:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:身心障礙撞球選手教練領導行為--以99年全國身心障礙運動會撞球選手為例
書刊名:長榮運動休閒學刊
作者:張育瑋
出版日期:2012
卷期:6
頁次:頁66-73
主題關鍵詞:獎賞行為運動成就訓練天數Reward behaviorMovement achievementTraining time
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:169
  • 點閱點閱:37
本研究之目的在於探討(一)身心障礙撞球選手教練領導行為之現況;(二)不同背景變項的身心障礙撞球選手教練領導行為之差異情形。本研究以問卷調查法來收集所需資料,問卷包含:一、個人基本資料;二、教練領導行為量表。研究對象以身心障礙撞球選手為母群體,採立意取樣方式抽取參與99年全國身心障礙運動會接球選手,共計發出91份問卷,回收有效問卷91份,回收有效問卷率為100%。資料處理,採敘述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析。本研究主要結果為:身心障礙撞球選手教練領導行為以「獎賞行為」及「訓練與指導行為」層面的成受程度最高,而「專制行為」為最低;身心障礙撞球選手每週不同訓練天數在訓練與指導行為與民主行為上達顯著差異;不同運動成就在訓練與指導行為、民主行為、關懷行為與獎賞行為上達顯著差異。
The purpose of this study is to present the situation of disabled billiard player's coach leading behavior and the analysis on the diversity of leading behaviors of these coaches based on their various backgrounds. The study collects all information using questionnaires which included the personal profile and the coach leading behavior scale. The research is based on the disabled billiard players as sample group, using random sampling from the disable billiard players in the National Disabled Games and Practices. The total distribution for this sample is 91 questionnaires and we received a 100% return of effective questionnaires. The result of data will be analyzed via the descriptive statistic, the independent-samples t test, and one-way ANOVA. Our research has concluded that the leadership behaviors of these coaches are generally good. We found that the 2 variables, that is, training days and different sport achievement background, indicated significant differences in on these coaches' leadership. However, there is no difference shown on the sexual and educational background. According to these results, we found that coaches tend to base their trainings on ”reward” and ”instructio”. Also, the longer the training time, the more outstanding the reward will be indicated in training, democracy and care.
期刊論文
1.黃金柱(19900600)。國家級運動教練領導行為之調查研究。國立體育學院論叢,1(2),33-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Smoll, Frank L.、Smith, Ronald E.(1989)。Leadership Behaviors in Sport: A Theoretical Model and Research Paradigm。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,19(18),1522-1551。  new window
3.Westre, Kirk R.、Weiss, Maureen R.(1991)。The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams。The Sport Psychology,5(1),41-54。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭孝存(2008)。臺北市國小排球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴世堤(2002)。我國籃球教練領導行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣體育學院,台中。  延伸查詢new window
3.李建平(2002)。大專網球優秀選手對教練領導行為與訓練滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳其昌(1993)。排球教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳慧卿(2001)。選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度關係之實證研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳玉娟(1995)。臺灣地區游泳教練領導行為與選手成績表現及滿意度關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭添財(2004)。國小桌球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sabock, R. J.(1985)。The Coach。Philadelphia, WB:Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE