:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:N3護理人員參加臨床能力進階制度意願之相關影響因素
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:利怡慧林伶黛蔡菁菁周嫚君林梅香
作者(外文):Li, Yi-huiLin, Ling-daiTsai, Ching-chingChou, Man-chunLin, Mei-hsiang
出版日期:2012
卷期:59:1
頁次:頁41-50
主題關鍵詞:護理人員臨床進階制度動機滿意度專業能力成就感Nurse staffClinical ladder programMotivationLevel of satisfactionProfessional competenceSense of achievement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:220
背景: 實施護理人員能力進階制度可激勵工作士氣,藉以留任資深優秀人員。瞭解影響護理人員參加臨床能力進階制度之因素,顯得相對重要。 目的: 探討影響護理人員參加臨床能力進階制度相關因素。 方法: 採橫斷式、相關性研究設計,針對臺灣南部某醫學中心符合晉升條件之 N3護理人員,以立意取樣取得 389位符合選樣條件之個案,完成結構式問卷。 結 果 ⑴研究對象有 233人( 59.9%)意願參加臨床能力進階; ⑵參加臨床能力進階意願與年齡、工作年資、該職級年資、撰寫專案或研究報告經驗及晉升經驗呈顯著差異; ⑶參加臨床專業能力進階意願與動機、滿意度、專業能力及成就感均有顯著差異; ⑷以邏輯式回歸統計分析結果顯示:動機分數愈高者愈有意願參加臨床能力進階 (95% CI: 1.21-3.78)。 結論/實務應用: 作為臨床規劃護理人員在職教育之參考,提供護理行政者在未來輔導護理人員參考,創造更好的護理品質與績效。
Background: The professional nursing clinical ladder program can effectively enhance the professional morale of nursing staff and help retain the best senior nurses in clinical settings. Hence, it is important to explore factors that influence nurse staff intentions to participate in the clinical ladder. Purpose: This study examined factors that affect nurse staff intention to participate in the N3 nurse clinical ladder program. Methods: We used a cross sectional study design and a structured questionnaire survey. We employed purposive sampling to recruit 389 nurse staffs qualified for promotion to the N3 level from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Results: Findings showed: (1) Nearly two-thirds (233, 59.9%) of participants intended to participate in clinical ladder; (2) The factors of age, years of nursing experience, years in current position, project/research experience, promotion experience, and intention all significantly affected intent to participate in the ladder; (3) A significant difference between willingness to participate in the ladder program and each of the following variables -motivation, satisfaction, professional capacity, and sense of achievement; (4) Logistic regression analysis identified only motivation as a valid predictor of willingness to participate the ladder program (95% CI: 1.21-3.78). Conclusion / Implications for practice: Results provide a useful reference to nursing administrators for planning on-the-job training and increasing nurse staff participation in the ladder. The authors hope results can help promote better human resource management and achievements.
期刊論文
1.白玉珠、徐南麗、汪蘋(19990600)。某醫學中心護理人員自評之護理能力及個人特質相關性研究。護理研究,7(3),209-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bjørk, I. T.、Hansen, B. S.、Samdal, G. B.、Tørstad, S.、Hamilton, G. A.(2007)。Evaluation of clinical ladder participation in Norway。Journal of Nursing Scholarship,39(1),88-94。  new window
3.Girot, E. A.(1993)。Assessment of competence in clinical practice: a phenomenological approach。Journal of Advanced Nursing,18(1),114-119。  new window
4.Riley, J. K.、Rolband, D. H.、James, D.、Norton, H. J.(2009)。Clinical ladder: nurses' perceptions and satisfiers。The Journal of Nursing Administration,39(4),182-188。  new window
5.Pierson, M. A.、Liggett, C.、Moore, K. S.(2010)。Twenty years of experience with a clinical ladder: A tool for professional growth, evidence-based practice, recruitment, and retention。The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,41(1),33-40。  new window
6.張文英、王憲華、紀淑靜、陳麗芳、顧艷秋、尹裕君(20070400)。臺灣護理學會2004年與2005年護理專案審查結果之回顧與分析。護理雜誌,54(2),29-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳繪竹、李金德、林淑媛(20090600)。進階護理人員自評護理能力之探討。醫護科技期刊,11(2),87-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭美玉、陳季員(19990500)。高雄市醫院護理人員工作滿意度及其預測因子之探討。大仁學報,17,293-305。  延伸查詢new window
9.嚴玉華(20040600)。醫院護理人員在職教育訓練與專業能力進階制度之探討。東港安泰醫護雜誌,10(2),70-76。  延伸查詢new window
10.張淑卿、黃璉華、黃明珠、鍾聿琳(19970600)。臺北縣衛生所公衛護理人員參與在職教育動機及障礙之因素研究。護理研究,5(3),233-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.徐南麗、林碧珠、徐曼瑩、楊克平(20020100)。比較護理進階制度實施前後護理能力及影響因素分析。慈濟護理雜誌,1(1),76-85。  延伸查詢new window
12.DeBack, V.、Mentkowski, M.(1986)。Does the Baccalaureate Make a Difference? Differentiating Nurse Performance by Education and Experience。Journal of Nursing Education,25(7),275-285。  new window
13.盧美秀(20040800)。我國護理教育的現況與展望。護理雜誌,51(4),11-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳國瑚、陳麗如、蘇喜(20060600)。護理人員對護理工作認知與離職傾向之探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25(3),177-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.徐南麗、李茹萍、李芸茹、賴正芬、彭台珠(20030300)。護理人員進階制度實施後主客觀護理能力差異之比較。慈濟護理雜誌,2(1),53-62。  延伸查詢new window
16.曾珍麗、尹裕君、陳都美(19970300)。護理人員能力進階制度實施成效之探討。榮總護理,14(1),52-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Goodrich, C. A.,、Ward, C. W.(2004)。Evaluation and revision of a clinical advancement program。Medsurg Nursing,13(6),391-398。  new window
18.林明珍、陳芳巧、郭春花、藺寶珍、鄭綉絨(2004)。探討護理人員對能力進階N3個案報告之知識、態度、行為及其影響因素。慈濟護理雜誌,3(3),60-69。  延伸查詢new window
19.Drenkard, K.、Swartwout, E.(2005)。Effectiveness of a clinical ladder program。The Journal of Nursing Administration,35(11),502-506。  new window
20.Murray, M.(1993)。Where are career ladders going in the 90s?。Nursing Management,24(6),46-48。  new window
學位論文
1.莊玉嬪(2003)。基層護理人員臨床專業能力進階制度之探討--以某區域教學醫院為例(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王靜琳(2005)。護理人員工作壓力、社會支持與專業承諾之相關性研究(碩士論文)。美和技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.李宗倫(2004)。個人創造力歷程之研究--動機理論之整合觀點(碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
4.林淑真(2004)。護理人員晉升考試成績與專業照護能力及對進階制度態度之關係(碩士論文)。長庚大學,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.凌建玲(2002)。護理「專業能力進階制度」對護理人員之影響(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lazarus, R. S.(1966)。Psychological stress and the coping process。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
2.Maslow, Abraham H.、Frager, Robert、Fadiman, James、McReynolds, C.(1970)。Motivation and Personality。Harper。  new window
其他
1.台灣護理學會(2011)。能力進階規劃指引,http://www.twna.org.tw/frontend/un10_open/welcome.asp。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣護理學會(2011)。護理專案送審及通過總表,http://www.act.e-twna.org.tw/Judweb/QA/Report-MasterP.aspx?lmYvcWiqT%2fI%3d。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院衛生署(2010)。歷年醫療院所家數--按權屬別分,http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10133&class_no=440&level_no=4。  new window
4.利怡慧,周嫚君(2008)。參加能力進階制度調查表,高雄市:高雄長庚紀念醫院護理部。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部國語推行委員會(2000)。國語詞典簡編本,http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/jdict/GetContent.cgi?DocNum=40697&GraphicWord=&QueryString。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE