臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從當代社區的變異初探社區工作者角色
書刊名：臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊
作者：林明禛 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Ming-chen
出版日期：2013
卷期：3:1
頁次：頁99-126
主題關鍵詞：社區變異；社區工作模式；社區工作者角色；Vibration of community；Community work model；Community worker
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:750
  • 點閱點閱:153
社區組織工作專業之發展較個案工作、團體工作晚，才被確認為社會工作的一種干預方法。隨著時空及環境背景變化，國內社會工作者在社區工作操作場域的角色逐漸式微。除了外在社區形式的變異，也有來自社會工作專業發展的偏移。回顧1968年J. Rothman社區工作典範分類「地方發展」、「社會計畫」、「社會行動」三大模式以來，西方國家採用社區概念較為寬廣，工作者角色顯得綜融與多元。反觀台灣的社區工作者則相對狹隘，也在形式變異明顯的當代社區中，逐漸褪去社會工作者的專業光澤。首先，在強調「促成者」角色的「地方發展」模式中，被崛起的許多自稱社區的專家和社區營造者奪走光彩；在宣稱「專家者」角色的「社會計畫」模式，無能顯現分析社區問題、主導運作科層組織的專業才能，只能淪為事件善後的陪襯角色。最後，標舉關注弱勢與質疑社會制度不公，擔任「倡導者」、「行動者」角色的「社會行動」模式，在面對公部門的民營化與方案委託潮流下，形同被「收編」，甚至被非典型社工的社運者所「解構」。社會工作者延續著助人專業使命及承諾，允採取不同的思維因應；避免專業職能停滯和專業角色的消失。本文試著援用Rothman社區工作典範模式，回頭探討社會工作專業中的社區工作者，藉由實務專業才能的檢視，反省角色和功能，試著調整並尋回自己專業本位與功能，以保有專業存活機制。
The work profession of community-based organizations is recognized as a social work intervention method later than that of casework and group work is because its development is later. With the change of time, space and environmental background, the roles of social workers in Taiwan in the operating field of social work have gradually declined. In addition to the variation of external forms of community, there are also variations in the development of social work profession. According to the review on J. Rothman's classification of social work into three major models, "local development," "social project" and "social action" in 1968, a broader concept of community is adopted in western countries, and the roles of community workers are more comprehensive and diversified. On the contrary, the roles of community workers in Taiwan are relatively narrow. The halo of profession as social workers has also gradually faded in the contemporary community with a significant variation in forms. First, in the model of "local development" where the importance is attached to the role as "facilitators," the luster of community workers is taken away by many rising self-proclaimed community experts and community builders. Second, in the model of "social project" where the importance is attached to the role as "professionals," community workers are unable to reflect and analyze social issues, lack the professional competence to lead and operate bureaucratic organizations and hence become the supporting role of aftermath. Last, in the model of "social action" where the importance is attached to the role as "advocators" and "actors" paying attention to the disadvantaged groups and questioning the unfairness of social system, community workers seem to be "incorporated" into specific units under the trend of privatization and outsourcing of public sectors. They are even "deconstructed" by atypical social workers. Social workers continue the professional mission and commitment to helping people and take a different way of thinking and different responses to avoid the stagnation of professional competence and the disappearance of professional roles. Based on the community work models proposed by Rothman, this study attempts to review the roles and functions of community workers in the profession of social work and adjust and restore their professional standard and function to maintain the mechanism for profession survival by inspecting the practical professional competence,.
期刊論文
1.Frumklin, M.、O'Connor, G.(1985)。Where has the profession gone? Social work's search for identity。Urban and Social Change Review，18(1)，13-18。  new window
2.Leonard, P.(1978)。The Function of Social Work in Society. quoted from B. Stevens, A Fourth Model of Community Work。Community Development Journal，13(2)，86-94。  new window
3.Hillesy, George A. Jr.(1955)。Definitions of community: Areas of agreement。Rural sociology，20(2)，111-123。  new window
4.湯京平、吳重禮、蘇孔志(20021200)。分立政府與地方民主行政：從臺中縣「地方基層建設經費」論地方派系與肉桶政治。中國行政評論，12(1)，37-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林明禛(20110600)。中介團體：臺灣社區發展運作難題與另類選擇。社會政策與社會工作學刊，15(1)，137-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳欽春(2000)。社區主義在當代治理模式中的定位與展望。中國行政評論，10(1)，183-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林勝義(20040900)。從社區評鑑探討臺灣社區發展的走向。社區發展季刊，107，52-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陸光(19820600)。社區發展之展望。社區發展季刊，18，88-91。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐震(20040900)。臺灣社區發展與社區營造的異同--論社區工作中微視與鉅視面的兩條路線。社區發展季刊，107，22-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃源協(20040900)。社區工作何去何從：社區發展？社區營造？。社區發展季刊，107，78-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.賴兩陽(2001)。臺灣社會福利社區化之研究：政策發展、推動模式與實施績效(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝慶達(1995)。戰後臺灣社區發展運動之歷史分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周沛(2002)。社區社會工作。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李增祿(1986)。社會工作概論。台北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Garvin, C. D.、Tropman, J. E.(1992)。Social Work in Contemporary Society。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.Jordan, B.(2007)。Social Work and Well-Being。Lyme Regis：Russell House Publishing。  new window
5.Kramer, Ralph M.、Specht, Harry(1969)。Readings in Community Organization Practice。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.NASW(2003)。Social Work Speaks: National Association of Social Workers Policy Statements (2003-2006)。Washington DC：National Association of Social Workers Press。  new window
7.Rubin, H. J.、Rubin, I.(1986)。Community Organizing and Development。Ohio：Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
8.Skidmore, Rex. A.、Thackeray, Milton G.(1967)。Introduction to Social Work。雙葉書局。  new window
9.Weil, M.、Gamble, D. N.(2005)。Evolution Models, and the Changing Context of Community Practice。Thousand Oaks：Sage。  new window
10.梁祖彬(1996)。社區工作的工作概念。社區工作--理論與實踐。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.Shaffer, C. R.、Anundsem, K.(1993)。Creating Community Anywhere。New York：Jeremy P. Tarcher/Perigee Books。  new window
12.Spectht, H.、Courtney, M. E.(1994)。Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Abandoned Its Mission。New York, NY：The Free Press。  new window
13.Eisenstadt, S. N.、Roniger, Luis、Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah、Luis, Roniger(1984)。Patrons, Clients, and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.蘇景輝(2003)。社區工作--理論與實務。臺北：巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.徐震、林萬億(1982)。當代社會工作。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.Skidmore, R. A.、Thackeray, Milton G.、Farley, O. W.、Smith, L. L.、Boyle, S. W.(2000)。Introduction to social work。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
17.Chaskin, R. J.、Brown, P.、Venkatesh, S.、Vidal, A.(2001)。Building Community Capacity。New York：Aldine De Grayter。  new window
18.Stepney, P.、Popple, K.(2008)。Social Work and the Community: A Critical Context for Practice。Hampshire。  new window
19.Ross, Murray G.(1967)。Community Organization: Theory, Principles, and Practice。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
20.蔡明惠(1998)。臺灣鄉鎮派系與政治變遷：河口鎮「山頂」與「街仔」的鬥爭。臺北市：洪葉文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.施威全(1996)。地方派系。臺北：揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Throsby, David C.、張維倫、潘筱瑜、蔡宜真、鄒歷安(2003)。文化經濟學。臺北：典藏藝術。  延伸查詢new window
23.Wynne, D.(1992)。The Culture Industry: The Arts in Urban Regeneration。Ashgate Publishing Company。  new window
24.黃煌雄、郭石吉、林時機(2001)。社區總體營造總體檢調查報告書。台北：遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.徐震(1980)。社區與社區發展。臺北：正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.徐震、李明政(20040000)。社會工作思想與倫理。臺北市：松慧。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Olson, Mancur Jr.(1971)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。Harvard University Press。  new window
28.李明政(20030000)。文化福利權。臺北：松慧。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
30.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Stepney, Paul、Popple, Keith、鄧湘漪、陳秋山(2011)。社會工作與社區--實踐的批判性脈絡。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳其南(19950219)。經營大台灣從小社區做起。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.馮國堅、胡文龍、徐永德(1996)。社區工作的工作概念。社區工作--理論與實踐。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Abrams, P.(1978)。Introduction: social facts and sociological analysis。Work, Urbanism and Inequality: UK Society Today。London：Weidenfeld and Nicolson。  new window
3.Hamnett, C.(1979)。Area-based Explanations: A Critical Appraisal。Social Problem and the City: Geographical Perspectives。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Cox, Fred. M.(1977)。What's Going On: Assessing the Situation。Tactics and Techniques of Community Practice。Itasca：F.E. Peacock Publisher。  new window
5.Rothman, J.(1979)。Three Models of Community Organization Practice, Their Mixing and Thasing。Strategies of community organization。IL：F. E. Peacock。  new window
6.Smith, T.(1980)。Community Work: Professional or Social Movement?。The Boundaries of Change in Community Work。London：George Allen and Unwin。  new window
7.甘炳光、莫慶聯(1996)。社區工作的定義與目標。社區工作--理論與實踐。臺北：五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃世輝、宮崎清(1996)。從日本看台灣社區總體營造的發展與方法。人心之華--日本社區總體營造的理念與實例。南投：台灣省手工業研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.Rothman, J.(2001)。Approach to Community Intervention。Strategies of Community Intervention。Belmont：Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：434（臺灣：428，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1385896 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67192988
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上