和機會的關係。本文發現女性面對的壓迫,不僅是性別的,更具世代性。國家行動運用兩面手法,促使1950世代女性中老年後進入照顧工作,在家庭同時提供無限期的無酬與有酬照顧,進行照顧勞動的跨代移轉;1970世代女性因工作與照顧的多重壓力,無論自行在家照顧或購買照顧、使用育嬰留停津貼和喘息服務,皆面臨照顧與工作都要做的處境,女性角色擴大遂為事實。兩代女性生命歷程樣態鑲嵌於照顧分工轉型過程,造成女性勞動力在世代與階級重組,為父權國家所用。惟有透視性別角色未全面轉型的假平等,及存在性別內的不平等,才能真正解放女性,跳脫照顧陷阱。
Care as a concept has been developing for many years, from putting women into an unpaid care context, to diversity of care provision. Care as commodity or welfare goods implies the re-organization of responsibility between state, market, community, and family. This study reviews many existing papers relating to care and finds an important research gap: the different female experiences across generations and their interaction with the institutional structures are missing. Thus, this paper integrates a feminist approach and life course theory, to explore the nature of female caregiving in Taiwan over two generations (those born in the 1950s and 1970s). To achieve this goal, the research design is primarily based on qualitative research, including in-depth interviews and document analysis. The finding is that the oppressive situation faced by the female caregivers is both gendered and generationalized. The 1950s females are embedded into family care within their life course as unpaid and paid care workers, while the 1970s females face multiple pressures from work and caregiving, though with assistance from care allowances and respite services that actually do not change the female role as caregivers. This paper argues that the transformation of care contributes to the reorganization of female labor and to differentiating women's experience by generation and class. The reorganization of care division in the past decade is still deeply rooted in the patriarchal nature of the state and does not really help women escape from the trap of caregiving.
期刊論文
1.鄭清霞、洪惠芬(20050100)。養育責任的集體分擔--公共財與外部性的分析。臺大社會工作學刊,10,55-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ochiai, Emiko(2009)。Care Diamonds and welfare regimes in East and South East Asian societies: Bridging family and welfare sociology。International Journal of Japanese Sociology,18(1),60-78。  new window
3.Thomas, C.(1993)。De-Constructing Concepts Of Care。Sociology,27(4),649-669。  new window
4.James, N.(1992)。Care = organization + physical labour + emotional labour。Sociology of Health and Illness,14(4),488-509。  new window
5.王增勇(2011)。家庭照顧者作為一種改革長期照顧的社會運動。國家政策季刊,85,397-414。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳玉琴(2004)。台灣居家服務現況與檢討。社區發展季刊,106,132-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳書昀(2000)。「甜蜜的負荷」外一章:兒童少年家庭照顧者的生活境遇與福利建構。台大社工學刊,21,153-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪惠芬(20030900)。「照顧者正義」:性別正義不只是法律平等。臺灣社會研究,51,95-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.徐宗國(19930300)。女人和男人的工作與家庭--攸關時間。婦女與兩性學刊,4,175-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳淑君、莊秀美(2008)。台北市居家服務現況與相關議題探討。社區發展季刊,122,183-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許雅惠(2011)。未完成的革命:台灣婦女權益與福利之發展。社區發展季刊,133,363-383。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.梁嘉莉、行政院主計總處(20110900)。工作與家庭的平衡。主計月刊,669,37-43。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃志隆(20090700)。我國親職假改革方案的探討:理論觀點的檢視。靜宜人文社會學報,3(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉雅文、莊秀美(2005)。中低收入老人特別照顧津贴之相關探討:關於使用自主權與照顧者女性化議題之探討。社區發展季刊,108,237-248。  延伸查詢new window
15.Archer, J.(2009)。Intersecting feminist theory and ethnography in the context of social work research。Qualitative Social Work,8(2),143-160。  new window
16.Chiu, C. P.、Wei, S.(2011)。Child care friendly policies and integration of ECEC in Taiwan。International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy,5(2),1-19。  new window
17.Daly, M.、Lewis, J.(2000)。The concept of social care and analysis of contemporary welfare states。British Journal of Sociology,51(2),281-298。  new window
18.Graham, H.(1991)。The informal sector of welfare: A crisis in caring。Social Science and Medicine,32(4),507-515。  new window
19.黃松林、陳宇嘉(20050600)。A Research of Mixed Economy of Care: An Investigation of Domiciliary Care Services Users in Taiwan。社會政策與社會工作學刊,9(1),77-120。new window  new window
20.Kok, J.(2007)。Principles and prospects of the life course paradigm。Annales de Demographie Historique,1,203-230。  new window
21.Leira, A.(1994)。Concept of caring: Loving, thinking and doing。Social Service Review,68(8),185-201。  new window
22.Pfau-Effinger, B.(2005)。Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements。European Societies,7(2),321-347。  new window
23.Rummery, K.、Fine, M.(2012)。Care: A critical review of theory, policy and practice。Social Policy and Administration,46(3),321-343。  new window
24.Williams, F.(2001)。In and beyond new labor: Towards a new political ethics of care。Critical Social Policy,21(4),467-493。  new window
25.傅立葉、王兆慶(20111200)。照顧公共化的改革與挑戰:以保母托育體系的改革為例。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,79-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.潘淑滿(20060600)。平等或差異?--母親身分與母性政策的論述。社區發展季刊,114,219-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.林宗弘(20091200)。臺灣的後工業化:階級結構的轉型與社會不平等,1992-2007。臺灣社會學刊,43,93-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.黃源協(20011200)。臺灣社區照顧的實施與衝擊--福利多元主義的觀點。臺大社會工作學刊,5,53+55-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.蕭全政(19960600)。政治民主化與臺灣的對外政策--「一個中國」原則的鬆解。政治科學論叢,7,287-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.邱啟潤、陳武宗(19971200)。誰來關懷照顧者?。護理雜誌,44(6),25-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.馬慧君、張世雄(20061200)。變遷社會中的女性--一個生命歷程的研究觀點。國際文化研究,2(2),59-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.吳聰敏(19880200)。美援與臺灣的經濟發展。臺灣社會研究,1(1),145-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.陳正芬(20121200)。我是媳婦還是看護工?外籍媳婦照顧角色形成與照顧經驗之初探。臺大社會工作學刊,26,139-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.王淑英、孫嫚薇(20031200)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,2(4),147-174。  延伸查詢new window
35.李大正、楊靜利(20040600)。臺灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷。人口學刊,28,109-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.施世駿(20020600)。生命歷程研究對社會政策效果的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊,6(1),101-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.劉碧素、黃惠璣(20090800)。綜觀老人家庭照護與孝道。護理雜誌,56(4),83-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.劉毓秀(20111200)。北歐普及照顧與充分就業政策及其決策機制的臺灣轉化。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,1-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.曾薔霓(20070800)。尋找家庭場域中「照顧選擇及實踐」的可能與價值:中低收入老人特別照顧津貼的政策思考。臺灣社會福利學刊,6(1),131-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Mayer, Karl Ulrich(2004)。Whose Lives? How History, Societies, and Institutions Define and Shape Life Courses。Research in Human Development,1(3),161-187。  new window
41.潘淑滿(20051200)。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,20,41-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Bettio, F.、Plantenga, J.(2004)。Comparing care regimes in Europe。Feminist Economics,10(1),85-113。  new window
43.林津如(20071200)。父系家庭與女性差異認同:中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。臺灣社會研究季刊,68,1-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Daly, M.(2002)。Care as a Good for Social Policy。Journal of Social Policy,31(2),251-270。  new window
會議論文
1.王舒芸(2007)。兒童照顧政策「去」或「再」家庭化初探。40周年校慶研討會--家庭與工作:變遷現象與多元想像研討會,女性學會、高師大 (會議日期: 20071006~200710107)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.傅立案(2012)。高齡化與少子化福利國家與照顧政策:家庭照顧者就業與照顧工作共容與永續發展--福利國家體制、工作與家庭角色認同與福社 (計畫編號:NSC98-2621-M-004-002)。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝美娥(2000)。成年子女照顧老年失能父母後果之探討 (計畫編號:NSC89-2412-H-004-007-SSS)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李易駿(2003)。發展型福利體制探析:以日本、韓國與臺灣為例(博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Folbre, N.(2012)。For work and for money: Care provision in United States(-),New York。  new window
3.劉香蘭(2015)。揭開台灣照顧的多重面紗--個人生命經驗與社會政策的對話(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Edgell, S.、郭寶蓮、袁千雯(2009)。工作社會學導讀。原2009。臺北縣:艾德格。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hunt, Stephen(2005)。The Life Course: A Sociological Introduction。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
3.胡幼慧(2004)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Yu, Wei-hsin(2009)。Gendered Trajectories: Women, Work and Social Changes in Japan and Taiwan。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
5.許介鱗(2008)。戰後台灣史記。台北:文英堂。  延伸查詢new window
6.Abbott, P.、Wallace, C.(2005)。An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives。Routledge。  new window
7.Allan, G.、Jones, G.(2003)。Social relations and the life course。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
8.Bulmer, M.(1987)。The social basis of community care。London:Allen and Unwin。  new window
9.Bernard, H. R.、Ryaw, G. W.(2010)。Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches。Los Angeles:Sage Publications。  new window
10.Edaell, S.(2006)。The sociology oj work: continuity and change in paid and unpaid work。London:Sage Publications。  new window
11.Glenn, E. N.(2010)。Forced to care: Coercion and caregiving in America。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Hobson, B.、Lewis, J.、Siim, B.(2002)。Contested concepts in gender and politics。Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
13.Lewis, J.(2006)。Work-family balance, gender and policy。Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
14.Tronto, J.(1993)。Moral boundaries。Routledge。  new window
15.翟本瑞(2002)。社區工作與社會福利社區化。臺北:洪葉文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭全政(198904)。臺灣地區的新重商主義。臺北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.林萬億(2006)。臺灣的社會福利--歷史經驗與制度分析。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Kremer, Monique(2007)。How Welfare States Care: Culture, Gender and Parenting in Europe。Amsterdam University Press。  new window
20.黃源協(20000000)。社區照顧:臺灣與英國經驗的檢視。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Wade, Robert(1990)。Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialiation。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2009)。社會指標統計年報:工作與家庭,http://www.stat.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=3478&CtUnit=1033&Bas eDSD=7, 2014/04/20。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(2013)。102年婦女婚育與就業調査結果摘要分析,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=35732&ctNode=3303&mp=1, 2015/01/15。  延伸查詢new window
3.國家發展委員會(2013)。人口政策白皮書:少子女化、高齡化及移民,http://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=FBBD5FE5E5F21981。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.伊慶春、呂玉瑕(1996)。臺灣社會學研究中家庭與婦女研究之評介。兩岸三地社會學的發展與交流。臺灣社會學社。  延伸查詢new window
2.女學會(1997)。結論:讓國家作人民的照顧者。女性、國家、公民身分。台北:女書。  延伸查詢new window
3.周添城(1992)。權カ邊陲的中小企業。解剖台灣經濟--威權體制下的壟斷與剥削。台北:前衛。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉毓秀(1997)。前言:從父權國家到政府媽媽。女性、國家、照顧工作。台北:女書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Amsden, A. H.(1985)。The state and Taiwan’s development。Bring the state back。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Elder, G. H., Jr.(2003)。The life course in time and place。Social dynamics of the life course。New York:Walter de Gruyter, Inc。  new window
7.England, P.、Folbre, N.(1993)。Contracting for care。Beyond economic man。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Fisher, B.、Tronto, J. C.(1990)。Toward a feminist theory of caring。Circles of Care Work and Identity in Women's Lives。State University of New York Press。  new window
9.Folbre, N.、Nelson, J.(2003)。For love or money? Or both。Women and the economy: A reader。London:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
10.George, L. K.(2009)。Conceptualizing and measuring trajectories.。The craft of life course research。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
11.Krüger, H.(2003)。The life-course regime: Ambiguities between interrelatedness and individualization。Social dynamics of the life course。New York:Walter de Gruyter, Inc.。  new window
12.Marshall, V. W.、Mueller, M. M.(2003)。Theoretical roots of the life-course perspective。Social dynamics of the life course。New York:Walter de Gruyter, Inc.。  new window
13.Pavalko, E. K.(2011)。Caregiving and the life course: Connecting the personal and the public。Handbook of sociology of aging。New York:Springer Science+Business Media。  new window
14.Sackmann, R.、Wingens, M.(2003)。From transitions to trajectories: Sequence types。Social dynamics of the life course。New York:Walter de Gruyter, Inc。  new window
15.劉梅君(19970000)。建構「性別敏感」的公民權:從女性照顧工作本質之探析出發。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Graham, H.(1983)。Caring: A Labour of Love。A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring。Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
17.呂寶靜、陳景寧(19970000)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Leira, Arnlaug、Saraceno, Chiara(2002)。Care: Actors, relationships and contexts。Contested concepts in gender and social politics。Northampton:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE