:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論臺灣醫師適用「勞動基準法」之挑戰與法制發展
書刊名:真理財經法學
作者:張婷 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Ting
出版日期:2015
卷期:14
頁次:頁51+53-78
主題關鍵詞:醫師勞動基準法工作時間職災責任制PhysicianLabor Standards ActWorking hoursOccupational accidentsLiability system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:18
本文探討醫師是否適用「勞動基準法」,以保障其就業之職場環境安全與提供病人高醫療品質,進而促進國民之健康。若醫師適用「勞動基準法」已達共識,對於醫師適用「勞動基準法」之法制發展,本文認為醫師與會計師、律師雖皆屬專業人員,但醫院與診所有整合醫療服務之考量,似無僅以受雇醫師或僅以西醫師納人「勞動基準法」之必要。此外,由於臨床醫師人力短缺,主治醫師與住院醫師之業務內容,尤其值班與否,區別性趨於模糊,階段性僅規範住院醫師之考量似可放寬至醫師全體。有鑒於臨床醫師人力短缺,針對「勞動基準法」第84-1條責任制之適用時機,究係採護理人員與會計師之二階段模式?或採律師之一階段模式?端視醫師、醫療機構、病人與主管機關之問是否針對醫師替代人力來源凝聚共識而定。觀察護理二階段模式經驗,歷經14年方才由「勞動基準法」第84-1條責任制修改為適用「勞動基準法」基本原則。醫師人力養成教育時問長,培育期更久,無論適用二階段模式或一階段模式,可預見由適用責任制到排除適用責任制之因應調適期恐會更長。故,關於專業分級以及醫師替代人力來源等議題之凝聚共識實在刻不容緩。
This article discusses whether physicians are applicable to the “Labor Standards Act” or not. Not only physicians’ employment workplace environmental safety is ensured, but also provides patients’ high quality of care and promotes people’s health. If the consensus is that physicians should be applied into the “Labor Standards Act”, in terms of legal development of applying physicians to the “Labor Standards Act”, this article considers that although physicians, accountants, and lawyers are all professionals, but hospitals and clinics are considered to be integrated into one medical service. Thus, it seems not necessary to apply only employed physicians or western physicians into the “Labor Standards Act”. Besides, due to clinical physician manpower shortage, the working contents between an attending physician and a resident physician especially on duty or not is getting vague. The stage consideration of applying only resident physicians might change to cover all physicians. Due to clinical physician manpower shortage, in terms of the applicable timing of the Article 84-1 of the “Labor Standards Act”, should physicians apply the two stages model applied to nurses and accountants or the one stage model applied to lawyers? This depends on whether there is consensus on alternative sources of physician manpower decided between physicians, medical institutions, patients, and the competent authorities. Observing experiences of the two stages model applied to nurses, it has taken 14 years from changing Article 84-1 the liability system of the “Labor Standards Act” to basic principles of the “Labor Standards Act”. It takes a long time to educate and train physician manpower. No matter the two stages model or the one stage model is applied, it is predictable that the adjustment period will take longer from applying to excluding the liability system. Therefore, the consensus building of professional classification and alternative sources of physician manpower seem unable to wait.
期刊論文
1.陳志金、林宏榮、莊銀清、邱仲慶(20090700)。拒絕疲勞醫師,維護病人安全--從平衡住院醫師工時談起。醫療品質雜誌,3(4),44-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.錢建文(2013)。健保審査與醫學倫理--向全國健保審査醫師進言。台灣醫界雜誌,56(7),34-35。  延伸查詢new window
3.張婷(20130600)。行政院版本醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法(草案)之評析與建議。醫事法學,20(1),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王淑華、張皓翔、張必正、張哲瑞(20140600)。醫療安全暨品質研討系列《62》--走進社區、走進厝邊--家庭責任醫師制度的落實。臺灣醫界,57(6),26-30。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳宛庭、朱學亭、王拔群、黃立德、劉榮茂、王言航、張瑋佳(20131200)。住院醫師交接班改善方案--結構化的電子交班系統。醫療資訊雜誌,22(5),23-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳政誠、林瑜雯、陳禹、唐進勝、陳富莉(20120700)。醫院醫師職場危害暴露現況之調查研究。中華職業醫學雜誌,19(3),125-134。  延伸查詢new window
7.李志宏、施肇榮(20110800)。實習醫師的實習年限。臺灣醫界,54(8),27-34。  延伸查詢new window
8.李蜚鴻(2012)。臺灣醫師到大陸行醫。健康世界,442,54。  延伸查詢new window
9.林倩伃(2011)。大陸醫療服務市場龐大臺灣醫界望眼欲穿。健康世界,428,66-68。  延伸查詢new window
10.林煜軒、張立人、郭博昭、楊靜修(2012)。您累了嗎?--從心身醫學的實證研究看醫師過勞現象。臺灣醫界,55(4),51-52。  延伸查詢new window
11.施至遠(2014)。論人計酬與家庭責任醫師。醫療品質雜誌,8(2),32-35。  延伸查詢new window
12.洪世明、錢慶文(20101200)。醫院獨立總額對醫師診療行為之影響:以國軍醫院為例。醫務管理期刊,11(4),265-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.唐莘嵐、鄭博文、簡瑞騰(20140600)。區域教學醫院的醫師過勞情形之探討。Medical Journal of South Taiwan,10(1),30-43。  延伸查詢new window
14.高明見(2012)。我國醫師考試制度沿革概況。臺灣醫界,55(5),38-49。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳文侯、龔佩珍、蔡文正、李亞欣、曾盈甄(20110400)。基層醫師對實施基層分科總額預算之意願及影響因素。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,30(2),150-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.章殷超、鍾國彪(20030900)。追求我國健保體制下可靠的醫療服務:由醫師與醫院專業課責之外國經驗看起。臺灣醫學,7(5),718-725。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃 濤、張慈桂、蕭正光、姚霞玲、李明亮(19980600)。全民健保對未來醫師來源在質與量上之影響。醫學教育,2(2),56-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.劉玲伶、王震宇(20050200)。主治醫師排班原則之探討。北市醫學雜誌,2(2),193-202。  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡宏斌(20121000)。看臺灣青壯年醫師過勞與重症人力短缺的現象。健康世界,322=442,32-34。  延伸查詢new window
20.戴正德(20060300)。醫師的社會責任。健康世界,243=363,53-56。  延伸查詢new window
21.周瑛琪、唐明順、黃瑜琛、張盈盈(20090600)。臺灣醫師人力供需平衡策略之研究。健康管理學刊,7(1),117-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.洪麗雯(20050300)。總額預算、薪資公平與薪資滿足對醫師工作態度之相關性影響與探討。人力資源管理學報,5(1),135-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.許玫玲、張維容、黃國哲(20050200)。論病例計酬制度下醫院薪資策略對醫師診療行為之影響:以某區域醫院為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(1),12-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張濱璿(201410)。臺灣醫療責任保險之制度規劃與市場需求。醫療法律研討會--醫療責任保險制度。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃苓嵐(2000)。醫學倫理教育由理論到實踐。新北:新文京開發出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中央社(20141117)。保障醫師勞權勞部:緩進處理,http://udn.com/NEWS/BREAKINGNEWS/BREAKINGNEWS1/9071053.shtml, 2014/11/23。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20141109)。住院醫師納勞基法勞動部有共識,http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT5/9053864.shtml, 2014/11/23。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛生福利部醫事司(20130915)。住院醫師納入勞動基準法之辦理進程,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/Ministry/DM2_P.aspx7f—list_no=7&fod_list _no=4213&doc_no=32610, 2014/11/23。  延伸查詢new window
4.勞動部(20141108)。勞動部:住院醫師之勞動條件應予法律保障,http://www.mol.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=24&articl e_id=8288, 2014/11/23。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部高等教育司(1088)。教育部針對學生工會團體訴求「認定兼任助理是僱傭關係」之回應說明,http://www.edu.tw/newsl/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=22918&Index=:&WID=c0746986-1231-4472-abce-5c5396450ba9, 2014/11/25。  延伸查詢new window
6.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education(2014)。Comparison Table-2003 v 2011,https://www.acgme.Org/acgmeweb/tabid/271/GraduateMedicalEducation/DutyHours.aspx, 20141/11/26。  new window
7.European Commission(2014)。Working Conditions-Working Time Directive,http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=706&langId=ren&intPageId=205, 2014/11/26。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE