近年來以網際網路作為學習工具的學習者有明顯增加之趨勢，而開放式課程的崛起挾其免費使用的特性，更增添網路學習者的使用意願。然而綜觀現有之開放式課程網站，網站架構、學習資源與介面等內容與設計雖多元卻紛亂，目前尚未有一套針對開放式課程設計與規劃的評鑑標準，因此本研究之目的為建置一套能適切評鑑開放式課程網站之評鑑面向與指標。 為達成研究目的，本研究以相關文獻分析與研究為基礎，共計16名專家參與本研究，進行三回合德懷術專家問卷研究法，訂定開放式課程網站評鑑面向與指標。指標之定稿共有七面向與57項指標，研究者並統整專家對開放式課程網站評鑑各項指標之看法與意見。最後綜合研究結果後對現有之開放式課程網站提出建議。

OpenCourseWare (OCW), a set of free-of-use learning materials established by universities, became quite a success over the years and aroused the users’ willingness to learn online. However, the design of OCW websites, including the structure, organization of learning resources and interfaces is multi-variant and disordered. The system and arrangement are still lacking of an evaluation standard. The goal of this study is to establish and verify the dimensions and the criteria that are suitable for evaluation of OCW websites. To achieve the research goal, the researchers performed document analysis and the Delphi Method. Sixteen experts in a total took part in the Delphi panel. By giving three rounds of questionnaire to those experts in the self-developed e-Delphi system, the researcher gathered their opinions then analyzed them back and forth. The final edition of the Evaluation Dimensions and Criteria for OpenCourseWare Website includes seven dimensions with fifty-seven criteria. Finally, concrete suggestions for OCW website establishment and administration were provided. Implications and recommendations for future research were also addressed.