:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由認知負荷觀點探討國中代數試題難度
書刊名:教育研究學報
作者:侯志偉洪碧霞林素微 引用關係
作者(外文):Hou, Chih-weiHung, Pi-hsiaLin, Su-wei
出版日期:2019
卷期:53:1
頁次:頁45-69
主題關鍵詞:代數測驗認知成分試題難度參數迴歸分析Algebra testCognitive componentParameter of test difficultyRegression analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究從認知負荷的觀點,分析認知成分對於國中代數試題難度的解釋力。研究蒐集近十年國中基測與教育會考數學代數測驗試題共 65 題,對九年級 982 名學生施測。並以數的種類、表徵轉化、運算複雜度與方程式資訊等四項認知成分,實徵檢視認知成分編碼的適用性。測驗結果採用 Rasch 模式進行難度參數校準,以多元迴歸進行認知成分編碼對試題難度參數的預測分析。結果顯示表徵轉化、運算複雜度、方程式資訊對試題難度參數的解釋量約為 82%。整體而言,本研究所提出代數認知成分,初步試用對於試題的難度呈現合理解釋,可作為試題發展者及教師在代數測驗和教學之設計基礎,以及學生學習補充教材的規劃。
This study analyzes the explanatory power of cognitive components for the difficulty of national algebra test items. According to four cognitive components including the type of number, representation transformation, computational complexity, and equation information, a total of 65 algebra test items were drawn from the Basic Competence Test and the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students administered in Taiwan over the past ten years. A total of 982 students in the ninth grade were tested. The Rasch model is used to adjust the difficulty parameters, and the multivariate regression is used to predict and analyze the difficulty parameters of the test components. The results show that representation transformation, computational complexity, and equation information explain the difficulty parameter of the test items by about 82%. The initial trial indicates that the proposed algebraic cognitive components provide a reasonable explanation for the difficulty of the test items. Researchers and teachers can apply these components as the basis for algebra teaching and the testing design and planning for the supplementary algebra learning materials.
期刊論文
1.洪碧霞、蕭嘉偉、楊佩馨(20081200)。從認知負荷觀點分析國小二至四年級數與計算成就測驗。教育研究與發展期刊,4(4),151-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, Y. H.、MacDonald, G.、Leu, Y. C.(2011)。Validating cognitive sources of mathematics item difficulty: Application of the LLTM to fraction conceptual items。The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment,7(2),74-93。  new window
3.Embretson, S. E.、Daniel, R. C.(2008)。Understanding and quantifying cognitive complexity level in mathematical problem solving items。Psychology Science Quarterly,50(3),328-344。  new window
4.陳嘉皇(20071200)。國小三年級學童代數推理教學與解題表現研究。高雄師大學報. 自然科學與科技類,23,125-150。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐偉民、曾于珏(20130800)。臺灣、芬蘭、新加坡國小數學教科書代數教材之比較。教科書研究,6(2),69-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hung, Pi-Hsia、Hwang, Gwo-Jen、Lee, Yueh-Hsun、Su, I-Hsiang(2012)。A cognitive component analysis approach for developing game-based spatial learning tools。Computers & Education,59(2),762-773。  new window
7.陳嘉皇、梁淑坤(20140600)。表徵與國小學生代數思考之初探性研究。教育研究集刊,60(2),1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林曉芳、余民寧(20011200)。國中生在數學代數概念學習之評量研究--以二元一次方程式為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),303-326。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.劉家樟、楊凱琳、許慧玉(20120600)。小六學生不同代數表徵的解題表現、教師布題順序與代數教學信念之研究。當代教育研究,20(2),93-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.宋曜廷、周業太、曾芬蘭(20140300)。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊,59(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.孫慧茹、洪碧霞(20130400)。國民小學代數動態評量的發展與應用。數位學習科技期刊,5(2),59-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳彥廷、柳賢(20090600)。運用提問方法促進中學生對代數式中文字符號語意理解之研究:提問模型建構。科學教育學刊,17(3),203-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蘇義翔、洪碧霞(20150600)。基於認知成分之代數推理測驗自動化命題模式之發展。人文社會學報.國立臺灣科技大學,11(2),133-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Lesh, R.(1981)。Applied mathematical problem solving。Educational Studies in Mathematics,12(2),235-264。  new window
15.洪碧霞、蕭嘉偉、林素微(20100100)。PISA數學素養認知成份分析對補救教學的意涵。課程與教學,13(1),47-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.洪碧霞、林素微、林娟如(20061200)。認知複雜度分析架構對TASA-MAT六年級線上測驗試題難度的解釋力。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),69-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳仁輝、楊德清(20100200)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊,18(1),43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.郭汾派、林光賢、林福來(1989)。國中生文字符號概念的發展 (計畫編號:NSC77-0111-S004-001-A)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.顏錦偉(2016)。不同程度國中生代數解題之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
2.Collis, K. F.、University of Newcastle(1975)。The development of formal reasoning。Newcastle, N.S.W.:University of Newcastle。  new window
單篇論文
1.Cirino, P. T.,Tolar, T. D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2013)。Arithmetic and cognitive contributions to algebra,Evanston, IL:Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness。,https://search.proquest.com/docview/1773213671?accountid=-14224。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bejar, I. I.(2013)。Item Generation: Implications for a Validity Argument。Automatic Item Generation: Theory and Practice。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.Janssen, R.(2010)。Modeling the effect of item designs within the Rasch model。Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in modelbased approaches。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE