臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大型資料庫國小四年級自然科學習成就評量標準設定結果之效度評估
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：謝進昌／謝名娟 引用關係／林世華／林陳涌 引用關係／陳清溪 引用關係／謝佩蓉
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Jin-chang／Hsieh, Ming-chuan／Lin, Sieh-hwa／Lin, Chen-yung／Chen, Chin-hsi／Hsieh, Pei-jung
出版日期：2011
卷期：56:1
頁次：頁1-32
主題關鍵詞：效度評估；書籤標定法；標準設定；Validation；Bookmark method；Standard setting
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:182
摘要： 學習成就評量資料庫建置目的之一，在於描述學生於各學科的學習成就表現概況；而學習成就表現的描述，即牽涉到標準設定議題。隨著臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫對於國小四年級自然科之評量架構調整，致使沿用的表現標準已多不符合實務運用，而興起重新修訂 之舉。本研究主要目的在於評估2009 年自然科學習成就評量國小四年級標準設定結果之效度，以Kane（1994, 2001）的效度評估證據 為依據，藉由效度的過程證據、內部證據以及外部證據，作為標準設定結果之效度證據來源。結果發現，從各項效度證據來看，國小四年級自然科標準設定可由標準設定成員的組成及其回應、設定結果的一致性，以及外推論於數學成就的效度外部證據得到支持。本研究最後提出數項建議，供未來標準設定研究者參考。
Abstract： One of the main purposes for constructing an academic achievement database is to understand the students’ academic performance for each content area. Standard setting is the main issue in the academic achievement. Due to the adjustment of the test blueprint for Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement 4th grade science, the previous performance level description is outmoded for practice. Therefore, modifying the standards is necessary. The purpose of this study is to validate a science standard setting procedure designed for 2009 4th grade science students. Based on Kane’s (1994, 2001) framework for validation, this study collected procedural evidence, internal evidence, as well as external evidence using mathematics academic performance. Several suggestions are provided in the conclusion for further studies.
期刊論文
1.Berk, Ronald A.(1996)。Standard Setting: The Next Generation (Where Few Psychometricians Have Gone Before!)。Applied Measurement in Education，9(3)，215-235。  new window
2.吳宜芳、鄒慧英、林娟如(20100300)。標準設定效度驗證之探究--以大型數學學習成就評量為例。測驗學刊，57(1)，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Buckendahl, C. W.、Smith, R. W.、Impara, J. C.、Plake, B. S.(2002)。A comparison of Angoff and Bookmark standard setting methods。Journal of Educational Measurement，39(3)，253-263。  new window
4.Huynh, H.(2006)。A Clarification on the Response Probability Criterion RP67 for Standard Settings Based on Bookmark and Item Mapping。Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice，25(2)，19-20。  new window
5.Kane, M. T.(1994)。Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores。Review of Educational Research，64(3)，425-461。  new window
6.吳毓瑩、陳彥名、張郁雯、陳淑惠、何東憲、林俊吉(20090900)。以常態混組模型討論書籤標準設定法對英語聽讀基本能力標準設定有效性之輻合證據。教育心理學報，41(1)，69-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Karantonis, A.、Sireci, S. G.(2006)。The Bookmark Standard-setting Method: A Literature Review。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，25(1)，4-12。  new window
8.Cizek, G. J.、Bunch, M. B.、Koons, H.(2004)。Setting performance standards: Contemporary methods。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，23(4)，31-50。  new window
9.Berk, R. A.(1986)。A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-referenced Tests。Review of Educational Research，56(1)，137-172。  new window
10.侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華(20080400)。臺灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究：「臺灣社會變遷基本調查」第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析。調查研究：方法與應用，23，7-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Landis, J. Richard、Koch, Gary G.(1977)。The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data。Biometrics，33(1)，159-174。  new window
12.杜佳真、林世華(2007)。九年一貫課程數學領域能力指標「數與量」、「代數」主題軸第一、二階段表現標準適切性評估之研究。師大學報，52(1)，63-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳宜芳、鄒慧英(2010)。試題呈現與回饋模式對Angoff標準設定結果一致性提升效益之比較研究。教育研究與發展期刊，6(4)，47-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林娟如、洪碧霞、陳煥文、凃柏原(2008)。台灣大學生統計成就水準的發展。教育學誌，19，1-28。  延伸查詢new window
15.Nedelsky, L.(1954)。Absolute grading standards for objective tests。Educational and Psychological Measurement，14(1)，3-19。  new window
16.Efron, B.(1979)。Bootstrap methods。Another look at the jackknife，7(1)，1-26。  new window
17.Jaeger, R. M.(1991)。Selection of judges for standard setting。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，10(2)，3-14。  new window
18.Kane, M.(1998)。Choosing between examinee-centered and test-centered standing setting methods。Educational Assessment，5(3)，129-145。  new window
19.Lin, J.(2006)。The bookmark procedure for setting cut-scores and finalizing performance standards: Strengths and weaknesses。The Alberta Journal of Educational Research，52(1)，36-52。  new window
20.Ma, L.、Ma, X.(2005)。Estimating correlates of growth between mathematics and science achievement via a multivariate multilevel design with latent variables。Studies in Educational Evaluation，31(1)，79-98。  new window
21.Sireci, S. G.、Hauger, J. B.、Wells, C. S.、Shea, C.、Zenisky, A. L.(2009)。Evaluation of the standard setting on the 2005 Grade 12 National Assessment of Educational Progress mathematics test。Applied Measurement in Education，22(4)，339-358。  new window
會議論文
1.Bourque, M. L.(2009)。A history of NAEP achievement levels: Issues, implementation, and impact 1989-2009。20th anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988-2008。  new window
2.Lewis, D. M.、Mitzel, H. C.、Green, D. R.(1996)。Standard setting: A bookmark approach。  new window
3.Loomis, S. C.(2000)。Feedback in the NAEP achievement levels setting process。New Orleans。  new window
圖書
1.American College Testing(1994)。Setting achievement levels on the 1994 National Assessment of Educational Progress in geography and in U.S. history and the 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress in science (Final version) (Design document)。Washington, DC：National Assessment Governing Board。  new window
2.Hambleton, R. K.、Pitoniak, M. J.(2006)。Setting performance standards。Educational measurement。Washington, DC：American Council on Education。  new window
3.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2009)。PISA 2006 technical report。Paris：Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development。  new window
4.Reckase, M. D.(2000)。The evolution of the NAEP achievement levels setting process: A summary of the research and development efforts conducted by ACT。Iowa City, IA：American College Testing, Inc.。  new window
5.National Assessment Governing Board(1990)。Setting appropriate achievement levels for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Policy framework and technical procedures。Washington, DC：National Assessment Governing Board。  new window
6.ACT(2005)。Developing achievement levels on the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress in grade twelve mathematics: Process report。Washington, DC：National Assessment Governing Board。  new window
7.Ebel, R. L.(1972)。Essentials of educational measurement。Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC：American Psychological Association。  new window
10.郭生玉(1998)。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.Cizek, G. J.、Bunch, M. B.(2007)。Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests。Sage。  new window
12.Ministry of Education(2003)。國民小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.Council of Chief State School Officers(2001)。State student assessment programs annual survey ,Data vol. 2。Washington, DC。  new window
14.Kane, M.(2001)。So much remains the same: Conception and status of validation in setting standards。Standard setting: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
15.Loomis, S. C.、Bourque, M. L.(2001)。From tradition to innovation: Standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress。Standard setting: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
16.Mitzel, H. C.、Lewis, D. M.、Patz, R. J.、Green, D. R.(2001)。The Bookmark method: Psychological perspectives。Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
17.Mullis, I. V. S.、Erberber, E.、Preuschoff, C.(2008)。The TIMSS 2007 international benchmarks of student achievement in mathematics and science。TIMSS 2007 technical report。Chestnut Hill, MA。  new window
18.Reckase, M. D.(2001)。Innovative methods for helping standard-setting participants to perform their task: The role of feedback regarding consistency, accuracy, and impact。Standard setting: Concepts, methods, and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hambleton, R. K.(2001)。Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process。Standard setting: Concepts, methods and perspectives。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Angoff, William H.(1971)。Scales, norms, and equivalent scores。Educational measurement。Washington, DC：American Council on Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：955（臺灣：948，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68285462
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上