:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中繼屋社區居民組織運作之研究--屏東縣忠誠中期安置中心案例
書刊名:臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊
作者:陳鈺欣黃肇新 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-hsinHuang, Chao-hsing
出版日期:2012
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁79-109
主題關鍵詞:災變社會工作中繼屋社區工作組織決策Social work on disaster relief and reconstructionInterim housingCommunity workDecision making
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:49
  • 點閱點閱:69
中繼屋是重大災害發生以致受災地區暫時不適居住時,政府或民間社會提供受災者暫時居住的建築物。它的暫時性及時間長短不確定及較無新聞性,使其受關注的程度往往不若緊急救援時期的安置處所,及耗費更大、具長期效果的永久屋。然而,中繼屋時期也是受災者與國家社會救協助單位協商受災者返回原社區或遷往永久屋的轉換時期,有諸多決策需在此時期完成。中繼屋階段住民的組織與決策過程與原社區權力結構的關係如何?中繼屋期間是否形成新的權力結構及影響後續返鄉或遷往永久屋之決策?就協助之公部門及各種民間組織之作為如何影響中繼屋期間居民組織之形成及決策過程等問題是本文關切的焦點。本文將從相關文獻之回顧、與中繼屋住民及協助之公部門與民間組織代表訪談,整理出中繼屋階段影響住民組織與決策之因素。在天然災變幾成當代社會常態之際,本研究期待做為政府與民間救協助單位從救援到長期重建過程中,關於中繼屋階段受災者組織與決策之經驗知識,做為相闗單位行動與決策之參考。
Interim housing, delivered by public or private sectors, provides for temporary housing after major disasters. Due to uncertainty, temporality and lack of newsworthiness, interim housing usually gets less public attentions than emergency shelters and permanent housing.Interim housing, however, is only a step away from the reconstruction or relocation of original communities. For both victimized communities and local governments, there are many decisions to make during this intermediate period.This paper intends to answer these questions: How is the dynamics between the decision-making process of residents in interim housing and the power structure of the original community? Is a new power structure formed between residents in the interim period? Does the new power structure, if established, impact the choice of reconstruction or relocation of the community? How do public and private sectors' decision making impact the formation and decision-making of the organization among residents of the interim housing? Through a review of literature and interviews with residents in interim housing and public/private sectors, the authors analyze factors that affect the organization formation and decision making process during the stage of interim housing.The authors expect that this experience-based research will be a valuable piece of information to help public and private sectors make decisions on disaster management.
期刊論文
1.柯于璋(20090600)。災後遷村計畫之政治可行性分析:以高雄縣藤枝新舊部落為例。臺灣政治學刊,13(1),107-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝志誠、張紉、蔡培慧、王俊凱(2008)。台灣災後遷村政策之演變與問題。住宅學報,17(2),81-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.紅十字會(2009)。八八水災特輯。紅十字會訊,46,61-64。  延伸查詢new window
4.Liu, X.,、Lindquist, E., Vedlitz, A., and Vincent, K.、Vedlitz, A.,、Vincent, K.(2010)。Understanding local policy making: Policy elites’ perceptions of local agenda setting and alternative policy selection.。Policy Studies Journal,38,69-91。  new window
5.OMAR EL-ANWAR,、KHALED EL-RAYES,、AMR ELNASHAI(2008)。Multi-Objective Optimization of Temporary Housing for the 1994 Northridge Earthquake。Journal of Earthquake Engineering,12(2),81-91。  new window
6.全國成(20100900)。以原住民族的重建需求為觀點--探討家園重建政策與原鄉期待的落差與衝突。社區發展季刊,131,230-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡志偉(20090900)。災後重建與人權保障--以原住民族文化為本的思考。臺灣民主季刊,6(3),179-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.謝政道(20070600)。排灣族傳統社會結構之研究。人文社會科學研究,1(1),123-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Norris, Fran H.、Stevens, Susan P.、Pfefferbaum, Betty、Wyche, Karen F.、Pfefferbaum, Rose L.(2008)。Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness。American Journal of Community Psychology,41(1/2),127-150。  new window
10.Perry, Ronald W.、Lindell, Michael K.(1997)。Principles for Managing Community Relocation as a Hazard Mitigation Measure。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,5(1),49-59。  new window
學位論文
1.郭東雄(2003)。台灣排灣族七佳舊社住居文化之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Heracles Lang, BRR NAD Nias(2008)。Community housing in post disaster area on Nias island,。Indonesia:responding to community needs, Building resilience achieving effective post-disaster reconstruction:。  new window
2.Turner, John F. C.(1976)。Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments。N.Y.:Pantheon Books。  new window
3.Wates, Nick、Brook, Jeremy(2000)。The Community Planning Handbook: How people can shape their cities, towns, and villages in any part of the world。London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.。  new window
其他
1.李孟霖(2010)。遷村無配套 來義村決定不遷!,http://www.88news.org/?p=8743, 2010/12/27。  延伸查詢new window
2.王增勇(2010)。回到誰的家?小心「慈善」背後溫柔的箭,http://tywangster.blogspot.com/2010/02/blog-post.html, 2010/12/29。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部(2009)。莫拉克颱風社政部門相關作為辦理情形,台北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
4.台灣原住民部落行動聯盟(2009)。抗議立法院草率通過內容存有嚴重爭議的莫拉克災後重建特別條例聲明稿,http://www.ipact.atipc.org/ipact/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=63:2010-07-30-15-12-42&catid=41:2010-07-30-17-31-30&Itemid=85, 2010/12/29。  延伸查詢new window
5.范月華(2010)。大愛落成系列(二): 歡喜入厝南沙魯,原味消失了,http://www.88news.org/?p=2733, 2010/12/27。  延伸查詢new window
6.柯亞璇(2010)。魯凱:我們要有尊嚴的重建及生活,http://www.dfun.com.tw/?p=25092, 2010/12/27。  延伸查詢new window
7.鐘聖雄(2010)。大愛落成系列(六):愛的代價,http://www.88news.org/?p=2816, 2010/12/27。  延伸查詢new window
8.鐘聖雄(20100424)。堅決原鄉重建,鄒族拒當「櫥窗民族」!,http://www.88news.org/?p=3702。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE