最高法院長期以來以公序良俗為由，拒絕對猥褻性作品提供著作權保護。然而智慧財產法院以言論自由角度，說明承認猥褻性作品的著作權，乃是為了保障創作人之言論自由。從黑格爾哲學中所強調，權利存在目的係同時保障權利人，以及避免過度侵害他人自由之角度，本文主張即便以言論自由為著作權基礎，仍有可能存在不給予著作權保護之情形。並提議在最高法院尚未變更過去見解的前提下，於著作權領域中處理猥褻性作品是否享有著作權問題時，將公序良俗解為法律的統一性，並一併考量其他法規範的內容，或許有助於減少法規範的衝突。

For a long period, Supreme Court in Taiwan has adopted the ＂public order and moral＂ approach to refuse protection on obscene materials. Taiwan Intellectual Property Court, however, points out that in order to protection freedom of speech, obscene materials shall enjoy copyright. Base on the legal philosophy of Hegel, the purpose of right shall protect the holder of such while preventing excess interference of others' freedom. This article propose that even though freedom of speech is the foundation of copyright, situations that no copyright may still exist. This article further urges that unless the opinion of Supreme Court in Taiwan is changed, when dealing the question of whether obscenity shall enjoy protection under copyright, considering ＂public order and moral＂ as a tool in pursuing uniformity among regulations may reduce such conflicts.