:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:私立小型長照機構轉型為社會企業之可行性探討
書刊名:國家與社會
作者:黃淑奕丘昌泰 引用關係
作者(外文):Ng, Shu-yeeChiou, Chang-tay
出版日期:2016
卷期:18
頁次:頁201-232
主題關鍵詞:長期照顧服務法長照機構社會企業高齡化社會Long-term Care Services ActLong-term care organizationSocial enterpriseAging society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:7
台灣將於2018年後步入「高齡社會」,屆時失能人口的遞增將導致長照需求的增加,實有必要設置各種公私立的長照服務機構。本研究所稱「私立小型長照機構」係指床位在5~50之私人創設的長照機構,其所提供的佔床率已佔全國長照總床數的八成以上,顯見其重要性,而其定位與管理效能乃成為長照政策的核心議題之一。私立小型長照機構目前面臨多重困境,如機構轉型問題、人力財務資源不足、經營管理效率問題,其中最大者是機構轉型問題;《老人福利法》第36條要求必須轉型為財團法人,《長期照顧服務法(簡稱:長照法)》第22條則規定機構住宿式服務、其他經中央主管機關公告之服務類長照機構,應以財團法人或社團法人設立之,攸關機構轉型的兩大專法顯有衝突矛盾之處。從「私立」定位的長照機構可能轉型為「公共化」的財團或社團法人嗎?果真這些機構都轉型為財團或社團法人,政府應如何進行有效的管理?當前不少公立財團法人往往淪為安插私人的「肥缺」,政府有何能力去管理人民團體?私立機構要轉型為財團或社團法人有一定的規範與要求,尤其在資金與人力資源部分,資源原本已處於不利的私立小型長照機構,未來應怎樣符合轉型的要求?此為本文主要探討的焦點。本文檢視私立長照機構的經營目標,主張宜轉型為歐美國家甚為興盛的社會企業。本文從技術、資源、經濟、社會、政府等可行性角度進行評估,採文獻檢視與深度訪談,選擇若干桃園市的私人長照機構,詢問其對於未來長照機構定位與未來發展之看法,並分析是否有轉型為社會企業之可能?本研究探討轉型為財團或社團法人的困難度,並評析轉型為社會企業之可行性,期望為台灣小型私立照護機構的未來指出另外一條可行的道路。
Taiwan expects to become an aged society after 2018. Increasing disability population brings about the necessary to set up private and public long-term care organizations to fulfill the social needs. The definition of "small-scale private long-term care organization (SPLCO)" is defined as the capability of accommodation around 5~50 beds for those who requiring long term caring services. Nowadays, those private organizations play an important role in Taiwan's long term caring market, as 90% of the occupied beds are supported by SPLCO. The legal status and efficiency of management has become a core issue to make policy-making for long-term care services. However, operation of these private organizations is likely to face multiple difficulties right now, such as the inefficiency of management, shortage of resources and operation, especially significant is how to transform into foundations or non-profit corporations, as the Article 36 of the "Senior Citizens Welfare Act" and the Article 22 of the "Long-term Care Service Act" are stipulated. However, what kinds of difficulties the SPLCOs have to cope with? Is it possible from a private company transforming to social enterprises that emphasize economic and social goals. The research method utilizes literature review and in-depth interviews to collect and analyze pros and cons on of the transformation of social enterprise. The paper will evaluate the feasibility of social enterprises from technical, economic, social perspective. Research findings show that the transformation of SPLCO from private organization to social enterprise is important to meet the social needs of long-term care service.
期刊論文
1.高凱聲(19990100)。論電信事業價格調整上限管制制度。經社法制論叢,23,31-59。  延伸查詢new window
2.王娟嬑、夏侯欣鵬、胡哲生、蔡淑梨(20110300)。營利事業經營社會企業之初探。創業管理研究,6(1),29-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Young, Dennis R.(2001)。Organizational Identity in Nonprofit Organizations: Strategic and Structural Implications。Nonprofit Management and Leadership,12(2),139-157。  new window
4.Dees, J. G.、Elias, J.(1994)。The Challenges of Combining Social and Commercial Enterprise。Business Ethics Quarterly,8(1),165-178。  new window
5.王卓聖(20130300)。OECD國家之長期照顧改革策略借鑒及啟示。社區發展季刊,141,45-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王兆慶(20130900)。長照機構制度的營利/非營利之爭:社會企業的觀點。社區發展季刊,143,128-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.于躍門(2011)。認識社會企業。新社會政策,15,20-23。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳正芬、官有垣(20110600)。臺灣機構式長期照顧服務組織屬性與政府相關政策演變之探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(1),91-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭勝分(20070600)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,7,65-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.胡哲生、陳志遠(20091200)。社會企業本質、任務與發展。創業管理研究,4(4),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.衛福部(2015)。全國老人福利機構資源分佈表104-12-03版。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛福部(2015)。老人長期照護、養護及安養機構概況(Excel檔案格式)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.丘昌泰(2014)。公共管理。臺北:智勝。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johonson, N.(1987)。The Welfare State in Transition: The Theory and Practice of Welfare Pluralism。Amherst:The University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
3.Frumkin, P.(2009)。On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy。Boston, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Dees, J. G.(1994)。Social Enterprise: Private Initiatives for the Common Good。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School。  new window
5.Social Enterprise London(2001)。Introducing Social Enterprise。London, UK:Social Enterprise。  new window
6.詹火生、林青璇(2002)。老人長期照護政策--國家干預觀點之分析。臺北:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(1999)。Social Enterprises。Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
8.社企流(2014)。社企力!:社會企業=翻轉世界的變革力量。用愛創業,做好事又能獲利!。果力文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.薑清凰(2015)。找無看護:五年後老人恐病痛無人顧、病逝無人問,http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Editorial/publish-195.htm, 2015/10/22。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴添富(2015)。賴添富:長照服務法上路前的四大建議,http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/3333。, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛福部(2015)。衛生福利部社會保險司--104年長照保險制度規劃報告,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/doc/長照保險法草案報告_0045093001.pdf, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
4.國家發展委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計(103至150年)報告,http://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=84223C65B6F94D72, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳正芬(2014)。我想要一個「像家」的照顧機構!,http://www.commonhealth.com.tw/blog/blogTopic.action?nid=774, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
6.何定照(2013)。林三貴:長照綠地等待青年耕耘,http://vision.udn.com/vision/story/7648/737287, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃處(2010)。2010年至2060年臺灣人口推計,http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Files/policy/2012/policy_12_017_1.pdf, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
8.台北IMC月刊(2015)。《第55屆12月》所有身障的創新,都是久別的重逢/許佐夫執行長,http://www.tp.imc.org.tw/?p=3230, 2016/03/11。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dees, J. Gregory(1998)。The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship,https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dees, J. G.、Elias, J.(1998)。The Challenges of Combining Social and Commercial Enterprise。University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment。Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE