:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:重看不重用?!--從美國經驗論我國應用美術作品可著作性之判斷
書刊名:中正財經法學
作者:姚信安 引用關係
作者(外文):Yao, Hsin-an
出版日期:2015
卷期:10
頁次:頁107-166
主題關鍵詞:美術著作應用美術實用物品可著作性可分性法則觀念上之區別Work of artApplied artUseful articleCopyrightabilitySeparability doctrineConceptual separability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:16
期刊論文
1.張懿云(19960600)。德國與美國著作權法關於"應用美術著作"的保護--兼論我國之保護制度。輔仁法學,15,203-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丁靜玟(200305)。著作是否為大量生產與其是否屬美術著作及受保護無關。理律法律雜誌雙月刊,5,7。  延伸查詢new window
3.月旦法學雜誌編輯部(199902)。臺灣高等法院刑事判決/八十七年度上易字第二〇五六號。月旦法學雜誌,45,133-135。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳櫻琴(19911000)。美術著作之研究--兼論應用美術是否為美術著作。法學叢刊,144,81-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.謝銘洋(199908)。美術工藝品與新式樣之區別--評臺灣高等法院八十七年上易字第二〇五六號判決。月旦法學雜誌,51,188-194。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fischman Afori, Orit(2008)。Reconceptualizing Property in Designs。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,25,1018-1105。  new window
7.Afori, Orit Fischman(2010)。The Role of the Non-Functionality Requirement in Design Law。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal,20,847-850。  new window
8.Broaddus, Matthew C.(2009)。Designer Should Strive to Create "Useless" Products: Using the "Useful Article" Doctrine to Avoid Separability Analysis。S. Tex. L. Rev.,51,501-504。  new window
9.Denicola, Robert C.(1983)。Applied Art and Industrial Design: A Suggested Approach to Copyright in Useful Articles。Minnesota Law Review,67,707-710。  new window
10.Derenberg, Walter J.(1953)。Copyright No-Man Land: Fringe Rights in Literary and Artistic Property。Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society,35,627-646。  new window
11.Farley, Christine Haight(2005)。Judging Art。Tulane Law Review,79,805-858。  new window
12.Keyes, Barton R.(2008)。Alive and Well: The (Still) Ongoing Debate Surrounding Conceptual Separability in American Copyright Law。Ohio State Law Journal,69,109-115。  new window
13.Langs, Stephen(1998)。The Definitional Scope of an Intrinsic Utilitarian Function under the 1976 Copyright Act: One Man's Use Is Another Man's Art。Western New England Law Review,20,143-148。  new window
14.LoBello, Mark A.(1992)。The Dichotomy between Artistic Expression and Industrial Design: To Protect or not to Protect。Whittier Law Review,13,107-108。  new window
15.Moffat, Viva R.(2014)。The Copyright/Patent Boundary。University of Richmond Law Review,48,611-624。  new window
16.Monseau, Susanna(2012)。The Challenge of Protecting Industrial Design in a Global Economy。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,20,495-531。  new window
17.Perlmutter, Shira(1990)。Conceptual Separability and Copyright in the Designs of Useful Articles。Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,37,339-351。  new window
18.Pogue, Richard W.(1953)。Borderland: Where Copyright and Design Patent Meet。Michigan Law Review,52,33-53。  new window
19.Polakovic, Raymond M.(1993)。Should the Bauhaus Be in the Copyright Doghouse? Rethinking Conceptual Separability。University of Colorado Law Review,64,871-874。  new window
20.Reichman, J. H.(1983)。Design Protection in Domestic and Foreign Copyright Law: From the Berne Revision of 1948 to the Copyright Act of 1976。Duke Law Journal,32,1143-1146。  new window
21.Reichman, J. H.(1993)。Charting the Collapse of the Patent-Copyright Dichotomy: Premises for A Restructured International Intellectual Property System。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,13,475-482。  new window
22.Rogers, Nathan C.(1998)。Copyright Protection: A Dead Fish for Sculptors of Taxidermy Mannequins?。John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law,6,159-160。  new window
23.Scafldi, Susan(2010)。The Global Contours of IP Protection for Trade Dress, Industrial Design, Applied Art, and Product Configuration。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal,20,783-787。  new window
24.Setliff, Eric(2006)。Copyright and Industrial Design。Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,30,49-54。  new window
25.Simon, David A.(2011)。Culture, Creativity, & Copyright。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal,29,279-336。  new window
研究報告
1.王梅珍(199311)。應用美術著作權之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蕭雄淋(2010)。著作權法論。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部智慧財產局(2008)。著作權案例彙編--美術著作篇。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Copyright Office(1910)。Rules and Regulations for the Registration of Claims to Copyright。Washington, DC:G.P.O.。  new window
4.Nimmer, Melville B.、Nimmer, David(2007)。Nimmer On Copyright。Matthew Bender。  new window
5.Derclaye, Estelle、Leistner, Matthias(2011)。Intellectual Property Overlaps: A European Perspective。Hart Publishing。  new window
6.Goldstein, Paul(2013)。Goldstein On Copyright。Aspen。  new window
7.Joyce, Craig(2006)。Copyright Law。Matthew Bender。  new window
8.Leaffer, Marshall A.(2010)。Understanding Copyright Law。LexisNexis。  new window
9.Patry, William F.(1986)。Latman's The Copyright Law。Bna Books。  new window
10.SCHECHTER, ROGER E.、THOMAS, JOHN R.(2010)。PRINCIPLES OF Copyright Law。West Academic Publishing。  new window
11.Yen, Alfred C.、Liu, Joseph P.(2008)。Copyright Law: Essential Cases and Materials。Thomson West。  new window
12.羅明通(2009)。著作權法論。臺北:臺英國際商務法律事務所。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭成思(2009)。版權法。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.經濟部智慧財產局(2010)。歷年著作權法規彙編專輯。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.章忠信。中華民國智慧財產局於88年1月26日正式成立,http://www.copyrightnote.org/cmote/bbs.php?board=4&act=read&id=6, 2014/08/01。  延伸查詢new window
2.章忠信(20001013)。著作物所有權與著作財產權之區別,http://www.copyrightnote.org/ArticleContent.aspx?ID=1&aid=9。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴文智。企業法務著作權須知--什麼樣的作品會受到著作權法保護,http://www.is-law.com/post/4/1057, 2014/08/01。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cellini Salt Cellar,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellini_Salt_Cellar, 2014/08/01。  new window
5.WIPO(1978)。Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works,ftp://ftp.wipo.int/pub/library/ebooks/historical-ipbooks/GuideToTheBemeConventionForTheProtectionOfLiteraryAndArtisticWorksParisActl971.pdf, 2014/08/01。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE