From 2009 to 2016 there were many incidents of random killings took place in Taiwan, people provoked the abolition of the death penalty controversy. Study Jie death penalty in the past and profound scholarship, but in recent years, random killings Rational Thinking behind the cause of the problem, in fact, many factors of national policy structures, personal motive, of course, too. Although the national policies with the international conventions and the international trend in the direction of development, countries must also reflect on the lack of policy, rather than just focus on whether or not to abolish the death penalty controversy. In recent years, foreign literature reference shows that almost abolished the death penalty can be said that the international trend. Amnesty International statistics perform several of the death penalty in 2007 to 2012 among 80 countries, where 34 countries continue to death accounted for 42.5% of the total, while the state 46 ＂no death penalty＂ accounted for 57.5% of the total, so there nearly half of the country continued to continue the death penalty, which includes China, Japan and the United States. Democratic countries, public opinion is indeed a reference to national policy, but not as public opinion changes in national policy direction, random killings generated a lot of controversy, in addition to the impact of international conventions on human rights with the international trend, this study focused on ＂stipulate willful killing of children under the age of 12 the only updated the death penalty,＂ ＂death penalty deterrence capabilities,＂ ＂death and populist opposition to waste,＂ ＂Convention on Human Rights and abolish the death penalty deduction,＂ ＂abolish the death penalty and alternatives,＂ ＂abolition of death penalty and referendum＂ controversial point six death penalty policy to provide some suggestions, hoping to discuss the dispute through rational thought as a reference of national policy.