:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:詠物明志--論「賞玩文學」的源流與意涵
書刊名:中國現代文學
作者:鄭穎 引用關係
作者(外文):Zheng, Ying
出版日期:2009
卷期:15
頁次:頁105-125
主題關鍵詞:詠物視覺文化消費文化賞玩文學ObjectObject-appreciatingVisual cultureCulture of consumptionAdmiration of literature
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:101
曾經,載於國家典藏或檔案冊錄中,作為檔案庫藏這些滿載時光歷史印記的「物」,在唐代以後,漸漸走入文人書房。收藏、品玩、鑑賞,成為文人建構超脫俗世的憑藉物,並依此建立起飽含文人內涵的情境。這從「視覺物品」漸次豐富,成為「文化內涵」的物;尤其自明代文人畫及戀物開始,收藏賞玩「物」的流行,背後意義為何?「詠物」本是中國文學中早被確認的文類(genre),如詩詞中大量被吟詠或描述文物的文章,皆與視覺文物有極大關係,它牽涉到文物本身的意義、「物」的視覺文化涵義;到了文人筆下,藉物抒情,從「載物」到「詠物」,從記錄到文學,它的書寫意義何在?尤其是,這類以「賞玩」為主題的書寫,不只在賞玩文化流行的明清兩代出現,現代文學大家,從周作人、魯迅,到沈從文、汪曾祺,到當代的張錯,以文學「賞玩」、「詠物」,成為他們神遊古今,隱遁於渾囂塵世最好的寄託所在,「賞玩文學」作為接續詠物傳統的現代書寫方式,其意涵為何?
The "objects" once collected and recorded in the national archives as historical imprints of times started to be collected, tasted, and appreciated by literati and became their reliance for constructing a detached world in their literary creations and their contexts of literary insights after the Tang Dynasty. What are meanings behind the transformation of objects from "visual objects" to the more enriched "cultural insights", especially in the beginning of portrait and fetishism in the Ming Dynasty when the fad of admiration of "objects" started? "Object-appreciation" is originally the earliest identified genre in Chinese literature, for example, articles with large amount of object-chanting or descriptive objects are closely related to visual literary objects, which involve the meanings of object themselves and the visual cultural insights of "objects". What are the written meanings of objects in the works of literati from the "object-recording" to "object-appreciating" and from the recording to literature? In particular, the writings of subject of "admiration of object" not only showed up in the culture of admiration in Ming and Qing Dynasties, but can also be found in the works of modern literary writers like Zhou Zuo-ren, Lu Xun, Shen Cong-wen, Wang Ceng-qi, and Zhang Cuo. The "admiration of object" and "Object-appreciation" became their way to express their ideas of sequestering themselves from the world. What are the meanings of using "admiration of literature" as writing methods in modern writings for continuing the object-appreciation tradition?
期刊論文
1.巫仁恕(20061200)。明清消費文化研究的新取徑與新問題。新史學,17(4),217-254。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王鴻泰(20061200)。雅俗的辯證--明代賞玩文化的流行與士商關係的交錯。新史學,17(4),73-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王正華(20010900)。藝術史與文化史的交界:關於視覺文化研究。近代中國史研究通訊,32,76-89。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭穎(1996)。五四新文學時期的小品文研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Clunas, Craig(2004)。Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China。Honolulu:University of Hawai'i Press。  new window
2.陸世儀(1983)。思辨錄輯要。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.Benjamin, Walter、林志明(1998)。說故事的人。臺灣攝影工作室。  延伸查詢new window
4.張錯(2005)。西洋文學術語手冊--文學詮釋舉隅。臺北:書林出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Benjamin, Walter、許綺玲、簫永盛(1999)。迎向靈光消逝的年代。臺北市:臺灣攝影工作室。  延伸查詢new window
6.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘家來(2008)。中國傳統文玩。中國傳統文玩。北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(唐)張彥遠(2005)。歷代名畫記‧論鑑識收藏購求閱完。中國歷代畫論采英。南京。  延伸查詢new window
9.伍紹棠(1988)。長物志。藝術叢編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.羅鋼、王中忱(2003)。物的文化傳記─商品化的過程。消費文化讀本。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.(明)黎遂球(1987)。琉璃碗雙紅魚記。明人小品集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.張錯(2008)。詠物。詠物。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.張錯(2004)。青衣人─唐絞胎騎馬狩獵俑。另一種遙望。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)趙希鵠(1988)。洞天清錄集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)董其昌(1985)。骨董十三說,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(宋)趙希鵠(1988)。洞天清錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)褚人獲(1986)。堅觚甲集,杭州。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)沈德符(1954)。萬曆野獲篇,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)文震亨(1988)。長物志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)花村看行侍者(1994)。花村談往,上海。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)李漁(2008)。閒情偶記,重慶。  延伸查詢new window
9.(宋)米芾(1977)。畫史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE