:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:2007年臺灣學生學習成就評量結果之分析
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:曾建銘陳清溪 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Chien-mingChen, Chin-hsi
出版日期:2009
卷期:5:4
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫成就評量九年一貫能力指標課程綱要Taiwan Assessment of Student AchievementTASACompetence indicators1st to 9th Grade Curricula AlignmentCurriculum Guidelines
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:70
臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫(TASA)已邁入第四年,本研究主要在呈現國語文、英語文、數學、社會及自然等五科在國小四年級、國小六年級、國中二年級、高中二年級及高職二年級等五個教育階段在2007年全國分層隨機抽樣施測的結果。施測的結果包括九年一貫能力指標與高中、高職課程綱要內容的答對率較佳與待加強之描述性統計分析,以及學生、學校相關背景變項的統計分析。其結果除了提供行政機關、教師、家長與課程教學參考外,最重要的是提供具體的學生學習成就現況資料給教育部作為九年一貫課程實施成果的對照,以便將來對課程、教學及政策改進提供參考。對於導致本研究結果之因素,需藉由本研究之資料庫做進一步相關研究來發掘與推論,在保護學生個人隱私與避免不當比較的前提下,國家教育研究院籌備處已開放資料庫之申請,有興趣之教育相關研究人員,可連結各領域的觀點,對相關議題進行研究與探討。
The Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement has been conducted for four years. The study is to present the stratified sampling results of five subjects Chinese, English, Mathematics, Social science, and Natural science administered in the five educational levels of 4th grade, 6th grade in elementary school, second grade in junior high school, second grade in senior high school, and second grade in vocational high school in 2007. The results include the better and worse descriptive statistics of the answer correct rate of competence indicators for 1st to 9th grade curricula alignment and curriculum guidelines of senior and vocational high schools as well as the statistic analysis of variables of students’ and schools’ background. The results can be the reference of students, teachers, and householders. In addition, the most important is that the results would be a contrast for the policy results of 1st to 9th grade curricula alignment. The results will offer to be the reference for the future of curriculum, instruction, and policy. As for the cause factors of the study results, it needs further research to investigate by the TASA database. Moreover, under the conditions of not violating students’ privacy and avoiding inappropriate comparison, the Preparatory Office has provided the database for interested researchers to investigate related study.
期刊論文
1.Petersen, N. S., Cook, L. L.,、Stocking, M. L.(1983)。IRT versus conventional equating methods: A comparative study of scale stability。Journal of Educational Statistics,8,137-156。  new window
2.Kim, S.,、Cohen, A. S.(2002)。A comparison of linking and concurrent calibration undergraded response theory。Applied Psychological Measurement,26,25-41。  new window
3.Klein, L. W.、Jarjoura, D.(1985)。The importance of content representation for common-item equating with non-random groups。Journal of Educational Measurement,22,197-206。  new window
4.Kim, S. H.、Cohen, A. S.(1998)。A Comparison of Linking and Concurrent Calibration Under Item Response Theory。Applied Psychological Measurement,22,131-143。  new window
5.Stocking, M. L.、Lord, F. M.(1983)。Developing a common metric in item response theory。Applied Psychological Measurement,7(2),201-210。  new window
6.Hambleton, R. K.,、Cook, L. L.(1977)。Latent trait models and their use in the analysis of educational test data。Journal of Educational Measurement,14,75-96。  new window
圖書
1.Zimowski, M. F.、Muraki, E.、Mislevy, R. J.、Bock, R. D.(2003)。BILOG-MG: Multiple-group IRT analysis and test maintence for binary for binary items。Mooresvilk IL:Scientific Software。  new window
2.王寶墉(1995)。現代測驗理論。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lord, F. M.(1980)。Applications of item response theory to practice testing problems。Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erbium Associates。  new window
4.郭玉生(1999)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論(IRT)及其應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kolen, M. J.、Brennan, R. J.(1995)。Test Equating: Methods and Practices。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE