:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自然科成就測驗試題難度成份分析
書刊名:教育學誌
作者:胡智超凃柏原 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Chih-chaoTwu, Bor-yaun
出版日期:2012
卷期:28
頁次:頁155-191
主題關鍵詞:認知成份分析類別迴歸線性羅吉斯潛在特質模式Cognitive components analysisCategorical regressionLinear logistic latent trait model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:37
期刊論文
1.Dimitrov, D. M.、Raykov, T.(2003)。Validation of Cognitive Structures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach。Multivariate Behavioral Research,38(1),1-23。  new window
2.Embretson, S. E.、Gorin, J.(2001)。Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles。Journal of Educational Measurement,38(4),343-368。  new window
3.Green, K. E.、Smith, R. M.(1987)。A Comparison of Two Methods of Decomposing Item Difficulties。Journal of Educational Statistics,12(4),369-381。  new window
4.Fischer, G. H.(1973)。The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research。Acta Psychologica,37(6),359-374。  new window
5.張銘秋、謝秀月、徐秋月(20100100)。PISA科學素養之試題認知成份分析。課程與教學,13(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.洪碧霞、林素微、林娟如(20061200)。認知複雜度分析架構對TASA-MAT六年級線上測驗試題難度的解釋力。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),69-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Enright, M. K., Allen, N. L.,、Kim, M.(1993)。A complexity analysis of items from a survey of academic achievement in the life sciences。Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service。  new window
學位論文
1.Rosca, C. V.(2004)。What makes a science item difficulty? A study of TIMSS-R items using regression and the linear logistic test model,Boston。  new window
2.李岳勳(2004)。國小電腦化空間感測驗難度來源之成份分析(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pellegrino, J. W.、Chudowsky, N.、Glaser R.(2001)。Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment。Washington, DC:Center for Education, National Research Council。  new window
2.張春興(2002)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭生玉(2003)。心理與教育測驗。臺北:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.丁振豐(1995)。幾何圖形類比推理題目內容成份分析之研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周甘逢、劉冠麟(2002)。教育心理學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林世華、葉嘉惠(1999)。數字系列完成測驗試題認知成份分析之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.林清山(2002)。教育心理學:認知取向。  延伸查詢new window
5.凃柏原、梁恩琪、翁大德、楊毅立(2004)。國中基測自然科試題分析研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.盧思丞、凃柏原(2012)。TIMSS八年級與國中基測物理試題認知成份之探討。  延伸查詢new window
7.Embretson, S.(1993)。Psychometric Models for Learning and Cognitive Processes。  new window
8.Emmerich, W.(1989)。Appraising the cognitive features of subject tests。  new window
9.Fischer, G. H.(1995)。The linear logistic model。  new window
10.Gorin, J. S.(2005)。Manipulating processing difficult of reading comprehension questions: The feasibility of verbal item generation。  new window
11.Gorin, J. S., & Embretson, S. E.(2006)。Item difficult modeling of paragraph comprehension items。  new window
12.Sternberg, R. J.(1978)。Contrasting conceptions of intelligence and their education implication。  new window
13.Yepes-Baraya, M.(1996)。A cognitive study based on the NAEP Science Assessment。  new window
14.Yepes-Baraya, M.(1997)。Lessons learned form the coding of item attributes for the 1996 NAEP science assessment G4。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE