臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從環境正義觀點探討曾文水庫越域引水工程計畫
書刊名：臺灣政治學刊
作者：范玫芳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fan, Mei-fang
出版日期：2012
卷期：16:2
頁次：頁117-173
主題關鍵詞：環境正義；越域引水；水資源開發；環境風險；公民參與；Environmental justice；Water resource development；Trans-basin water diversion；Environmental risks；Public participation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:76
本研究從環境正義觀點檢視曾文水庫越域引水工程計畫，探究水資源利益與環境風險分配的不公平、缺乏差異肯認與居民被排除 在決策程序之間的交織影響。個案呈現不同專業社群之間多元的知識宣稱、在地知識與專家知識之間的衝突。官方將越域引水工程框架為南部區域供水與經濟發展議題，地方團體則質疑工程所牽涉龐大的土石利益、專家在水資源開發思維之侷限性，以及地方原住民不成比例地承擔環境風險。引水工程同時凸顯缺乏對「人」與「地方」適切肯認的問題。原住民部落所具特殊象徵意義與無形的文化資產被排除在環評報告之外，且決策過程欠缺充分告知同意和實質參與。越域引水工程具有高度爭議性與不確定性，對生態所造成的影響具有難以預測性與不可回復性，無法僅仰賴專家與技術官僚，必須肯認文化與地方差異並納入常民知識於知識生產與決策過程。本文主張水資源政策規劃應即早擴大社會參與並納入公眾審議的精神，透過跨文化與跨學科領域間持續的對話尋求共識，以及公民社會行動聯盟帶來轉變。
This paper aims to examine the Tseng-Wen Reservoir Trans-basin Water Diversion Project from the perspective of environmental justice, and to explore the disputes on the distribution of interests and environmental risks of the project, and the policy implications of local action. It reveals the multiple perspectives of stakeholders on the project, the various knowledge claims among experts of different disciplines, and conflicts between local knowledge and the experts. The authorities have framed the project as either a water supply effectiveness issue or an economic development issue. However, environmental groups fear that the project involves extensive self-interest and bribery, consider the experts’ thinking on water resource development to be limited, and are of the opinion that local aboriginal tribes suffer disproportionate environmental risks. It highlights the problem of a lack of recognition of people and place. The tribes’ unique cultural meanings, invisible cultural assets, and their integrated relationship with nature are excluded from the EIA report, which lacks fully informed consent or substantial participation from local residents in the decisionmaking process. The project involves scientific controversy as well as unpredictable and irreversible impacts on the environment which cannot rely upon experts and technocracy only. It needs to recognize local particularities, and lay knowledge needs to be included in knowledge production and policy-making. This paper argues for the need for early involvement and public deliberation on water resource planning, for consensus seeking through continuous intercultural and interdisciplinary dialogue, and for alliance building to bring transformation.
期刊論文
1.李永展(20060600)。環境正義與生物多樣性的共生策略--達娜伊谷案例分析。建築與規劃學報，7(1)，19-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Braun, K.、Kropp, C.(2010)。Beyond Speaking Truth? Institutional Responses to Uncertainty in Scientific Governance.。Science, Technology & Human Values，35(6)，371-382。  new window
3.Fan, M.F.(2006)。Environmental Justice and Nuclear Waste Conflictsin Taiwan。Environmental Politics，15(3)，417-434。  new window
4.Fan, M.F.(2006)。Nuclear Waste Facilities on Tribal Land: The Yami’s Struggles for Environmental Justice。Local Environment，11(4)，433-444。  new window
5.Honneth, A.(1992)。Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition。Political Theory，20(2)，187-201。  new window
6.Hunold, C.、Young I.(1998)。Justice, Democracy and Hazardoussiting。Political Studies，46，82-95。  new window
7.Ishiyama, N.(2003)。Environmental Justice and American Indiantribal sovereignty: Case study of a land-use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah。Antipode，35，119-39。  new window
8.Kurtz, H. E.(2007)。Gender and environmental justice in Louisiana: Blurring the boundaries of public and private spheres。Gender Place and Culture，14(4)，409-26。  new window
9.Simmons, P.、Walker, G.(2005)。Stigma happens – social problemsin the siting of nuclear waste facilities。Risk Analysis，14，773-777。  new window
10.Walker, G.(2010)。Environmental justice, impact assessment and the politics of knowledge: The implications of assessing the social distribution of environmental outcomes。Environmental Impact Assessment Review，30(5)，312-318。  new window
11.Schlosberg, David(2004)。Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories。Environmental Politics，13(3)，517-540。  new window
12.李永展、何紀芳(19991200)。環境正義與鄰避設施選址之探討。規劃學報，26，91-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃之棟、黃瑞祺(20091200)。正義的繼受：我們與美國人講的到底是不是同樣的「環境正義」？。國家發展研究，9(1)，85-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Been, Vicki(1994)。Locally Undesirable Land Uses in Minority Neighborhoods: Disproportionate Siting or Market Dynamics?。The Yale Law Journal，103(6)，1383-1422。  new window
15.紀駿傑、王俊秀(19980700)。環境正義：原住民與國家公園衝突的分析。山海文化雙月刊，19，86-104。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.丁澈士(2006)。曾文水庫越域引水可替代方案。曾文水庫越域引水研討會與談，高雄縣政府 。高雄縣：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
2.李根政(2006)。從生態環境看曾文水庫越域引水。曾文水庫越域引水研討會，高雄縣政府 。高雄縣：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
3.林連山(2006)。從水資源供需運用看曾文水庫越域引水。曾文水庫越域引水研討會與談，高雄縣政府 。高雄縣：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
4.魯台營(2006)。從水資源供需運用看曾文水庫越域引水。曾文水庫越域引水研討會，高雄縣政府 。高雄縣：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴建信(2006)。曾文水庫越域引水計畫簡報。曾文水庫越域引水研討會，高雄縣政府 。高雄縣：高雄縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李卓翰(1998)。自然資源開發與環境正義的衝突分析--以和平水泥專業區的開發為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉名森(2002)。環境正義檢視鄰避設施選址決策之探討--以桃園縣南區焚化廠設置抗爭為例(碩士論文)。台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bryner, G.C.(2002)。Assessing Claims of Environmental Justice:Conceptual Frameworks。Justice and Natural Resources: Concepts, Strategies, and Applications。Washington, DC：Island Press。  new window
2.Holifield, R.(2010)。Actor-network Theory as a Critical Approach to Environmental Justice: A Case Against Synthesis with Urban Political Ecology。Spaces of Environmental Justice。Oxford, UK：Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
3.Walker, G.(2010)。Beyond distribution and proximity: exploring themultiple spatialities of environmental justice。Spaces of Environmental Justice。Oxford, UK：Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
4.Wenz, P.(1988)。Environmental Justice。New York, NY：State University of New York。  new window
5.Wigley, D.、Shrader-Frechette, K(1995)。Consent, Equity, and Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case Study。Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice。Lanham, MD：Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
6.Yeh, F. C.(2010)。Challenges and Constrains of Practice of SIA: Experiences form Austrian and Hong Kong。Workshop on Social Impact Assessment and Social Development。Taipei：National Taiwan University。  new window
7.Young, I.(1990)。Justice and the Politics of Difference。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University。  new window
8.Zerner, C.(2000)。People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation.。New York, NY：Columbia University。  new window
9.Dobson, Andrew(1998)。Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Cole, J. W.、Foster, S. R.(2001)。From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement。New York, NY：New York University Press。  new window
11.Low, Nicholas、Gleeson, Brendan(1998)。Justice, Society and Nature: An Exploration of Political Ecology。Routledge。  new window
12.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、Miller, A. V.(1977)。Phenomenology of Spirit。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Honneth, A.、Anderson, Joel(1995)。The Struggle for Recognition: the Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
14.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston：Beacon Press。  new window
15.Schlosberg, David(2007)。Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Fraser, Nancy(1997)。Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the 'Postsocialist' Condition。Routledge。  new window
其他
1.中央社(2004)。反對曾文水庫越域引水　布農族人赴經濟部抗議，http://www.abohome.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105:recordsrecord04-105&catid=35:record04&Itemid=234， 20110410。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央社(2010)。小林滅村關鍵110秒：地質脆弱是元凶，http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/WebNews_Detail.aspx?Type=FirstNews&ID=201004140050， 20100414。  延伸查詢new window
3.中央社(2009)。反對曾文水庫越域引水　黃金山請縣府歸納民意，http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/WebNews_Detail.aspx?Type=FirstNews&ID=201004140050， 20100414。  延伸查詢new window
4.台灣立報(2009)。百變金鋼之曾文水庫越域引水計畫，http://www.coolloud.org.tw/， 20090427。  延伸查詢new window
5.林益仁(20090425)。「家」與「屋」的差別：對慈濟「永久屋」思維的衷心建議。  延伸查詢new window
6.苦勞網(2000)。為什麼以犧牲原住民為代價？談「荖濃溪越域引水」，http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/44535， 20000728。  延伸查詢new window
7.經濟部水資源局(2002)。台灣地區水資源開發綱領計畫政策評估說明書，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
8.經濟部水資源局(2003)。曾文水庫越域引水計畫環評影響評估報告書，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
9.經濟部水資源局(2008)。曾文水庫越域引水下游輸水工程環境影響差異分析暨環境現況差異分析及對策檢討報告，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
10.經濟部水資源局(2009)。曾文水庫越域引水計畫環評影響差異分析報告，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
11.經濟部水資源局(2010)。曾文水庫越域水計劃環境影響評估報告書第二次變更內容對照表，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
12.經濟部水資源局(2010)。曾文水庫越域水計劃環境影響評估報告書第三次變更內容對照表，台北：經濟部水資源局。  延伸查詢new window
13.聯合報。環保人士質疑　水利署喊冤：小林滅村都怪越域引水？，http://twgeoref.moeacgs. gov.tw/storage/2009%5C20091021/0001.doc， 20090818。  延伸查詢new window
14.蕭戎(2009)。對八八水災背後的生態觀點的一些思考，http://www.eco.pu.edu.tw/per/news.php?Sn=287， 20110111。  延伸查詢new window
15.環境資訊中心網站(2004)。環境日前夕　保育團體公佈十大不永續建設與施政政策，http://e-info.org.tw/news/taiwan/2004/ta04060401.htm， 20041015。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fraser, N.(1999)。Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation。Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn。London, UK：Sage。  new window
2.Schlosberg, D.(2003)。The Justice of Environmental Justice: Reconciling Equity, Recognition, and Participation in a Political Movement。Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice。Cambridge, MS：MIT。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1300（臺灣：1287，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67778363
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上