臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：詮釋取徑之藝術研究方法
書刊名：藝術教育研究
作者：賴雯淑 引用關係／許雯婷
作者(外文)：Lai, Wen-shu／Hsu, Wun-ting
出版日期：2011
卷期：22
頁次：頁109-145+147-149
主題關鍵詞：詮釋學；藝術研究方法；詮釋歷程；Hermeneutics；Art research methodology；The hermeneutic process
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:38
藝術可被視為人類在意義溝通上的重要途徑，而詮釋學作為一門意義理解與闡釋的方法學，兩者之間具有密切關聯性。因此對詮釋取徑內涵的釐清，有助於將之應用於藝術的質性研究，故本文分別從以下四個面向進行論述：（1）詮釋作為藝術研究方法的適切性；（2）詮釋學脈絡的梳理；（3）探討藝術與詮釋學概念的關聯，進而具體化藝術詮釋的歷程與模式；（4）反思詮釋取徑作為藝術研究方法之侷限性。筆者認為這方面的探討有助於理解詮釋學方法應用於藝術研究、藝術作品的理解與鑑賞教學等相關領域的貢獻。
Art is an important vehicle for human to communicate meaning. And hermeneutics is regarded as a methodology of understanding and interpreting meaning. Therefore, art and hermeneutics have an indispensible connection. Thus, it is profitable to explore the hermeneutic approach as a research methodology in visual arts. This paper includes the following aspects: (1) examine why hermeneutics is an appropriate methodology for art research today, (2) overview of the history of hermeneutics, (3) discuss the relations between art and hermeneutic concepts, then reify the hermeneutic process and mode in terms of art interpretation, and (4) reflect on the limitations of hermeneutics as a research approach in art research. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the hermeneutic approach is a suitable methodology in art research and the limitations of it. We believe that this paper is helpful to the understanding of hermeneutics as a research methodology in visual arts and its contribution in this field.
期刊論文
1.陳榮華(20041000)。海德格與高達美的時間概念。國立臺灣大學哲學論評，28，1+3-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sullivan, G.(2004)。Studio art as research practice。In E。  new window
3.Eisner, Elliot W.(2006)。Does Arts-Based Research Have a Future?。Studies in Art Education，48(1)，9-18。  new window
4.Packer, Martin J.(1985)。Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct。American Psychologist，40(10)，1081-1093。  new window
5.Klein, H. K.、Myers, M. D.(1999)。A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretative field studies in information systems。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，67-94。  new window
6.賴雯淑(20081200)。威廉．肯胥居「Drawings for Projection」之美學脈絡。國際藝術教育學刊，6(2)，8-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉豐榮(20041200)。視覺藝術創作研究方法之理論基礎探析：以質化研究觀點為基礎。藝術教育研究，8，73-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉仲嚴(20100500)。藝術本位研究方法論與方法的議題和前景。藝術教育研究，19，1-23+25-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gadamer, H. G.(2002)。在現象學和辯證法之間：一種自我批判的嘗試（Zwischen phänomenologie und dialektik。Versuch einer selbstkritik）（夏鎮平譯）。  延伸查詢new window
10.Gadamer, H. G.(2002)。Zwischen phänomenologie und dialektik。Versuch einer selbstkritik (Xia。  new window
11.陳榮華(2003)。從提問（das Fragen）概念論海德格與高達美哲學的思考概念。未出版。  延伸查詢new window
12.樊柯(2009)。文化理解的效果歷史事件：一種本體論的詮釋。南洋師範學院學報（社會科學版），8（11），61-63。  延伸查詢new window
13.Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K.(2000)。Reflexive methodology。New vistas for qualitative research。  new window
14.Kögler, H. H.(1996)。The power of dialogue。Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P。  new window
15.Maranhão, T.(1991)。Reflection。dialogue。  new window
16.Ricoeur, P.(2002)。詮釋學的任務（The task of hermeneutics）（李幼蒸譯）。載於洪漢鼎（編）。  延伸查詢new window
17.He, Ming-Hong(2009)。The becoming of field concept in Matthew Barney's “Cremaster” (Unpublished master's thesis)。National Chiao Tung University。  new window
18.Lai, Wen-Shu(2008)。Aesthetics in William Kentridge's “Drawings for Projection”。The International Journal of Arts Education，6(2)，18-24。  new window
19.Lai, Wen-Shu(2011)。The temporality in Andrei Tarkovsky's Ivan's childhood。In Feng。  new window
20.Bachelard, G.(2003)。The poetics of space (Gong。Jow-Jiun & Wang。  new window
21.Betti, E.(2002)。Hermeneutics as the general methodology of the geisteswissenschaften (Hong。Han-Ding Trans。  new window
22.Gadamer, H. G.(1995)。Wahrheit und methode。Ergänzungen register (Hong。  new window
23.Gadamer, H. G.(2004)。Wahrheit und methode (Hong。Han-Ding Trans。  new window
24.Ricoeur, P.(2002)。The task of hermeneutics (Li。You-Zheng Trans。  new window
25.Wang, Yi-Ting(2007)。Multiple interpretation of the photographs in “Paris。Texas” (Unpublished master's thesis)。  new window
26.Li, Jian-Sheng(2002)。Lijie shijian yu wenben yiyi。Wenxue quanshixue。  new window
27.Li, Xin-Min(2005)。The visual narrative in the film of Lars von Trier。Suppression of humanity (Unpublished master's thesis)。  new window
28.Hong, Han-Ding(2008)。Dangdai zhexue quanshixue daolun。Taipei。  new window
29.Yin, Ding(1990)。Lijie de mingyun。Taipei。  new window
30.Liang, Fu-Zhen(2000)。Quanshixue fangfa ji qi zai jiaoyu yanjiu shang de yingyong。In National Chung Cheng University。  new window
31.Chan, Wing-Wah(2003)。Cong tiwen (das Fragen) gainian lun Heidegger yu Gadamer zhexue de sikao gainian。  new window
32.Chan, Wing-Wah(2004)。The concept of time in Heidegger and Gadamer。National Taiwan University Philosophical Review，28，1-38。  new window
33.Peng, Qi-Fu(2005)。Lijie zhi si。Quanshixue chulun。  new window
34.Lau, Chung-Yim(2010)。Issues and prospects for art-based research methodologies and methods。Research in Arts Education，19，1-23。  new window
35.Fan, Ke(2009)。The understanding culture as an effectively historical event。An ontological interpretation，8(11)，61-63。  new window
36.Pan, De-Rong(1999)。Quanshixue daolun。Taipei。  new window
37.Liu, Feng-Jung(2004)。An analysis of theoretical foundation for research methods of visual art production。Qualitative perspectives，73-94。  new window
38.Lai, Wen-Shu(2008)。Fragments of images。One-person exhibition catalogue。  new window
39.Yan, Ping Ed.(1997)。Gadamer。Shanghai。  new window
40.Bamford, A.(2008)。Slide presentation。In B。  new window
41.Barthes, R.(1977)。Image music text (S。Heath。  new window
42.Bleicher, J.(1980)。Contemporary hermeneutics。Hermeneutics as method。  new window
43.Bontekoe, R.(1996)。Dimensions of the hermeneutic circle。Atlantic Highlands。  new window
44.Crotty, M.(1998)。The foundations of social research。Meaning and perspective in the research process。  new window
45.Eco, U.(1992)。a)。Interpretation and history。  new window
46.Eco, U.(1992)。b)。Overinterpreting texts。  new window
47.Eisner, E. W.(1991)。The enlightened eye。Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice。  new window
48.Gadamer, H. G.(1975)。Truth and method (G。Barden & J。  new window
49.Gadamer, H. G.(1989)。a)。Truth and Method (2nd ed。  new window
50.Gadamer, H. G.(1989)。b)。Text and interpretation (D。  new window
51.Gergen, M., & Gergen, K.(2000)。Qualitative inquiry。Tensions and transformations。  new window
52.Heidegger, M.(1971)。Poetry。language。  new window
53.Higgs, J.(2001)。Charting standpoints in qualitative research。In H。  new window
54.Hoy, D. C.(1978)。The critical circle。Literature。  new window
55.Koch, T.(1996)。Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing。Philosophy，24，174-184。  new window
56.Koch, T.(1999)。An interpretive research process。Revisiting phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches，6(3)，20-34。  new window
57.Madison, G. B.(1988)。The hermeneutics of postmodernity。Figures and theme。  new window
58.Paterson, M., & Higgs, J.(2005)。Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice。The Qualitative Report，10(2)，339-357。  new window
59.Richardson, L.(1994)。Writing。A method of inquiry。  new window
60.Ricoeur, P.(1967)。The symbol of evil (E。Buchanan。  new window
61.Reinharz, S.(1997)。Who am I。The need for a variety of selves in fieldwork。  new window
62.Ricoeur, P.(1974)。Existence and hermeneutics (K。McLaughlin。  new window
63.Ricoeur, P.(1976)。Interpretation theory。Discourse and the surplus of meaning。  new window
64.Ricoeur, P.(1978)。a)。The rule of metaphor。  new window
65.Ricoeur, P.(1978)。b)。Metaphor and the main problem of hermeneutics。  new window
66.Ricoeur, P.(1984)。Time and narrative (K。McLaughlin & D。  new window
67.Ricoeur, P.(1991)。From text to action (K。Blamey & J。  new window
68.Rorty, R.(1989)。Contingency。irony and solidarity。  new window
69.Shahn, B.(1963)。The shape of content。Cambridge。  new window
70.Sontag, S.(1964)。Against interpretation。and other essays。  new window
71.Steedman, P.(1991)。On the relations between seeing。interpreting and knowing。  new window
72.Wilson, B.(1997)。The second search。Metaphor。  new window
73.Zurmuehlen, M.(1990)。Studio art: Praxis。symbol。  new window
學位論文
1.王怡婷(2007)。論《巴黎． 德州》中照片的多重詮釋(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李新敏(2006)。拉斯馮提爾電影中視覺敘事法：人性的壓迫(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.何明鴻(2009)。論馬修巴尼《Cremaster》中場概念的生成(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.殷鼎(199001)。理解的命運。臺北：東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schwandt, T. A(2001)。Dictionary of qualitative inquiry。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
3.彭啟福(2005)。理解之思--詮釋學初論。安徽合肥：安徽人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Allen, Graham(2000)。Intertextuality。Routledge。  new window
5.洪漢鼎(20080900)。當代哲學詮釋學導論。臺北市：五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hirsch, Eric Donald Jr.(1967)。Validity in interpretation。Yale University Press。  new window
7.Polanyi, Michael(1966)。The Tacit Dimension。New York, NY：Doubleday & Company。  new window
8.李建盛(2002)。理解事件與文本意義--文學詮釋學。上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Palmer, Richard E.(1969)。Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer。Evanston。  new window
10.Danner, H.(1994)。Methoden geisteswissenschaftlicher Pädagogik。München：Universität Taschenbuch Verlag。  new window
11.Barthes, Roland、屠友祥(2004)。S/Z。台北：桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
12.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、洪漢鼎、夏鎮平(1995)。真理與方法（II）：補充和索引。臺北：時報文化出版企業公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Sokolowski, Robert、李維倫(2004)。現象學十四講。臺北：心靈工坊出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.潘德榮(1999)。詮釋學導論。五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Sokolowski, Robert(2000)。Introduction to Phenomenology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
17.Bachelard, Gaston、龔卓軍、王靜慧(2003)。空間詩學。張老師文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、洪漢鼎(2004)。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Heidegger, Martin、Macquarrie, John、Robinson, Edward S.(1962)。Being and Time。Harper & Row。  new window
20.Simms, Karl(2003)。Paul Ricoeur。Routledge。  new window
21.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
22.Barthes, Roland、林志明(2004)。S/Z。文本理論。臺北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
23.Hilligoss, S.(1997)。Robert Coles。New York：Twayne Publishers。  new window
24.Irwin, Robert(1985)。Being and Circumstance: Notes toward a Conditional Art。Larkspur Landing, CA：The Lapis Press。  new window
25.賴雯淑(2008)。b）。未完成的影像。  延伸查詢new window
26.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、嚴平(1997)。加達默爾集。上海：上海遠東。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Altheide, D. L.、Johnson, J. M.(1994)。Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.貝蒂、洪漢鼎(2002)。作為精神科學一般方法論的詮釋學。詮釋學經典文選。臺北：桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。高雄：麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1107（臺灣：1101，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：3987111 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：69782762
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上