李茂能 (1994)。共變數分析的基本假設與應用。嘉義師院學報，8，145-170。
李茂能 (2006)。結構方程式軟體AMOS之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北市：心理出版社。
李茂能 (2011)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用 (第二版)。台北市：五南。
李茂能 (2015)。傳統整合分析理論與實務：ESS & EXECL。台北市：五南。
李茂能 (2016)。當代整合分析理論與實務：ESS、Meta-SEM、Mvmeta & WinBUGS。台北市：五南。
李茂能、楊德清 (2015)。工作記憶力。後設認知能力對於國小高年級一般兒童與注意力缺陷過動症兒童之數常識發展的徑路結構分析。科學教育學刊，23(3)，265-291。
李茂能 (2019)。卡方事後考驗增益集 (未出版)。
李茂能 (2019)。結構方程模式理論與實務：圖解AMOS取向。台北市:五南。
余民寧 (2011)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。台北市：心理出版社。
余明杰、李茂能、楊德清 (2016)。國小四年級學童數常識三階段診斷測驗工具的發展　　　
與應用之研究。科學教育學刊，24(1)，89-114。
洪碧霞、林素微、林娟如 (2006)。數學試題認知複雜度分析架構對TASA-MA六年級線上測驗試題難度的解釋力。教育研究與發展期刊，2(4)，69-86。
林世華 (2002)。研究用軟體：詹森內門法。檢索於：2019年4 月20日。林世華個人網頁。取自：http://www.linsh.linsh.org/。
林素微 (2002)。國小高年級學童數感特徵暨數感動態評量發展之探討 (未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
林清山 (1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北：東華。
林福來、單維彰、李源順、鄭彰華 (2013)。十二年國民基本教育數學領域綱要內容之前導研究。台北市：國家教育研究院
范德鑫 (1992)。共變數分析功能、假設及使用之限制。師大學報，37，133-163
陳新豐 (2003)。線上題庫等化連結方式之比較。花蓮師院學報，17，153-191。
陳霈頡、楊德清 (2010)。數常識過程導向加強教學活動之研究。科學教育與發展季刊，(57)，55-88。
黃仕奇、楊德清 (2014)。數位動畫對小六學童數常識發展之研究。科學教育學刊，22(1)，33-55。
國家教育研究院 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：數學領域。檢索於：2018年12月20日。取自國家教育研究院十二年國民教育課程綱要。網址:https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/114/144789974.pdf。
程俊博 (2004)。以多元觀點評量生活科技。生活科技教育月刊，37(7)，76-83。
張家淦、張靖敏、張道宜 (2018)。精緻式電腦化即時回饋評量系統 (未出版)。
楊德清、李茂能 (2007)。九年一貫國小階段數常識電腦化診斷測驗系統之開發與應用(NSC96-2521-S-415-001)。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。
楊德清、李茂能 (2010)。開發數位學習活動以幫助國小5、6年級學生發展數字常識之研究(NSC97-2511-S-415-010-MY3)。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。
楊德清、洪素敏 (2008)。分數補救教學之歷程的研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(2) ，85-118。
薛雅純 (2019)。以均一教育平台實施差異化教學之實務見解。臺灣教育評論月刊， 8(1)， 245-248。
劉曼麗 (2005)。小數診斷教學研究。科學教育學刊，13(1)，29-52。
劉曼麗、侯淑芬 (2006)。整數數感融入國小四年級數學科教學之研究。科學教育學刊，14(2)，121-147。
賴建昌 (2011)。使用線上遊戲式評量改善國小四年級學童數感能力之研究。(未出版碩士論文)。亞洲大學，台中。
Airasian, P. W. (1997). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 54(2), 279-299.
Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on Science Learning. In Abell, S. K., and Lederman, N. G., (Eds.), Handbook on research on science education (pp. 3-30). New York: Routledge.
Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 148.
Aristotle, & Burnet, J. (1967). Aristotle on education: Being extracts from the Ethics and Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89-99.
Baum, W. M., Reese, H. W., & Powers, W. T. (1973). Behaviorism and feedback control. Science, 181(4105), 1114-1120.
Beevers, C. E., Wild, D. G., McGuine, G. R., Fiddes, D. J., & Youngson, M. A. (1999). Issues of partial credit in mathematical assessment by computer. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 7(1), 26-32.
Bell, B. (2013). Learning in science: The Waikato research. New York, NY:Routledge.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science 　　　　　　　　　　 education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553.
Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333-339.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
Bond, L., Smith, R., Baker, W. K., & Hattie, J. A. (2000). Certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards:A construct and consequentialvalidity study. Washington, DC: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 279-293). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Bowman, T. G., & Laurent, T. (2011). Immediate feedback and learning in athletic training education. Athletic Training Education Journal, 6(4), 202-207.
Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., Dihoff, R. E., & Cook, M. J. (2006). Acquisition and retention of Esperanto: The case for error correction and immediate feedback. The Psychological Record, 56(2), 205-218.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273-281.
Carels, E. J. (1975). The effects of false feedback, sex, and personality on learning, retention, and the Zeigarnik effect in programmed instruction. Dissertation Abstract international, 36, 2094A. (University Microfilms No.75-22, 345).
Carmichael, J. (2009). Team-based learning enhances performance in introductory biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(4), 54-61.
Çekirdekci, S., Şengül, S., & Doğan, M. C. (2016). Examining the relationship between number sense and mathematics achievement of 4th grade students. Qualitative Studies, 11(4), 48-66.
Chang, T. & Li, M. (2019). A Relative Effectiveness Assessment of an Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique Employed on Computers and Scratch Cards: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 12-29. Retrieved from https://educationaltechnology.net/ijet/index.php/ijet/article/view/76
Cheung, K. L.& Yang, D. C. (2018). Examining the differences of Hong Kong and Taiwan students’ performance on the number sense three-tier test.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3329-3345.
Cheung, M. W. (2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 227-246.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2008). A model for integrating fixed-,random-, and mixed-effects meta- analyses into structural equation modeling. Psychological methods, 13(3), 182.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2009). Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 425-438.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2010). Fixed-effects meta-analyses as multiple-group structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 481-509.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2013). Multivariate meta-analysis as structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(3), 429-454.
Cheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modelling approach. Singapore : John Wiley & Sons.
Cheung, M.W.-L. (2018 in press). Issues in solving the problem of effect size heterogeneity in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A commentary and simulation study on Yu, Downes, Carter, and O’Boyle (2016). Journal of Applied Psychology.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.
Cirino, P. T. (2011). The interrelationships of mathematical precursors in kindergarten. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(4), 713-733.
Clariana, R. B. (1990). A comparison of answer until correct feedback and knowledge of correct response feedback under two conditions of contextualization. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(4), 125-129.
Clariana, R. B., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1991). The effects of different feedback strategies using computer-administered multiple-choice questions as instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 5-17.
Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Roher Murphy, L. C. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 5-22.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer- basedtutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of ACMCHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 245-252). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning.
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43(1), 1-29.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 83-120.
De Smedt, B., & Boets, B. (2010). Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: evidence from developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 3973-3981.
DiBattista, D., Mitterer, J., & Gosse, L. (2004). Acceptance by undergraduates of the immediate feedback assessment technique for multiple‐choice testing. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(1), 17-28.
DiBattista, D. (2005). The immediate feedback assessment technique: A learner-centered multiple-choice response form. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 111.
DiBattista, D., & Gosse, L. (2006). Test anxiety and the immediate feedback assessment technique. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(4), 311-328.
DiBattista, D., Gosse, L., Sinnige-Egger, J. A., Candale, B., & Sargeson, K. (2009). Grading scheme, test difficulty, and the immediate feedback assessment technique. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 311-338.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(6), 1246-1256.
Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 207-231.
Doucouliagos, H., Stanley, T. D., & Viscusi, W. K. (2014). Publication selection and the income elasticity of the value of a statistical life. Journal of Health Economics, 33, 67-75.
Elashoff, J. D. (1969). Analysis of covariance: A delicate instrument. American Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 383-401.
Epstein, M. L., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2001). Immediate feedback during academic testing. Psychological Reports, 88(3), 889-894.
Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2002). Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187- 201.
Epstein, M. L., Brosvic, G. M., Costner, K. L., Dihoff, R. E., & Lazarus, A. D. (2003). Effectiveness of feedback during the testing of preschool children, elementary school children, and adolescents with developmental delays. The Psychological Record, 53(2), 177-195.
Epstein Enterprises (2017). Immediate feedback assessment technique. Retieved June 20, 2017 from: http://www.epsteineducation.com/home/demo/demo1.htm.
Farland, M. Z., Barlow, P. B., Levi Lancaster, T., & Franks, A. S. (2015). Comparison of answer-until-correct and full-credit assessments in a team-based learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(2), 21.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2010). Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction. Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 951-961.
Finn, B., Thomas, R., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning. Learning and Instruction, 54, 104-113.
Fitch, E. F., & Hulgin, K. M. (2008). Achieving inclusion through CLAD: collaborative learning assessment through dialogue. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(4), 423-439.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. Ninth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Friso-van den Bos, I., van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 10, 29-44.
Geary, D. C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem-solving differences and cognitive deficits. Handbook of learning disabilities, 199-212.
Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 981-986.
Gomer, B., Jiang, G., & Yuan, K.-H. (2019). New effect size measures for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 371-389.
Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2012). Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge
Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis, (Vol. 6th). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hardy, R. J., & Thompson, S. G. (1996). A likelihood approach to meta‐analysis with random effects. Statistics in Medicine, 15(6), 619-629.
Hanna, G. S., & Long Jr, C. A. (1979). Effect of answer until correct testing on reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(2), 464-466.
Hassard, J. (2004). Jerome bruner and discovery learning. Retrieved from Georgia State University website: http://scied.gsu.edu/Hassard/mos/2.7.html
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York, NY :Taylor & Francis.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 411-422
Heald, H.M. (1970). The effects of immediate knowledge of results and correlation of errors and test anxiety upon test performance. Dissertation Abstract international, 31, 1621A. (University Microfilms No. 70-17, 724).
Higgins, J., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558.
Ji, X. (2016). A Primer on the Johnson-Neyman Technique: An Alternative Procedure to ANCOVA. General Linear Modeling Journal, 42(1), 25-31.
Jones, D. D. (2004). The use of feedback in web-based instruction: achievement, feedback study time, and efficiency. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first‐grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36-46.
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82-88.
Kaminski, E. (1997). Teacher education students’ number sense: Initial explorations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(2), 225-235.
Kehrer, P., Kelly, K. & Heffernan, N. (2013). Does immediate feedback while doing homework improve learning. in Boonthum-Denecke, Youngblood(Eds). Proceedings of the twenty-sixth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2013, St. Pete Beach, Florida. May 22-24, 2013. AAAI Press. p 542-545.
Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items.Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24.
Kluger, A. N., & Denisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Kulhavy, R. W., Yekovich, F. R., & Dyer, J. W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 522-528.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279–308.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
Li, M., N. (2015). Theory and practice of classical Meta-analysis: ESS & Excel. Taipei, Taiwan: Wunan.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marsh, E. J., Lozito, J. P., Umanath, S., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2012). Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test. Memory, 20(6), 645-653.
Maurer, T. W., & Kropp, J. J. (2015). The impact of the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique on course evaluations. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 3(1), 31-46.
McIntosh, A., Reys, B. J., & Reys, R. E. (1992). A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 2-8.
Merrel, J. D., Cirillo, P. F., Schwartz, P.M. & Webb, J. A. (2015). Multiple choice testing using immediate feedback – assessment technique (IF AT®) forms: assessing learning from mistakes. Higher Education Studies, 5(5), 50-55.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2005). Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science.
Mitkov, R., Le An, H., & Karamanis, N. (2006). A computer-aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items. Natural Language Engineering, 12(2), 177-194.
Mohamed, M., & Johnny, J. (2010). Investigating Number Sense Among Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 8(Supplement C), 317-324
Mohrweis, L. C., & Shinham, K. M. (2015). Enhancing Students' Learning: Instant Feedback Cards. American Journal of Business Education (Online), 8(1).
Moran, D. J., & Mallot, R.W.(2004). Evidence-based eucational methods: Advances from behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Casey, J. (1995).The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(1), 32-50.
Murphy, P. (2007). Reading comprehension exercises online: The effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 107-129.
Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi–media learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, and R. Brünken (Eds),Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Münster: Waxmann.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nesher, P. (1986). Learning mathematics: A cognitive perspective. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1114-1122.
O’Neil, M., Rasor, R. A., & Bartz, W. R. (1976). Immediate retention of objective test answers as a function of feedback complexity. Journal of Educational Research, 70, 72–75.
Olson, G. H. (1971). A mutivariate examination of the effects of behavioral objectives, knowledge of results and assingment of grades on facilitation of classroom learning. Dissertation Abstract International, 32, 6214A. (University Microfilms, No.72-13 552).
Otoyo, Lucia, & Bush, Martin. (2018). Addressing the Shortcomings of Traditional Multiple-Choice Tests: Subset Selection Without Mark Deductions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 23(18), 1-9.
Peck, S. D., Werner, J. L. S., & Raleigh, D. M. (2013). Improved class preparation and learning through immediate feedback in group testing for undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(6), 400-404.
Persky, A. M., & Pollack, G. M. (2008). Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(4), Article 83.
Peters, S. U. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of collaborative assessment preparation with immediate feedback in an intensive adult English as a second language classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Florida State University, Florida, USA.
Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. (Trans by S. Wedgwood). Oxford, England: Harvard U Press.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227.
Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores-and teaches. School and Society, 23(586), 373-376.
Pridemore, D. R., & Klein, J. D. (1991). Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 27-32.
Prieto, G., Velasco, A. D., Arias-Barahona, R., Anido, M., Núnez, A. M., & Có, P. (2010). Training of Spatial Visualization Using Computer Exercises. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 14(1), 105-115.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J. A., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 88, 87–100.
Raudenbush, S. W., Becker, B. J., & Kalaian, H. (1988). Modeling multivariate effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 111-120.
Razagifard, P., Ghabelnezam, A., & Fard, V. R. (2011) The effect of computer-mediated feedback on second language reading comprehension. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(1), 70-77.
Resnick, L. B. (1989). Defining, assessing and teaching number sense. In Establishing Foundations for Research on Number Sense and Related Topics: Report of a Conference (pp. 35-39).
Robinson, D. H., Sweet, M. S., & Mayrath, M. (2008). A computer-based, team-based testing system. In D. H. Robinson and G. Schraw (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction: Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp.277-290). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Robinson, C. S., Menchetti, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Toward a Two‐Factor Theory of One Type of Mathematics Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 81-89.
Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Computerized task‐based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 192-216.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11(6), 446-453.
Samuels, S. J., & Wu, Y. (2003). The effects of immediate feedback on reading achievement. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://www.tc.umn.edu/~samue001/web pdf/immediate _feedback.pdf.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162-173.
Schneider, J. L; Hein, S. M.; Murphy, K. L. (2014). Immediate answer-until-correct feedback in chemistry testing. Biennial Conference on Chemical Education. Retrieved April 11, 2016 from the World Wide Web: http://www.enfusestem.org/ wpcontent/ uploads/2016/04/2016NSF-Symposium-Poster-2016_04_11.pdf&embedded=true.
Scott, P., Asoko, H. and Leach, J., Students Conceptions and Conceptual Learning in Science. In S. K. Abell and N. G Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on research of science education (p. 31-56). New York: Routledge. 2007.
Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback.Research report. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. Retrieved Jun 15, 2016 from:http://www.ets.org.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games and Instruction, 55(2), 503-524.
Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-250.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
Slepkov, A. D. (2013). Integrated testlets and the immediate feedback assessment technique. American Journal of Physics, 81(10), 782-791.
Slepkov, A. D., Vreugdenhil, A. J., & Shiell, R. C. (2016). Score increase and partial-credit validity when administering multiple-choice tests using an answer-until-correct format. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1839-1846.
Smiley, W. F. (2011). A systematic evaluation of the immediate eedback Assessment Technique. (Unpublished master thesis). James Madison university, Virginia, USA.
Sowder, J. T. (1992). Make sense of numbers in school mathematics. In Gaca Leinhardt, Ralph Putman, and Rosemary, A. Hattrup (Eds.). Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 1-51). Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Abrams, K. R., & Myles, J. P. (2004). Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation (Vol. 13). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Stanley, T. D. (2008). Meta-regression methods for publication selection bias: Simulations and Heckman regression. Bulletin of Economic and Meta-Analysis, 70, 103-127.
Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60-78.
Sterne, J. A., Becker, B. J., & Egger, M. (2006). The Funnel Plot. In H. R. Rothstein , A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp.75-98). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Schwartz, F., & White, K. (2000). Making sense of it all: Giving and getting online course feedback. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies, and techniques for the virtual classroom (pp. 57–72). Boston:Allynand Bacon.
Sweet, M., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2012). Team-Based Learning in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Group Work that Works to Generate Critical Thinking and Engagement. Virginia, USA: Stylus.
Thompson, L. G. (1975). A study of the effect of an answer-until-correct multiple-choice procedure on mathematics achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon state university, Oregon, USA.
Thompson, T. (1998). Metamemory accuracy: Effects of feedback and the stability ofindividual differences. American Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 33–42.
Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Century psychology series. Human learning. New York, NY: The Century.
Torgensen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7-26
Valdez, A. (2012). Computer-based feedback and goal intervention: learning effects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 769-784.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning 　　　　　　 Outcomes:A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475-511。
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K–12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 5-24.
Warrington, M. A., & Kamii, C. (1998). Multiplication with Fractions: A Piagetian, Constructivist Approach. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 339-43.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). The semiotic mediation of mental life: L. S. Vygotsky and M. M. Bakhtin. In E. Mertz & R. J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives (pp. 49-71). Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
Yang, D. C. (2003). Teaching and learning number sense–an intervention study of fifth grade students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 115-134.
Yang, D. C. (2005). Number sense strategies used by 6th‐grade students in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31(3), 317-333.
Yang, D.C. (2015). Teaching and learning of number sense in Taiwan. In B. Sririman, J. F. Cai, K. H. Lee, L.Fan, Y. Shimizu, C. S. Lim, K. Subramaniam (Ed.), The First Sourcebook on Asian Research in Mathematics Education: China, Korea, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia and India. Charlotte NC:Information Age.
Yang, D. C., Li, M. N., & Lin, C. I. (2008). A study of the performance of 5th graders in number sense and its relationship to achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 789-807.
Li. M. N. & Yang, D. C. (2010). Development and validation of a computer- administered number sense scale for 5th-grade children in Taiwan. School Science and Mathematics, 110(4), 220-230. (NSC-97-2511-S-415-010-MY3).
Yang, D. C., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2009). Number sense strategies used by pre-service teachers in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 383-403.
Yang, D. C., & Tsai, Y. F. (2010). Promoting Sixth Graders' Number Sense and Learning Attitudes via Technology-based Environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 112-125.