:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:再訪法實證研究概念與價值:以簡單量化方法研究我國減刑政策為例
書刊名:國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者:蘇凱平
作者(外文):Su, Kai-ping
出版日期:2016
卷期:45:3
頁次:頁979-1043
主題關鍵詞:法實證研究量化分析法學方法刑事訴訟刑事程序刑事司法敘述統計減刑政策受刑人科際整合Empirical legal studiesQuantitative researchQuantitative analysisMethodologyResearch methodCriminal proceedingsCriminal procedureCriminal justiceDescriptive statisticsCommutation policyPrisoner populationPrison populationInterdiscipline
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:564
期刊論文
1.王泰升(20080900)。學說與政策交織下的日治臺灣民事法制變遷:以岡松文書為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,37(3),47-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林執中、陳昭如、顏厥安(20110300)。讓法學看見經驗的世界:「臺灣法實證研究資料庫」介紹。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(2),14-32。  延伸查詢new window
3.王泰升(20111000)。四個世代形塑而成的戰後臺灣法學。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,40(特刊),1367-1428。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Epstein, Lee、King, Gary(2002)。The Rules of Inference。The University of Chicago Law Review,69(1),1-133。  new window
5.Fischman, Joshua B.(2013)。Reuniting 'Is' and 'Ought' in Empirical Legal Scholarship。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,162(1),117-168。  new window
6.盧映潔(20050400)。臺灣性犯罪之分布狀況及再犯率研究。月旦法學,119,39-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Sentell, R. P., Jr.(1991)。The Georgia Jury and Negligence: The View from the Bench。Georgia Law Review,26(1),85-178。  new window
8.王兆鵬、吳從周(20010900)。板橋地方法院實驗「當事人進行主義」之實證研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,30(5),57-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳正順(19720400)。殺人犯罪之實証研究。犯罪與矯治學刊,5(2),3-12。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳統雄(1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、應用、反省。民意學術專刊,1985(夏),29-53。  延伸查詢new window
11.林文宗(19820800)。性犯罪被害者之實證研究。刑事法雜誌,26(4),29-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林常青、黃國昌、陳恭平(20111101)。資訊、變項及關聯性。臺灣法學雜誌,187,109-118。  延伸查詢new window
13.林常青、黃國昌、陳恭平(20120101)。關聯性與迴歸。臺灣法學雜誌,199,73-84。  延伸查詢new window
14.林常青、黃國昌、陳恭平(20120101)。關聯性與迴歸。臺灣法學雜誌,191,66-79。  延伸查詢new window
15.林常青、黃國昌、陳恭平(20120901)。關聯性與迴歸。臺灣法學雜誌,207,102-113。  延伸查詢new window
16.邱文聰(20080600)。被忽略的(立法)事實:探詢實證科學在規範論證中的可能角色兼評釋字第584號解釋。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,37(2),233-284。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.郭書琴(20130600)。從「法律知識的技術性」談法律科際整合研究方法與實例。成大法學,25,199-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳玉潔(20140600)。國際人權實證研究方法概述。臺灣人權學刊,2(3),171-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳昱成(20111200)。淺談財經領域常用的基礎數學觀念。科學教育,345,22-35。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃炳飛(19790500)。裁判離婚原因之實證研究。法鼎,7,231-262。  延伸查詢new window
21.黃國昌、林常青、陳恭平(20110901)。資訊、變項及關聯性。臺灣法學雜誌,183,127-141。  延伸查詢new window
22.蔡墩銘(19830600)。刑庭推事之心理研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,12(2),1-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Clermont, K. M.、Eisenberg, T.(1992)。Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism。Cornell Law Review,77(5),1124-1177。  new window
24.Eisenberg, Theodore(2011)。The Origins, Nature, and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns。University of Illinois Law Review,2011(5),1713-1738。  new window
25.Eisenberg, T.、Hannaford-Agor, P. L.、Hans, V. P.、Waters, N. L.、Munsterman, G. T.、Schwab, S. J.、Wells, M. T.(2005)。Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury。Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,2(1),171-207。  new window
26.Eisenberg, T.、Rachlinski, J. J.、Schwab, S. J.、Wells, M. T.(2004)。Editor's Introduction。Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,1(1),5-6。  new window
27.Friedman, B.(2006)。Taking Law Seriously。Perspectives on Politics,4(2),261-276。  new window
28.Gelb, K.(2009)。Myths and Misconceptions: Public Opinion versus Public Judgment about Sentencing。Federal Sentencing Reporter,21(4),288-290。  new window
29.George, T. E.(2006)。An Empirical Study of Empirical Legal Scholarship: The Top Law Schools。Indiana Law Journal,81,141-161。  new window
30.Heise, Michael(1999)。The Importance of Being Empirical。Pepperdine Law Review,26(4),807-834。  new window
31.Heise, Michael(2002)。The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism。University Of Illinois Law Review,2002(4),819-850。  new window
32.Heise, Michael(2011)。An Empirical Analysis of Empirical Legal Scholarship Production, 1990-2009。University Of Illinois Law Review,2011(5),1739-1752。  new window
33.Nard, Craig A.(1995)。Empirical Legal Scholarship: Reestablishing a Dialogue between the Academy and the Profession。Wake Forest Law Review,30,347-368。  new window
34.Roberts, J. V.(2003)。Public Opinion and Mandatory Sentencing: A Review of International Findings。Criminal Justice and Behavior,30(4),483-508。  new window
35.Schuck, P. H.(1989)。Why Don't Law Professors Do More Empirical Research?。Journal of Legal Education,39(3),323-336。  new window
36.劉尚志、林三元、宋皇志(20061000)。走出繼受,邁向立論:法學實證研究之發展。科技法學評論,3(2),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.黃榮堅(2004)。確認量刑的實質課題。臺灣本土法學雜誌,57,1-3。  延伸查詢new window
38.謝煜偉(20051100)。寬嚴並進刑事政策之省思。月旦法學,126,131-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Posner, Richard A.(1985)。An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law。Columbia Law Review,85(6),1193-1231。  new window
40.林山田(19771200)。法事實研究--一個亟待加強的法學研究。法學叢刊,22(4),48-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.黃國昌(20091200)。法學實證研究方法初探。月旦法學,175,142-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.內政部統計處(1996)。內政統計年報。臺北:內政部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
2.司法院統計處(1996)。司法統計年報。臺北:內政部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
3.法務部統計處(1996)。法務統計年報。臺北:法務部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃煌朝(2008)。產出品質、環境特性與地方法院審理效率(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒啟勳(2011)。我國減刑成效之評估研究--以2007年罪犯減刑為例(碩士論文)。中央警察大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Epstein, Lee、Martin, Andrew D.(2014)。An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Tamanaha, Brian Z.(2001)。A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Trochim, W. M. K.、Donnelly, J. P.(2006)。The Research Methods Knowledge Base。Mason, OH:Atomic Dog Publishing。  new window
4.Wheelan, Charles J.(2014)。Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data。New York, NY:Norton & Company。  new window
5.立法院(2015)。第8屆第7會期第2次會議議案關係文書(法務部對立法委員提出「政府應儘速提出減刑作業規畫之建議」乙案之研處意見)。臺北:立法院。  延伸查詢new window
6.監察院(2012)。司法概算獨立後績效之檢討專案調查研究報告。臺北:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gamer, Bryan A.(2014)。Black's Law Dictionary。St. Paul, MN:Westlaw BLACKS。  new window
8.Kalven, H.、Zeisel, H.(1966)。The American Jury。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Lee, H.(2014)。Foundations of Applied Statistical Methods。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
10.Newman, I.、Benz, C. R.(1998)。Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum。Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
11.Ruspini, E.(2002)。An Introduction to Longitudinal Research。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
12.Friedman, Barry(2009)。The Will Of The People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning Of the Constitution。New York, NY:Farrar, Straus and Giroux。  new window
13.Creswell, John W.(2014)。Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches。Sage。  new window
其他
1.法務部(20070523)。法務部對於罪犯減刑案之政策說帖,https://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=:88413&ctNode=27518&mp=001。  延伸查詢new window
2.法務部(20070721)。法務部澄清外界對96年減刑作業缺乏配套的批評與誤解,http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=92923&ctNode=14394&mp=001。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇永欽(20111126)。白玫瑰運動帶給司法改革的啟示 (義守大學演講資料),http://www2.isu.edu.tw/upload/82201/18/files/6.ppt。  延伸查詢new window
4.Center for Sex Offender Management(200004)。Public Opinion and the Criminal Justice System: Building Support for Sex Offender Management Programs,http://www.csom.org/pubs/pubpinion.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Baldwin, John、Davis, Gwynn(2012)。Empirical Research in Law。The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies。  new window
2.Bradney, A.(2012)。The Place of Empirical Legal Research in the Law School Curriculum。The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research。  new window
3.Breyer, S.(2011)。[Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence]Introduction。Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。National Academies Press。  new window
4.Friedman, D.(1995)。Rational Criminals and Profit-Maximizing Police: the Economic Analysis of Law and Law Enforcement。The New Economics of Human Behavior。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Galligan, D. J.(2010)。Legal Theory and Empirical Research。The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research。  new window
6.Partington, M.(2010)。Empirical Legal Research and Policy-making。The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE