臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：重探哈斯「新功能主義」及其在歐洲統合演進上的意涵
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：衛民 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wei, Min
出版日期：2016
卷期：55:1
頁次：頁69-90
主題關鍵詞：新功能主義；統合理論；外溢效果；新制度主義；實用建構主義；Neo-functionalism；Integration theory；Spillover effect；New institutionalism；Pragmatic constructivism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:153
  • 點閱點閱:37
「新功能主義」（Neo-Functionalism, NF）是研究區域統合（integration）最常被討論的論述之一，不過近年來新功能主義在內容上已有了很大的轉化：外溢效果（spill-overeffect）不再被視作統合的唯一自變項，而統合也只是「暫時」的依變項，不再是一項必定的結果。哈斯（Ernst Haas）在新世紀即對其近50年前所提之新功能主義提出評論，獲學界高度矚目，頗值關心此議題及關心兩岸發展的人士注意；本文藉助哈斯該文及各方對其論述所做的評論，重新對新功能主義的統合觀點進行探討，並兼敘其對兩岸統合所具之意涵。
Neo-functionalism（NF）is one of the most argumentative theories for dealing with issues of regional integration. Supporters of NF argue that when the spillover effectis created through the process of functional integration, separate entities can construct political systems compatible with each other. Nevertheless, NF, especially that proposed by Ernst Hass, has changed since it was contested by scholars and testified in the literature. Nowadays, it is not valid to argue that the spillover effect can create integration automatically. Neither is the spillover effect the only independent variable for integration, nor is integration a determinable dependent variable, but a temporary one, for spillover effect. Raising great attention recently, Hass's NF, as one of the most prominent integration theories in the past fifty years, is suitable for those concerned with cross-strait relations. This paper explores integration concepts by analyzing a paper proposed by Hass in 2004 and comments on Hass's works by other scholars.
期刊論文
1.Haas, Ernst B.(1976)。Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration。International Organization，30(2)，173-212。  new window
2.Rosamond, Ben(2005)。The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas。Journal of European Public Policy，12(2)，237-254。  new window
3.羅至美(20100900)。歐盟統合的多樣性路徑與對兩岸關係的政策意涵。問題與研究，49(3)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.翁松燃(20010300)。統合模式初探。新世紀智庫論壇，13，6-10。  延伸查詢new window
5.Schmitter, Philippe C.(1970)。A Revised Theory of Regional Integration。International Organization，24(4)，836-868。  new window
6.包宗和(2009)。一個超越歷史侷限的兩岸觀：迎向『擱置爭議，追求雙贏』的新路線。遠景季刊，42(8)，41-52。  延伸查詢new window
7.林碧炤(1987)。歐洲整合：理論與爭議。中山社會科學譯叢，2(2)，116。  延伸查詢new window
8.Corbey, Dorette(1995)。Dialectical Functionalism as a Booster of European Integration。International Organization，49(2)，709-719。  new window
9.Haas, Ernst B.、Schmitter, Philippe C.(1964)。Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America。International Organization，18(4)，705-737。  new window
10.Koeble, Thomas(1995)。The New Institutionalism in Political and Sociology。Comparative Politics，27(2)，231-243。  new window
11.黃偉峰(20010300)。歐盟整合模式與兩岸主權爭議之解析。歐美研究，31(1)，129-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Immergut, Ellen M.(1998)。The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism。Politics & Society，26(1)，5-34。  new window
13.Haas, Ernst Bernard(1961)。International Integration: The European and the Universal Process。International Organization，15(3)，366-392。  new window
圖書
1.Rosamond, Ben(2000)。Theories of European Integration。Macmillan Education Ltd.。  new window
2.Hodgson, Geoffrey M.(2004)。The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Lecours, André(2005)。New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis。University of Toronto Press。  new window
4.Haas, Ernst(1975)。The Obsolescence of regional Integration Theory。Berkley：Institute of International Studies。  new window
5.黃光國(2013)。社會科學的理路。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Keohane, Robert O.、Hoffmann, Stanley(1991)。The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change。Westview Press。  new window
7.Harrop, Jeffrey(2000)。The Political Economy of Integration in the European Union。Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.。  new window
8.張亞中(2011)。一中同表或一中各表：記兩岸統合學會與聯合報的辯論。臺北：生智。  延伸查詢new window
9.Holland, Martin(1992)。European Community Integration。London：Pinter。  new window
10.Jorgensen, Knud、Pollack, Mark、Rosamond, Ben(2006)。Handbook of European Union Politics。London：Sage Publication。  new window
11.McAllister, Richard(1997)。From EC to EU: A Historical and Political Survey。London：Routledge。  new window
12.McCormick, John(2002)。Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
13.Moravcsik, Andrew(1998)。The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。  new window
14.林碧炤(1990)。國際政治與外交政策。台北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Giddens, Anthony、李康、李猛(2002)。社會的構成。臺北縣：左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳新興(19950000)。整合理論與兩岸關係之研究。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張亞中(20000000)。兩岸統合論。臺北：生智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Haas, Ernst Bernard(1958)。The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957。Stanford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1991)。[The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis] Introduction。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.布赫迪厄(2009)。反思社會學的實踐（巴黎研討班）。布赫迪厄社會學面面觀。臺北：麥田。  延伸查詢new window
3.施正鋒(2003)。統合理論與臺灣。歐洲統合與臺灣。前衛。  延伸查詢new window
4.高朗(1999)。從整合理論探索兩岸整合的條件與困擾。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.華康德(2009)。邁向社會實踐理論--布赫迪厄社會學的結構和邏輯。布赫迪厄社會學面面觀。臺北：麥田。  延伸查詢new window
6.Castiglione, Dario、Schonlau, Justus(2006)。Constitutional Politics。Handbook of European Union Politics。London：Sage Publications。  new window
7.Haas, Ernst(2001)。Does Constructivism Subsume Neo-Functionalism?。The Social Construction of Europe。London：Sage Publication。  new window
8.Haas, Ernst(2004)。Introduction: Institutionalism or Constructivism?。The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957。Notre Dame, IN：University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
9.Lane, Jan-Erik(1993)。The New Institutionalism。Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Approach。London：Sage Publication。  new window
10.Marsh, David、Furlong, Paul(2002)。A Skin not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science。Theory and Methods in Political Science。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
11.McAnulla, Stuart(2002)。Structure and Agency。Theory and Methods in Political Science。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Rosamond, Ben(2007)。The Political Sciences of European Integration: Disciplinary History and EU Studies。Handbook of European Union Politics。London：Sage Publications。  new window
13.Sandholtz, Wayne、Sweet, Alec Stone(2010)。Neo-Functionalism and Supranational Governance。The Oxford Handbook of the European Union。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Schmitter, Philippe C.(2004)。Neo-Neofunctionalism。European Integration Theory。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Taylor, Paul(1990)。Functionalism: The Approach of David Miltrany。Frameworks for International Co-Operation。London：Pinter。  new window
16.Gould, Harry(1998)。The Substantive Meaning of Agent-structure Debate。International Relations in a Constructed World。Armonk, N.Y.：M.E. Sharpe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：794（臺灣：779，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67688113
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上