:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同體育教學活動項目對國小兒童健康體適能之影響
書刊名:運動與遊憩研究
作者:陶怡萱章菀真劉榮華葉丁嘉
作者(外文):Tao, Yi-hsuanChang, Wan-chenLiu, Jung-huaYeh, Ting-chia
出版日期:2015
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁60-76
主題關鍵詞:一般體育教學跳繩教學排球教學體適能General physical teachingJump rope teachingVolleyball teachingPhysical fitness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:165
本研究目的旨在瞭解不同體育教學項目對國小學童體適能之差異。以高雄市樂群國小五年級學童為研究對象。經體適能檢測方式蒐集資料分析不同體育教學項目間差異情形。經描述性統計、相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Scheffe事後比較,所得結果如下:一、本研究不同體育教學課程有一般體育教學組、跳繩教學組、排球教學組。體適能檢測項目有:身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、立定跳遠、一分鐘屈膝仰臥起坐、800公尺跑走。二、國小學童體適能在不同體育教學項目之差異比較。(一)一般體育教學組對國小學童體適能身體質量指數達顯著差異;柔軟度、爆發力、肌耐力、心肺耐力前後測皆未達顯著差異。(二)跳繩教學組及排球教學組對國小學童體適能項目柔軟度、爆發力、肌耐力、心肺耐力前後測皆達顯著差異。三、不同體育教學項目對國小學童體適能差異之比較。(一)不同體育教學項目對國小學童體適能身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、立定跳遠、800公尺跑走前後測皆未達顯著差異。(二)不同體育教學項目對國小學童體適能一分鐘仰臥起坐,前後測達顯著差異。其中「跳繩教學組」優於「一般體育教學組」、「排球教學組」優於「一般體育教學組」。四、不同體育教學項目對國小男女學童體適能差異之比較。(一)不同體育教學項目對國小男女學童體適能身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、立定跳遠前後測皆達顯著差異。(二)不同體育教學項目對國小男女學童體適能一分鐘仰臥起坐、800公尺跑走前後測未達顯著差異。
This study aims is to understand the effect factor of different physical teaching activities on the physical fitness of elementary school children. Study on the fifth grader of Kaohsiung Le-Chyun Elementary School; analyze the difference of different physical teaching activities by physical fitness tests to collect data. By descriptive statistics, dependent sample t test, independent sample t test, mono factor ANOVA, Scheffe after comparisons, the results are as follows: 1. This study of different physical teaching curriculum included general physical teaching team, jump rope teaching team and volleyball teaching team. The physical fitness tests included body mass index, sit and reach, standing long jump, one minute sit-ups and 800 meter running. 2. The difference of different physical teaching activities to the physical fitness of elementary school children. (1) The date of body mass index of physical fitness of elementary school children is found obviously different tested by general physical teaching team, but the data of flexibility, power, muscular endurance, cardiovascular endurance has no significant difference. (2) The activities of physical fitness of elementary school children as flexibility, power, muscular endurance, cardiovascular endurance, the data founded is obviously different tested by jump rope teaching team and volleyball teaching team. 3. The difference comparisons of different physical teaching activities to the physical fitness of elementary school children. (1) The data of body mass index, sit and reach, standing long jump, 800 meter running is not obviously different tested by different physical teaching activities to the physical fitness of elementary school children. (2) The test data of one minute sit-ups of different physical teaching activities has obvious difference to the physical fitness of elementary school children, jump rope team is better than general teaching team; volleyball team is also better than general teaching team. 4. Compare the difference of different physical teaching activities to the physical fitness of elementary school boys and girls. (1) The test data of Body mass index, sit and reach and standing long jump of different physical teaching activities is obvious different to the physical fitness of elementary school boys and girls. (2)The test data of one minute sit-ups and 800 meter running of different physical teaching activities is not obvious different to the physical fitness of elementary school boys and girls.
期刊論文
1.方進隆(19981200)。體適能推展策略與未來研究方向。中華體育季刊,12(3)=47,70-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.紀嘉琪(2011)。跳繩運動介入體育課對國中學生體適能的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育運動大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳宏仁(2008)。十二週規律羽球運動對國小四至六年級男童體適能之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳明木(2006)。跳繩運動訓練對國小學童心肺適能及爆發力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳冠仲(2012)。十二週規律羽球課程對國小肥胖男童體適能之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳美吟(2013)。跳繩運動對國小學童體適能與身心健康狀態之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育運動大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李鳳珠(2011)。四十週跳繩運動介入對國小學童身體適能之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.周熙平(2008)。跳繩訓練對學童骨質密度及體適能的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉順正(2006)。跳繩運動訓練對體重過重學童體適能之影響(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.金車教育基金會(1998)。週六非常體健營--青少年體育休閒問卷調查報告。台北市:金車教育基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.李勝雄(2001)。體適能學-策略與應用。臺北:五南書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳俊忠(2002)。強健體魄,活力青春。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部體育司(1998)。台閩地區中小學學生體能檢測資料處理--常模研究。台北市:教育部體育司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳俊忠(1995)。挑戰極限--運動事件省思。臺北市:傅文文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際--健康體能評量。臺北市:漢文書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.教育部(2004)。健康體適能要素。2004 國小體適能教學手冊(教師專用)。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE