:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「中學生領導表現觀察量表」之編製
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:鄭聖敏
作者(外文):Cheng, Sheng-min
出版日期:2013
卷期:60:2
頁次:頁369-396
主題關鍵詞:人際能力家長版領導表現觀察量表教師版領導表現觀察量表概念能力領導Conceptual abilitiesInterpersonal abilitiesLeadershipParent version of the observational scales for leadershipTeacher version of the observational scales for leadership
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:25
本研究之目的在編製可供國中教師及學生家長從不同情境脈絡來評估學生領導表現的「中學生領導表現觀察量表」。首先,根據相關文獻擬訂量表架構及試題,並經專家審查及國中教師、學生家長試答,發展預試量表。其次,透過219名國中學生之班級導師及家長建立預試資料,進行教師版與家長版量表之項目分析及探索性因素分析,再以大臺北地區284名國中學生為觀察對象,以結構方程模式進行教師版及家長版「中學生領導表現觀察量表」測量模式之適配度考驗。結果顯示,教師版和家長版「中學生領導表現觀察量表」各含15道題目,包括四個因素,可形成「概念能力」和「人際能力」二個向度分數,且量表模式具良好的適配度。教師版全量表Cronbach’s α係數為.938,「概念能力」向度為.941、「人際能力」向度為.888,其餘因素為.846~.924。家長版全量表Cronbach’s α係數為.879,「概念能力」向度為.813、「人際能力」向度為.823,其餘因素為.602~.819。本研究亦發現,教師與家長的觀察有助於了解學生更多元、豐富的領導表現。最後,根據研究結果,研究者對學生領導評量及未來研究提出相關建議。
The purposes of this study were to develop teacher and parent versions of observational scales to assess leadership for junior high school students in different contexts.After literature reviewed and experts consulted, the initial scales were developed and field-tested by 219 eighth grade students' teachers and their parent. Items analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used respectively to establish the measurement models of the two versions of the observational scales for leadership of junior high school students. Then, the follow-up study used the confirmatory factor analysis to test the measurement models' goodness of fit. There were 284 eighth grade students' teachers and their parent participated in this study in Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area.The results showed: (1) the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the measurement models of the two observational scales fitted the observed data; (2) both the teacher version and parent version of the observational scales composed of four factors, 15 items, which could be divided into two dimensions-conceptual abilities and interpersonal abilities; (3) the coefficients of internal consistency of total scale, two dimensions, and four factors were .846- .941 for teacher version, and .602- .879 for parent version of the observational scales. The study also found that the observation of teachers and parent in different contexts provided more information about students' leadership.Furthermore, some suggestions for students' leadership assessment and future research were provided.
期刊論文
1.鄭聖敏、王振德(20080700)。中學生領導才能內涵建構之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,33(2),85-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Karnes, F. A.(1996)。Leadership and the gifted。Focus on Exceptional Children,29(1),1-12。  new window
3.Oakland, T.、Falkenberg, B. A.、Oakland, C.(1996)。Assessment of leadership in children, youth and adults。Gifted Child Quarterly,40(3),138-147。  new window
4.Shaunessy, E.、Karnes, F. A.(2004)。Instruments for measuring leadership in children and youth。Gifted Child Today,27(1),42-47。  new window
5.Stephens, K.、Kames, F. A.(2000)。State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited。Exceptional Children,66,219-238。  new window
6.Zaccaro, S. J.、Mumford, M. D.、Connelly, M. S.、Marks, M. A.、Gilbert, J. A.(2000)。Assessment of leader problem-solving capabilities。Leadership Quarterly,11(1),37-64。  new window
研究報告
1.Council for Exceptional Children(1990)。Giftedness and Gifted: What's it All About?。Reston, VA:ERIC Clearinghouse for Handicapped and Gifted Children。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭聖敏(2006)。中學生領導才能內涵建構及相關因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王振德(2005)。領導技能問卷。心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2009)。教育部補助直轄市及縣(市)政府辦理資優教育方案作業原則。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳政見(2004)。領導才能性向測驗:指導手冊。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Clark, K. E.、Clark, M. B.(1990)。Measures of leadership。West Orange, NJ:Leadership Library of America。  new window
5.Ellis, J. L.(1990)。Leadership strengths indicator: A self-report leadership analysis instrument for adolescents。Monroe, NY:Trillium Press。  new window
6.Karnes, F. A.(1990)。Leadership and youth: A commitment。Measures of leadership。West Orange, NJ:Leadership Library of America。  new window
7.Kouzes, J. M.、Posner, B. Z.(1998)。Student leadership practices inventory: Facilitator's guide。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Kroeck, K. G.、Lowe, K. B.、Brown, K. W.(2004)。The assessment of leadership。The nature of leadership。CA:Sage。  new window
9.Naglieri, J. A.(2004)。Traditional IQ: 100 years of misconception and its relationship to minority representation in gifted programs。Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students。Waco, TX:Prufrock Press。  new window
10.van Linden, J. A.、Fertman, C. I.(1998)。Youth leadership: A guide to understanding leadership development in adolescents。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
11.吳裕益(2009)。結構方程模式的理論與應用。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭靜姿、胡純、吳淑敏、蔡明富、蘇芳柳(2003)。特殊需求學生特質檢核表。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
13.Davis, G. A.、Rimm, S. B.(2004)。Education of the Gifted and Talented。Boston, MA:Pearson Education:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
14.李茂能(2009)。圖解Amos在學術研究之運用。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.余民寧(2008)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
16.Gardner, John W.(1990)。On Leadership。New York, NY:The Free Press。  new window
17.Bass, Bernard M.(1990)。Bass & stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications。New York:Free Press。  new window
18.吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用設計。臺北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Yukl, Gary A.(2006)。Leadership in Organizations。Prentice Hall。  new window
其他
1.教育部(1997)。特殊教育法。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2009)。特殊教育法。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2012)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準,http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law Class/ LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080065, 2012/07/07。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rice, F. P.、Dolgin, K. G.(2002)。Adolescents and their families。The adolescent: Development, relationships, and culture。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE