:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為何日本無法追求樞紐位置 : 美、中東亞角力的政策選擇
書刊名:遠景基金會季刊
作者:何思慎 引用關係楊雯婷 引用關係陳舜仁
作者(外文):Ho, Szu-shenYang, Wen-tingChen, Shun-jen
出版日期:2016
卷期:17:4
頁次:頁43-98
主題關鍵詞:戰略三角樞紐美日中關係日中韓關係東亞Strategic trianglePivotU.S.-Japan-Chinese RelationsJapan-China-Korean RelationsEast Asia
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:79
  • 點閱點閱:120
本文以近年美、日、中之間的角力檢驗戰略三角理論,試圖補充理論原有假說,使其更適用於後冷戰時期的國際關係。作者將雙邊關係中的國內政治因素,諸如歷史問題、領土問題、價值觀差異、政治體制等議題放入討論,以研析美、日、中三角關係中的雙邊關係近況,以及日本為主的各國因國內政治因素而放棄尋求羅曼蒂克三角中樞紐位置的情況。研究結果顯示,美中關係及日中關係在理念層次各自受到價值觀差異及民族主義情緒所限制,一直呈現「負面/對稱」情況,阻礙其改善關係。尤其,日本在改善日中關係上,在國內政治上受日相安倍的歷史詮釋及厭中輿論限制,使其難以追求樞紐位置。
With the power struggle between the U.S., Japan, and China, this paper is aimed at verifying the strategic triangle theory and trying to present some additional hypotheses to the theory itself so that it can be more applicable to international relations in the post-Cold War era. The authors try to include internal political factors in bilateral relations, such as issues of history, territory, value and political difference, into their discussion, and try to analyze recent bilateral relations in the triangle of the U.S., Japan, and China, and try to explain why Japan, with its internal political issues, stops acting as the pivot in the romantic triangle. The study shows that China-American relations and China-Japanese relations are each restricted by a difference of values and by nationalist sentiment. Thus, both bilateral relations are “negative” in the ideational dimension, which impedes any effort at improving relations. Moreover, internal factors, such as Prime Minister Abe’s interpretation of h istory and the public’s negative attitude toward China, hinder Japan from pursuing the pivot position.
期刊論文
1.袁鶴齡、沈燦宏(20120900)。從美中臺戰略三角的演變看兩岸信心建構措施的建立。東吳政治學報,30(3),51-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.初國華、張昌吉(20100300)。戰略三角理論與臺灣的三角政治。問題與研究,49(1),87-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.邵軒磊(20160100)。政治模擬研究法初探:以戰略三角理論之檢証為例。全球政治評論,53,67-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃棟(2012)。認知結構平衡理論視角下的三邊關係研究。太平洋學報,20(2),21-30。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20150312)。日「中」重啟海洋事務磋商。大陸情勢雙週報,1685,20-23。  延伸查詢new window
6.(20150611)。「美日同盟」強化在南海佈局。大陸情勢雙週報,1691,22-25。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20160225)。朝核危機與美「中」競合關係。大陸情勢雙週報,1707,18-21。  延伸查詢new window
8.何思慎(2014)。評日本2014年版《防衛白皮書》。海峽評論,286。  延伸查詢new window
9.Flournoy, Michèle、Davidson, Janine(2012)。Obama's New Global Posture: The Logic of U.S. Foreign Deployment。Foreign Affairs,91(4),54-63。  new window
10.Dittmer, Lowell(2005)。The Sino-Japanese-Russian Triangle。Journal of Chinese Political Science,10(1),1-21。  new window
11.栗山尚一(1995)。激動の90年代と日本外交の新展開--新しい国際秩序構築への積極的貢献のために。外交フォーラム,3(5),12-21。  延伸查詢new window
12.何思慎、陳舜仁(20100600)。後小泉時代日本東亞安全戰略調整之研究。政治學報,49,71-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.羅致政(19950100)。美國在臺海兩岸互動所扮演的角色--結構平衡者。美歐月刊,10(1)=105,37-54。  延伸查詢new window
14.Swaine, Michael D.(2010)。Perceptions of an Assertive China。China Leadership Monitor,32(2),1-19。  new window
15.Dittmer, Lowell(1981)。The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis。World Politics,33(4),485-515。  new window
16.趙建民、何思慎(20040100)。日本外交中有關中國或美國優先之爭論--兼論日、中、臺新安全架構。問題與研究,43(1),83-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳玉山(20000600)。非自願的樞紐:美國在華盛頓-臺北-北京之間的地位。政治科學論叢,12,189-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Dittmer, Lowell(20140526)。Japan, China and the American Pivot: A Triangular Analysis。  new window
學位論文
1.紀凱露(2005)。國力不對等戰略三角互動模式之研究--以冷戰時期美中蘇三角與後冷戰時期美中台三角為例(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reilly, James M.(2008)。The Role of Public Opinion in China's Japan Policy: 1997-2007(-)。The George Washington University,Washington, D.C.。  new window
圖書
1.劉江永(2000)。彷徨中的日本。天津人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Friedberg, Aaron L.、溫洽溢(2014)。美國回得了亞洲嗎?。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡明彥(2008)。21世紀美國東亞戰略與美日中安全關係。臺北:鼎茂圖書。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dittmer, Lowell(1992)。Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications, 1945-1990。University of Washington Press。  new window
5.王堯鈞(2005)。進出戰略三角--認同台灣的國際政治學。臺北:翰蘆。  延伸查詢new window
6.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.、林添貴(2015)。美國世紀的終結?。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
7.Clinton, Hillary Rodham(2014)。Hard Choices: A Memoir。New York:Simon & Schuster。  new window
8.Davidson, Jason W.(2006)。The Origins of Revisionist and Status-quo States。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
9.添谷芳秀(1997)。日本外交と中国1945-1972。東京:慶応義塾大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
10.高木誠一郎(2000)。脱冷戦期の日本外交とアジア太平洋。東京:日本国際問題研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.安倍晉三(2006)。美しいし国へ。東京:文藝春秋。  延伸查詢new window
12.日本防衛省(2014)。日本防衛--防衛白書(平成26年版)。東京:日経印刷。  延伸查詢new window
13.日本防衛省(2009)。日本防衛--防衛白書(平成21年版)。東京:ぎょらせい。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳玉山(1997)。抗衡或扈從:兩岸關係新詮--從前蘇聯看臺灣與中國大陸間的關係。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李仲維(20141108)。中日韓談判暫難突破。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20141107)。楊潔篪會見日本國家安全保障局長谷內正太郎,http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2014-11/07/c_1113163321.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20141109)。美國務卿克里:非常歡迎日中緩和緊張關係,http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1034/6/9/2/103469277.html?coluid=202&kindid=11696&docid=103469277&mdate=1109150225。  new window
4.(20141110)。專家:「習安會」系兩國關係回暖開端,http://news.wenweipo.com/2014/11/10/IN1411100051.htm。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20141119)。日媒:日本政府反水中日四點原則共識已被打破,http://news.takungpao.com.hk/world/exclusive/2014-11/2831310.html。  延伸查詢new window
6.(20141121)。日本稱4點原則共識中日雙方文字表達上不是嚴密一致,http://zh.cn.nikkei.com/politicsaeconomy/politicsasociety/11972-20141121.html。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20150815)。外交部發言人華春瑩就日本首相安倍晉三發表戰後70週年首相談話答記者問,http://news.xinhuanet.com/2015-08/15/c_1116261957.htm。  延伸查詢new window
8.(20151102)。日韓首腦就多個議題展開磋商分歧較多前景難明,http://www.chinanews.com/m/gj/2015/11-02/7601644.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
9.李文(20141113)。日本外相:日中四項原則沒有法律效力,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2014/11/141113_jp_foreign_minister_deny。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱佳妮,劉東凱(20141114)。外交部:四點原則共識是推動中日關係走向改善的重要條件,http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2014-11/14/c_1113256610.htm。  延伸查詢new window
11.尹楨淏(20140813)。韓中日領導人團結齊心實現東北亞共贏,http://218.145.28.85/big5/site/data/html_dir/2014/08/13/20140813000024.html。  延伸查詢new window
12.尹楨淏(20140807)。美憂三角同盟破裂 就慰安婦問題對日施壓,http://chn.chosun.com/218.145.28.85/big5/site/data/html_dir/2014/08/07/20140807000006.html。  延伸查詢new window
13.張國威(20141021)。日國安局長訪韓稱改善日韓關係,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20141021005109-260408。  延伸查詢new window
14.張軍社(20150125)。中日同意盡早啟動海上聯絡機制意義重大,http://www.hxvos.com/news/2015-01/15/cms847771article.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
15.現代院課題組(20150202)。太平洋足夠寬廣--關於構建「跨太平洋安全合作架構」的思考,http://www.faobserver.com/NewsInfo.aspx?id=10952。  延伸查詢new window
16.何思慎(20150929)。時論:亞太新安全秩序美中說了算,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150929000412-260109。  延伸查詢new window
17.何思慎(20141202)。「習安會」的意義及對日、韓、「中」三邊關係影響,http://140.119.184.164/view_pdf/176.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊明珠(20151228)。慰安婦問題談妥日韓關係將邁向新時代,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201512280252-1.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
19.馮瑋(20150115)。中日建立「海空聯絡機制」符合誰利益,http://sj.haiwainet.cn/n/2015/0115/c456388-28311255.html。  延伸查詢new window
20.童倩(20150814)。《安倍談話》反省與道歉篇幅史無前例,http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world/2015/08/150814_jp_abe_speech。  延伸查詢new window
21.童倩(20141111)。日本官民看習安會:憂慮但期待互惠,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2014/11/141111_japan_china_relations_apec。  延伸查詢new window
22.童倩(20141022)。日本官員欲否認強徵慰安婦獲日媒支持,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2014/10/141022_japan_comfort-women_history。  延伸查詢new window
23.鍾辰芳(20141108)。專家:日中關係融冰美鬆口氣,http://www.voachinese.com/a/china-japan-20141107/2512609.html。  延伸查詢new window
24.Dyer, Geoff,Brown, Kevin(20091116)。China says Fed policy threatens global recovery,http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/85f1fac2-d1dc-11de-a0f0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz4CsOmCFZ1。  new window
25.Dyer, Geoff(20100131)。China flexes its diplomatic muscles,http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dd773774-0e8d-11df-bd79-00144feabdc0.html#axzz4CsOmCFZ1。  new window
26.Buckley, Chris(20131019)。Outspoken Chinese Professor Says He Was Dismissed,http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/world/asia/xia-yeliang-an-outspoken-chinese-professor-says-hehas-been-dismissed.html。  new window
27.Browne, Andrew,Dean, Jason(20100317)。Business Sours on China: Foreign Executives Say Beijing Creates Fresh Barriers; Broadsides, Patent Rules,http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704688604575125650352968686。  new window
28.Mirsky, Jonathan(20150722)。'The China Challenge,' by Thomas J. Christensen,http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/books/review/the-china-challenge-by-thomas-jchristensen.html。  new window
29.Manyin, Mark E.,Chanlett-Avery, Emma(20080916)。Japan's Political Turmoil in 2008: Background and Implications for the United States,https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22951.pdf。  new window
30.Lieberthal, Kenneth G.(20091223)。Climate Change and China's Global Responsibilities,https://www.brookings.edu/blog/upfront/2009/12/23/climate-change-and-chinas-global-responsibilities/。  new window
31.Jacobs, Andrew(20131210)。Chinese Professor Who Advocated Free Speech Is Fired,http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/11/world/asia/chinese-professor-who-advocated-free-speech-is-fired.html。  new window
32.Fidler, Stephen,Batson, Andrew(20090406)。Beijing Exercises Its Global Leverage,www.wsj.com/articles/SB123896756914390613。  new window
33.Schell, Orville(20150709)。Can the U.S. and China Get Along?,http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/10/opinion/can-the-usand-china-get-along.html。  new window
34.Rubio, Marco(20150827)。How My Presidency Would Deal With China: Approaching Beijing on the basis of strength and example, not weakness and appeasement,http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-my-presidency-would-deal-with-china-1440717685。  new window
35.Pomfret, John(20100315)。Newly powerful China defies Western nations with remarks, policies,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/14/AR2010031400368.html。  new window
36.Pomfret, John(20100131)。China's strident tone raises concerns among Western governments, analysts,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/30/AR2010013002443.html。  new window
37.Nye, Joseph S.(20100310)。China's Bad Bet Against America,http://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/nye80/English。  new window
38.Wines, Michael(20100314)。Chinese Leader Defends Currency and Policies,http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/world/asia/15china.html?_r=0。  new window
39.Wines, Michael(20100125)。China Issues Sharp Rebuke to U.S. Calls for an Investigation on Google Attacks,http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/world/asia/26google.html。  new window
40.U.S. Department of Defense(20120105)。Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense,http://www.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf。  new window
41.Snyder, Scott(20141208)。New U.S.-ROK Alliance Challenges: Internal Tensions and China's Rise,http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottasnyder/2014/12/08/new-u-s-rok-alliance-challenges-internal-tensions-and-chinas-rise。  new window
42.Shambaugh, David(20100217)。The Chinese tiger shows its claws,http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d55d5578-1b62-11df-838f-00144feab49a.html#axzz4CsOmCFZ1。  new window
43.(20150714)。内閣不支持42%.支持39%安保法案「反対」56%朝日新聞社世論調査。  延伸查詢new window
44.日本内閣府(2016)。外交に関する世論調査,http://survey.gov-online.go.jp/h27/h27-gaiko/zh/z10.html。  延伸查詢new window
45.日本内閣府(2015)。「平和安全法制」の概要,http://www.cas.go.jp/ip/gaivou/jimu/pdf/gaiyou-heiwaanzenhousei.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
46.(20160923)。「第12回日中共同世論調査」結果,http://www.genron-npo.net/world/archives/6365.html。  延伸查詢new window
47.(20140228)。中国当局が身柄拘束、朱建栄教授日本に戻る,http://www.news24.jp/articles/2014/02/28/10246692.html。  延伸查詢new window
48.(20150714)。大半が「反対」多数安保法案、各社世論調査。  延伸查詢new window
49.安倍晉三(20150814)。平成27年8月14日内閣総理大臣談話,http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/97_abe/discource/20150814danwa.html。  延伸查詢new window
50.日本外務省(20150503)。安倍総理大臣の米国訪問(平成27年4月26日〜5月3日),http://www.mofa.go.jp/na/nal/us/page3e_000327.html。  延伸查詢new window
51.日本内閤府(2016)。「外交に関する世論調査」の概要,http://survey.gov-online.go.jp/h27/h27-gaiko/gairyaku.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.包宗和(2009)。戰略三角個體論檢視與總體論建構及其對現實主義的衝擊。重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.閻鐵麟(2013)。從美國亞太地區軍事部署之規劃認識「再平衡」政策。美國「再平衡」政策對東亞局勢之影響。臺北:遠景基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.林繼文(2009)。雙層三角:以空間模型分析國內政治對美中台戰略三角的影響。重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.包宗和(1999)。戰略三角角色轉變與類型變化分析--以美國和台海兩岸三角互動為例。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dueck, Colin(2000)。Détente: Was Détente a Success?。History in Dispute. Vol. 1: The Cold War: First Series。Detroit:St. James Press。  new window
6.Roehrig, Terence(2014)。South Korea: An Alliance in Transition。Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific。Annapolis:Naval Institute Press。  new window
7.Mearsheimer, John J.(2006)。Structural Realism。International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Lord, Carnes、Erickson, Andrew S.(2014)。[Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific] Introduction。Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific。Annapolis:Naval Institute Press。  new window
9.Kaplan, Morton A.(1969)。Variants on Six Models of the International System。International Politics and Foreign Policy。New York:Free Press。  new window
10.Gries, Peter Hays(2005)。Nationalism and Chinese Foreign Policy。China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy。Lanham:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
11.小沢隆一(2011)。民主党政権の安保.防衛政策はどこへ向かうのか?。民主党政権下の日米安保。東京:花伝社。  延伸查詢new window
12.久保文明(2009)。オバマ政権にとってのアジア:課題、政策。オバマ政権のアジア戦略。東京:株式会社ウエッジ。  延伸查詢new window
13.高井潔司(2012)。もう--つの天安門事件[中国では六.四事件と呼ぶ](1989年)--日中相互認識をめぐる報道フレームの転換。日中関係史1972-2012III社会.文化。東京:東京大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE