臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：不只是文化資產保存：由華光社區文化資產保存運動探討如何「賦形」規劃理論
書刊名：都市與計劃
作者：黃舒楣
作者(外文)：Huang, Shu-mei
出版日期：2016
卷期：43:3
頁次：頁229-260
主題關鍵詞：國土活化；文化資產保存；華光社區；臺北刑務所；賦形；Revitalization of national assets；Cultural heritage；Huaguang；Taihoku Prison；Materialize
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:42
脫胎於都市化過程之文化資產已然專業化發展，文化與都市規劃之關係卻愈加疏離，且官僚分工忽視了一個重要經驗議題:台灣的文化資產議題多半涉及國有土地規劃課題，而國有土地規劃課題的規劃歷史債務，正可透過文化資產認識來釐清。此課題還有其理論潛力，能回應當代規劃理論探討「去抽象化」或「賦形」理論之迫切性，如何能透過文化資產與規劃的重新對話來落實。本文透過參與式觀察法檢視華光社區文化資產保存運動，反省華光抗爭運動後期啟動的文資保存論述 (2013 年 2 月∼2014 年 11 月)，如何重新定義「拆除」為「破壞」，由之探討如何以文化資產保存過程的物質環境變動來「賦形」規劃理論於實踐。
Cultural heritage, which partially resulted from processes of urbanization, has become a profession of its own right. The professionalization of cultural heritage, however, alienates it from the field of planning. The tendency leaves a significant issue unattended, which is, that much of built heritage in Taiwan is located on state properties intertwined with planning histories. It is through studying cultural heritage that we may be able to clarify these planning failures and thereof responsibilities. Moreover, the empirical question could enable an exploration into ways to rematerialize planning theories. Based on the authors' participant-observation of the preservation movement as part of the community movement occurring at Huaguang during the period from January 2013 to November 2014, this paper provides a reflective account of the preservation movement. It addresses the following questions: What opportunities and limitations can cultural heritage offer to urban movements against the top-down project and the resulting forced relocation? In which way does it redefines ＂demolition＂ as ＂destruction＂ and allows the tension between residents and citizen to materialize? The analytical results show how cultural heritage can play a large role in re-materializing planning theories into practices.
期刊論文
1.顏亮一(20061200)。國族認同的時空想像：臺灣歷史保存概念之形成與轉化。規劃學報，33，91-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林崇熙(20091200)。文化資產作為一種新科學：文化資產學芻議。文化資產保存學刊，10，13-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.許肇源、連哲民、黃柏璋(20080900)。從新莊樂生療養院事件看臺灣都市文化資產保存機制之缺失。都市與計劃，35(3)，269-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉厚連(20020900)。國家資產經營管理體制問題之探討--兼評「國家資產經營管理委員會」之功能。土地問題研究季刊，1(3)=3，112-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉厚連(20050300)。我國公有土地私有化問題之制度分析。土地問題研究季刊，4(1)=13，70-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.夏鑄九(19981200)。臺灣的古蹟保存：一個批判性回顧。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報，9，1-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王志弘(2013)。歷史保存的弔詭，公共文化的困境。臺灣建築，215，100-103。  延伸查詢new window
8.王淳熙、傅朝卿(2010)。文化景觀保存維護的永續性實踐。文化與建築研究集刊，14，1-21。  延伸查詢new window
9.林崇熙(2010)。文化資產的價值經營。文化資產保存學刊，13，41-56。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃麗玲(20100900)。更新是門好生意？--對臺北市都市更新政策的反思。建築師，36(9)=429，93-97。  延伸查詢new window
11.Beauregard, R.(1990)。Bringing the city back in。Journal of the American Planning Association，56(2)，210-215。  new window
12.Beauregard, R. A.(2012)。Planning with things。Journal of Planning Education and Research，32(2)，182-190。  new window
13.Beauregard, R.(2013)。The neglected places of practice。Planning Theory and Practice，14(1)，8-19。  new window
14.Campbell, H.(2002)。Planning: An Idea of Value。Town Planning Review，73(3)，271-288。  new window
15.Flyvbjerg, B.(2004)。Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections。Planning Theory and Practice，5(3)，283-306。  new window
16.Forester, J.(2006)。Exploring urban practice in a democratising society: Opportunities, techniques and challenges。Development Southern Africa，23(5)，569-586。  new window
17.Harrison, P.(2014)。Making planning theory real。Planning Theory，13(1)，65-81。  new window
18.Healey, P.(1996)。The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design，23(2)，217-234。  new window
19.Kemmis, S.(2005)。Knowing practice: searching for saliences。Pedagogy, Culture and Society，13(3)，391-426。  new window
20.Lennon, M.(2015)。Finding purpose in planning。Journal of Planning Education and Research，35(1)，63-75。  new window
21.Yiftachel, O.(2006)。Re-engaging planning theory? Towards 'south-eastern' perspective。Planning Theory，5(3)，211-222。  new window
22.榮芳杰、傅朝卿(20090300)。世界文化遺產的監測機制對文化遺產經營管理的影響與啟示。建築學報，67，57-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Wirth, Louis(1938)。Urbanism as a Way of Life。American Journal of Sociology，44(1)，1-24。  new window
24.Molotch, Harvey(1976)。The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place。American Journal of Sociology，82(2)，309-332。  new window
25.Gold, Raymond L.(1958)。Roles in sociological field observations。Social Forces，36(3)，217-223。  new window
26.顏亮一(20060600)。市民認同、地區發展與都市保存：迪化街個案分析。都市與計劃，33(2)，93-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Ashworth, G. J.(2009)。Paradigms and paradoxes in heritage as development。International IAPS-CSBE & HOUSING Network 2009, Requalifying Old Places for New Uses。Istanbul, Turkey。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡敏真(2012)。居住城市的權利：臺北市華光社區的都市民族誌研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾平輝(2008)。國有土地利用策略之研究--以國家資產經營管理委員會決策模式為例(碩士論文)。東海大學，臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊宜靜(2015)。國家與社會關係的司法中介與權利折衝：公有地上非正式住區拆遷的治理與抵抗(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ley, D.(1996)。The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Casey, Edward S.(1993)。Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world。Bloomington, Indiana：Indiana University Press。  new window
3.Ley, D.(1983)。A Social Geography of the City。New York：Harper and Row, Publishers。  new window
4.Ashworth, G. J.、Graham, B. J.、Tunbridge, J. E.(2007)。Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies。London：Pluto Press。  new window
5.Smith, Laurajane(2006)。Uses of Heritage。Routledge。  new window
6.Schmuck, Richard A.(1997)。Practical action research for change。Arlington Heights, Illinois：IRI/SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.。  new window
7.DeWalt, K. M.、DeWalt, B. R.(2002)。Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers。Walnut Creek, CA：Altamira Press。  new window
8.Benjamin, Walter、許綺玲、簫永盛(1999)。迎向靈光消逝的年代。臺北市：臺灣攝影工作室。  延伸查詢new window
9.林政佑(2014)。日治時期臺灣監獄制度與實踐。國史館。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bernard, H. R.(1994)。Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches。Walnut Creek：AltaMira Press。  new window
11.De Munck, V. C.、Sobo, E. J.(1998)。Using methods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook。Walnut Creek：AltaMira Press。  new window
12.Graham, Brian J.、Ashworth, Gregory J.、Tunbridge, John E.(2000)。A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture, and Economy。London：Arnold。  new window
13.Green, B.(2009)。Understanding and Researching Professional Practice。Rotterdam：Sense Publishers。  new window
14.Hayden, D.(1995)。The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History。Cambridge, Mass.：MIT Press。  new window
15.Zhang, L.(2010)。In Search of Paradise: Middle-Class Living in a Chinese Metropolis。Ithaca：Cornell University Press。  new window
16.Flyvbjerg, B.(1998)。Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.Innes, Judith E.、Booher, David E.(2010)。Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy。Routledge。  new window
18.Low, Setha M.(2000)。On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture。Austin：University of Texas Press。  new window
19.Low, Setha M.、Lawrence-Zúñiga, Denise(2003)。The anthropology of space and place: locating culture。Blackwell Publishing。  new window
20.MacIntyre, Alasdair Chalmers(2007)。After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory。Notre Dame, IN：University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
21.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.(1995)。Designing qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, Calif.：Sage Publications。  new window
22.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas A.(1984)。Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society。Boston, Massachusetts：Beacon Press。  new window
23.Forester, John(1999)。The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
24.Lefebvre, Henri、Nicholson-Smith, Donald(1991)。The Production of Space。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
25.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.(1989)。Designing Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
26.Jacobs, Jane(1961)。The Death and Life of Great American Cities。New York：Vintage Books。  new window
27.Halbwachs, Maurice、Coser, Lewis A.(1992)。On Collective Memory。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Haraway, D.(2004)。Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective。The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies。London。  new window
2.王志弘(2008)。臺北市文化治理的性質與轉變，1967-2002。流動與根著：臺社都市與區域讀本。臺北：臺灣社會研究雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
3.顏亮一(2013)。樂生啟示錄：古蹟保存與社會正義。反造城市：臺灣非典型都市規劃術。臺北：左岸。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kawulich, B. B.(2004)。Muscogee women's identity development。The Family Experience: A Reader in Cultural Diversity。Boston：Pearson Education。  new window
5.Thompson, E. P.(1966)。History from below。Times Literary Supplement。  new window
6.Harding, S.(1993)。RETHINKING STANDPOINT EPISTEMOLOGY: WHAT IS "STRONG OBJECTIVITY" ?。Feminist epistemologies。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：926（臺灣：901，外國：25） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68324538
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上